Skip to main content
Log in

An experimental study on hydrodynamic performance of a box-floating breakwater in different terrains

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experimental investigation on the hydrodynamic performance of a box-floating breakwater in different terrains is performed in a 2D wave flume under regular wave actions and irregular wave actions, respectively. The wave transmission coefficients, motion responses and mooring forces are focused to validate the hydrodynamic performance of the box-floating breakwater. The performance of the box-floating breakwater in flat terrain is also experimentally investigated for comparison. The influences of the terrain width and quantity on the hydrodynamic behaviors of the box-floating breakwater are discussed and analyzed. The results indicate that the box-floating breakwater in different terrains has a better wave attenuating ability than the box-floating breakwater in flat terrain due to wave energy loss caused by the interaction between the breakwater and terrain. However, the width of terrain has a limited effect on the hydrodynamic performance of the floating breakwater. For double terrains, the wave attenuation performance of the box-type floating breakwater increases with the decrease of the spacing between double terrains, especially for long-period waves. It is also found that terrain has significant influences on the roll and heave motions, while terrain hardly affects the sway motions. In addition, terrain plays an important role in the mooring forces, while the width and quantity of terrain weakly affect the mooring forces of box-floating breakwater. To investigate the hydrodynamic performance of rectangular floating breakwater in different terrains systematically, Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) methods is used. It can be concluded that the results of SPH show a good agreement with the experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40
Fig. 41
Fig. 42
Fig. 43
Fig. 44
Fig. 45

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dai J, Wang CM, Utsunomiya T, Duan WH (2018) Review of recent research and developments on floating breakwaters. Ocean Eng 158:132–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sannasiraj SA, Sundar V, Sundaravadivelu R (1998) Mooring forces and motion responses of pontoon-type floating breakwaters. Ocean Eng 25(1):27–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams AN, Abul-Azm AG (1997) Dual pontoon floating breakwater. Ocean Eng 24(5):465–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ikeno M, Shimoda N, Iwata K (1988) A new type of breakwater utilizing air compressibility. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on coastal engineering. ASCE, pp 2326–2339

  5. Ji CY, Chen X, Cui J, Yuan ZM, Incecik A (2015) Experimental study of a new type of floating breakwater. Ocean Eng 105:295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mani JS (1991) Design of Y-frame floating breakwater. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 117(2):105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Murali K, Mani JS (1997) Performance of cage floating breakwater. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 123(4):172–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arunachalam VM, Raman H (1982) Experimental studies on a perforated horizontal floating plate breakwater. Ocean Eng 9(1):35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Usha R, Gayathri T (2005) Wave motion over a twin-plate breakwater. Ocean Eng 32:1054–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dong GH, Zheng YN, Li YC, Teng B, Guan CT, Lin DF (2008) Experiments on wave transmission coefficients of floating breakwaters. Ocean Eng 35:931–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shugan IV, Hwung HH, Yang RY, Hsu WY (2012) Elastic plate as floating wave breaker in a beach zone. Phys Wave Phenom 20(3):199–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Drimer N, Agnon Y, Stiassnie M (1992) A simplified analytical model for a floating breakwater in water of finite depth. Appl Ocean Res 14(1):33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ikesue S, Tamura K, Sugi Y, Takaki M, Kihara K, Matsuura M (2002) Study on the performance of a floating breakwater with two boxes. The twelfth international offshore and polar engineering conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, 26–31 May, Kitakyushu, Japan, pp 26–31

  14. Gesraha MR (2006) Analysis of shaped floating breakwater in oblique waves: I. Impervious rigid wave boards. Appl Ocean Res 28(5):327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sulisz W, Mcdougal WG, Sollitt CK (1989) Wave interaction with rubble toe protection. Ocean Eng 16(5):463–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen ZJ, Wang YX, Dong HY, Zheng BX (2012) Time-domain hydrodynamic analysis of pontoon-plate floating breakwater. Water Sci Eng 5(3):291–303

    Google Scholar 

  17. He F, Huang ZH, Adrian WKL (2012) Hydrodynamic performance of a box floating breakwater with and without pneumatic chambers: an experimental study. Ocean Eng 51:16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang ZH, He F, Zhang WB (2014) A floating box-type breakwater with slotted barriers. J Hydraul Res 52(5):720–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ji C, Deng X, Cheng Y (2019) An experimental study of double-row floating breakwaters. J Mar Sci Technol 24(2):359–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goda Y, Suzuki Y (1976) Estimation of incident and reflected waves in random wave experiments. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on coastal engineering. ASCE, pp 828–845

  21. McCarthney BL (1985) Floating breakwater design. Ocean Eng 111:304–318

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cui J, Chen X, Guo JT, Deng XK, Ji CY, Li Q (2019) Experimental study on the hydrodynamic performance of rectangular floating breakwater influenced by reef areas. Mar Georesource Geotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2019.1580806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ji CH, Cheng Y, Yang K, Oleg G (2017) Numerical and experimental investigation of hydrodynamic performance of a cylindrical dual pontoon-net floating breakwater. Coast Eng 129:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rogers BD, Dalrymple RA (2008) SPH modeling of Tsunami waves, advances in coastal and ocean engineering, vol 10 advanced numerical models for tsunami waves and runup. World Scientific, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cui J, Li Q, Chen Y, Ji CY, Deng XK (2019) Addition of dynamic mooring line force based on lumped-mass method in SPH. Ocean Eng 182:90–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 51779111, 51609109), the Key University Science Research Project of Jiangsu Province (Grant no. 17KJA416003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaokang Deng.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, J., Liu, H., Deng, X. et al. An experimental study on hydrodynamic performance of a box-floating breakwater in different terrains. J Mar Sci Technol 25, 991–1009 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-019-00695-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-019-00695-4

Keywords

Navigation