Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Application of bovine bone versus bovine DBM graft on bone healing of radial defect in rat

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative Clinical Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reconstruction of the fractured bone and bone healing biology is compound processes, and the effectiveness of osteosynthesis is determined by their success. Currently, autografts or allografts and mineral bone substitutes are used commonly for skeletal restoration. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of bovine demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and bovine bone (bovine xenografts) on the bone healing process in rat. Sixteen female Sprague-Dawley rats were used in separate four groups: autograft (positive control, n = 4), untreated defect (negative control, n = 4), bovine DBM (n = 4), and bovine bone graft (n = 4). Radiological, histopathological, and biomechanical evaluations were done during the study, and results were recorded and analyzed statistically. At the 56th postoperative day, there was no significant differences in different groups in the biomechanical and radiographical criteria (P > 0.05), but there were significant differences in the mode of union and cancellous bone formation between the groups in histopathological evaluation at the 56th postoperative day (P < 0.05); the present study showed that there was no difference in the radiological and biomechanical performances of the healing bones between the bovine DBM and bovine bone graft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashay AK, Di Cesare PE (1995) Osteoinductive agents: basic science and clinical applications. Am J Orthop 24:752–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanasiou VT, Papachristou DJ, Panagopoulos A, Saridis A, Scopa CD, Megas P (2009) Histological comparison of autograft, allograft-DBM, xenograft, and synthetic grafts in a trabecular bone defect: an experimental study in rabbits. Med Sci Monit Basic Res 16:BR24–BR31

    Google Scholar 

  • Berberi AN, Sabbagh JM, Aboushelib MN, Noujeim ZF, Salameh ZA (2014) A 5-year comparison of marginal bone level following immediate loading of single-tooth implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets in the maxilla. Front Physiol 5:29

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bigham AS, Dehghani SN, Shafiei Z, Torabi Nezhad S (2008) Xenogenic demineralized bone matrix and fresh autogenous cortical bone effects on experimental bone healing: radiological, histopathological and biomechanical evaluation. J Orthop Traumatol 9:73–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bigham AS, Dehghani SN, Shafiei Z, Nezhad ST (2009) Experimental bone defect healing with xenogenic demineralized bone matrix and bovine fetal growth plate as a new xenograft: radiological, histopathological and biomechanical evaluation cell tissue. Bank 10:33–41. doi:10.1007/s10561-10008-19107-y.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bigham-Sadegh A, Oryan A (2015) Selection of animal models for pre-clinical strategies in evaluating the fracture healing, bone graft substitutes and bone tissue regeneration and engineering. Connect Tissue Res 56:175–194. doi:10.3109/030082070300201501027341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom MPG, Seigerman DA (2005) The clinical use of allografts, demineralized bone matrices, synthetic bone graft substitutes and osteoinductive growth factors: a survey study. Hss J 1:9–18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty MJ, Schlag G, Schwarz N, Mollan RAB, Nolan PC, Wilson DJ (1994) Biocompatibility of xenogeneic bone, commercially available coral, a bioceramic and tissue sealant for human osteoblasts. Biomaterials 15:601–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furst G et al (2003) Sinus grafting with autogenous plateletâ€گrich plasma and bovine hydroxyapatite. Clin Oral Implants Res 14:500–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Wang H-L (2008) Common implant-related advanced bone grafting complications: classification, etiology, and management. Implant Dent 17:389–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liebschner MAK (2004) Biomechanical considerations of animal models used in tissue engineering of bone. biomaterials 25:1697–1714

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meimandi-Parizi A, Oryan A, Shafiei-Sarvestani Z, Bigham AS (2012) Human platelet rich plasma plus Persian gulf coral effects on experimental bone healing in rabbit model: radiological, histological, macroscopical and biomechanical evaluation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 23:473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noumbissi SS, Lozada JL, Boyne PJ, Rohrer MD, Clem D, Kim JS, Prasad H (2005) Clinical, histologic, and histomorphometric evaluation of mineralized solvent-dehydrated bone allograft (puros) in human maxillary sinus grafts. J Oral Implantol 31:171–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orsini G, Traini T, Scarano A, Degidi M, Perrotti V, Piccirilli M, Piattelli A (2005) Maxillary sinus augmentation with Bioâ€گOssآ® particles: a light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy study in man. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 74:448–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oryan A, Parizi AM, Shafiei-Sarvestani Z, Bigham AS (2012) Effects of combined hydroxyapatite and human platelet rich plasma on bone healing in rabbit model: radiological, macroscopical, hidtopathological and biomechanical evaluation. Cell Tissue Bank 13:639–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oryan A, Alidadi S, Moshiri A, Maffulli N (2014) Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions. J Orthop Surg Res 9:18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Oryan A, Monazzah S, Bigham-Sadegh A (2015) Bone injury and fracture healing biology. Biomed Environ Sci 28:57–71

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paulo AO, Castro-Silva II, Oliveira DF, Machado MEL, Bonetti-Filho I, Granjeiro JM (2011) Repair of critical-size defects with autogenous periosteum-derived cells combined with bovine anorganic apatite/collagen: an experimental study in rat calvaria. Braz Dent J 22:322–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilitsis JG, Lucas DR, Rengachary SR (2002) Bone healing and spinal fusion. Neurosurg Focus 13:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodella LF, Favero G, Labanca M (2011) Biomaterials in maxillofacial surgery: membranes and grafts. Int J Biomed Sci: IJBS 7:81

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skoglund A, Hising P, Young C (1997) A clinical and histologic examination in humans of the osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12:194–199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takagi K, Urist MR (1982) The role of bone marrow in bone morphogenetic protein-induced repair of femoral massive diaphyseal defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 171:224–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Urist MR, Mikulski AJ, Lietz A (1979) Solubilized and insolubilized bone morphogenetic protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76:1928–1832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urist MF, Sato K, Brownell AG (1983) Human bone morphogenetic protein. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 173:194–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vail TB, Trotter GW, Powers BE (1994) Equine demineralized bone matrix: relationship between particle size and osteoinduction. Vet Surg 23:386–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Seeman E (2008) Skeletal growth and peak bone strength best practice & research. Clin Endocrinol Metab 22:687–700

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the University for their financial support and cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

    Somayeh Monazzah & Ahmad Oryan

  2. Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahr-e-Kord University, Shahr-e-Kord, Iran

    Amin Bigham-Sadegh

  3. Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

    Abdolhamid Meimandi-Parizi

Authors
  1. Somayeh Monazzah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmad Oryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amin Bigham-Sadegh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abdolhamid Meimandi-Parizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Bigham-Sadegh.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was funded by grant number 94GRD1M1880.

Ethical approval

All guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed in accordance with the permission and prescribed guidelines of the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monazzah, S., Oryan, A., Bigham-Sadegh, A. et al. Application of bovine bone versus bovine DBM graft on bone healing of radial defect in rat. Comp Clin Pathol 26, 1293–1298 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-017-2526-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-017-2526-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation