Abstract
A membrane-integrated continuous system was designed with new orientation of the membrane modules and investigated for treatment of industrial wastewater using forward osmosis (FO) in the upstream and nanofiltration in the recovery stage. Effects of applied pressure, cross-flow rate of feed water, variations of draw solution concentration and the run time on effectiveness of the system in separation and yield of pure water flux were studied in a continuous scheme in the context of pharmaceutical wastewater being a very complex system. Polyamide composite membranes out of a given lot were screened for application in FO and draw solute recovery stages. Two draw solutions in different concentrations (made of NaCl and MgSO4) were examined, where 0.5 M NaCl was found to be the best one for the FO stage. During investigation with pharmaceutical wastewater, more than 97 % purification could be achieved in terms of chemical oxygen demand while analysis of specific compounds such as Nebivolol and Paracetamol indicated almost 100 % removal. The study revealed that the new design could significantly reduce concentration polarization and reverse salt diffusion resulting in a sustained yield of pure water flux of around 52 L/m2h using NaCl as draw solute. Downstream nanofiltration module operated at only 12 bar trans-membrane pressure ensured continuous recovery and recycle of 99 % of the draw solute while producing safe reusable water at the rate of 58–60 L/m2h. The study culminates not only in a new design for a clean water environment but also in definite policy suggestions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achilli A, Cath TY, Childress AE (2010) Selection of inorganic based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications. J Membr Sci 364(1–2):233–241
APHA (1995) Standard methods, 19th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
Altun ML (2002) HPLC method for the analysis of paracetamol, caffeine and dipyrone. Turk J Chem 26:521–528
Bamaga OA, Yokochia A, Zabarab B, Babaqi AS (2011) Hybrid FO/RO desalination system: preliminary assessment of osmotic energy recovery and designs of new FO membrane module configurations. Desalination 268:163–169
Boleda MR, Galceran MT, Ventura F (2009) Monitoring opiates, cannabinoids and their metabolites in wastewater, surface water and finished water in Catalonia, Spain. Water Res 43:1126–1136
Cath TY, Childress AE, Elimelech M (2006) Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J Membr Sci 281(1–2):70–87
Chakrabortty S, Roy M, Pal P (2013) Removal of fluoride from contaminated groundwater by cross flow nanofiltration: transport modeling and economic evaluation. Desalination 313:115–124
Choi Y, Choi J, Oh H, Lee S, Yang DR, Kim JH (2009) Toward a combined system of forward osmosis and reverse osmosis for seawater desalination. Desalination 247:239–246
Cornelissen ER, Harmsen D, Korte KF, Ruiken CJ, Qin JJ, Oo H, Wessels LP (2008) Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge. J Membr Sci 319(1–2):158–168
Fernández C, González-Doncel M, Pro J, Carbonell G, Tarazona JV (2010) Occurrence of pharmaceutically active compounds in surface waters of the Henares–Jarama–Tajo River system (Madrid, Spain) and a potential risk characterization. Sci Total Environ 408:543–551
Gao P, Ding Y, Li H, Xagoraki I (2012) Occurrence of pharmaceuticals in municipal wastewater treatment plant: mass balance and removal processes. Chemosphere 88:17–24
Gebhardt W, Schroder HF (2007) Liquid chromatography–(tandem) mass spectrometry for the follow-up of the elimination of persistent pharmaceuticals during wastewater treatment applying biological wastewater treatment and advanced oxidation. J Chromatogr A 1160:34–43
Gilron J (2014) Water-energy nexus: matching sources and uses. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(8):1471–1479
Janalizadeh H, KhoshgoftarManesh MH, Amidpour M (2015) Exergoeconomicand exergoenvironmental evaluation of integration of desalinations with a total site utility system. Clean Techn Environ Policy 17(1):103–117
Jin X, Shan J, Wang C, Wei J, Tang CY (2012) Rejection of pharmaceuticals by forward osmosis membranes. J Hazard Mater 227–228:55–61
Kosutic K, Dolar D, Asperger D, Kunst B (2007) Removal of antibiotics from a model wastewater by RO/NF membranes. Sep Sci Technol 53:244–249
Kumar R, Pal P (2012) Response surface-optimized Fenton’s pre-treatment for chemical precipitation of struvite and recycling of water through downstream nanofiltration. Chem Eng J 210:33–44
Kumar R, Pal P (2013a) A membrane-integrated advanced scheme for treatment of industrial wastewater: dynamic modelling towards scale up. Chemosphere 92:1375–1382
Kumar R, Pal P (2013b) Membrane-integrated hybrid bioremediation of industrial wastewater: a continuous treatment and recycling approach. Desalin Water Reuse 1(3):26–38
Kumar R, Pal P (2013c) Removal of phenol from coke-oven wastewater by cross-flow nanofiltration membranes. Water Environ Res 85:447–455
Kumar R, Pal P (2013d) Turning hazardous waste into value-added products: production and characterization of struvite from ammoniacal waste with new approaches. J Clean Prod 43:59–70
Kumar A, Xagoraraki I (2010) Human health risk assessment of pharmaceuticals in water: an uncertainty analysis for meprobamate, carbamazepine and phenytoin. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 57(2–3):146–156
Kumar R, Bhakta P, Chakraborty S, Pal P (2011) Separating cyanide from coke wastewater by cross flow nanofiltration. Sep Sci Technol 46:2119–2127
Liu P, Zhang H, Feng Y, Yang F, Zhang J (2014) Removal of trace antibiotics from wastewater: a systematic study of nanofiltration combined with ozone-based advanced oxidation processes. Chem Eng J 240:211–220
Lutchmiah K, Verliefde ARD, Roest K, Rietveld LC, Cornelissen ER (2014) Forward osmosis for application in wastewater treatment: a review. Water Res 58:179–197
McCutcheon JR, Elimelech M (2006) Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behaviour in forward osmosis. J Membr Sci 284:237–247
Nasr P, Sewilam H (2015a) Forward osmosis: an alternative sustainable technology and potential applications in water industry. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-015-0927-8
Nasr P, Sewilam H (2015b) The potential of groundwater desalination using forward osmosis for irrigation in Egypt. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-015-0902-4
Pal P, Kumar R (2014) Treatment of coke wastewater: a critical review for evolving a sustainable management strategy. Sep Purif Rev 43:89–123
Pal P, Chakraborty S, Roy M (2012) Arsenic separation by a membrane-integrated hybrid treatment system: modeling, simulation and techno-economic evaluation. Sep Sci Technol 47(8):1091–1101
Pal P, Chakrabortty S, Linnanen L (2014a) A nanofiltration–coagulation integrated system for separation and stabilization of arsenic from groundwater. Sci Total Environ 476–477:601–610
Pal P, Bhakta P, Kumar R (2014b) Cyanide removal from industrial wastewater by cross-flow nanofiltration: transport modeling and economic evaluation. Water Environ Res 86(8):698–709
Roy M, Chakrabortty S (2014) Developing a sustainable water resource management strategy for a fluoride-affected area: a contingent valuation approach. J Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(2):341–349
SantAnna V, Damasceno L, Marczak F, Isabel CT (2012) Membrane concentration of liquid foods by forward osmosis: process and quality view. J Food Eng 111:483–489
Satyamoorthy S, Andrew C (2013) Assessment of quantitative structural property relationship for prediction of pharmaceutical sorption during biological wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 92:639–646
Shukla SK (2015) Membrane filtration of chlorination and extraction stage bleach plant effluent in Indian paper Industry. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15(2):235–243
Stackelberg PE, Gibs J, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, Zaugg SD, Lippincott R (2007) Efficiency of conventional drinking-water-treatment processes in removal of pharmaceuticals and other organic compounds. Sci Total Environ 377:255–272
Tang W, Ng HY (2008) Concentration of brine by forward osmosis: performance and influence of membrane structure. Desalination 224:143–153
Wang KY, Ong RC, Chung TS (2010) Double–skinned forward osmosis membranes for reducing internal concentration polarization within the porous sublayer. Indus Eng Chem Res 49:4824–4831
Xie M, Price WE, Nghiem LD (2012) Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds by forward osmosis: role of solution pH and membrane orientation. Sep Purif Technol 93:107–114
Yang Q, Wang KY, Chung TS (2009) A novel dual-layer forward osmosis membrane for protein enrichment and concentration. Sep Sci Technol 69:269–274
Zupanc M, Kosjek T, Petkovšek M, Dular M, Kompare B, Širok B, Blazeka Z (2013) Ester Heath, removal of pharmaceuticals from wastewater by biological processes, hydrodynamic cavitation and UV treatment. Ultrason Sonochem 20:1104–1112
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the Department of Science and Technology,Government of India for financial support under the DST-FIST program in developing the research infrastructure.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thakura, R., Chakrabortty, S. & Pal, P. Treating complex industrial wastewater in a new membrane-integrated closed loop system for recovery and reuse. Clean Techn Environ Policy 17, 2299–2310 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0971-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0971-4