Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Flex power on GPS Block IIR-M and IIF

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

GPS Block IIR-M and Block IIF satellites have the capability to redistribute transmit power between individual signal components. This so-called flex power can be used for increased protection against jamming and was already demonstrated in September 2010. Since January 2017, a geographically driven flex power mode has been enabled on ten Block IIF satellites. It is visible in carrier-to-noise density ratio observations of ground-based GPS receivers as well as differential code bias estimates between the L1 C/A- and P(Y)-code signals. Measurements with a 30 m high-gain antenna revealed a 2.5 dB increase of the L1 C/A and P(Y) power when the L1 M-code is regularly disabled. During four days in April 2018, a different flex power mode was put in place for all healthy Block IIR-M and IIF satellites. Carrier-to-noise density observations of geodetic GPS receivers show an increase of about 11 dB for combined L1 + L2 P(Y)-code power. The high-gain antenna measurements consistently show an increase of P(Y)-code power by 5 and 6 dB for L1 and L2, respectively, due to deactivation of the military M-code on both frequencies. Finally, during three days in April/May 2018, another type of flex power was observed: for 11 h of each of the three days, another geographically driven flex power mode was enabled but over a different area than the flex power mode mentioned above. Next to measurements of signal spectra, in-phase/quadrature components, and signal power with a high-gain antenna, the impact of flex power on the tracking and measurements of geodetic receivers is investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker BC, Betz JW, Clark JE, Correia JT, Gillis JT, Lazar S, Rehborn KA, Straton JR (2000) Overview of the GPS M code signal. In: Proc. ION NTM 2000, Institute of Navigation, Anaheim, California, USA, January 26–28, pp 542–549

  • Betz J (2016) Engineering satellite-based navigation and timing—global navigation satellite systems, signals, and receivers. Wiley, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119141167

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Defense Science Board (2005) The future of the Global Positioning System. Tech. rep., Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. https://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2000s/ADA443573.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2018

  • Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems. J Geod 83(3–4):191–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0300-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar C, Goldstein DB, Bentley P (2002) Current constellation GPS satellite ground received signal power measurements. In: Proc. ION NTM 2002, Institute of Navigation, San Diego, California, USA, January 28–30, pp 948–954

  • Falletti E, Pini M, Presti LL (2011) Low complexity carrier-to-noise ratio estimators for GNSS digital receivers. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 47(1):420–437. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2011.5705684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher SC, Ghasemi K (1999) GPS IIF—the next generation. Proc IEEE 87(1):24–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.736340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch R (1982) The synergism of GPS code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of the third international symposium on satellite doppler positioning at physical sciences laboratory of New Mexico State University, Feb. 8–12, vol 2, pp 1213–1231

  • Hauschild A, Montenbruck O (2016) A study on the dependency of GNSS pseudorange biases on correlator spacing. GPS Solut 20(2):159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-014-0426-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson M, Jensen ABO, Horemuz M, Hedling G (2016) Review of code and phase biases in multi-GNSS positioning. GPS Solut 21(3):849–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-016-0572-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IS-GPS-200J (2018) Interface specification IS-GPS-200: Navstar GPS space segment/navigation user segment interfaces. https://www.gps.gov/technical/icwg/IS-GPS-200J.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2018

  • IS-GPS-705E (2018) Navstar GPS space segment/user segment L5 interfaces. Tech. rep., Global Positioning System Directorate Systems Engineering & Integration. https://www.gps.gov/technical/icwg/IS-GPS-705E.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2018

  • InsideGNSS Team (2010) IS-GPS-200E: flexing power and fixing phrase ambiguities. InsideGNSS. http://insidegnss.com/is-gps-200e-flexing-power-and-fixing-phrase-ambiguities. Accessed 10 Aug 2018

  • International GNSS Service (IGS) RINEX Working Group and Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services Special Committee 104 (RTCM-SC104) (2015) RINEX, the receiver independent exchange format, Version 3.03. http://igs.org/pub/data/format/rinex303.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2018

  • Jimenez-Banos D, Perello-Gisbert J, Crisci M (2011) The measured effects of GPS Flex power capability collected on sensor station data. In: 2010 5th ESA workshop on satellite navigation technologies and European workshop on GNSS signals and signal processing (NAVITEC). https://doi.org/10.1109/NAVITEC.2010.5708073

  • Laurichesse D, Mercier F, Berthias JP, Broca P, Cerri L (2009) Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP and satellite precise orbit determination. J Inst Navig 56(2):135–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-4296.2009.tb01750.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melbourne WG (1985) The case for ranging in GPS based geodetic systems. In: Proceedings of the first international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, edited by C. Goad, US Department of Commerce, Rockville, Maryland, USA, pp 373–386

  • Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P, Prange L, Deng Z, Zhao Q, Perosanz F, Romero I, Noll C, Stürze A, Weber G, Schmid R, MacLeod K, Schaer S (2017) The multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service (IGS)—achievements, prospects and challenges. Adv Space Res 59(7):1671–1697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck O, Hauschild A, Steigenberger P (2014) Differential code bias estimation using multi-GNSS observations and global ionosphere maps. In: Proc. ION ITM 2014, Institute of Navigation, San Diego, California, USA, January 27–29, pp 802–812

  • Partridge MD, Dafesh PA (2001) Code power measurement methodology for GPS Block IIR-M and IIF on-orbit test procedures. In: Proc. ION GPS 2001, Institute of Navigation, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, September 11–14, pp 2764–2772

  • Rajan JA, Irvine J (2005) GPS IIR-M and IIF: payload modernization. In: Proc. ION NTM 2005, San Diego, California, USA, January 24–26, pp 508–514

  • Rajan JA, Tracy JA (2002) GPS IIR-M: modernizing the signal-in-space. In: Proc. ION GPS 2002, Institute of Navigation, Portland, Oregon, USA, September 24–27, pp 1585–1594

  • Seybold JS (2005) Introduction to HF propagation. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steigenberger P, Hauschild A, Langley R (2017) US air force puts more power into GPS Block IIR-M C/A-code. GPS World 28(4):8–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Steigenberger P, Thoelert S, Montenbruck O (2018) GNSS satellite transmit power and its impact on orbit determination. J Geod 92(6):609–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1082-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szilágyi B, Bar-Sever Y, Bertiger W, Romans L (2017) New methodology and operational service for near-real-time calibration of GNSS inter-signal biases. ION GNSS+ 2017, Institute of Navigation, Portland, Oregon, USA, September 25–29

  • Thoelert S, Hauschild A, Steigenberger P, Langley R, Antreich F (2018) GPS IIR-M L1 transmit power redistribution: analysis of GNSS receiver and high-gain antenna data. J Inst Navig. https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoelert S, Meurer M, Erker S (2012a) In-orbit analysis of antenna pattern anomalies of GNSS satellites. J Inst Navig 59(2):135–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoelert S, Meurer M, Erker S, Montenbruck O, Hauschild A, Fenton P (2012b) A multi-technique approach for characterizing the SVN49 signal anomaly, part 2: chip shape analysis. GPS Solut 16(1):29–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-011-0204-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoelert S, Montenbruck O, Meurer M (2014) IRNSS-1A: signal and clock characterization of the Indian regional navigation system. GPS Solut 18(1):147–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-013-0351-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoelert S, Furthner J, Meurer M (2013) GNSS survey—signal quality assessment of the latest GNSS satellites. In: Proc. ION ITM 2013, Institute of Navigation, San Diego, California, USA, January 28–30, pp 608–615

  • Thoelert S, Erker S, Meurer M (2009) GNSS signal verification with a high-gain antenna—calibration strategies and high quality signal assessment. In: Proc. ION ITM 2009, Institute of Navigation, Anaheim, California, USA, January 26–28, pp 289–300

  • Woo K (2000) Optimum semicodeless carrier-phase tracking of L2. J Inst Navig 47(2):82–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-4296.2000.tb00204.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu A (2002) Predictions and field measurements of the GPS Block IIR L1 and L2 ground powers. In: Proc. ION NTM 2002, Institute of Navigation, San Diego, California, USA, January 28–30, pp 931–938

  • Wübbena G (1985) Software developments for geodetic positioning with GPS using TI4100 code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of the first international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, edited by C. Goad, US Department of Commerce, Rockville, Maryland, USA, pp 403–412

Download references

Acknowledgements

We’d like to acknowledge the efforts of the IGS/MGEX station operators and data centers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. German Space Operations Center (GSOC), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft-und Raumfahrt (DLR), Münchener Straße 20, 82234, Weßling, Germany

    Peter Steigenberger & Oliver Montenbruck

  2. Institute of Communications and Navigation (IKN), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft-und Raumfahrt (DLR), Münchener Straße 20, 82234, Weßling, Germany

    Steffen Thölert

Authors
  1. Peter Steigenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steffen Thölert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Oliver Montenbruck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Steigenberger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steigenberger, P., Thölert, S. & Montenbruck, O. Flex power on GPS Block IIR-M and IIF. GPS Solut 23, 8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-018-0797-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-018-0797-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation