Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lime Treatment of Mine Drainage at the Sarcheshmeh Porphyry Copper Mine, Iran

  • Technical Communication
  • Published:
Mine Water and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laboratory and field treatment tests were performed to evaluate the effectiveness of lime treatment for mitigation of environmental effects of acid mine drainage (AMD) at the Sarcheshmeh porphyry copper mine. AMD associated with the rock waste dumps is contaminated with Al (>36,215 μg/L), Cd (>105 μg/L), Co (>522 μg/L), Cu (>53,250 μg/L), Mn (>42,365 μg/L), Ni (>629 μg/L), and Zn (>12,470 μg/L). The concentrations of other metals (Fe, Mo, Pb, and Se) are low or below detection limits (As, Cr, and Sb). Due to the very high Al and Mn content and the low concentration of Fe, a two-stage lime treatment method was chosen for the laboratory tests. In the first stage, the AMD was treated at four pH set points: 7.5, 8.9, 9, and 10. In the second stage, after removing the sludge at pH 9, treatment was continued at pH 10 and 11. The results indicated that a two-stage treatment method was not necessary because elements such as Al, Cu, Co, and Zn were easily treated at pH 7.5, while complete removal of Cd, Mn, and Ni only required a pH of 10. Increasing pH during the treatment process only caused a slight increase in Al. Field treatment tests support the laboratory results. Lime treatment of highly contaminated AMD from dump 11, using simple low density sludge pilot scale equipment, show that contaminant metals are treatable using this method. The mean treatment efficiency for contaminant metals was 99.4% for Al, % for Cd, 99.6% for Co, 99.7% for Cu, 98.5% for Mn, 99.7% for Ni, 99% for U, and 99.5% for Zn. The optimum pH for AMD treatment by lime was in the range of 9–10. The produced sludge in the treatment process was highly enriched in the contaminant metals, especially Cu (>7.34%), Al (>4.76%), Mn (>2.94%), and Zn (>1.25%). A correlation coefficient matrix indicates that the distribution pattern of the contaminant metals between soluble and precipitated phases is consistent with the hydrochemical behavior of the metals during the lime treatment process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Akcil A, Koldas S (2006) Acid mine drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies. J Clean Prod 14:1139–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1973) Exploration for ore deposits in Kerman Region. Geological Survey of Iran, Report Yu-53, Tehran, Iran

  • Atapour H, Aftabi A (2007) The geochemistry of gossans associated with Sarcheshmeh porphyry copper deposit, Rafsanjan, Kerman, Iran: implications for exploration and the environment. J Geochem Explor 93:47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubé BP, Zinck J, Eng M (2003) Lime treatment of acid mine drainage in Canada. In: Proceedings of Brazil-Canada Seminar on Mine Rehabilitation, Florianópolis, Brazil

  • Banks D, Younger PL, Arnesen RT, Lversen ER, Banks SB (1997) Mine water chemistry: the good, the bad and the ugly. Environ Geol 32(3):157–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazin D, Hubner H (1969) La region cuprifere a gisements porphyry de Kerman (Iran). Miner Deposita 74:200–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello C (2003) Acid mine drainage: innovative treatment technologies. US environmental protection agency, office of solid waste and emergency response, technology innovation office, Washington, DC, USA. http://clu-in.org/download/studentpapers/costello_amd.pdf

  • Cotton FA, Wilkinson G (1988) Advance inorganic chemistry, 5th edit. Wiley-Interscience, New York City

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulton R, Bullen C (2003) The design and optimization of active mine water treatment plants. Land Contam Reclam 11:273–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cravotta CA III, Kirby CS (2004) Effects of abandoned coal-mine drainage on streamflow and water quality in the Shamokin Creek Basin, Northumberland and Columbia Counties, Pennsylvania. US Geological Survey WRI 03-4311, Denver, CO, USA

  • Cravotta CA III, Brady KBC, Rose AW, Douds JB (1999) Frequency distribution of the pH of coal-mine drainage in Pennsylvania. In: Morganwalp DW, Buxton H (eds) US Geological Survey WRI 99-4018A, Denver, CO, USA, pp 313–324

  • Dimitrijevic MD (1973) Geology of Kerman region. Institute for geological and mining exploration and investigation of nuclear and other mineral raw material, Beograd, Yugoslavia, Iran Geol. Survey Rept Yu/52, Tehran, Iran

  • Ehrlich HL (1990) Geomicrobiology. 2nd edit. Marcel Dekker, New York City

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder JF (1988) Metal biogeochemistry in surface-water systems—a review of principles and concepts. US Geological Survey Circular 1013, Denver, CO, USA

  • Environment Australia (1997) Managing sulphidic mine wastes and acid drainage. Best Practices, Environmental Management in Mining, Commonwealth of Australia, May 1997, 81 pp

  • Etminan E (1977) Le porphyre cuprifere de Sarcheshmeh (Iran): Role des phases fluides dans les mechanismes d’alteration et de mineralization. Annales de l’Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Géologi, Sciences de la Terre

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichlin WH, Plumlee GS, Smith KS, McHugh JB (1992) Geochemical classification of mine drainage and natural drainage in mineralized areas. In: Kharaka YK, Maest AS, (eds) Proceedings of 7th international symposium on water-rock interaction, Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, pp 381–384

  • Fiset JM, Zinck JM, Laflamme G (2003) Mine sludge stability/densification in cold climates: sludge characterization and sludge densification. MERG Report. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster AL, Brown JG, Tingle TN, Parks GA (1998) Quantitative arsenic speciation in mine tailings using X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Amer Mineral 83:553–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammons CH, Metesh JJ, Duaime TE (2005) An overview of the mining history and geology of Butte, Montana. Mine Water Environ 25:70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedin RS, Nairn RW, Kleinmann RLP (1994) Passive Treatment of Coal Mine Drainage. USBM IC 9389. US Department of the Interior, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hezarkhani H (2006) Hydrothermal evolution of the Sar-Cheshmeh porphyry Cu–Mo deposit, Iran: evidence from fluid inclusions. J Asian Earth Sci 28:409–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilson G, Murck B (2001) Progress toward pollution prevention and waste minimization in the North American gold mining industry. J Clean Prod 9:405–4015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby CS, Cravotta CA (2005) Net alkalinity and net acidity 2: practical considerations. Appl Geochem 20:1941–1964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuyucak N (1995) Discussion: effect of pH on metal solubilization from sewage sludge. Can J Civil Eng 22:838–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuyucak N (2000) Microorganism, biotechnology and acid rock drainage. In: Proceedings of international minerals and metallurgical processing, special technology review paper

  • Kuyucak N (2006) Selecting suitable methods for treating mining effluents. Prepared for PerCan Mine Closure Course, Lima, Peru. http://www.minem.gob.pe/minem/archivos/file/dgaam/publicaciones/curso_cierreminas/02_T%C3%A9cnico/10_Tratamiento%20de%20Aguas/TecTratAgu-L1_AMD%20treatment%20options.pdf

  • Kuyucak N, Payant S (1996) Enhanced lime neutralization methods for improving sludge density and final effluent quality. In: Proceedings of mineral and metallurgical industries, CIM Conf, Vancouver, BC, Canada

  • Kuyucak N, Lindvall M, Sundqvist T, Sturk H (2001) Implementation of a high density sludge “HDS” treatment process at the Kristineberg mine site. http://www.boliden.com/www/bolidense.nsf/(LookupWebAttachment)/Library%20Lectures/$file/HDS_Treatment_Kristineberg.pdf

  • Lapakko KA (2002) Metal mine rock and waste characterization tools: an overview, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. http://www.pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G00559.pdf

  • Levinson AA (1980) Introduction to exploration geochemistry. Applied Publ Ltd, Wilmette IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel FMM, Hering JG (1993) Principles and applications of aquatic chemistry. Wiley, New York City

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickel EH, Glover JE, Groves DI, Smith RE (eds) (1979) Gossan mineralogy and geochemistry viewed in the context of solution chemistry. Pathfinder and Multi-element Geochemistry in Mineral Exploration, Univ of Western Australia publ 4, pp 1–13

  • Nordstrom DK, Alpers CN (1999) Geochemistry of acid mine waters. The Environmental geochemistry of mineral deposits. part a: processes, techniques, and health issues, vol 6A, ch 4, Rev in Economic Geology, Soc of Economic Geologists, Chelsea, MI, USA, pp 133–160

  • Payette C, Lam WW, Mikula RJ (1991) Evaluation of improved lime neutralization processes: part 2. sludge characterization. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on the abatement of acidic drainage (ICARD), Montreal, Canada, CANMET, Ottawa, Canada, pp 15–29

  • Roddick-Lanzilotta AJ, McQuillan AJ, Craw D (2002) Infrared spectroscopic characterization of arsenate (V) ion adsorption from mine waters, Macreas Mine, New Zealand. Appl Geochem 17:445–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose AW, Cravotta CA III (1998) Geochemistry of coal mine drainage. In: Brady KBC, Smith MW, Schueck J (eds) Coal mine drainage prediction and pollution prevention in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 5600-BKDEP2256, Harrisburg, pp 1.1–1.22

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahraei PH, Nikouei MR, Babaei B (2005) Acid mine drainage at Sar Cheshmeh copper mine and methods of its preventing. In: Proceedings of 20th world mining congress, Tehran, Iran, pp 203–208

  • Shahabpour J (1982) The Sarcheshmeh porphyry copper deposit. In: Proceedings of 1st Symposium of Mining (Kerman) pp 318–345 (in Persian)

  • Shahabpour J, Doorandish M (2007) Mine drainage water from the Sar Cheshmeh porphyry copper mine, Kerman, IR Iran. Environ Monit Assess 141:105–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabpour J, Kramers JD (1987) Lead isotope data from the Sarcheshmeh porphyry copper deposit, Iran. Mineralium Deposita 22:275–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverira AN, Silva R, Rubio J (2009) Treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD) in South Brazil comparative active processes and water reuse. Int J Miner Process 93:103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skousen J, Politan K, Hilton T, Meek A (1990) Acid mine drainage treatment systems: chemicals and coasts. Green Lands 20(4):31–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Skousen J, Rose AW, Geidel G, Foreman J, Evans R, Hellier W (1998) Handbook of technologies for avoidance and remediation of acid mine drainage. National Mine Land Reclamation Center, Morgantown

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen Robertson, Kirsten SRK Inc, Norelco Environmental Consultants, Gormely Process Engineering (1989) Draft acid rock drainage technical guide. British Columbia acid mine drainage task force report. BiTech Publ Ltd, Vancouver

  • Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1970) Aquatic Chemistry: an introduction emphasizing chemical equilibria in natural waters. Wiley Interscience, New York City

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1981) Aquatic chemistry. 2nd edit. Wiley, New York City

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of the Interior (2002) Acid mine drainage treatment techniques and costs. US Office of Surface Mining. Available at: http://www.osmre.gov/amdtcst.htm

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1983) Neutralization of acid mine drainage, design manual. US EPA 600/2–83-001, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (2009) National primary and secondary regulations. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/safewater

  • Waterman GC, Hamilton RL (1975) The Sar-Cheshmeh porphyry copper, deposit. Econ Geol 70:568–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2006) Guidelines for drinking-water quality: 1st addendum to 3rd edit, vol 1, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Ziemkiewicz P, Skousen J (1996) Prevention of acid mine drainage by alkaline addition, 2nd edit. In: Skousen JG, Ziemkiewicz PF (eds) Acid mine drainage: control and treatment. National Mine Land Reclamation Center, Morgantown, pp 79–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinck JK (2006) Disposal, reprocessing and reuse options for acidic drainage treatment sludge. In: Proceedings of 7th ICARD, St. Louis, MO, USA, pp 2604–2617

  • Zinck JK, Wilson LJ, Chen TT, Griffith W, Mikhail S, Turcotte AM (1996) Characteristics and stability of acid mine drainage treatment sludges. MEND Project Report 3.42.2, CANMET, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth Sciences, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, 71454, Shiraz, Iran

    Mehdi Khorasanipour & Farid Moore

  2. Research and Development Division, Sarcheshmeh Copper Complex, Kerman, Iran

    Reza Naseh

Authors
  1. Mehdi Khorasanipour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Farid Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Reza Naseh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Khorasanipour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khorasanipour, M., Moore, F. & Naseh, R. Lime Treatment of Mine Drainage at the Sarcheshmeh Porphyry Copper Mine, Iran. Mine Water Environ 30, 216–230 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-011-0142-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-011-0142-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation