Skip to main content
Log in

Perceived quality of multimedia educational content: A cognitive style approach

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Multimedia Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive styles influence the way how humans process information, with previous research demonstrating that they have significant effects on student learning in multimedia environments. On the other hand, the perceptual quality of the human multimedia experience is notoriously difficult to measure. In this paper, we report the results of an empirical study, which investigated the relationship between user cognitive styles and perceptual multimedia quality, in which users had the possibility to specify their desired Quality of Service settings — in terms of frame rates and color depth. Results show that whilst color choice is impacted by a participant's cognitive style, such Quality of Service parameters do not significantly affect perceived multimedia quality, and that users do not necessarily choose optimum presentation settings to enhance their perceived enjoyment and assimilation of multimedia informational content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chou, C., Lin, H.: The effect of navigation map types and cognitive styles on learners' performance in a computer-networked hypertext learning system. J. Educ. Multimedia Hypermedia 7(2/3), 151–176 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mayer, R.E.: The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learn. Instrum. 13, 125–139 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schnotz, W., Lowe, R.: External and internal representations in multimedia learning. Learn. Instrum. 13(2), 117–123 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gill, A.J.: Personality and language: the projection and perception of personality in computer-mediated communication, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Edinburgh, UK (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oberlander, J., Gill, A.J.: Individual differences and implicit language: personality, parts-of-speech and pervasiveness. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1035–1040. Chicago, USA (2004)

  6. Garrett, B.M., Callear, D.: The value of intelligent multimedia simulation for teaching clinical decision-making skills. Nurse Educ. Today 21(5), 382–390 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, S.Y., Angelides, M.C.: Customisation of Internet multimedia information systems design through user modelling. In: Nansi, S. (ed.) Architectural Issues of Web-Enabled Electronic Business, pp. 241–255. Idea Group, Pennsylvania (2003)

  8. Garrand, T.: Writing for Multimedia: Entertainment, Education, Training, Advertising and the World Wide Web. Focal Press, Boston (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hapeshi, K., Jones, D.: Interactive Multimedia for Instruction: A Cognitive Analysis of the Role of Audition and Vision. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 4(1), 79–99 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Reeves, B., Nass, C.: Perceptual user interfaces: perceptual bandwidth. Commun. ACM 23(3), 65–70 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gross, R.D.: Psychology—The Science of Mind and Behaviour. Hodder & Stoughton, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lewalter, D.: Cognitive strategies for learning from static and dynamic visuals. Learn. Instrum. 13, 177–189 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De Westelinck, K., Valcke, M., De Craene, B., Kirschner, P.:Multimedia learning in social sciences: limitations of external graphical representations. Computers in Human Behavior 21(4), 555–573 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lowe, R.K.: Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learn. Instrum. 13, 157–176 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Bradac, J., Mulac, A., House, A.: Lexical diversity and magnitude of convergent versus divergent style shifting: perceptual and evaluatory consequences. Lang. Commun. 8, 213–228 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cialdini, R.B.: Influence: Science and Practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xia, W., Lee, G.: The influence of persuasion, training and experience on user perceptions and acceptance of IT innovation. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems. Brisbane, Australia (2000)

  18. Apteker, R.T., Fisher, J.A., Kisimov, V.S., Neishlos, H.: Video Acceptability and Frame Rate. IEEE Multimedia 2(3), 32–40 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Steinmetz, R.: Human Perception of Jitter and Media Synchronisation. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 14(1), 61–72 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wijesekera, D., Srivastava, J., Nerode, A., Foresti, M.: Experimental Evaluation of Loss Perception in Continuous Media. Multimedia Syst. 7(6), 486–499 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Watson, A., Sasse, M.A.: Multimedia conferencing via Multicast: determining the quality of service required by the end user. In: Proceedings of the AVSPN '97—International Workshop on Audio-Visual Services Over Packet Networks. Aberdeen, UK (1997)

  22. Wilson, G.M., Sasse, M.A.: Investigating the impact of audio degradations on users: subjective vs. objective assessment methods. In: Proceedings of the OZCHI'2000. Sydney (2000)

  23. Ghinea, G., Thomas, J.P.: QoS Impact on user perception and understanding of multimedia video clips. In: Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia '98 Bristol, UK (1998)

  24. Riding, R.J., Grimley, M.: Cognitive style and learning from multimedia materials in 11 year old children. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 30(2), 43–56 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Riding, R.J., Sadler-Smith, E.: Type of instructional material, cognitive style and learning performance. Educational Studies 18, 323–340 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Riding, R.J.: Cognitive Styles Analysis. Learning and Training Technology, Birmingham, UK (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weller, H.G., Repman, J., Rooze, G.E.: The relationship of learning, behavior, and cognitive styles in hypermedia-based instruction: implications for design of HBI. Comput. Sch. 10, 401–420 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chuang, Y-R.: Teaching in a Multimedia Computer Environment: a study of effects of learning style, gender, and math achievement. Available via http://imej.wfu.edu./articles/1999/1/10/index/asp [21/12/2001] (1999)

  29. Lee, C.H.: The effects of auditory cues in interactive multimedia and cognitive style on reading skills of third graders. Unpublished Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, USA (1994)

  30. Ford, N., Miller, D., Moss, N.: The role of individual differences in Internet searching: an empirical study. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 52(12), 1049–1066 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ford, N., Wood, F., Walsh, C.: Cognitive styles and searching. online CD-ROM Rev. 18(2), 79–86 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Avitabile, J.: Interaction of presentation mode and learning style in computer science. In: Proceedings of the National Educating Computing Conference. San Diego, USA, June 22–24, (1998)

  33. Beacham, N.A., Elliott, A.C., Alty, J.L., Al-Sharrah, A.: Media combinations and learning styles: a dual coding approach. In: Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2002 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Denver, Colorado, USA (2002)

  34. Ford, N., Chen, S.Y.: Individual differences, hypermedia navigation and learning: an empirical study. J. Educ. Multimedia Hypermedia 9(4), 281–312 (2000)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Witkin, H.A., Oltman, P.K., Raskin, E., Karp, S.A.: A Manual for the Group Embedded Figures Test. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Reips, U.-D.: The web experiment method: advantages, disadvantages, and solutions. In: Birnbaum, M.H. (ed.) Psychological Experiments on the Internet, pp. 89–117. Academic Press, San Diego (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Stephen, P., Hornby, S.: Simple Statistics for Library and Information Professionals. Library Association, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ghinea, G., Chen, S.Y.: The impact of cognitive styles on perceptual distributed multimedia quality. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 34(4), 393–406 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Huang, A.H.: Effects of multimedia on document browsing and navigation: an exploratory empirical investigation. Int. J. Inform. Manage. 41, 189–198 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Witkin, H.A., Moore, C.A., Goodenough, D.R., Cox, P.W.: Field-dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Rev. Educ. Res. 47(1), 1–64 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ford, N., Chen, S. Y.: Matching/mismatching revisited: an empirical study of learning and technology style. British Journal of Educational Technology 32(1), 5–22 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gheorghita Ghinea.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghinea, G., Chen, S.Y. Perceived quality of multimedia educational content: A cognitive style approach. Multimedia Systems 11, 271–279 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-005-0007-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-005-0007-8

Keywords

Navigation