Abstract
The occurrences of equatorial plasma bubble (EPB) irregularities over Asian and American sectors often show a different behavior due to significantly different geometries of the geomagnetic field. By using the GPS total electron content observations over equatorial and low latitudes sectors of Asian (about 120°E) and American (about 60°W) during 1997–2018, we present a comparative study of long-term occurrences of EPB kilometer-scale irregularities over the two longitude sectors. The results show that post-sunset EPB irregularities over the Asian sector were positively correlated with solar activity. However, in the American sector, such a positive dependence was not apparent in 2000–2002, which could be partly induced by limited data available during the high occurrence season of solar maximum when the GPS receivers frequently lost lock. The geomagnetic disturbance tends to inhibit the generation of EPB irregularities over both sectors during post-sunset but enhance their generation during post-midnight. The latitudinal distribution of EPB irregularities exhibited a double-peak structure centered within ± 10° (dip lat.), with the latitudinal limit below ± 25° at solar maximum in both sectors and below ± 20° and ± 10° at solar minimum in American and Asian sectors, respectively. Specifically, in the American sector, the occurrence rates were about two times higher than those in the Asian sector, and the occurrence rates in the northern hemisphere were apparently lower than those in the southern hemisphere. The enhanced ionization by particle precipitation over the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly region could cause the north–south asymmetry of occurrence rates of EPB irregularities. The results help in designing experiments to understand better the generation of EPB irregularities under the future international meridian circle project.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The GPS TEC data were obtained from IGS (http://www.igs.org), UNAVCO (http://www.unavco.org), CMONOC (http://neiscn.org/chinsoftdmds/ltwshujugongxinag/index.jhtml or please contact Jianyong Li, jyli@neis.cn), GA (http://www.ga.gov.au), EMBRACE (http://www2.inpe.br/climaespacial/portal/en/), RBMC (http://www.ibge.gov.br), JAXA (http://mgmds01.tksc.jaxa.jp) and Geophysics Center, National Earth System Science Data Center at BNOSE, IGGCAS (http://wdc.geophys.ac.cn). The Kp index was obtained from GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences (http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/en/kp-index/). The DMSP particle data and the ROCSAT-1 vertical drift data were obtained from NASA’s Space Physics Data Facility (https://spdf.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/data/).
References
Aa E et al (2018) Midlatitude plasma bubbles over china and adjacent areas during a magnetic storm on 8 September 2017. Space Weather 16:321–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017SW001776
Aa E, Zou S, Eastes R, Karan DK, Zhang S-R, Erickson PJ, Coster AJ (2020a) Coordinated ground-based and space-based observations of equatorial plasma bubbles. J Geophys Res Space Phys 125:e2019JA027569. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027569
Aa E, Zou S, Liu S (2020b) Statistical analysis of equatorial plasma irregularities retrieved from swarm 2013–2019 observations. J Geophys Res Space Phys 125:e2019JA027569. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027022
Abadi P, Otsuka Y, Shiokawa K, Husin A, Liu H, Saito S (2017) Equinoctial asymmetry in the zonal distribution of scintillation as observed by GPS receivers in Indonesia. J Geophys Res Space Phys 122:8947–8958. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024146
Abdu MA (2012) Equatorial spread F/plasma bubble irregularities under storm time disturbance electric fields. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 75–76:44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.04.024
Abdu MA, Bittencourt JA, Batista IS (1981) Magnetic declination control of the equatorial F region dynamo electric field development and spread F. J Geophys Res Space Phys 86:11443–11446. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA086iA13p11443
Abdu MA, Souza JR, Batista IS, Sobral JHA (2003) Equatorial spread F statistics and empirical representation for IRI: a regional model for the Brazilian longitude sector. Adv Space Res 31:703–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00031-0
Abdu MA, Batista IS, Carrasco AJ, Brum CGM (2005) South Atlantic magnetic anomaly ionization: a review and a new focus on electrodynamic effects in the equatorial ionosphere. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 67:1643–1657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2005.01.014
Ajith KK et al (2015) Explicit characteristics of evolutionary-type plasma bubbles observed from equatorial atmosphere radar during the low to moderate solar activity years 2010–2012. J Geophys Res Space Phys 120:1371–1382. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020878
Barros D, Takahashi H, Wrasse CM, Figueiredo CAOB (2018) Characteristics of equatorial plasma bubbles observed by TEC map based on ground-based GNSS receivers over South America. Ann Geophys 36:91–100. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-91-2018
Basu S, Groves KM, Quinn JM, Doherty P (1999) A comparison of TEC fluctuations and scintillations at Ascension Island. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 61:1219–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(99)00052-8
Buhari SM et al (2017) Climatology of successive equatorial plasma bubbles observed by GPS ROTI over Malaysia. J Geophys Res Space Phys 122:2174–2184. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023202
Burke WJ, Gentile LC, Huang CY, Valladares CE, Su SY (2004) Longitudinal variability of equatorial plasma bubbles observed by DMSP and ROCSAT-1. J Geophys Res 109:A12301. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010583
Candido CMN, Batista IS, Becker-Guedes F, Abdu MA, Sobral JHA, Takahashi H (2011) Spread F occurrence over a southern anomaly crest location in Brazil during June solstice of solar minimum activity. J Geophys Res 116:A06316. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA016374
Carter BA, Zhang K, Norman R, Kumar VV, Kumar S (2013) On the occurrence of equatorial F-region irregularities during solar minimum using radio occultation measurements. J Geophys Res Space Phys 118:892–904. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50089
Chen S, Huang Z (2017) Ionospheric F-layer global scintillation index variation using COSMIC during the period of 2007–2013. GPS Solut 21:1049–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-016-0593-2
Dao E, Kelley MC, Hysell DL et al (2012) On the distribution of ion density depletion along magnetic field lines as deduced using C/NOFS. Radio Sci 47:RS3001. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RS004967
Eccles JV, St. Maurice JP, Schunk RW, (2015) Mechanisms underlying the prereversal enhancement of the vertical plasma drift in the low-latitude ionosphere. J Geophys Res Space Phys 120:4950–4970. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020664
Fejer BG, Scherliess L, de Paula ER (1999) Effects of the vertical plasma drift velocity on the generation and evolution of equatorial spread F. J Geophys Res Space Phys 104:19859–19869. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900271
Hu L, Zhao X, Sun W, Wu Z, Zheng J, Xie H et al (2020) Statistical characteristics and correlation of low-latitude F region bottom-type irregularity layers and plasma plumes over Sanya. J Geophys Res Space Phys 125:e2020JA027855. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA027855
Huang C-S (2018) Effects of the postsunset vertical plasma drift on the generation of equatorial spread F. Prog Earth Planet Sci 5:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-017-0155-4
Huang C-S, de La Beaujardiere O, Roddy PA, Hunton DE, Liu JY, Chen SP (2014) Occurrence probability and amplitude of equatorial ionospheric irregularities associated with plasma bubbles during low and moderate solar activities (2008–2012). J Geophys Res Space Phys 119:1186–1199. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA019212
Huba JD, Joyce G (2007) Equatorial spread F modeling: multiple bifurcated structures, secondary instabilities, large density ‘bite-outs’, and supersonic flows. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028519
Kelley MC (2009) The Earth’s ionosphere: plasma physics and electrodynamics, vol 43. Academic press, San Diego, CA
Kintner PM, Ledvina BM, de Paula ER (2007) GPS and ionospheric scintillations. Space Weather. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006SW000260
Kumar S, Chen W, Liu Z, Ji S (2016) Effects of solar and geomagnetic activity on the occurrence of equatorial plasma bubbles over Hong Kong. J Geophys ResSpace Phys 121:9164–9178. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022873
Li G, Ning B, Liu L, Ren Z, Lei J, Su SY (2007) The correlation of longitudinal/seasonal variations of evening equatorial pre-reversal drift and of plasma bubbles. Ann Geophys 25:2571–2578. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-2571-2007
Li G, Ning B, Liu L, Wan W, Liu JY (2009) Effect of magnetic activity on plasma bubbles over equatorial and low-latitude regions in East Asia. Ann Geophys 27:303–312. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-303-2009
Li G et al (2018) Storm-enhanced development of postsunset equatorial plasma bubbles around the meridian 120°E/60°W on 7–8 September 2017. J Geophys Res Space Phys 123:7985–7998. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025871
Li G et al (2020) Challenges to equatorial plasma bubble and ionospheric scintillation short-term forecasting and future aspects in east and southeast Asia. Surv Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-020-09613-5
Ma G, Maruyama T (2006) A super bubble detected by dense GPS network at east Asian longitudes. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027512
Nishioka M, Saito A, Tsugawa T (2008) Occurrence characteristics of plasma bubble derived from global ground-based GPS receiver networks. J Geophys Res 113:A05301. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012605
Otsuka Y, Shiokawa K, Ogawa T (2006) Equatorial ionospheric scintillations and zonal irregularity drifts observed with closely-spaced GPS receivers in Indonesia. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 84A:343–351. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.84A.343
Pi X, Mannucci AJ, Lindqwister UJ, Ho CM (1997) Monitoring of global ionospheric irregularities using the worldwide GPS network. Geophys Res Lett 24:2283–2286. https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL02273
Ren Z, Wan W, Liu L, Chen Y, Le H (2011) Equinoctial asymmetry of ionospheric vertical plasma drifts and its effect on F-region plasma density. J Geophys Res 116:A02308. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA016081
Sobral JHA et al (2002) Ionospheric plasma bubble climatology over Brazil based on 22 years (1977–1998) of 630nm airglow observations. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 64:1517–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00089-5
Spogli L et al (2013) (2013) GPS scintillations and total electron content climatology in the southern low, middle and high latitude regions. Ann Geophys 56(2):R0220. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-6240
Stuani Pereira VA, de Oliveira Camargo P (2017) Brazilian active GNSS networks as systems for monitoring the ionosphere. GPS Solut 21:1013–1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-016-0589-y
Su SY, Liu CH, Ho HH, Chao CK (2006) Distribution characteristics of topside ionospheric density irregularities: equatorial versus midlatitude regions. J Geophys Res 111:A06305. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011330
Sun L, Xu J, Wang W, Yuan W, Li Q, Jiang C (2016) A statistical analysis of equatorial plasma bubble structures based on an all-sky airglow imager network in China. J Geophys Res Space Phys 121:11495–11517. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022950
Takahashi H et al (2014) Diagnostics of equatorial and low latitude ionosphere by TEC mapping over Brazil. Adv Space Res 54:385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.01.032
Takahashi H et al (2009) Simultaneous observation of ionospheric plasma bubbles and mesospheric gravity waves during the SpreadFEx Campaign. Ann Geophys 27:1477–1487. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-1477-2009
Thébault E, Finlay CC, Beggan CD et al (2015) International geomagnetic reference field: the 12th generation. Earth Planet Sp 67:79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015-0228-9
Tsunoda RT (1985) Control of the seasonal and longitudinal occurrence of equatorial scintillations by the longitudinal gradient in integrated E region Pedersen conductivity. J Geophys Res Space Phys 90:447–456. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA090iA01p00447
Tsunoda RT (2010) On seeding equatorial spread F during solstices. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042576
Tulasi Ram S, Rama Rao PVS, Prasad DSVVD, Niranjan K, Gopi Krishna S, Sridharan R, Ravindran S (2008) Local time dependent response of postsunset ESF during geomagnetic storms. J Geophys Res 113:A07310. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012922
Wan X, Xiong C, Rodriguez-Zuluaga J, Kervalishvili GN, Stolle C, Wang H (2018) Climatology of the occurrence rate and amplitudes of local time distinguished equatorial plasma depletions observed by swarm satellite. J Geophys Res Space Phys 123:3014–3026. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA025072
Xiong C, Park J, Lühr H, Stolle C, Ma SY (2010) Comparing plasma bubble occurrence rates at CHAMP and GRACE altitudes during high and low solar activity. Ann Geophys 28:1647–1658. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-28-1647-2010
Yao D, Makela JJ (2007) Analysis of equatorial plasma bubble zonal drift velocities in the Pacific sector by imaging techniques. Ann Geophys 25:701–709. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-701-2007
Yokoyama T, Yamamoto M, Otsuka Y, Nishioka M, Tsugawa T, Watanabe S, Pfaff RF (2011) On post-midnight low-latitude ionospheric irregularities during solar minimum: 1. equatorial atmosphere radar and GPS-TEC observations in Indonesia. J Geophys Res Space Phys. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016797
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41727803, 41904141 and 42020104002), the Solar-Terrestrial Environment Research Network (STERN) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the Chinese Meridian Project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, X., Xie, H., Hu, L. et al. Climatology of equatorial and low-latitude F region kilometer-scale irregularities over the meridian circle around 120°E/60°W. GPS Solut 25, 20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-01054-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-01054-2