Skip to main content
Log in

New sinusoidal basis functions and a neural network approach to solve nonlinear Volterra–Fredholm integral equations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present and investigate the analytical properties of a new set of orthogonal basis functions derived from the block-pulse functions. Also, we present a numerical method based on this new class of functions to solve nonlinear Volterra–Fredholm integral equations. In particular, an alternative and efficient method based on the formalism of artificial neural networks is discussed. The efficiency of the mentioned approach is theoretically justified and illustrated through several qualitative and quantitative examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkinson K (1997) The numerical solution of integral equations of the second kind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Babolian E, Masouri Z, Hatamzadeh-Varmazyar S (2009) Numerical solution of nonlinear Volterra–Fredholm integro-differential equations via direct method using triangular functions. Comput Math Appl 58(2):239–247

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Babolian E, Shahsavaran A (2009) Numerical solution of nonlinear Fredholm integral equations of the second kind using Haar wavelets. J Comput Appl Math 225(1):87–95

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Biazar J, Ghazvini H (2008) Numerical solution for special non-linear Fredholm integral equation by HPM. Appl Math Comput 195(2):681–687

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Capuano N, DAniello G, Gaeta A, Miranda S (2015) A personality based adaptive approach for information systems. Comput Hum Behav 44:156–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen G (2004) Stability of nonlinear systems. In: Encyclopedia of RF and Microwave Engineering

  7. Dastjerdi HL, Ghaini FM (2012) Numerical solution of Volterra-Fredholm integral equations by moving least square method and Chebyshev polynomials. Appl Math Model 36(7):3283–3288

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Deb A, Dasgupta A, Sarkar G (2006) A new set of orthogonal functions and its application to the analysis of dynamic systems. J Frankl Inst 343(1):1–26

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Deb A, Roychoudhury S, Sarkar G (2016) Analysis and identification of time-invariant systems, time-varying systems, and multi-delay systems using orthogonal hybrid functions: theory and algorithms withMATLAB®, vol 46. Springer, Kolkota

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Deb A, Sarkar G, Sengupta A (2011) Triangular orthogonal functions for the analysis of continuous time systems. Anthem Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Effati S, Buzhabadi R (2012) A neural network approach for solving Fredholm integral equations of the second kind. Neural Comput Appl 21(5):843–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gaeta M, Loia V, Tomasiello S (2013) A generalized functional network for a classifier-quantifiers scheme in a gas-sensing system. Int J Intell Syst 28(10):988–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hahn W (1967) Stability of motion. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Hale J, Kocak H (1991) Dynamics and bifurcations. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Han Z, Li S, Cao Q (2012) Triangular orthogonal functions for nonlinear constrained optimal control problems. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 4(12):1822–1827

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haykin S (1999) Neural networks a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Pretice Hall International, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Jafarian A, Measoomy S, Abbasbandy S (2015) Artificial neural networks based modeling for solving Volterra integral equations system. Appl Soft Comput 27:391–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khalil HK (1988) Nonlinear systems. McMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lagaris IE, Likas A, Fotiadis DI (1998) Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 9(5):987–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marcus C, Westervelt R (1989) Dynamics of iterated-map neural networks. Phys Rev A 40(1):501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Michel AN, Farrell JA, Porod W (1989) Qualitative analysis of neural networks. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst 36(2):229–243

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Mirzaee F (2017) Numerical solution of nonlinear Fredholm–Volterra integral equations via Bell polynomials. Comput Methods Differ Equ 5(2):88–102

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Mirzaee F, Hadadiyan E (2012) Approximate solutions for mixed nonlinear Volterra–Fredholm type integral equations via modified block-pulse functions. J Assoc Arab Univ Basic Appl Sci 12(1):65–73

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Mirzaee F, Hadadiyan E (2016) Numerical solution of Volterra–Fredholm integral equations via modification of hat functions. Appl Math Comput 280:110–123

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Mirzaee F, Hadadiyan E (2017) Using operational matrix for solving nonlinear class of mixed Volterra–Fredholm integral equations. Math Methods Appl Sci 40(10):3433–3444

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Mirzaee F, Hoseini AA (2013) Numerical solution of nonlinear Volterra-Fredholm integral equations using hybrid of block-pulse functions and Taylor series. Alex Eng J 52(3):551–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mirzaee F, Hoseini SF (2016) Application of Fibonacci collocation method for solving Volterra–Fredholm integral equations. Appl Math Comput 273:637–644

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Ordokhani Y, Razzaghi M (2008) Solution of nonlinear Volterra–Fredholm–Hammerstein integral equations via a collocation method and rationalized Haar functions. Appl Math Lett 21(1):4–9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Paripour M, Kamyar M (2013) Numerical solution of nonlinear Volterra–Fredholm integral equations by using new basis functions. Commun Numer Anal 1(17):1–12

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Rampone S, Pierro V, Troiano L, Pinto IM (2013) Neural network aided glitch-burst discrimination and glitch classification. Int J Mod Phys C 24(11):1350,084

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wishes to thank the anonymous reviewers and the editor in charge of handling this paper for all their criticisms and comments. All of their suggestions contributed significantly to improve the quality of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefania Tomasiello.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tomasiello, S., Macías-Díaz, J.E., Khastan, A. et al. New sinusoidal basis functions and a neural network approach to solve nonlinear Volterra–Fredholm integral equations. Neural Comput & Applic 31, 4865–4878 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-03984-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-03984-y

Keywords

Navigation