Abstract
The air traffic management system in the USA is an example of a distributed problem-solving system. It has elements of both cooperative and competitive problem-solving. It includes complex organizations such as Flight Operations Centers, the FAA Air Traffic Control Systems Command Center (ATCSCC), and traffic management units at en route centers that focus on daily strategic planning, as well as individuals concerned more with immediate tactical decisions (such as air traffic controllers and pilots). The design of this system has evolved over time to rely heavily on the distribution of tasks and control authority in order to keep cognitive complexity manageable for any one individual operator, and to provide redundancy (both human and technological) to serve as a safety net to catch the slips or mistakes that any one person or entity might make. Within this distributed architecture, a number of different conceptual approaches have been applied to deal with cognitive complexity and to provide redundancy. These approaches can be characterized in terms of the strategy for distributing: (1) control or responsibility, (2) knowledge or expertise, (3) access to data, (4) processing capacity, and (5) goals and priorities. This paper will provide an abstract characterization of these alternative strategies for distributing work in terms of these 5 dimensions, and will illustrate and evaluate their effectiveness in terms of concrete realizations found within the National Airspace System.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baecker R, Grudin J, Buxton W, Greenberg S (1995) Readings in groupware and computer-supported cooperative work: assisting human–human collaboration. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco
Beach LR, Connolly T (2005) The psychology of decision making: people in organizations, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Billings C (1997) Aviation automation: the search for a human-centered approach. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
Bittner K (2002) Use case modeling. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Harlow, UK
Bowers C, Salas E, Jentsch F (eds) (2006) Creating high-tech teams: practical guidance on work performance and technology. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
Caldwell B (2005) Multi-team dynamics and distributed expertise in mission operations. Aviat Space Environ Med 76(6):145–153
Carroll JM (1995) Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development. Wiley, New York
Cockburn A (2000) Writing effective use cases. Addison-Wesley, Harlow, England
Dechter R (2003) Constraint Processing. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA
Diaper D, Stanton N (eds) (2004) The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
Durfee EH, Lesser VR, Corkill DD (1989) Trends in cooperative distributed problem-solving. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 1:63–83
Endsley M (2003) Designing for situation awareness. Taylor and Francis, London
Endsley M, Garland D (2000) Situation awareness: analysis and measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
Erkens G, Andriessen J, Peters N (2003) Interaction and performance in computer-supported collaborative tasks. In: Van Oostendorp H (ed) Cognition in a digital world. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 225–251
Fleishman EA, Zacarro SJ (1992) Toward a taxonomy of team performance functions. In: Swezey RW, Salas E (eds) Teams: their training and performance. Ablex, Norwood, NJ
Griffith TL, Sawyer JE, Neale MA, (2003) Virtualness and knowledge in teams: managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals and information technology. MIS Quart 27:265–287
Hertel G, Geister S, Konradt U (2005) Managing virtual teams: a review of current empirical research. Hum Resour Manage Rev 15(1):69–95
Hinds P, Kiesler S (eds) (2002) Distributed work. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Hopkin VD (1995) Human factors in air traffic control. Taylor-Francis, New York
Kerns K, Smith PJ, McCoy CE, Orasanu J (1999) Ergonomic issues in air traffic management. In: Marras W, Karwowski W (eds) Handbook of industrial ergonomics. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 1979–2003
Kulak D, Guiney E (2003) Use cases: requirements in context, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Harlow, UK
Lacher A, Klein G (1993) Air carrier operations and collaborative decision-making study, MTR 93W0000244. The MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA
Obradovich JH, Smith PJ, Denning R, Chapman R, Billings C, McCoy E, Woods D (1998) Cooperative problem-solving challenges for the movement of aircraft on the ground. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd annual meeting, Chicago IL. pp 57–61
Orasanu J (1991) Shared problem models and flight crew performance. In: Johnson N, McDonald N, Fuller N (eds) Aviation psychology in practice. Brookfield, Avebury, VT, pp 255–285
Orasanu J, Salas E (1993) Team decision-making in complex environments. In: Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE (eds) Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex, Norwood, NJ
Rasmussen J, Brehmen B, Leplat J (eds) (1991) Distributed decision making: cognitive models for cooperative work. Wiley, Chichester, UK
Robertson S, Zachery W, Black J (eds) (1990) Cognition, computing and cooperation. Ablex, Norwood, NJ
Salas E, Fiore S (eds) (2004) Team cognition: understanding the factors that drive process and performance. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
Schroeder R, Axelsson A-S (eds) (2005) Work and planning in shared virtual environments: computer supported cooperative work. Springer, New York
Smith PJ, Beatty R, Spencer A, Billings C (2003) Dealing with the challenges of distributed planning in a stochastic environment: coordinated contingency planning. In: Proceedings of the 2003 annual conference on digital avionics systems, Chicago
Smith PJ, Geddes N (2003) A cognitive systems engineering approach to the design of decision support systems. In: Sears A, Jacko J (eds) Handbook of human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 656–675
Smith PJ, Geddes N, Beatty R (2007) Human-centered design of decision support systems. In: Sears A, Jacko J (eds) Handbook of human-computer interaction, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
Smith PJ, Klopfenstein M, Jezerinac J, Spencer A (2005) Distributed work in the National Airspace System: providing feedback loops using the post-operations evaluation tool (POET). In: Kirwan B, Rodgers M, Schaefer D (eds) Human factors impacts in air traffic management. Ashgate, Hampshire, UK, pp 127–152
Smith PJ, McCoy E, Denning R, Obradovich JH (1997c) Cooperative problem-solving in the air traffic management system.In: Proceedings of the 1997 annual meeting of the IEEE Society for Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp 3137–3141
Smith PJ, McCoy E, Layton C (1997a) Brittleness in the design of cooperative problem-solving systems: the effects on user performance. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 27:360–371
Smith PJ, McCoy E, Orasanu J (2000) Distributed cooperative problem-solving in the air traffic management system. In: Klein G, Salas E (eds) Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 369–384
Smith PJ, McCoy CE, Orasanu J, Billings C, Denning R, Rodvold M, Gee T, Van Horn A (1997b) Control by permission: a case study of cooperative problem-solving in the interactions of airline dispatchers with ATCSCC. Air Traffic Control Q 4:229–247
Wambsganss MC (1997) Collaborative traffic flow management. Metron, Washington, DC
Wickens C, Mavor A, McGee J (1997) Flight to the future: human factors in air traffic control. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, P.J., Spencer, A.L. & Billings, C.E. Strategies for designing distributed systems: case studies in the design of an air traffic management system. Cogn Tech Work 9, 39–49 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-006-0056-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-006-0056-6