Skip to main content
Log in

A revised Brown and Payne model of voting behaviour applied to the 2009 elections in Italy

  • Published:
Statistical Methods & Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When elections are close in time, voters may stick to their preferred party or chose a different option for several reasons; reliable estimates of the amount of transitions across the available options can allow to answer a number of relevant questions about electoral behaviour. We describe a modified version of the model due to Brown and Payne (J Am Stat Assoc 81:453–460, 1986) and argue that it is based on simple, yet realistic, assumptions with a direct interpretation in terms of individual behaviour and compares well with other models proposed more recently. We apply the model to an Italian borough where, during June 2009, two elections were held simultaneously and a runoff took place two weeks later. Estimates of the joint distribution of voters between the European Parliament election and the other two elections provide evidence of substantially different kinds of voting behaviour which, given the specific context, we interpret in the light of the recent literature on the subject.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez RM, Boehmke FJ, Nagler J (2006) Strategic voting in British elections. Elect Stud 25: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ames B, Baker A, Renno LR (2009) Split-ticket voting as the rule: voters and permanent divided government in Brazil. Elect Stud 28: 8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antweiler W (2007) Evaluating voter migration in Canada using generalized maximum entropy. Elect Stud 26: 756–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolucci F, Dardanoni V, Forcina A (2001) Positive quadrant dependence and marginal modeling in two-way tables with ordered margins. J Am Stat Assoc 96: 1497–1505

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Blais A, Young R, Turcotte M (2005) Direct or indirect? Assessing two approaches to the measurement of strategic voting. Elect Stud 24: 163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown P, Payne C (1986) Aggregate data, ecological regression and voting transitions. J Am Stat Assoc 81: 453–460

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Burden BC (2005) Minor parties and strategic voting in recent US presidential elections. Elect Stud 24: 603–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forcina A, Marchetti GM (2009) The Brown and Payne model of voter transition revisited. In: Proceedings, Cladag 2009

  • Goodman LA (1953) Ecological regression and the behaviour of individuals. Am Sociol Rev 18: 351–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann M, Pappi FU (2008) Strategic voting in German constituencies. Elect Stud 27: 228–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston RJ, Pattie CJ (1991) Tactical voting in Great Britain in 1983 and 1987: an alternative approach. Br J Polit Sci 21: 95–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King G (1997) A solution to the ecological inference problem: reconstructing individual behavior from aggregate data. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • King G, Rosen O, Tanner MA (1999) Binomial-beta hierarchical models for ecological inference. Sociol Methods Res 28: 61–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, G, Rosen, O, Tanner, MA (eds) (2004) Ecological inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Merolla JL, Stephenson LB (2007) Strategic voting in Canada: a cross time analysis. Elect Stud 26: 235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser RG, Scheiner E (2009) Strategic voting in established and new democracies: ticket splitting in mixed-member electoral systems. Elect Stud 28: 51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam Cho WK, Judge GG (2008) Recovereing vote choice from partial incomplete data. J Data Sci 6: 155–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield J (2004) Ecological inference for 2 × 2 tables. J R Stat Soc A 167: 1–42

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Forcina.

Electronic Supplementary Material

The Below is the Electronic Supplementary Material.

ESM 1 (PDF 59 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forcina, A., Gnaldi, M. & Bracalente, B. A revised Brown and Payne model of voting behaviour applied to the 2009 elections in Italy. Stat Methods Appl 21, 109–119 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-011-0184-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-011-0184-x

Keywords

Navigation