Skip to main content
Log in

Countervailing power? Collusion in markets with decentralized trade

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Economic Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the collective incentives of buyers and sellers to form cartels in markets with decentralized trade and pairwise bargaining. Cartels are coalitions of buyers or sellers that limit market participation and compensate inactive members for their abstention. In stable market outcomes, cartels set Nash equilibrium quantities and cartel memberships are immune to deviations. The set of stable market outcomes is non-empty and its full characterization is provided. Stable market outcomes are of two types: (i) at least one cartel restrains trade and market participation is balanced; (ii) only one cartel is active and it reduces trade slightly below the opponent’s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bloch F, Ghosal S (2000) Buyers’ and sellers’ cartels on markets with indivisible goods. Rev Econ Des 5: 129–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogomolnaia A, Jackson MO (2002) The stability of hedonic coalition structures. Games Econ Behav 38: 201–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burani N, Zwicker W (2003) Coalition formation games with separable preferences. Math Soc Sci 45: 27–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aspremont C, Jacquemin A, Gabszewicz JJ, Weymark J (1983) The stability of collusive price leadership. Can J Econ 16: 17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donsimoni MP, Economides NS, Polemarchakis HM (1986) Stable cartels. Int Econ Rev 27: 317–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith JK (1952) American capitalism: the concept of countervailing power. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn H, Wolinsky A (1988) Worker substitutability and patterns of unionisation. Econ J 98: 484–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inderst R, Wey C (2003) Bargaining, mergers, and technology choice in bilaterally oligopolistic industries. RAND J Econ 34: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagos R (2000) An alternative approach to search frictions. J Political Econ 108: 851–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee P, McMillan J (1992) Bidding rings. Am Econ Rev 82: 579–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno D, Wooders J (2002) Prices, delay and the dynamics of trade. J Econ Theory 104: 304–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponsati C (2004) Search and bargaining in large markets with homogeneous traders. Contribut Theor Econ 4:1. http://www.bepress.com/bejte/contributions/vol4/iss1/art1

  • Ray D, Vohra R (1999) A theory of endogenous coalition structures. Games Econ Behav 26: 286–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein A, Wolinsky A (1985) Equilibrium in a market with sequential bargaining. Econometrica 53: 1133–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer F, Ross D (1990) Industrial market structure and economic performance, 3rd edn. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder CM (1996) A dynamic theory of countervailing power. RAND J Econ 27: 747–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler GJ (1954) The economist plays with blocks. Am Econ Rev 44: 7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Stole LA, Zwiebel J (1996) Organizational design and technology choice under intrafirm bargaining. Am Econ Rev 86: 195–222

    Google Scholar 

  • von Ungern-sternberg T (1996) Countervailing power revisited. Int J Indus Org 14: 507–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooders J (1997) Equilibrium in a Market with intermediation is walrasian. Rev Econ Des 3: 75–89

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia Burani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burani, N., Ponsati, C. Countervailing power? Collusion in markets with decentralized trade. Rev Econ Design 15, 91–120 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-009-0093-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-009-0093-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation