Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the literature, marginal gaps below 120 μm are recommended for conventionally cemented crown restorations. Therefore, the null hypothesis tested was as follows: the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval of the marginal accuracy of chair-side generated lithium disilicate crowns lies below 120 μm. Prior to definite insertion, the accuracy of 20 lithium disilicate crowns (e.max CAD LT) was evaluated by a replica technique. A light-body silicone was used to document the gap between crown and abutment. The thickness of the light-body silicone layer was examined under microscope (MM40, Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan; magnification, ×50) at four different landmarks (LM): LM1 = marginal discrepancy, LM2 = mid-axial discrepancy of the inner crown surface, LM3 = axio-occlusal discrepancy, and LM4 = mid-occlusal discrepancy. At LM1, the mean marginal discrepancy revealed 100 μm (SD, ±61 μm); the median was 81 μm. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was 90 μm, and the upper bound was 110 μm. The means of internal gaps at LM2, LM3, and LM4 showed 148 μm (SD, ±61 μm), 227 μm (SD, ±83 μm), and 284 μm (SD, ±95 μm), respectively. The lower bounds of the 95% confidence interval revealed values between 137 μm (LM2) and 269 μm (LM4). The upper bounds were between 158 μm (LM2) and 300 μm (LM4). The null hypothesis was not rejected. Within the limits of the study, the chair-side generated lithium disilicate crowns exhibited a sufficient clinical accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wiedhahn K (2007) From blue to white: new high-strength material for Cerec—IPS e.max CAD LT. Int J Comput Dent 10:79–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Luthy H, Hammerle CH (2007) Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 20:383–388

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Luthy H, Gauckler LJ, Scharer P et al (2006) Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 37:685–693

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M (2008) Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dent Mater 24:1311–1315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holmes JR, Sulik WD, Holland GA, Bayne SC (1992) Marginal fit of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 67:594–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA (1971) The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131:107–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwickerath H (1979) Marginal cleft and solubility. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 34:664–669

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH (2007) A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 18(3):73–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R (1985) The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater 1:197–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP (1991) Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 65:357–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Janenko C, Smales RJ (1979) Anterior crowns and gingival health. Aust Dent J 24:225–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kastner K, Walter MH (2000) Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 84:419–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Molin M, Karlsson S (1993) The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 51:201–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD (1989) Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 62:405–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rahme HY, Tehini GE, Adib SM, Ardo AS, Rifai KT (2008) In vitro evaluation of the “replica technique” in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 9:25–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R (2007) Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent 35:68–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR (1995) The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J 40:17–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G (2008) Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns—validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 35:116–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weaver JD, Johnson GH, Bales DJ (1991) Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 66:747–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang CJ, Millstein PL, Nathanson D (1992) Effects of cement, cement space, marginal design, seating aid materials, and seating force on crown cementation. J Prosthet Dent 67:786–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Reich S, Kappe K, Teschner H, Schmitt J (2008) Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci 116:579–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P (2005) Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 113:174–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, Kern M (2003) Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont 16:587–592

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pfeiffer J (1999) Dental CAD/CAM technologies: the optical impression (II). Int J Comput Dent 2:65–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The prospective clinical trial of chair-side generated lithium disilicate ceramics was financially supported by Ivoclar-Vivadent.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Reich did an oral presentation by order of Ivoclar-Vivadent and received a fee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Reich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reich, S., Uhlen, S., Gozdowski, S. et al. Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique. Clin Oral Invest 15, 521–526 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0414-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0414-x

Keywords

Navigation