Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation and prediction of blast-induced ground vibration at Shur River Dam, Iran, by artificial neural network

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to evaluate and predict blast-induced ground vibration at Shur River Dam in Iran using different empirical vibration predictors and artificial neural network (ANN) model. Ground vibration is a seismic wave that spreads out from the blasthole when explosive charge is detonated in a confined manner. Ground vibrations were recorded and monitored in and around the Shur River Dam, Iran, at different vulnerable and strategic locations. A total of 20 blast vibration records were monitored, out of which 16 data sets were used for training of the ANN model as well as determining site constants of various vibration predictors. The rest of the 4 blast vibration data sets were used for the validation and comparison of the result of ANN and different empirical predictors. Performances of the different predictor models were assessed using standard statistical evaluation criteria. Finally, it was found that the ANN model is more accurate as compared to the various empirical models available. As such, a high conformity (R 2 = 0.927) was observed between the measured and predicted peak particle velocity by the developed ANN model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duvall WI, Johnson CF, Meyer AVC (1963) Vibrations from instantaneous and millisecond delay quarry blasts. RI. 6151. US, Bureau of Mines, United States Department of Interior, Washington

  2. Nicholls HR, Johnson CF, Duvall WI (1971) Blasting vibrations and their effects on structures. Bulletin Washington, DC, Bureau of Mines, no. 656

  3. Siskind DE, Crum SV, Otterness RE, Kopp JW (1989) Comparative study of blasting vibrations from Indiana surface coal mines. RI 9226, USBM

  4. Elseman I, Rasoul A (2000) Measurement and analysis of the effect of ground vibration induced by blasting at the limestone quarries of the Egyptian cement company. Cairo University, Egypt

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2009) Prediction of blast induced ground vibration using artificial neural network. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:1214–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2007) Evaluation of blast induced ground vibration predictors. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mostafa TM (2009) Artificial neural network for prediction and control of blasting vibrations in Assiut (Egypt) limestone quarry. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(2):426–431

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duvall WI, Fogelson DE (1962) Review of criteria for estimating damages to residences from blasting vibrations. R. I. 5968, US, Bureau of Mines

  9. Ambraseys NR, Hendron AJ (1968) Dynamic behaviour of rock masses rock mechanics in engineering, practices. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davies B, Farmer IW, Attewell PB (1964) Ground vibrations from shallow sub-surface blasts, vol 217. The Engineer, London, pp 553–559

  11. Indian Standards Institute (1973) Criteria for safety and design of structures subjected to underground blast. ISI Bull, IS-6922

  12. Roy PP (1991) Prediction and control of ground vibrations due to blasting. Colliery Gaurdian, 239

  13. Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2005) Prediction of blast induced air overpressure in opencast mine. Noise Vib Worldwide 36:7–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rajasekaran S, Pai GAV (2005) Neural networks, fuzzy logic and genetic algorithms: synthesis and applications. Prentice Hall, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  15. Monjezi M, Dehghani H (2008) Evaluation of effect of blasting pattern parameters on back break using neural networks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:1446–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Monjezi M, Ahmadi M, Sheikhan M, Bahrami A, Salimi AR (2010) Predicting blast-induced ground vibration using various types of neural networks. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:1233–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Monjezi M, Ghafurikalajahi M, Bahrami A (2011) Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using artificial neural networks. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26:46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Monjezi M, Singh TN, Khandelwal M, Sinha S, Singh V, Hosseini I (2006) Prediction and analysis of blast parameters using artificial neural network. Noise Vib Worldwide UK 37(5):8–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rogers SJ, Chen HC, Kopaska-Merkel DC, Fang JH (1995) Predicting permeability from porosity using artificial neural networks. AAPG 79:1786–1797

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Monjezi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Monjezi, M., Hasanipanah, M. & Khandelwal, M. Evaluation and prediction of blast-induced ground vibration at Shur River Dam, Iran, by artificial neural network. Neural Comput & Applic 22, 1637–1643 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0856-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-0856-y

Keywords

Navigation