Skip to main content
Log in

Thiobacillus denitrificans immobilized biotrickling filter for NO2 removal

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) removal efficiency of a biotrikling filter was evaluated under different operating conditions. Activated alumina (AA) was used as the immobilization matrix for Thiobacillus denitrificans (T. denitrificans) in the biotrickling filter. Batch studies were conducted to find out the degradation kinetics of nitrate and nitrite for a concentration range of 600–10,000 mg/L expressed as nitrogen. Nitrite exhibited maximum degradation rate followed by nitrate. Electron acceptor in the form of NO2 gas showed least removal efficiency. Bio-kinetic parameters for T. denitrificans, by utilizing nitrate and nitrite as electron acceptors, were also evaluated. The μmax (Maximum specific growth rate) and YT (Yield coefficient) values for T. denitrificans in the presence of nitrate and nitrite were 1.03 h−1, 0.275 and 0.63 h−1, 0.1316 respectively. Column study was conducted to find the adsorption and desorption potential of activated alumina. The adsorbed NO2 from AA could easily be desorbed using distilled water with an efficiency of 76±0.8%. Once fed batch studies were conducted to evaluate the NO2 removal efficiency by a biotrickling filter. With an influent NO2 gas concentration of 2,735 ppm, the reactor could achieve a removal efficiency of 99% within 2 min from gas phase and within 96 h from the liquid phase, with an average biomass concentration of 200 mg/g of AA. The mechanism of NO2 gas removal in the biotrickling filter seems to be the dissolution of NO2 in water to form NO 3 , conversion of NO 3 to NO2 , and finally to N2 gas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Public Health Association (APHA) (1998) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn, New York

  • Apel WA, Turick CE (1993) The use of denitrifying bacteria for the removal of nitrogen oxides from combustion gases. Fuel 72:1715–1718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chagnot E, Taha S, Martin G, Vicard JF (1998) Treatment of nitrogen oxides on a percolating biofilter after pre-concentration on activated carbon. Proc Biochem 33:617–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou MS, Lin JH (2000) Biotrickling filtration of nitric oxide. J AWMA 50:502–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung YC, Huang C (1998) Biotreatment of ammonia in air by an immobilized Nnitrosomonas europaea biofilter. Environ Prog 17(2):70–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidova YB, Schroeder ED, Chang DPY (1997) Biofiltration of nitric oxides. In: Proceedings of the 90th annual meeting and exhibition of AWMA, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 8–13

  • Deshusses MA (1997) Transient behavior of biofilters : start-up, carbon balances and interactions between pollutants. J Environ Engg ASCE 563–568

    Google Scholar 

  • du Plessis CA, Kinney KA, Schroeder ED, Chang DPY, Scow KM (1998) Denitrification and nitric oxide reduction in an aerobic toluene-treating biofilter. Biotech BioEngg 58:408–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayens LC (1999) Control of hydrogen sulfide emissions associated with wastewater treatment plants. Pract Period Hazard Toxic Radioac Waste Manag 3(1):35–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbort D, Phipps PJ, Strange JE (1971) Chemical analysis of microbial cells. In: Norris JR, Ribbons DW (ed) Methods in microbiology, vol 5B. Academic, New York

  • IS:5182 (1975) Part-4: Nitrogen oxides. Indian standard methods for measurement of air pollution 3–6

  • Knippschild, Rehm HJ (1995) Degradation of 2-Chloroethanol by free and immobilized Pseudomonas putida US2. Appl Microb Biotechnol 44:253–258

  • Leson G, Winer AM (1991) Biofiltration: an innovative air contamination control technology for voc emission. J Air Waste Manag 41:1045–1054

    Google Scholar 

  • NAPCA (1970) Control techniques for nitrogen oxides from stationary sources. AP-67, Washington, DC

  • Ottengraf SPP, Van Den Over AHC (1983) Kinetics of organic compound removal from waste gases with a biological filter. Biotech Bioengg 25:3089–3102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philip L, Iyengar L, Venkobachar C (1993) Evaluation of sodium alginate as an immobilizing medium for copper removal by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on heavy metals, Toronto, Canada

  • Philip L, Iyengar L, Venkobachar C (1996) Immobilized microbial reactor for heavy metal pollution control. Int J Environ Pollut 6:277–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Philoip L, Venkobachar C (2001) An insight into the mechanism of biosorption of copper by Bacillus polymyxa. Int J Environ Pollut 15(4):448–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanmugasundaram RL, Chen M, Sublette KL (1993) Reduction of nitric oxide by denitrifying bacteria. Appl Biochem Biotech 39:727–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwaree RS, Cho KS, Hirai M, Shoda M (1992) Biological deodorization of dimethyl sulfide using different fabrics as the carriers of microorganisms. Appl Biochem Biotech 32:135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wark K, Warner CF (1981) Air pollution its origin and control. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilli M, Converti A, Lodi A, Del Borghi M, Ferraiolo G (1993) Phenol removal from waste gases with a biological filter by Pseudomonas putida. Biotech Bioengg 41(7):693–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ligy Philip.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krishna, N.D.V.N.S.M., Philip, L. Thiobacillus denitrificans immobilized biotrickling filter for NO2 removal. Clean Techn Environ Policy 7, 285–293 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-005-0003-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-005-0003-x

Keywords

Navigation