Skip to main content
Log in

The normative score and the cut-off value of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the most common scoring systems used for patients with low back pain (LBP). Although the normative score of the ODI was reported to be 10.19 in a review article, no study has calculated the normative score after adjusting the value based on the age distribution. In addition, none of the previous studies has estimated the cut-off value which separates LBP with disability from LBP without disability. The purpose of this study was to estimate the normative score by adjusting the data for age distribution in Japan, and to determine the cut-off value which separates LBP with disability from LBP without disability.

Methods

We conducted an internet survey on LBP using the Japanese version of the ODQ. A total of 1,200 respondents, composed of 100 males and 100 females in each age group (from the 20s to 70s), participated in this study. We also asked them to provide information about their backgrounds. We estimated the normative score after correcting for the age distribution of Japan. We also estimated the ODI of those with or without disability, the factors associated with the ODI, and the cut-off value which separates LBP with disability from LBP without disability.

Results

The participants’ backgrounds were similar to the national survey. The normative score of the ODI was estimated at 8.73. The ODI of the LBP with disability group was 22.07. Those with sciatica and obese subjects showed higher ODI than those without. The optimal cut-off value was estimated to be 12.

Conclusions

We defined the normative score and the cut-off value of the ODI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krismer M, van Tulder M, Low Back Pain Group of the Bone and Joint Health Strategies for Europe Project (2007) Strategies for prevention and management of musculoskeletal conditions. low back pain (non-specific). Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 21:77–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Suzukamo Y, Takahashi N, Konno S, Kikuchi S, Fukuhara S (2007) Outcome study of low back pain. Pharma Medica 25:9–12 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hattori S, Takeshima N, Kimura N, Yamamoto K, Mizutani A, Noguchi T (2004) The clinical perspective on chronic pain management in Japan. Pain clinic 25:1541–1551 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Matsudaira K, Takeshita K, Kunogi J, Yamazaki T, Hara N, Yamada K, Takagi Y (2011) Prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain in the general Japanese population. Pain clinic 32:1349–1360 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 25:2940–2952

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujiwara A, Kobayashi N, Saiki K, Kitagawa T, Tamai K, Saotome K (2003) Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and short-form 36. Spine 28:1601–1607

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Coelho RA, Siqueira FB, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML (2008) Responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index in subjects with low back pain. Eur Spine J 17:1101–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maughan EF, Lewis JS (2010) Outcome measures in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 19:1484–1494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Monticone M, Baiardi P, Vanti C, Ferrari S, Pillastrini P, Mugnai R, Foti C (2012) Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in Italian subjects with sub-acute and chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 21:122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF (1992) Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 50:133–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hashimoto H, Komagata M, Nakai O, Morishita M, Tokuhashi Y, Sano S, Nohara Y, Okajima Y (2006) Discriminative validity and responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index among Japanese outpatients with lumbar conditions. Eur Spine J 15:1645–1650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (2008). The results of the National Health and Nutrition Survey Japan. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/eiyou/h20-houkoku.html (in Japanese). Accessed 16 July 2011

  14. Dionne CE, Dunn KM, Croft PR, Nachemson AL, Buchbinder R, Walker BF, Wyatt M, Cassidy JD, Rossignol M, Leboeuf-Yde C, Hartvigsen J, Leino-Arjas P, Latza U, Reis S, Gil Del Real MT, Kovacs FM, Oberg B, Cedraschi C, Bouter LM, Koes BW, Picavet HS, van Tulder MW, Burton K, Foster NE, Macfarlane GJ, Thomas E, Underwood M, Waddell G, Shekelle P, Volinn E, Von Korff M (2008) A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies. Spine 33:95–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Statistics Bureau, Japan (2006) Population of Japan (final report of the 2005 population census). http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/kokusei/2005/nihon/index.htm. Published Oct. 31. Accessed 16 July 2011

  16. Fairbank J (1995) Use of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Spine 20:1535–1537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hupli M, Heinonen R, Vanharanta H (1997) Height changes among chronic low back pain patients during intense physical exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports 7:32–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hupli M, Hurri H, Luoto S, Sainio P, Alaranta H (1996) Isokinetic performance capacity of trunk muscles. Part I: The effect of repetition on measurement of isokinetic performance capacity of trunk muscles among healthy controls and two different groups of low-back pain patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 28:201–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hupli M, Sainio P, Hurri H, Alaranta H (1997) Comparison of trunk strength measurements between two different isokinetic devices used at clinical settings. J Spinal Disord 10:391–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kankaanpää M, Taimela S, Laaksonen D, Hänninen O, Airaksinen O (1998) Back and hip extensor fatigability in chronic low back pain patients and controls. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79:412–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kankaanpää M, Taimela S, Webber CL Jr, Airaksinen O, Hänninen O (1997) Lumbar paraspinal muscle fatigability in repetitive isoinertial loading: EMG spectral indices, Borg scale and endurance time. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 76:236–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hill JC, Konstantinou K, Egbewale BE, Dunn KM, Lewis M, van der Windt D (2011) Clinical outcomes among low back pain consulters with referred leg pain in primary care. Spine 36:2168–2175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Valat JP, Genevay S, Marty M, Rozenberg S, Koes B (2010) Sciatica. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 24:241–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shiri R, Karppinen J, Leino-Arjas P, Solovieva S, Viikari-Juntura E (2010) The association between obesity and low back pain: a meta-analysis.: The association between obesity and low back pain: A meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 171:135–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin CW, McAuley JH, Macedo L, Barnett DC, Smeets RJ, Verbunt JA (2011) Relationship between physical activity and disability in low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 152:607–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hendrick P, Milosavljevic S, Hale L, Hurley DA, McDonough S, Ryan B, Baxter GD (2011) The relationship between physical activity and low back pain outcomes: a systematic review of observational studies. Eur Spine J 20:464–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Snook SH (2004) Work-related low back pain: secondary intervention. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 14:153–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kleinman L, Leidy NK, Crawley J, Bonomi A, Schoenfeld P (2001) A comparative trial of paper-and-pencil versus computer administration of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire. Med Care 39:181–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Boeckner LS, Pullen CH, Walker SN, Abbott GW, Block T (2002) Use and reliability of the World Wide Web version of the Block Health Habits and History Questionnaire with older rural women. J Nutr Educ Behav. 34(Suppl 1):S20–S24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juichi Tonosu.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tonosu, J., Takeshita, K., Hara, N. et al. The normative score and the cut-off value of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Eur Spine J 21, 1596–1602 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2173-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2173-7

Keywords

Navigation