Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A novel mathematical model of bone remodelling cycles for trabecular bone at the cellular level

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After an initial phase of growth and development, bone undergoes a continuous cycle of repair, renewal and optimisation by a process called remodelling. This paper describes a novel mathematical model of the trabecular bone remodelling cycle. It is essentially formulated to simulate a remodelling event at a fixed position in the bone, integrating bone removal by osteoclasts and formation by osteoblasts. The model is developed to construct the variation in bone thickness at a particular point during the remodelling event, derived from standard bone histomorphometric analyses. The novelties of the approach are the adoption of a predator–prey model to describe the dynamic interaction between osteoclasts and osteoblasts, using a genetic algorithm–based solution; quantitative reconstruction of the bone remodelling cycle; and the introduction of a feedback mechanism in the bone formation activity to co-regulate bone thickness. The application of the model is first demonstrated by using experimental data recorded for normal (healthy) bone remodelling to predict the temporal variation in the number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. The simulated histomorphometric data and remodelling cycle characteristics compare well with the specified input data. Sensitivity studies then reveal how variations in the model’s parameters affect its output; it is hoped that these parameters can be linked to specific biochemical factors in the future. Two sample pathological conditions, hypothyroidism and primary hyperparathyroidism, are examined to demonstrate how the model could be applied more broadly, and, for the first time, the osteoblast and osteoclast populations are predicted for these conditions. Further data are required to fully validate the model’s predictive capacity, but this work shows it has potential, especially in the modelling of pathological conditions and the optimisation of the treatment of those conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agerbaek M, Eriksen E, Kragstrup J, Mosekilde L, Melsen F (1991) A reconstruction of the remodelling cycle in normal human cortical iliac bone. Bone Miner 12: 101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allori A, Sailon A, Warren S (2008) Biological basis of bone formation, remodelling, and repair—Part I: Biochemical signaling molecules. Tissue Eng Part B 14(3): 259–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubin JE (1998) Advances in the osteoblast lineage. Biochem Cell Biol 76(6): 899–910

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce BF, Xing L (2008) Functions of RANKL/RANK/OPG in bone modelling and remodelling. Arch Biochem Biophys 473: 139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buenzli PR, Pivonka P, Smith DW (2011) Spatio-temporal structure of cell distribution in cortical bone multicellular units: a mathematical model. Bone 48(4): 918–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canalis E (1993) Regulation of bone remodelling. In: Favus M, Christakos S, Gagel R, Kleerekoper M, Langman C, Shane E, Stewart A, Whyte M (eds) Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism. Lippincott-Raven, New York, pp 33–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen P (2001) The skeleton in primary hyperparathyroidism: a review focusing on bone remodelling, structure, mass, and fracture. APMIS Suppl 102: 1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn TA (1996) The bone organ system: form and function. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J (eds) Osteoporosis, Chap 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen E, Gundersen H, Melsen F, Mosekilde L (1984a) Reconstruction of the resorptive site in iliac trabecular bone: a kinetic model for bone resorption in 20 normal individuals. Metab Bone Dis Rel Res 5: 235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen E, Gundersen H, Melsen F, Mosekilde L (1984b) Reconstruction of the formative site in iliac trabecular bone in 20 normal individuals employing a kinetic model for matrix and mineral apposition. Metab Bone Dis Rel Res 5: 243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen E, Mosekilde L, Melsen F (1985) Trabecular bone remodelling and bone balance in hyperthyroidism. Bone 6: 421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen E, Mosekilde L, Melsen F (1986a) Kinetics of trabecular bone resorption and formation in hypothyroidism: evidence for a positive balance per remodelling cycle. Bone 7: 101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen E, Mosekilde L, Melsen F (1986b) Trabecular bone remodelling and balance in primary hyperparathyroidism. Bone 7: 213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost H (1979) Treatment of osteoporoses by manipulation of coherent bone cell populations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 143: 227–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost H (1986) Intermediary organization of the skeleton. CRC press, Boca Raton

  • Gause GF, Smaragdova N, Witt A (1936) Further studies of interaction between predator and prey. J Anim Ecol 5: 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilsanz V, Gibbens D, Carlson M, Boechat I, Cann C, Schulz E (1988) Peak trabecular bone density: a comparison of adolescent and adult females. Calcif Tissue Int 43: 260–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski Z, Hooper C (1980) Study of cell kinetics within evolving secondary haversian systems. J Anat 131: 91–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski Z, Duck B, Sekaly G (1981) Kinetics of osteoclasts and their nuclei in evolving secondary haversian systems. J Anat 133: 397–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanatani M, Sugimoto T, Sowa H, Kobayashi T, Kanzawa M, Chihara K (2004) Thyroid hormone stimulates osteoclast differentiation by a mechanism independent of RANKL–RANK interaction. J Cell Physiol 201(1): 17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komarova S, Smith R, Dixon S, Sims S, Wahl L (2003) Mathematical model predicts a critical role for osteoclast autocrine regulation in the control of bone remodelling. Bone 33: 206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll M (2000) Parathyroid hormone temporal effects on bone formation and resorption. Bull Math Biol 62: 163–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuang Y (1990) Global stability of Gause-type predator-prey systems. J Math Biol 28: 463–474

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire V, Tobin F, Greller L, Cho C, Suva L (2004) Modeling the interactions between osteoblast and osteoclast activities in bone remodelling. J Theor Biol 229: 293–309

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Manolagas SC (2000) Birth and death of bone cells: basic regulatory mechanisms and implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 21(2): 115–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miura M, Tanaka K, Komatsu Y, Suda M, Yasoda A, Sakuma Y, Ozasa A, Nakao K (2002) A novel interaction between thyroid hormone and 1,25(OH)(OH)2D3 in osteoclast formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 291: 987–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moroz A, Crane M, Smith G, Wimpenny D (2006) Phenomenological model of bone remodelling cycle containing osteocyte regulation loop. Biosystems 84: 183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt A (1994) Osteonal and hemi-osteonal remodelling: the spatial and temporal framework for signal traffic in adult human bone. J Cell Biochem 55: 273–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt A (2000) The mechanism of coupling: a role for the vasculature. Bone 26: 319–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pivonka P, Zimak J, Smith D, Gardiner B, Dunstan C, Sims N, Martin T, Mundy G (2008) Model structure and control of bone remodelling: a theoretical study. Bone 43: 249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pivonka P, Zimak J, Smith D, Gardiner B, Dunstan C, Sims N, Martin T, Mundy G (2010) Theoretical investigation of the role of the RANK–RANKL–OPG system in bone remodelling. J Theor Biol 262: 306–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rattanakul C, Lenbury Y, Krishnamara N, Wollkind D (2003) Modelling of bone formation and resorption mediated by parathyroid hormone: response to oestrogen/PTH therapy. Biosystems 70: 55–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodan GA (1998) Control of bone formation and resorption: biological and clinical perspective. J Cell Biochem 30–31(Suppl): 55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodan GA, Martin TJ (2000) Therapeutic approaches to bone diseases. Science 289: 1508–1514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman GD (1999) Cell biology of the osteoclast. Exp Hematol 27(8): 1229–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryser MD, Komarova SV, Nigam N (2010) The cellular dynamics of bone remodelling: a mathematical model. SIAM J Appl Math 70(6): 1899–1921

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Seeman E, Delmas P (2006) Bone quality the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N Engl J Med 354: 2250–2261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeldt DW, Rubin CT (2001) Biology of bone and how it orchestrates the form and function of the skeleton. J Eur Spine 10: S86–S95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teitelbaum SL (2000) Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science 289: 1504–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udagawa N, Nakamura M, Sato N, Takahashi N (2006) The mechanism of coupling between bone resorption and formation. J Oral Biosci 48: 185–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi M (2007) Skeletal remodelling in health and disease. Nat Med 13: 791–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Fagan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ji, B., Genever, P.G., Patton, R.J. et al. A novel mathematical model of bone remodelling cycles for trabecular bone at the cellular level. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 11, 973–982 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-011-0366-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-011-0366-3

Keywords

Navigation