Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Heat Treatment and Layer Orientation on the Tensile Strength of a Crystalline Rock Under Brazilian Test Condition

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of heat treatment and the layer orientation on the tensile properties of granitic gneiss were studied under the unconfined stress condition. The tensile strength of the samples was studied using a Brazilian configuration, and the geochemical and microstructural properties were studied using the X-ray diffraction technique as well as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. The fracture pattern and the geometrical analyses were performed using the digital photographs. The results show that both the heat treatment and layer orientation have strong control on the tensile strength, force-parallel and layer-parallel strains, and on the tensile fracture geometry. A general decrease in the tensile strength of the rock was documented with the increasing heat treatment. Although, in the heat-treated samples, X-ray diffraction study do not reveal any major change in the mineral composition, but the SEM shows the development of several micro-cracks in the grains. In the samples with different layer orientation, along with the changes in the tensile strength and layer-parallel to force-parallel strain ratio, the layer activation under shear stress is also noticed. Here, the ratio between the tensile to shear stress, acting along the layers is thought to be the major controlling factor of the tensile properties of rocks, which has many applications in mining, civil constructions, and waste disposal work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amadei F (1996) Importance of anisotropy when estimating and measuring in situ stresses in rock. Int J Rock Mech Min 33:293–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D3967–08 (2008) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength on intact rock core specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. doi:10.1520/D3967-08

  • Bauer SJ, Johnson B. (1979) Effects of slow uniform heating on the physical properties of the Westerly and Charcoal granites. In: Proceedings of 20th symposium on rock mechanics Austin, Texas: ASCE, New York, pp 7–18

  • Chen YL, Ni J, Shao W, Azzam R (2012) Experimental study on the influence of temperature on the mechanical properties of granite under uni-axial compression and fatigue loading. Int J Rock Mech Min 56:62–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Dan DQ, Konietzky H, Herbst M (2013) Brazilian tensile strength tests on some anisotropic rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min 58:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi RD, Goel RK, Prasad VVR, Sinha A (2008) Thermo-mechanical properties of Indian and other granites. Int J Rock Mech Min 45:303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautam PK, Verma AK, Maheshwar S, Singh TN (2015) Thermomechanical analysis of different types of sandstone at elevated temperature. Rock Mech Rock Eng. doi:10.1007/s00603-015-0797-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuze FE (1983) High-temperature mechanical, physical and thermal properties of granitic rocks—a review. Int J Rock Mech Min 20(1):3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homand-Etienne F, Houpert R (1989) Thermally induced microcracking granites: characterization and analysis. Int J Rock Mech Min 26(2):125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homand-Etienne F, Troalen JP (1984) Behaviour of granites and limestones subjected to slow homogenous temperature change. Eng Geol 20:219–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Xu J (2014) Mechanical properties of Qinling biotite granite after high temperature treatment. Int J Rock Mech Min 71:188–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquet J, François P (1980) Experimental deformation of partially melted granitic rocks at 600–900 C and 250 MPa confining pressure. Tectonophysics 68(1–2):131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao S, Ranjith PG, Wasantha PLP, Chen BK (2015) Experimental and numerical studies on the mechanical behavior of Australian Strathbogie granite at high temperatures: an application to geothermal energy. Geothermics 54:96–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma Y, Singh TN (2010) A new technique for porosity estimation using seismic density. Petroview III(3):3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Szwedzicki T (2007) A hypothesis on modes of failure of rock samples tested in uniaxial compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng 40(1):97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavallali A, Vervoort A (2010) Effect of layer orientation on the failure of layered sandstone under Brazilian test conditions. Int J Rock Mech Min 47:313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavallali A, Vervoort A (2013) Behaviour of layered sandstone under Brazilian test conditions layer orientation and shape effects. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 5:366–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vervoort A, Min K, Konietzky H, Cho J, Debecker B, Dinh Q, Frühwirt T, Tavallali A (2014) Failure of transversely isotropic rock under Brazilian test condition. Int J Rock Mech Min 70:343–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishal V, Pradhan SP, Singh TN (2011) Tensile strength of rock under elevated temperature. Geotech Geol Eng 29:1127–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisetsaen S, Walsri C, Fuenkajorn K (2015) Effects of loading rate and temperature on tensile strength and deformation of rock salt. Int J Rock Mech Min 73:10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong TF (1982) Effects of temperature and pressure on failure and post-failure behaviour of Weterly granite. Mech Mater 1:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Gao F, Shen X, Xie H (2008) Mechanical characteristics and microcosmic mechanism of granite under temperature loads. J China Univ Min Tech 18:413–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Z (2015) Thermal influence on mechanical properties of granite: a micromechanical perspective. Rock Mech Rock Eng. doi:10.1007/s00603-015-0767-1

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the generous help extended by Mr. Rajesh Singh, Mr. Tushar Gupta and Mr. Nikhil Sirdesai during various stages of Brazilian tensile test experiments and manuscript preparation. The anonymous reviewer is thanked for his positive criticisms that helped to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debanjan Guha Roy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guha Roy, D., Singh, T.N. Effect of Heat Treatment and Layer Orientation on the Tensile Strength of a Crystalline Rock Under Brazilian Test Condition. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49, 1663–1677 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0891-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0891-y

Keywords

Navigation