Skip to main content
Log in

Tactual perception: a review of experimental variables and procedures

  • Review
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the literature on tactual perception. Throughout this review, we will highlight some of the most relevant aspects in the touch literature: type of stimuli; type of participants; type of tactile exploration; and finally, the interaction between touch and other senses. Regarding type of stimuli, we will analyse studies with abstract stimuli such as vibrations, with two- and three-dimensional stimuli, and also concrete stimuli, considering the relation between familiar and unfamiliar stimuli and the haptic perception of faces. Under the “type of participants” topic, we separated studies with blind participants, studies with children and adults, and also performed an overview of sex differences in performance. The type of tactile exploration is explored considering conditions of active and passive touch, the relevance of movement in touch and the relation between haptic exploration and time. Finally, interactions between touch and vision, touch and smell and touch and taste are explored in the last topic. The review ends with an overall conclusion on the state of the art for the tactual perception literature. With this work, we intend to present an organised overview of the main variables in touch experiments, compiling aspects reported in the tactual literature, and attempting to provide both a summary of previous findings, and a guide to the design of future works on tactual perception and memory, through a presentation of implications from previous studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramowicz A, Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ (2010) Learning and generalization in haptic classification of 2-D raised-line drawings of facial expressions of emotion by sighted and adventitiously blind observers. Perception 39(9):1261–1275. doi:10.1068/p6686

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alary F, Goldstein R, Duquette M, Chapman CE, Voss P, Lepore F (2008) Tactile acuity in the blind: a psychophysical study using a two-dimensional angle discrimination task. Exp Brain Res 187(4):587–594. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1327-7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alary F, Duquette M, Goldstein R, Chapman CE, Voss P, La Buissonnière-Ariza V, Lepore F (2009) Tactile acuity in the blind: a closer look reveals superiority over the sighted in some but not all cutaneous tasks. Neuropsychologia 47(10):2037–2043. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.014

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Auvray M, Spence C (2008) The multisensory perception of flavor. Conscious Cognit 17(3):1016–1031. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.06.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Auvray M, Gallace A, Tan HZ, Spence C (2007) Crossmodal change blindness between vision and touch. Acta Psychol (Amst) 126(2):79–97. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.10.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Auvray M, Gallace A, Spence C (2011) Tactile short-term memory for stimuli presented on the fingertips and across the rest of the body surface. Atten Percept Psychophys 73(4):1227–1241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bach-y-Rita P (1972) Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballesteros S, Manga D, Reales JM (1997) Haptic discrimination of bilateral symmetry in 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional unfamiliar displays. Percept Psychophys 59(1):37–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft T, Servos P (2011) Distractor frequency influences performance in vibrotactile working memory. Exp Brain Res 208(4):529–532. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2501-2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bardwick J (1971) Psychology of women. Harper & Row, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann-Tiest WMB, Kappers AML (2007) Haptic and visual perception of roughness. Acta Psychol (Amst) 124(2):177–189. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann-Tiest WWB, Norman J, Kahrimanovic M, Kappers AML (2010) Hand movements during haptic object exploration. Perception 39. ECVP abstract supplement, p 132

  • Bigelow A (1981) Children’s tactile identification of miniaturized common objects. Dev Psychol 17(1):111–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss J, Crane H, Mansfield P (1966) Information available in brief tactile presentations. Percept Psychophys 1:273–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresciani J-P, Ernst MO (2007) Signal reliability modulates auditory-tactile integration for event counting. Neuroreport 18(11):1157–1161. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e3281ace0ca

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bresciani J, Ernst M, Drewing K, Bouyer G, Maury V, Kheddar A (2005) Feeling what you hear: auditory signals can modulate tactile tap perception. Exp Brain Res 162(2):172–180. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-2128-2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce V, Young A (1998) In the eye of the beholder: the science of face perception. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns P, Röder B (2010) Tactile capture of auditory localization: an event-related potential study. Eur J Neurosci 31(10):1844–1857. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07232.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bult JHF, de Wijk RA, Hummel T (2007) Investigations on multimodal sensory integration: texture, taste, and ortho- and retronasal olfactory stimuli in concert. Neurosci Lett 411(1):6–10. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.036

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bülthoff I, Newell FN (2006) The role of familiarity in the recognition of static and dynamic objects. Prog Brain Res 154:315–325. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)54017-8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bushnell EW, Baxt C (1999) Children’s haptic and cross-modal recognition with familiar and unfamiliar objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25(6):1867–1881

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casey SJ, Newell FN (2005) The role of long-term and short-term familiarity in visual and haptic face recognition. Exp Brain Res 166(3–4):583–591. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-2398-3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casey SJ, Newell FN (2007) Are representations of unfamiliar faces independent of encoding modality. Neuropsychologia 45(3):506–513. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.011

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catherwood D (1993) The robustness of infant haptic memory: testing its capacity to withstand delay and haptic interference. Child Dev 64:702–710

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo Z, Vecchi T (2008) Supramodality effects in visual and haptic spatial processes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 34(3):631–642. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.631

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo Z, Vecchi T (2011) Blind vision: the neuroscience of visual impairment. MIT Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo Z, Vecchi T, Cornoldi C, Mammarella I, Bonino D, Ricciardi E, Pietrini P (2008) Imagery and spatial processes in blindness and visual impairment. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32(8):1346–1360. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.05.002

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CE (1994) Active versus passive touch: factors influencing the transmission of somatosensory signals to primary somatosensory cortex. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 72(5): 558–570. NRC Research Press Ottawa, Canada. doi:10.1139/y94-080

  • Cholewiak RW, Collins AA, Brill C (2001) Spatial factors in vibrotactile pattern perception. In: Proceedings of the eurohaptics 2001, Birmingham, UK, 1–4 July 2001

  • Cinel C, Humphreys GW, Poli R (2002) Cross-modal illusory conjunctions between vision and touch. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28(5):1243–1266. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.28.5.1243

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen H, Scherzer P, Viau R, Voss P, Lepore F (2011) Working memory for braille is shaped by experience. Commun Integr Biol 4(2):227–229. doi:10.4161/cib.4.2.14546

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta D, Snapp-Childs W (2009) Seeing and touching: the role of sensory-motor experience on the development of infant reaching. Infant Behav Dev 32(1):44–58. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2008.10.004

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornoldi C, De Beni R, Giusberti F, Massironi M (1998) Memory and imagery: a visual trace is not a mental image. In: Conway M, Gathercole S, Cornoldi C (eds) Theories of memory, vol 2. Psychology Press, Hove, pp 87–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Craddock M, Lawson R (2008) Repetition priming and the haptic recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects. Percept Psychophys 70(7):1350–1365. doi:10.3758/PP.70.7.1350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craddock M, Lawson R (2009a) Size-sensitive perceptual representations underlie visual and haptic object recognition. PLoS One 4(11). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008009

  • Craddock M, Lawson R (2009b) The effects of size changes on haptic object recognition. Atten Percept Psychophys 71(4):910–923. doi:10.3758/APP.71.4.910

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craig J, Evans P (1987) Vibrotactile masking and the persistence of tactual features. Percept Psychophys 42(4):309–317

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin V (1977) Active and passive touch at four age levels. Dev Psychol 13(3):253–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz A, Green BG (2000) Thermal stimulation of taste. Nature 403(6772):889–892. doi:10.1038/35002581

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delwiche J (2004) The impact of perceptual interactions on perceived flavor. Food Qual Prefer 15(2):137–146. doi:10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00041-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Demattè ML, Sanabria D, Sugarman R, Spence C (2006) Cross-modal interactions between olfaction and touch. Chem Senses 31(4):291–300. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjj031

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande G, Hu X, Lacey S, Stilla R, Sathian K (2010) Object familiarity modulates effective connectivity during haptic shape perception. NeuroImage 49(3): 1991–2000. Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.052

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton R, Greene A, Srinivas K (1997a) Transfer between vision and haptics: memory for 2-D patterns and 3-D objects. Psychon Bull Rev 4(3):403–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton R, Srinivas K, Greene A (1997b) Do vision and haptics share common representations? Implicit and explicit memory within and between modalities. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 23:153–163

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415(6870):429–433. doi:10.1038/415429a

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freides D (1974) Human information processing and sensory modality: cross-modal functions, information complexity, memory, and deficit. Psychol Bull 81(5):284–310

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallace A, Spence C (2009) The cognitive and neural correlates of tactile memory. Psychol Bull 135(3):380–406. doi:10.1037/a0015325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallace A, Spence C (2010) The science of interpersonal touch: an overview. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34(2):246–259. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.10.004

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallace A, Tan HZ, Haggard P, Spence C (2008) Short term memory for tactile stimuli. Brain Res 1190:132–142. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.11.014

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garbin CP (1988) Visual-haptic perceptual nonequivalence for shape information and its impact upon cross-modal performance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 14(4):547–553

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geffen G, Rosa V, Luciano M (2000a) Effects of preferred hand and sex on the perception of tactile simultaneity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 22(2):219–231

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geffen G, Rosa V, Luciano M (2000b) Sex differences in the perception of tactile simultaneity. Cortex 36(3):323–335

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1962) Observations on active touch. Psychol Rev 69(6): 477–491. American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/h0046962

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson J (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillmeister H, Eimer M (2007) Tactile enhancement of auditory detection and perceived loudness. Brain Res 1160:58–68. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.041

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giudice NA, Betty MR, Loomis JM (2011) Functional equivalence of spatial images from touch and vision: evidence from spatial updating in blind and sighted individuals. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 37(3):621–634. doi:10.1037/a0022331

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnow JJ (1971) Eye and hand: differential memory and its effect on matching. Neuropsychologia 9(1):89–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guclu B, Murat A (2007) Active touch does not improve sequential processing in a counting task. Acta Neurobiol Exp 67:165–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagander L, Midani H, Kuskowski M, Parry G (2000) Quantitative sensory testing: effect of site and pressure on vibration thresholds. Clin Neurophysiol 111(6):1066–1069

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatwell Y (2003) Manual exploratory procedures in children and adults. In: Hatwell Y, Streri A, Gentaz E (eds) Touching for knowing. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbig HB, Ernst MO (2008) Haptic perception in interaction with other senses. In: Grünwald M (ed) Human haptic perception: basics and applications, Birkhäuser Basel, Basel, pp 235–249. doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-7612-3_18

  • Heller M (1984) Active and passive touch: the influence of exploration time on form recognition. J Gen Psychol 110:243–249

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heller M, Ballesteros S (2006) Preface. In: Heller M, Ballesteros S (eds) Touch and blindness: psychology and neuroscience. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller MA, Jones ML, Walk AM, Schnarr R, Hasara A, Litwiller B (2010) Sex differences in the haptic change task. J Gen Psychol 137(1):49–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ho C, Tan HZ, Spence C (2006) The differential effect of vibrotactile and auditory cues on visual spatial attention. Ergonomics 49(7):724–738. doi:10.1080/00140130600589887

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Homa D, Kahol K, Tripathi P, Bratton L, Panchanathan S (2009) Haptic concepts in the blind. Atten Percept Psychophys 71(4):690–698. doi:10.3758/APP.71.4.690

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hötting K, Röder B (2004) Hearing cheats touch, but less in congenitally blind than in sighted individuals. Psychol Sci 15(1):60–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • James TW, Blake R (2004) Perceiving object motion using vision and touch. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 4(2):201–207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones SE (1986) Sex differences in touch communication. West J Speech Commun Taylor & Francis

  • Kaas A, Stoeckel M, Goebel R (2008) The neural bases of haptic working memory. In: Grunwald M (ed) Human haptic perception: basics and applications. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 113–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanwisher N (2000) Domain specificity in face perception. Nat Neurosci 3(8):759–763

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kappers AML, Douw F (2010) Hand movement investigations inspired by Yarbus. Perception, 39. Supplement ECVP conference abstracts, p 67

  • Kappers AML, Schakel WB (2011) Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task. Exp Brain Res 208(3):467–473. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2500-3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katz D (1989) The world of touch (L. Krueger, Trans.). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (original work published in 1925)

  • Kilgour A, Lederman SJ (2002) Face recognition by hand. Percept Psychophys 64(3):339–352. doi:10.3758/BF03194708

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiphart MJ, Auday BC, Cross HA (1988) Short-term haptic memory for three-dimensional objects. Percept Mot Ski 66(1):79–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiphart MJ, Hughes J, Simmons J, Cross HA (1992) Short-term haptic memory for complex objects. Bull Psychon Soc 30:212–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky RL (1992) Stages of manual exploration in haptic object identification. Percept Psychophys 62:661–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ (1995) Identifying objects from a haptic glance. Percept Psychophys 57(8):1111–1123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ (2003) The haptic identification of everyday life objects. In: Hatwell Y, Streri A, Gentaz E (eds) Touching for knowing. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Metzger V (1985) Identifying objects by touch—an expert system. Percept Psychophys 37(4):299–302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Reed C (1987) There’s more to touch than meets the eye: the salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. J Exp Psychol Gen 116(4):356–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky RL, Loomis JM, Lederman SJ, Wake H, Fujita N (1993) Haptic identification of objects and their depictions. Perception Psychophysics 54:170–178

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey S, Campbell C (2006) Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory: evidence from interference effects. Q J Exp Psychol (Colchester) 59(2):361–376. doi:10.1080/17470210500173232

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey S, Campbell C, Sathian K (2007) Vision and touch: multiple or multisensory representations of objects. Perception 36(10):1513–1521. doi:10.1068/p5850

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey S, Flueckiger P, Stilla R, Lava M, Sathian K (2010) Object familiarity modulates the relationship between visual object imagery and haptic shape perception. NeuroImage 49(3):1977–1990. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.081

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laird DA (1932) How the consumer estimates quality by subconscious sensory impressions. J Appl Psychol 16(3): 241–246. American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/h0074816

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson R (2009) A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 35(4):911–930. doi:10.1037/a0015025

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson R, Bulthoff HH (2008) Using morphs of familiar objects to examine how shape discriminability influences view sensitivity. Percept Psychophys 70(5):853–877. doi:10.3758/PP.70.5.853

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (1987) Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition. Cogn Psychol 19(3):342–368

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (1996) Action for perception: manual exploratory movements for haptically processing objects and their features. In: Wing A, Haggard P, Flanagan R (eds) Hand and brain: neurophysiology and psychology of hand. Academic, San Diego, pp 431–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (2004) Haptic identification of common objects: effects of constraining the manual exploration process. Percept Psychophys 66(4):618–628. doi:10.3758/BF03194906

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (2009) Haptic perception: a tutorial. Atten Percept Psychophys 71(7):1439–1459. doi:10.3758/APP.71.7.1439

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ, Loomis JM, Williams DA (1982) The role of vibration in the tactual perception of roughness. Percept Psychophys 32(2):109–116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL, Abramowicz A, Salsman K, Kitada R, Hamilton C (2007) Haptic recognition of static and dynamic expressions of emotion in the live face. Psychol Sci 18(2):158–164. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01866.x

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lhote M, Streri A (1998) Haptic memory and handness in 2-month-old infants. Laterality Asymmetries Bidy Brain Cognit 3(2):173–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JM, Lederman SJ (1986) Tactual perception. In: Boff K, Kaufman L, Thomas J (eds) Handbook of perception and human performance, Organization, New York

  • Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ (1991) Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view. Perception 20(2):167–177

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Louw S, Kappers AML, Koenderink JJ (2002) Haptic discrimination of stimuli varying in amplitude and width. Exp Brain Res 146(1):32–37. doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1148-z

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Z, Imamiya A (2003) Color presentation mode affects human haptic memory for rough surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE international conference on information reuse and integration, IRI—2003, Las Vegas, USA

  • Luo Z, Imamiya A (2004). Do colors affect our recognition memory for haptic rough surfaces. In: Computational science—Iccs 2004, Pt 3, proceedings, vol 3038, pp 897–904. Presented at the computational science—Iccs 2004, Pt 3, proceedings

  • Newell FN, Ernst MO, Tjan B, Bülthoff H (2001) Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition. Psychol Sci 12(1):37

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norman JF, Norman HF, Clayton AM, Lianekhammy J, Zielke G (2004) The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape. Percept Psychophys 66(2):342–351

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Occelli V, Spence C, Zampini M (2008) Audiotactile temporal order judgments in sighted and blind individuals. Neuropsychologia 46(11):2845–2850. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.023

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Picard D (2006) Partial perceptual equivalence between vision and touch for texture information. Acta Psychol 121(3):227–248. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.06.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard D, Lebaz S, Jouffrais C, Monnier C (2010) Haptic recognition of two-dimensional raised-line patterns by early-blind, late-blind, and blindfolded sighted adults. Perception 39(2):224–235. doi:10.1068/p6527

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plaisier MA, Bergmann-Tiest WMBB, Kappers AML (2008) Haptic pop-out in a hand sweep. Acta Psychol 128(2):368–377. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.011

    Google Scholar 

  • Postma A, Zuidhoek S, Noordzij ML, Kappers AML (2007) Differences between early-blind, late-blind, and blindfolded-sighted people in haptic spatial-configuration learning and resulting memory traces. Perception 36(8):1253–1265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pring L, Rusted J (1985) Pictures for the blind: an investigation of the influence of pictures on recall of text by blind children. Br J Dev Psychol. British Psychological Society

  • Richardson BL, Wuillemin DB, Mackintosh GJ (2011) Can passive touch be better than active touch? A comparison of active and passive tactile maze learning. Br J Psychol 72(3):353–362. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1981.tb02194.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Röder B, Rösler F (2004) Compensatory plasticity as a consequence of sensory loss. In: Calvert G, Spence C, Stein B (eds) The handbook of multisensory processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 915

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadato N, Ibaņez V, Deiber M, Hallett M (2000) Gender difference in premotor activity during active tactile discrimination. NeuroImage 11(5):532–540. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0566

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanabria D, Soto-Faraco S, Spence C (2005a) Spatiotemporal interactions between audition and touch depend on hand posture. Exp Brain Res 165(4):505–514. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-2327-5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanabria D, Soto-Faraco S, Spence C (2005b) Assessing the effect of visual and tactile distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion. Exp Brain Res 166(3–4):548–558. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-2395-6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders AFJ, Kappers AML (2008) Factors affecting the haptic filled-space illusion for dynamic touch. Exp Brain Res 192(4):717–722. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1635-y

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sathian K, Prather SC (2006) Cerebral cortical processing of tactile form: evidence from functional neuroimaging. In: Heller M, Ballesteros S (eds) Touch and blindness: psychology and neuroscience. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrick CE (1975) The art of tactile communication. Am Psychol 30(3):353–360

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simões-Franklin C, Whitaker TA, Newell FN (2011) Active and passive touch differentially activate somatosensory cortex in texture perception. Hum Brain Mapp 32(7):1067–1080. doi:10.1002/hbm.21091

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Gallace A (2007) Recent developments in the study of tactile attention. Can J Exp Psychol/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale 61(3):196–207. doi:10.1037/cjep2007021

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Ho C (2008) Multisensory warning signals for event perception and safe driving. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 9(6): 523–554. Taylor and Francis Ltd. doi:10.1080/14639220701816765

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadtlander LM, Murdoch LD, Heiser SM (1998) Visual and Haptic influences on memory: age differences in recall. Exp Aging Res 24(3):257–272

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens J, Foulke E, Patterson M (1996) Tactile acuity, aging, and braille reading in long-term blindness. J Exp Psychol Appl 2(2):91–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Stier DS, Hall JA (1984) Gender differences in touch: an empirical and theoretical review. J Pers Soc Psychol 47(2): 440. American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.2.440

    Google Scholar 

  • Streri A, Lhote M, Dutilleul S (2000) Haptic perception in newborns. Dev Sci 3(3):319–327. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00126

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener EB (1909) A text-book of psychology. New York: Macmillan

  • Trojan J, Getzmann S, Möller J, Kleinböhl D, Hölzl R (2009) Tactile-auditory saltation: spatiotemporal integration across sensory modalities. Neurosci Lett 460(2):156–160. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2009.05.053

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turvey M (1996) Dynamic touch. Am Psychol 51(11):1134–1152

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van der Horst BJ, Willebrands WP, Kappers AML (2008) Transfer of the curvature aftereffect in dynamic touch. Neuropsychologia 46(12):2966–2972. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn GH, Richardson BL, Wuillemin DB, Symmons MA (2010) Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size. Atten Percept Psychophys 72(3):813–822. doi:10.3758/APP.72.3.813

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verrillo RT (1968) A duplex mechanism of mechanoreception. In: Kenshalo D (ed) The skin senses. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrillo RT, Gescheider GA (1975) Enhancement and sumation in the perception of two sucessive vibrotactile stimuli. Percept Psychophys 18:128–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner SH, Sakovits LJ (1986) A process analysis of infant visual and cross-modal recognition memory: implications for an amodal code. Adv Infancy Res. Elsevier/JAI Press

  • Weber E (1996) E. H. Weber on the tactile senses (H. Ross & D. Murray, Trans.). Taylor & Francis, Erlbaum (original works published in 1834 and 1905)

  • Whitaker TA, Simões-Franklin C, Newell FN (2008) Vision and touch: independent or integrated systems for the perception of texture. Brain Res 1242:59–72. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.037

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willis F, Hofmann G (1975) Development of tactile patterns in relation to age, sex, and race. Dev Psychol 11(6):866

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods AT, O’Modhrain S, Newell FN (2004) The effect of temporal delay and spatial differences on cross-modal object recognition. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 4(2):260–269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woods AT, Moore A, Newell FN (2008) Canonical views in haptic object perception. Perception 37(12):1867–1878. doi:10.1068/p6038

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zampini M, Brown T, Shore DI, Maravita A, Röder B, Spence C (2005) Audiotactile temporal order judgments. Acta Psychol 118(3):277–291. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.017

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimler J, Keenan JM (1983) Imagery in the congenitally blind: how visual are visual images. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 9(2):269–282

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zuidhoek S, Kappers AML, Postma A (2007) Haptic orientation perception: sex differences and lateralization of functions. Neuropsychologia 45(2):332–341. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.032

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Portuguese “Foundation for Science and Technology” through PhD scholarship SFRH/BD/35918/2007.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra M. Fernandes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernandes, A.M., Albuquerque, P.B. Tactual perception: a review of experimental variables and procedures. Cogn Process 13, 285–301 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0443-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0443-2

Keywords

Navigation