Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Do the coupling effects of environmental regulation and R&D subsidies work in the development of green innovation? Empirical evidence from China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global environmental problems will require the development of new technologies. How will green technology-related public policy affect this process? By exploiting an economic assessing model of green technical innovation efficiency, this paper examines the impact of two different environmental policies (environmental regulation and government subsidy) and their interaction on green technical innovation. The analysis was conducted by collecting innovation-related data on 30 provinces in China over the period 2006–2016. It was found that there are dramatic regional differences in green innovation efficiency in China. The average efficiency in the eastern region is about 0.8, followed by the western region, the central region and the north-eastern region, with 0.4, 0.2 and 0.2, respectively. During the sample period, there was a statistically significant effect of the coupling of the two policy instruments on the innovative efficiency of green technology of China, which is − 0.01. Regulatory policies have a remarkable incentive influence on the performance of green innovation in the central region (0.5) but a restraining effect on the eastern region (− 0.9). R&D subsidies play an essential role in inducing green technology only in the central region (0.2). The paper concludes that both regulative policy and governmental subsidies have failed to achieve the goal of promoting green innovation development in China.

Graphic abstract

These two figures show the average regional efficiency of the two types of innovation with or without environment-related factors using innovation-related data on a panel of 30 provinces in China over the period 2006–2016.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion P, Akcigit U, Deaton A, Roulet A (2016) Creative destruction and subjective well-being. Am Econ Rev 106(12):3869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai W, Zhou X (2017) Dual effects of China’s environmental regulation on green total factor productivity. Economist 9:27–35 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Calel R (2018) Adopt or innovate: understanding technological responses to cap-and-trade. CESifo working paper 6847

  • Calel R, Dechezleprêtre A (2016) Environmental policy and directed technological change: evidence from the European carbon market. Rev Econ Stat 98:173–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canter U, Graf H, Herrmann J, Kalthaus M (2016) Inventor networks in renewable energies: the influence of the policy mix in Germany. Res Policy 45:1164–1184

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW (1962) On some works of Kantorovich, Koopmans and others. Manag Sci 8(3):246–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S (2010) Win win in energy saving and emission reduction and China’s industry. Econ Study 3(3):41–55 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen XH, Zeng XY, Wang F (2016) The impact of carbon trading price on carbon emissions in supply chain under carbon cap trading mechanism. Syst Eng Theory Pract 36(10):2562–2571 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole M, Elliott R, Okubo T (2010) Trade, environmental regulations and industrial mobility: an indutry-level study for Japan. Ecol Econ 69(10):1995–2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan Q, Zhang T (2018) Research on environmental regulation policy and pollution control mechanism in China’s economic growth path. World Econ 8:170–191 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco C, Marin G (2017) The effect of within-sector, upstream and downstream environmental taxes on innovation and productivity. Environ Resour Econ 66:261–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao XW, Yan HB (2018) Comparison of subsidies policies for new energy industry: R&D subsidies, production subsidies or consumption subsidies. Popul Resour Environ 214(06):33–43 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Pontoglio S (2011) The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments—a typical case of the blind men and elephant. Ecol Econ 72(1):28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw JO, Mody A (1996) Innovation and the international diffusion of environmental responsive technology. Res Policy 25(4):549–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Cao W (2017) The impact of environmental regulation on the performance of circular economy in China: from the perspective of ecological innovation. Soft Sci China 6:140–154 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Lin B (2016) Impact of energy conservation policies on the green productivity in China’s manufacturing sector: evidence from a three-stage DEA model. Appl Energy 168:351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pakes A, Griliches Z (1984) Patents and R&D at the firm level: a first report. Econ Lett 5(4):377–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer K, Oates WE, Portney PR (1995) Tightening environmental standards. The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? J Econ Perspect 9(4):112–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavel C, Chirantan C (2017) Does environmental regulation indirectly induce upstream innovation? New evidence from India. Res Policy 46:939–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren SM, Zhang J (2013) Subsidies, rent-seeking costs and additional rates: an empirical study of China’s equipment manufacturing enterprises. J Manag World 10:118–129 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao M, Bao Q (2012) Government subsidies and enterprise productivity: an empirical analysis based on China’s industrial enterprises. China’s Ind Econ 7:70–82 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Lu Y, Wang T (2007) Spatial discrepancy in patent-based innovation of environmental technologies. Chin J Environ Eng 3:123–129 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tone KA (2001) Slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130:498–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Shen N (2016) Environmental regulation and environmental productivity: the case of China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 62:758–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Sun X (2017) The mechanism of government subsidies driving industrial transformation and upgrading. China’s Ind Econ 10:99–117 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Wu Y, Yan P (2010) Environmental efficiency and environmental total factor productivity growth in China’s regional economies. Econ Res J 5:96–110 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Hu J (2018) Environmental regulation, industrial structure adjustment and green economic growth: an empirical test based on China’s provincial panel data. Explor Econ Issues 3:7–17 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu SC, Zhang WW (2016) Effects of carbon tax on China’s economy and emission reduction under different return scenarios—a simulation analysis based on dynamic CGE. Popul Resour Environ China 26(12):46–54 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan F, Su L, Qiao J (2011) Investigation on the relationship between industrial agglomeration development and environmental pollution. Sci Res 1:79–83 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C (2011) Environmental regulation on China’s industrial technical innovation. Econ Manag 46:113–124 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Yang F (2009) International practice and enlightenment of carbon tax. Tax Res 4:88–90 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Pu Y, Chen S, Fang F (2015) Government support and new industrial development: taking new energy as an example. Econ Res J 6:147–161 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge support from Prof. Qian Yu and Dr. Haoqiang Wu for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper, as well as seminar participants at Wuhan University of Technology during the initial writing of this paper. And our special thanks to Mr. Rui Lin for his company and assisting in collecting panel data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, China

    Sumin Hu & Shulin Liu

Authors
  1. Sumin Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shulin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumin Hu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, S., Liu, S. Do the coupling effects of environmental regulation and R&D subsidies work in the development of green innovation? Empirical evidence from China. Clean Techn Environ Policy 21, 1739–1749 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01745-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01745-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation