Skip to main content
Log in

Neuronavigation and complication rate in epilepsy surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of neuronavigation for complications in temporal lobe epilepsy surgery was evaluated. Thirty-seven patients operated on with neuronavigation (group N: 38 operations; mean age 33.9 years; etiology: cryptogenetic 31, symptomatic 7; lateralization: 22 right, 16 left) and 22 patients operated on without neuronavigation (group NN: 23 operations; mean age 29.7 years; etiology: cryptogenetic 9, symptomatic 14; lateralization: 13 right; 10 left) were analyzed. The minimal follow-up time was 2 years. There was a clear difference in the number of complications (N 7.9%; NN 21.7%), which consisted of hemiparesis (N: 1; NN: 2), cranial nerve palsy (N: 1; NN: 2), aphasia (N: 1; NN: 0), and postoperative infection (N: 0; NN: 1). In addition, there was a reduced need for temporal re-resection after intraoperative electrocorticography (N 30.6%; NN 47.1%). Operation time (N: 239±9.4 min; NN: 208±12.1 min), duration of postoperative in-hospital and in-ICU stay [N: 16.9±1.1 days (1.0±0.0 days); NN: 17.2±2.8 days (1.1±0.1 days)], extension of temporal lobe resection from polar (N: 41.2±1.5 cm; NN: 42.9±3.9 cm), and postoperative seizure frequency reduction (N 90.4%; NN 94.7%) were not different. Because of the trend towards a reduction of complications and re-resections after electrocorticography, the authors recommend neuronavigation despite its higher costs as an additional tool in epilepsy surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beckung E, Uvebrant P, Hedström A, Rydenhag B (1994) The effects of epilepsy surgery on the sensorimotor function of children. Dev Med Child Neurol 36:893–901

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chabrerie A, Ozlen F, Nakajima S, Leventon ME, Arsumi H, Grimson E, Keeve E, Helmers S, Riviello Jr J, Holmes G, Duffy F, Joles F, Kikinis R, Black PM (1997) Three-dimensional reconstruction ad surgical navigation in pediatric epilepsy surgery. Pediatr Neurosurg 27:304–310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Golfinos JG, Fitzpatrick BC, Smith LR, Spetzler RF (1995) Clinical use of a frameless stereotactic arm: results of 325 cases. J Neurosurg 83:197–205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grunert P, Müller-Forell W, Darabi K, Reisch R, Busert C, Hopf N, Perneczky A (1998) Basic principles and clinical applications of neuronavigation and intraoperative computed tomography. Comput Aided Surg 3:166–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. International League Against Epilepsy (1997) A global survey on epilepsy surgery, 1980–1990: a report by the Commission on Neurosurgery of Epilepsy, the International League Against Epilepsy. Epilepsia 38:249–255

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Malmgren K, Sullivan M, Edstedt G, Kullberg G, Kumlien E (1997) Health-related quality of life after epilepsy surgery: a Swedish multicenter study. Epilepsia 38:830–838

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McCallum J (1997) Combined frameless stereotaxy and neuroendoscopy in placement of intracranial shunt catheters. Pediatr Neurosurg 26:127–129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oertel J, Gaab MR, Runge U, Piek J (2002) Epilepsy surgery with the waterjet dissector (in German). Z Epileptol 15:54 (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Piek J, Oertel J, Gaab MR (2002) Waterjet dissection in neurosurgical procedures: clinical results in 35 patients. J Neurosurg 96:690–696

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Silander H, Blom S, Malmgren K, Rosen I, Uvebrant P (1997) Surgical treatment for epilepsy: a retrospective Swedish multicenter study. Acta Neurol Scand 95:321–330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sipos EP, Tebo SA, Zinreich SJ, Long DM, Brem H (1996) In vivo accuracy testing and clinical experience with the ISG viewing wand. Neurosurgery 39:194–204

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Roost D, Schaller C, Meyer B, Schramm J (1997) Can neuronavigation contribute to standardization of selective amygdalohippocampectomy? Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 69:239–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wagner W, Tschiltschke W, Niendorf WR, Schroeder HWS, Gaab MR (1997) Infrared-based neuronavigation and cortical motor stimulation in the management of central-region tumors. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 68:112–116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wagner W, Gaab MR, Schroeder HWS, Sehl U, Tschiltschke W (1999) Experiences with cranial neuronavigation in pediatric neurosurgery. Pediatr Neurosurg 119:231–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wagner W, Gaab MR, Schroeder HWS, Tschiltschke W (2000) Cranial neuronavigation in neurosurgery: assessment of usefulness in relation to type and site of pathology in 284 patients. Minim Invas Neurosurg 43:124–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Watanabe E, Watanabe T, Manaka S, Mayanagi Y, Takakura K (1987) Three-dimensional digitizer (Neuronavigator): new equipment for CT-guided stereotaxic surgery. Surg Neurol 27:543–547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Watanabe E, Mayanagi Y, Kosugi Y, Manaka S, Takakura K (1991) Open surgery assisted by the neuronavigator, a stereotactic, articulated, sensitive arm. Neurosurgery 28:792–800

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wirtz CR, Knauth M, Hassfeld S, Tronnier VM, Albert FK, Bonsanto MM, Kunze S (1998) Neuronavigation—first experiences with three different commercially available systems. Zentralbl Neurochir 59:14–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wurm G, Wies W, Schnizer M, Trenkler J, Holl K (2000) Advanced surgical approach for selective amygdalohippocampectomy through neuronavigation. Neurosurgery 46:1377–1382

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the expert support of Mrs. Ilgert and Mrs. Janke with preparation of the figures.The authors are also in debt to the technicians of the epilepsy unit for continuous help with data acquisition. The authors state that they do not have any financial interest in the device under discussion in the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Oertel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oertel, J., Gaab, M.R., Runge, U. et al. Neuronavigation and complication rate in epilepsy surgery. Neurosurg Rev 27, 214–217 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-004-0324-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-004-0324-y

Keywords

Navigation