Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Validating UML and OCL models in USE by automatic snapshot generation

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Software & Systems Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the testing and certification of UML and OCL models as supported by the validation tool USE. We extend the available USE features by introducing a language for defining properties of desired snapshots and by showing how such snapshots are generated. Within the approach, it is possible to treat test cases and validation cases. Test cases show that snapshots having desired properties can be constructed. Validation cases show that given properties are consequences of the original UML and OCL model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. OMG: (ed) OMG Unified Modeling Language Specification, Version 1.5. OMG. OMG Document formal/03-03-01, http://www.omg.org (2003, March)

  2. Warmer, J., Kleppe, A.: The Object Constraint Language: Precise Modeling with UML. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hussmann, H., Demuth, B., Finger, F.: Modular architecture for a toolset supporting OCL. In: Evans, A., Kent, S., Selic, B. (eds.) Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Unified Modeling Language (UML'2000), LNCS 1939, pp. 278–293, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (2000)

  4. ArgoUML Team.: The ArgoUML Tool. http://www.argouml.tigris.org (2003)

  5. Boldsoft.: The Boldsoft OCL Tool Model Run. http://www.boldsoft.com, Boldsoft, Stockholm, Boldsoft, Stockholm, Sweden (2002)

  6. Chiorean, D.: Using OCL Beyond Specifications. In: Evans, A., France, R., Moreira, A., Rumpe, B. (eds.) Proceedings UML'2001 Workshop Rigorous Development, pp. 57–68, Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), German Informatics Society, Bonn, Germany (2001)

  7. Ahrendt, W., Baar, T., Beckert, B., Giese, M., Habermalz, E., Hähnle, R., Menzel, W., Schmitt, P.H.: The KeY approach: Integrating object oriented design and formal verification. In: Ojeda-Aciego, M., de Guzmán, I.P., Brewka, G., Pereira, L.M. (eds.) Proceedings of 8th European Workshop Logics in AI (JELIA'2000), LNCS 1919, pp. 21–36. Springer, Berlin (2000)

  8. Canals, A., Cassaing, Y., Jammes, A., Pomies, L., Roblet, E.: How You could Use NEPTUNE in the Modelling Process. J. Object Technol. 2(1), 69–83 (2003) http://www.jot.fm

    Google Scholar 

  9. Richters, M., Gogolla, M.: On Formalizing the UML Object Constraint Language OCL. In: Ling, T.-W., Ram, S., Lee, M.L., (eds.) Proceedings 17th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER'1998), pp. 449–464. Springer, Berlin, LNCS 1507 (1998)

  10. Richters, M., Gogolla, M.: OCL—Syntax, Semantics and Tools. In: Clark, T., Warmer, J. (eds.) Advances in Object Modelling with the OCL, pp. 43–69. Springer, Berlin, LNCS 2263 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Richters, M., Gogolla, M.: Validating UML Models and OCL Constraints. In: Evans, A., Kent, S. (eds.) Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Unified Modeling Language (UML'2000), pp. 265–277. Springer, Berlin, LNCS 1939 (2000)

  12. Scott, W.A.: Building Object Applications: Patterns, Architecture, Design, Construction, and Testing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oliver, I., Kent, S.: Validation of object-oriented models using animation. In: Proceedings EuroMicro, vol. 2, pp. 2237–2243. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1999)

  14. Jézéquel, J.-M., Le Guennec, A., Pennaneach, F.: Validating distributed software modeled with the Unified Modeling Language. In: Bézivin, J., Muller, P.-A. (eds.) Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on Unified Modeling Language (UML'1998), LNCS 1618, pp. 365–377, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (1999)

  15. Dupuy, S., du Bousquet, L.: A multi-formalism approach for the validation of UML models. Formal Aspects Comput. 12(4), 228–230 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Muthiayen, D.: Real-Time Reactive System Development—A Formal Approach Based on UML and PVS. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science at Concordia University, Montreal, Canada (2000, January)

  17. Fröhlich, P., Link, J.: Automated Test Case Generation from Dynamic Models. In: Bertino, E. (ed.) Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP'2000), pp. 472–491. Springer, Berlin, LNCS 1850 (2000)

  18. Jackson, D., Schechter, I., Shlyakhter, I.: Alcoa: The Alloy constraint analyzer. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'2000), pp. 730–733. ACM, New York (2000)

  19. Martin, H.: Using test hypotheses to build a UML model of object-oriented smart card applications. In Rault, J.-C. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and Systems Engineering and their Applications (ICSSEA'1999), Paris (1999)

  20. Graubmann, P., Rudolph, E.: Hypermscs and sequence diagrams for use case modelling and testing. In: Evans, A., Kent, S., Selic, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Unified Modeling Language (UML'2000), LNCS 1939, pp. 32–46, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (2000)

  21. Abdurazik, A., Offutt, J.: Using UML collaboration diagrams for static checking and test generation. In: Evans, A., Kent, S., Selic, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Unified Modeling Language (UML'2000), LNCS 1939, pp. 383–395. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (2000)

  22. Offutt, J., Abdurazik, A.: Generating tests from UML specifications. In: France R., Rumpe B. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Unified Modeling Language (UML'1999), LNCS 1723, pp. 416–429. Springer, Berlin (1999)

  23. Agerholm, S., Larsen, P.G.: A Lightweight Approach to Formal Methods. In: Hutter, D., Stephan, W., Traverso, P., Ullmann, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Workshop on Current Trends in Applied Formal Methods (FM-TRENDS'1998), LNCS 1641, pp. 168–183. Springer, Berlin (1999)

  24. Bohling, J.: Generation of Snapshots for the Validation of UML Class Diagrams. (In German). Diploma Thesis, University of Bremen (2001)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science Department Database Systems Group, University of Bremen, 28334, Bremen, Germany

    Martin Gogolla, Jørn Bohling & Mark Richters

Authors
  1. Martin Gogolla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jørn Bohling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mark Richters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Gogolla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gogolla, M., Bohling, J. & Richters, M. Validating UML and OCL models in USE by automatic snapshot generation. Softw Syst Model 4, 386–398 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-005-0089-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-005-0089-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation