Skip to main content
Log in

A theory of Markovian time-inconsistent stochastic control in discrete time

  • Published:
Finance and Stochastics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop a theory for a general class of discrete-time stochastic control problems that, in various ways, are time-inconsistent in the sense that they do not admit a Bellman optimality principle. We attack these problems by viewing them within a game theoretic framework, and we look for subgame perfect Nash equilibrium points. For a general controlled Markov process and a fairly general objective functional, we derive an extension of the standard Bellman equation, in the form of a system of nonlinear equations, for the determination of the equilibrium strategy as well as the equilibrium value function. Most known examples of time-inconsistent stochastic control problems in the literature are easily seen to be special cases of the present theory. We also prove that for every time-inconsistent problem, there exists an associated time-consistent problem such that the optimal control and the optimal value function for the consistent problem coincide with the equilibrium control and value function, respectively for the time-inconsistent problem. To exemplify the theory, we study some concrete examples, such as hyperbolic discounting and mean–variance control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The main reason is that in order to get a good recursion, we need to express the right-hand side of the equation above as E[ ⋅ ]-expectations of objects involving \(X_{n+1}^{u}\).

  2. An easy sufficient condition is that φ takes values in [0,1).

References

  1. Barro, R.: Ramsey meets Laibson in the neoclassical growth model. Q. J. Econ. 114, 1125–1152 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Basak, S., Chabakauri, G.: Dynamic mean–variance asset allocation. Rev. Financ. Stud. 23, 2970–3016 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Björk, T., Murgoci, A.: A general theory of Markovian time-inconsistent stochastic control problems. Working paper (2009). http://www.hhs.se/se/Search/Person/Pages/Person.aspx?PersonID=37

  4. Björk, T., Murgoci, A.: A theory of Markovian time-inconsistent stochastic control in continuous time. Submitted, Stockholm School of Economics (2010). http://hhs.se/DF/People/Pages/Person.aspx?PersonID=37

  5. Björk, T., Murgoci, A., Zhou, X.-Y.: Mean–variance portfolio optimization with state dependent risk aversion. Math. Finance 24, 1–24 (2014)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Czichowsky, C.: Time-consistent mean–variance portfolio selection in discrete and continuous time. Finance Stoch. 17, 227–271 (2013)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Ekeland, I., Lazrak, A.: Being serious about non-commitment: subgame perfect equilibrium in continuous time. arXiv:math/0604264v1 [math.OC]

  8. Ekeland, I., Privu, T.: Investment and consumption without commitment. Math. Financ. Econ. 2, 57–86 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldman, S.: Consistent plans. Rev. Econ. Stud. 47, 533–537 (1980)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris, C., Laibson, D.: Dynamic choices of hyperbolic consumers. Econometrica 69, 935–957 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Krusell, P., Smith, A.: Consumption and savings decisions with quasi-geometric discounting. Econometrica 71, 366–375 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kryger, E., Steffensen, M.: Some solvable portfolio problems with quadratic and collective objectives. Working paper (2010). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1577265

  13. Luttmer, E., Mariotti, T.: Subjective discounting in an exchange economy. J. Polit. Econ. 111, 959–989 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peleg, B., Menahem, E.: On the existence of a consistent course of action when tastes are changing. Rev. Econ. Stud. 40, 391–401 (1973)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Pollak, R.: Consistent planning. Rev. Econ. Stud. 35, 185–199 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Strotz, R.: Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econ. Stud. 23, 165–180 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vieille, N., Weibull, J.: Multiple solutions under quasi-exponential discounting. Econ. Theory 39, 513–526 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are greatly indebted to Ivar Ekeland, Ali Lazrak, Traian Pirvu, Suleyman Basak, Mogens Steffensen, Jörgen Weibull, and Eric Böse-Wolf for very helpful comments. A number of very valuable comments from two anonymous referees have helped to improve the paper considerably.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomas Björk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Björk, T., Murgoci, A. A theory of Markovian time-inconsistent stochastic control in discrete time. Finance Stoch 18, 545–592 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-014-0234-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-014-0234-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

JEL Classification

Navigation