Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Association between adjunct clindamycin and in-hospital mortality in patients with necrotizing soft tissue infection due to group A Streptococcus: a nationwide cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) due to group A Streptococcus (GAS) is a severe life-threatening microbial infection. The administration of adjunct clindamycin has been recommended in the treatment of NSTIs due to GAS. However, robust evidence regarding the clinical benefits of adjunct clindamycin in NSTI patients remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the association between early administration of adjunct clindamycin and in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTI attributed to GAS. The present study was a nationwide retrospective cohort study, using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database focusing on the period between 2010 and 2018. Data was extracted on patients diagnosed with NSTI due to GAS. We compared patients who were administered clindamycin on the day of admission (clindamycin group) with those who were not (control group). A propensity score overlap weighting method was adopted to adjust the unbalanced backgrounds. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality and survival at 90 days after admission. We identified 404 eligible patients during the study period. After adjustment, patients in the clindamycin group were not significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (19.2% vs. 17.5%; odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.59–2.09; p = 0.74) or improved survival at 90 days after admission (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.51–1.68; p = 0.80). In this retrospective study, early adjunct clindamycin does not appear to improve survival. Therefore, the present study questions the benefits of clindamycin as an adjunct to broad spectrum antibiotics in patients with NSTI due to GAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database.

Code availability

Stata/MP15 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA)

Abbreviations

NSTI:

Necrotizing soft tissue infection

GAS:

Group A Streptococcus

ICD-10:

International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

PS:

Propensity score

References

  1. Hua C, Bosc R, Sbidian E, De Prost N, Hughes C, Jabre P et al (2018) Interventions for necrotizing soft tissue infections in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011680.pub2

  2. Madsen MB, Skrede S, Perner A, Arnell P, Nekludov M, Bruun T et al (2019) Patient’s characteristics and outcomes in necrotising soft-tissue infections: results from a Scandinavian, multicentre, prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med 45:1241–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05730-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Urbina T, Madsen MB, de Prost N (2020) Understanding necrotizing soft tissue infections in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 46:1739–1742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06071-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peetermans M, de Prost N, Eckmann C, Norrby-Teglund A, Skrede S, De Waele JJ (2020) Necrotizing skin and soft-tissue infections in the intensive care unit. Clin Microbiol Infect 26:8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stevens DL, Bryant AE (2017) Necrotizing soft-tissue infections. N Engl J Med 377:2253–2265. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1600673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaul R, McGeer A, Low DE, Green K, Schwartz B, Simor AE et al (1997) Population-based surveillance for group A streptococcal necrotiziug fasciitis: clinical features, prognostic indicators, and microbiologic analysis of seventy-seven cases. Am J Med 103:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00160-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stevens DL (2000) Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome associated with necrotizing fasciitis. Annu Rev Med 51:271–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Melissa Johnson (2021) Clindamycin: An overview. Up To Date. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/clindamycin-an-overview?search=clindamycin&source=search_result&selectedTitle=2~145&usage_type=default&display_rank=1. Accessed 13 October 2021

  9. Yan S, Bohach GA, Stevens DL (1994) Persistent acylation of high-molecular-weight penicillin-binding proteins by penicillin induces the postantibiotic effect in Streptococcus pyogmes. J Infect Dis 170:609–614. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/170.3.609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mascini EM, Jansze M, Schouls LM, Verhoef J, Van Dijk H (2001) Penicillin and clindamycin differentially inhibit the production of pyrogenic exotoxins A and B by group A streptococci. Int J Antimicrob Agents 18:395–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-8579(01)00413-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stevens DL, Bryant AE, Hackett SP (1995) Antibiotic effects on bacterial viability, toxin production, and host response. Clin Infect Dis 20:S154–S157. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/20.Supplement_2.S154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stevens DL, Yan S, Bryant AE (1993) Penicillin-binding protein expression at different growth stages determines penicillin efficacy in vitro and in vivo: an explanation for the inoculum effect. J Infect Dis 167:1401–1405. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/167.6.1401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gemmell CG, Peterson PK, Schmeling D, Kim Y, Mathews J, Wannamaker L et al (1981) Potentiation of opsonization and phagocytosis of Streptococcus pyogenes following growth in the presence of clindamycin. J Clin Invest 67:1249–1256. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI110152

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eagle H (1952) Experimental approach to the problem to treat ment failure with penicillin. Am J Med 175:389–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0954-6820.1964.tb04669.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Andreoni F, Zörcher C, Tarnutzer A, Schilcher K, Neff A, Keller N et al (2017) Clindamycin affects group a streptococcus virulence factors and improves clinical outcome. J Infect Dis 215:269–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zimbelman J, Palmer A, Todd J (1999) Improved outcome of clindamycin compared with beta-lactam antibiotic treatment for invasive Streptococcus pyogenes infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 18:1096–1100. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006454-199912000-00014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mulla ZD, Leaverton PE, Wiersma ST (2003) Invasive Group A Streptococcal Infections in Florida. South Med J 96:968–73. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.060241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Carapetis JR, Jacoby P, Carville K, Ang SJJ, Curtis N, Andrews R (2014) Effectiveness of clindamycin and intravenous immunoglobulin, and risk of disease in contacts, in invasive group a streptococcal infections. Clin Infect Dis 59:358–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Couture-Cossette A, Carignan A, Mercier A, Desruisseaux C, Valiquette L, Pépin J (2018) Secular trends in incidence of invasive betahemolytic streptococci and efficacy of adjunctive therapy in Quebec, Canada, 1996–2016. PLoS ONE 13:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Babiker A, Li X, Lai YL, Strich JR, Warner S, Sarzynski S et al (2021) Effectiveness of adjunctive clindamycin in β-lactam antibiotic-treated patients with invasive β-haemolytic streptococcal infections in US hospitals: a retrospective multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 3099:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30523-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP, Goldstein EJC, Gorbach SL et al (2014) Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2014:59. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yasunaga H (2019) Real World Data in Japan: Chapter II The Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database. Ann Clin Epidemiol 1:76–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lundgren RS, Kramer CB, Rivara FP, Wang J, Heimbach DM, Gibran NS et al (2009) Influence of comorbidities and age on outcome following burn injury in older adults. J Burn Care Res 30:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e318198a416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ono K, Wada K, Takahara T, Shirotani T (2007) Indications for computed tomography in patients with mild head injury. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 47:291–297. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.47.291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Suissa S (2008) Immortal time bias in pharmacoepidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 167:492–499. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Defining Adult Overwight and Obesity. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html. Accessed 21 Nov 2019

  27. Desai RJ, Franklin JM (2019) Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners. BMJ 367:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomas LE, Li F, Pencina MJ (2020) Overlap weighting: a propensity score method that mimics attributes of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 323:2417–2418. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.7819

  29. Austin PC (2009) Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med 28:3083–3107. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 46:399–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.568786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li F, Thomas LE (2019) Addressing extreme propensity scores via the overlap weights. Am J Epidemiol 188:250–257. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwy201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Minami M, Kamimura T, Isaka M, Tatsuno I, Ohta M, Hasegawa T (2010) Clindamycin-induced CovS-mediated regulation of the production of virulent exoproteins streptolysin O, NAD glycohydrolase, and streptokinase in Streptococcus pyogenes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:98–102. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00804-09

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Šmitran A, Vuković D, Opavski N, Gajić I, Marinković J, Božić L et al (2018) Influence of subinhibitory antibiotic concentration on streptococcus pyogenes adherence and biofilm production. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 65:229–240. https://doi.org/10.1556/030.65.2018.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (21AA2007 and 20AA2005) and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan (20H03907)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shoichiro Hamada.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The present study was approved by The University of Tokyo Institutional Review Board (approval number: 3501–1). Because the data are anonymous, the requirement for patient informed consent was waived.

Consent to participate

All authors directly participated in the planning, execution, or analysis of the study.

Consent for publication

The contents of this manuscript have not been copyrighted or published previously and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. All authors have read and approved the final version submitted.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 98 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOC 97 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamada, S., Nakajima, M., Kaszynski, R.H. et al. Association between adjunct clindamycin and in-hospital mortality in patients with necrotizing soft tissue infection due to group A Streptococcus: a nationwide cohort study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 41, 263–270 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04376-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04376-2

Keywords

Navigation