Skip to main content
Log in

Navigated 3D–ultrasound versus conventional neuronavigation during awake resections of eloquent low-grade gliomas: a comparative study at a single institution

  • Original Article - Brain Tumors
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The data showing usefulness of navigated 3D–ultrasound (3DUS) during awake resections of eloquent gliomas are sparse. Results of surgeries performed using 3DUS were never compared to procedures guided by standard neuronavigation. The aim of this work is to assess the effectiveness of 3DUS during awake resections of eloquent low-grade gliomas (LGGs) by comparing surgical results of two series of patients operated on using conventional neuronavigation and using 3DUS. To our knowledge, a similar study is lacking in the literature.

Methods

During a 4-year period (September 2006 to August 2010) 21 awake resections of LGGs guided by neuronavigation (series 1, S1) were consecutively performed in Department of Neurosurgery in Bratislava. During another 4-year period (August 2010 to July 2014) 28 awake resections of LGGs guided by 3DUS (series 2, S2) were consecutively conducted. In both patients series, the eloquent cortical and subcortical structures were intraoperatively detected by direct electrical stimulation. Extent of tumor resection (EOR) and functional outcome in both series were compared.

Results

EOR was significantly greater (p = 0.022) in S2 (median = 93.25%; mean = 86.79%), as compared to S1 (median 87.1%; mean = 75.85%). One permanent minor deficit in S1 and 2 minor deficits in S2 occurred, the difference was not significant (p = 0.999).

Conclusions

Our work represents the first study comparing results of surgeries guided by 3DUS versus conventional navigation. The extent of awake resections of eloquent LGG guided by 3DUS was greater comparing to awake resections guided by standard neuronavigation; use of 3DUS had no impact on the number of new permanent deficits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berger MS, Ojemann GA (1992) Intraoperative brain mapping techniques in neurooncology. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 58:153–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berger MS, Deliganis AV, Dobbins J, Keles GE (1994) The effect of extent of resection on recurrence in patients with low-grade cerebral hemisphere gliomas. Cancer 74:1784–1791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cséfalvay Z, Egryová M, Wiedermann I (2007) Diagnostics and therapy of aphasia, alexia and agraphia (in Slovak). Ing. Kaminský, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Renzi E, Vignolo LA (1962) The token test: a sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain 85:665–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duffau H (2014) The conceptual limitation to relying on intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in glioma surgery. World Neurosurg 82:601–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Duffau H, Capelle L, Denvil D, Sichez N, Gatignol P, Taillandier L, Lopes M, Mitchell MC, Roche S, Muller JC, Bitar A, Sichez JP, van Effenterre R (2003) Usefulness of intraoperative electrical subcortical mapping during surgery for low-grade gliomas located within eloquent brain regions: functional results in a consecutive series of 103 patients. J Neurosurg 98:764–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghinda D, Zhang N, Lu J, Yao CJ, Yuan S, Wu JS (2016) Contribution of combined intraoperative electrophysiological investigation with 3-T intraoperative MRI for awake cerebral glioma surgery: comprehensive review of the clinical implications and radiological outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 40:E14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huncke K, Van de Wiele B, Fried I, Rubinstein EH (1998) The asleep-awake-asleep anesthetic technique for intraoperative language mapping. Neurosurgery 42:1312–1317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jakola AS, Myrmel KS, Kloster R, Torp SH, Lindal S, Unsgård G, Solheim O (2012) Comparison of a strategy favoring early surgical resection vs a strategy favoring watchful waiting in low-grade gliomas. JAMA 308:1881–1888

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (2007) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. IARC, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lu J, Wu J, Yao C, Zhuang D, Qiu T, Hu X, Zhang J, Gong X, Liang W, Mao Y, Zhou L (2013) Awake language mapping and 3-Tesla intraoperative MRI-guided volumetric resection for gliomas in language areas. J Clin Neurosci 20:1280–1287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maldaun MV, Khawja SN, Levine NB, Rao G, Lang FF, Weinberg JS, Tummala S, Cowles CE, Ferson D, Nguyen AT, Sawaya R, Suki D, Prabhu SS (2014) Awake craniotomy for gliomas in a high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging suite: analysis of 42 cases. J Neurosurg 121:810–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moiyadi A, Shetty P (2016) Early experience with combining awake craniotomy and intraoperative navigable ultrasound for resection of eloquent region gliomas. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1584512

  14. Motomura K, Natsume A, Iijima K, Kuramitsu S, Fujii M, Yamamoto T, Maesawa S, Sugiura J, Wakabayashi T (2017) Surgical benefits of combined awake craniotomy and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging for gliomas associated with eloquent areas. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.9.JNS16152

  15. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Cerny S, Hastreiter P, Greiner G, Fahlbusch R (2000) Quantification of, visualization of, and compensation for brain shift using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 47:1070–1080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nossek E, Korn A, Shahar T, Kanner AA, Yaffe H, Marcovici D, Ben-Harosh C, Ben Ami H, Weinstein M, Shapira-Lichter I, Constantini S, Hendler T, Ram Z (2011) Intraoperative mapping and monitoring of the corticospinal tracts with neurophysiological assessment and 3-dimensional ultrasonography-based navigation. Clin Article J Neurosurg 114:738–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Racine CA, Li J, Molinaro AM, Butowski N, Berger MS (2015) Neurocognitive function in newly diagnosed low-grade glioma patients undergoing surgical resection with awake mapping techniques. Neurosurgery 77:371–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Santini B, Talacchi A, Squintani G, Casagrande F, Capasso R, Miceli G (2012) Cognitive outcome after awake surgery for tumors in language areas. J Neuro-Oncol 108:319–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Satoer D, Vork J, Visch-Brink E, Smits M, Dirven C, Vincent A (2012) Cognitive functioning early after surgery of gliomas in eloquent areas. J Neurosurg 117:831–838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shewan CM, Kertesz A (1980) Reliability and validity characteristics of the western aphasia battery (WAB). J Speech Hear Disord 45:308–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Solheim O, Jakola AS, Unsgård G (2014) Scientific alchemy and proposed gold standards of care. World Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2014.05.029

  23. Šteňo A, Karlík M, Mendel P, Čík M, Šteňo J (2012) Navigated three-dimensional intraoperative ultrasound-guided awake resection of low-grade glioma partially infiltrating optic radiation. Acta Neurochir 154:1255–1262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Šteňo A, Hollý V, Fabian M, Kuniak M, Timárová G, Šteňo J (2014) Direct electrical stimulation of the optic radiation in patients with covered eyes. Neurosurg Rev 37:527–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Šteňo A, Matejčík V, Šteňo J (2015) Intraoperative ultrasound in low-grade glioma surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 135:96–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Šteňo A, Jezberová M, Hollý V, Timárová G, Šteňo J (2016) Visualization of lenticulostriate arteries during insular low-grade glioma surgeries by navigated 3D ultrasound power Doppler: technical note. J Neurosurg 125:1016–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Šteňo A, Guissani C, Riva M (2016) Multimodal imaging in glioma surgery. In: Prada F, Solbiati L, Martegani A, DiMeco F (eds) Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in neurosurgery—from standard B-mode to elastosonography. Springer, Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London, pp 81–97

    Google Scholar 

  28. Šteňo A, Matejčík V, Šteňo J (2016) Letter to the editor: identification of residual glioma using ultrasound miniprobes. Neurosurg Focus 41:E15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Šteňová V, Cséfalvay Z (2011) Factors influencing lexical access in picture naming. Picture naming test with norms (in Slovak). Mabag, Bratislava

  30. Unsgaard G, Selbekk T, Brostrup Müller T, Ommedal S, Torp SH, Myhr G, Bang J, Nagelhus Hernes TA (2005) Ability of navigated 3D ultrasound to delineate gliomas and metastases—comparison of image interpretations with histopathology. Acta Neurochir 147:1259–1269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Widhalm G, Wolfsberger S, Minchev G, Woehrer A, Krssak M, Czech T, Prayer D, Asenbaum S, Hainfellner JA, Knosp E (2010) 5-Aminolevulinic acid is a promising marker for detection of anaplastic foci in diffusely infiltrating gliomas with nonsignificant contrast enhancement. Cancer 116:1545–1552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yordanova YN, Moritz-Gasser S, Duffau H (2011) Awake surgery for WHO grade II gliomas within “noneloquent” areas in the left dominant hemisphere: toward a “supratotal” resection. Clinical article J Neurosurg 115:232–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Atle Kleven, former CEO at SonoWand, for very important comments and suggestions during the writing of this paper.

Funding

Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic and the Slovak Academy of Sciences (VEGA) provided financial support in the form of grant (number 1/0959/16). The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrej Šteňo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Šteňo, A., Hollý, V., Mendel, P. et al. Navigated 3D–ultrasound versus conventional neuronavigation during awake resections of eloquent low-grade gliomas: a comparative study at a single institution. Acta Neurochir 160, 331–342 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3377-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3377-8

Keywords

Navigation