Skip to main content
Log in

Cholecalciferol plus diphacinone baits for vole control: a novel approach to a historic problem

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Combination baits containing cholecalciferol plus an anticoagulant are effective against commensal rodents resistant to anticoagulants, and they likely pose less risk than anticoagulant-only rodenticides due to lower concentrations of active ingredients and shorter time to death. However, these combination baits have not been tested for agricultural rodent pests. Therefore, we established a study to test the efficacy of cholecalciferol plus diphacinone artichoke bract and pellet baits to determine their ability to manage California voles Microtus californicus in artichokes, where resistance to anticoagulants is known to occur. Field tests using radiocollared voles indicated that bract baits were highly efficacious (85 %), although pellet baits were less effective (60 %). Low observed efficacy of pellet baits may have resulted from poor weather following application during the second sampling period; further testing may yield more positive results. We observed a bimodal distribution in timing of death, with one group of voles dying between 4.3 and 5.8 days post-consumption; the other group died between 9.0 and 14.5 days post-consumption. Deaths in the first group were attributed to cholecalciferol, while deaths in the second group were likely due to chronic anticoagulant exposure. Almost double the proportion of voles that died from bract consumption did so during the early period when compared to their pellet plot counterparts. This suggests that voles were consuming greater quantities of bract baits over a shorter period of time when compared to the pellet bait. Collectively, these findings indicate that baiting with cholecalciferol plus diphacinone coated bracts is an effective method for controlling vole populations in artichokes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin RA (2011) Developing an IPM program for controlling pocket gophers and voles in alfalfa. In: Putnam D, Ottman M, Creech E (eds) Proceedings, 2011 Western Alfalfa and Forage Conference. Las Vegas, pp 99–107

  • Baldwin RA, Stetson DI (2011) Determination of efficacy of chlorophacinone treated artichoke bracts, zinc phosphide treated artichoke bracts, and Rozol® pellets for controlling California voles in artichokes. Final report to California Department of Pesticide Regulation, University of California, Davis

  • Baldwin RA, Meinerz R, Witmer G (2014a) Field efficacy trial of cholecalciferol + diphacinone baits for California vole control. Final report to California Department of Food and Agriculture, University of California, Davis

  • Baldwin RA, Salmon TP, Schmidt RH, Timm RM (2014b) Perceived damage and areas of needed research for wildlife pests of California agriculture. Integr Zool 9:265–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batzli GO (1968) Dispersion patterns of mice in California annual grassland. J Mammal 49:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JP (1984) Vole control in field crops. Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 11:5–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell MD, Broome KG, Eason CT, Fairweather AAC, Ogilvie S, Murphy EC (2013) How long do vertebrate pesticides persist in living animals? Priorities for research. New Zealand Department of Conservation Research and Development Series 337, Wellington, New Zealand

  • Eason CT, Ogilvie S (2009) A re-evaluation of potential rodenticides for aerial control of rodents. Department of Conservation Research and Development Series 312, Wellington, New Zealand

  • Eason CT, Fagerstone KA, Eisemann JD, Humphrys S, O’Hare JR, Lapidge SJ (2010) A review of existing and potential New World and Australasian vertebrate pesticides with a rationale for linking use patterns to registration requirements. Int J Pest Manage 56:109–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engeman RM, Witmer GW (2000) Integrated management tactics for predicting and alleviating pocket gopher (Thomomys spp.) damage to conifer reforestation plantings. Integr Pest Manage Rev 5:41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel MW, Woods LW, Poppenga R, Sweitzer RA, Thompson C, Matthews SM, Higley JM, Keller SM, Purcell K, Barrett RH, Wengert GM, Sacks BN, Clifford DL (2012) Anticoagulant rodenticides on our public and community lands: spatial distribution of exposure and poisoning of a rare forest carnivore. PLoS ONE 7:e40163

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heske EJ (1987) Spatial structuring and dispersal in a high density population of the California vole Microtus californicus. Holarct Ecol 10:137–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima LL, Salmon TP (2010) Assessing some potential environmental impacts from agricultural anticoagulant uses. Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 24:199–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh RE (1987) Relevant characteristics of zinc phosphide as a rodenticide. In: Proceedings of the Great Plains wildlife damage control workshop 8:70–74

  • Marsh RE, Tunberg AD, Allen D, Howard WE, Salmon TP (1984) Research on meadow mouse (Microtus californicus) biology and its control relative to artichoke production. Progress report to Artichoke Research Association, University of California, Davis

  • McMillin SC, Hosea RC, Finlayson BF, Cypher BL, Mekebri A (2008) Anticoagulant rodenticide exposure in an urban population of the San Joaquin kit fox. Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 23:163–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Myllymäki A (1995) Anticoagulant resistance in Europe: appraisal of the data from the 1992 EPPO questionnaire. Pest Sci 43:69–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker WT, Muller LI, Gerhardt RR, O’Rourke DP, Ramsay EC (2008) Field use of isoflurane for safe squirrel and woodrat anesthesia. J Wildl Manage 72:1262–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pospischil R, Schnorbach HJ (1994) Racumin Plus®, a new promising rodenticide against rats and mice. Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 16:180–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh SR, Johnson S, Tamarin RH (2003) Voles. In: Feldhamer GA, Thompson BC, Chapman JA (eds) Wild mammals of North America: biology management and conservation. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 349–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon TP, Gibson EK (2003) Anticoagulant baiting strategies for meadow vole control in artichokes. Final report to California Department of Food and Agriculture, University of California, Davis

  • Salmon TP, Lawrence SJ (2005) Identifying anticoagulant resistance and devising management strategies for resistant vole populations in artichokes (Microtus californicus). Final report to California Department of Food and Agriculture, University of California, Davis

  • Salmon TP, Lawrence SJ (2006) Anticoagulant resistance in meadow voles (Microtus californicus). Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 22:156–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberhorn EM, Schnabel DL, Salmon TP (2006) Ecological risk assessment for use of agricultural rodenticides in California. Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 22:458–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen VA, Powell RA (1998) Estimating survival rates of black bears. Can J Zool 76:1335–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone WB, Okoniewski JC, Stedelin JR (2003) Anticoagulant rodenticides and raptors: recent findings from New York, 1998–2001. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 70:34–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tosh DG, McDonald RA, Bearhop S, Llewellyn NR, Montgomery WI, Shore RF (2012) Rodenticide exposure in wood mouse and house mouse populations on farms and potential secondary risk to predators. Ecotoxicology 21:1325–1332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whisson DA, Engeman RM, Collins K (2005) Developing relative abundance techniques (RATs) for monitoring rodent populations. Wildl Res 32:239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witmer G, Moulton RS, Baldwin RA (2014) An efficacy test of cholecalciferol plus diphacinone rodenticide baits for California voles (Microtus californicus Peale) to replace ineffective chlorophacinone baits. Int J Pest Manage 60:275–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ocean Mist and Sea Mist Farms for all of the assistance and resources they have provided throughout the duration of this project. In particular, we thank F. Castaneda, C. Drew, D. Huss, and their highly efficient staff for the tremendous effort they have dedicated to this project. We also greatly appreciate the insight and guidance provided by C. Eason and D. MacMorran on the use of C+D baits and for formulating the products for our use. T. Salmon provided historical guidance on bait mixing. This project was funded by the Vertebrate Pest Control Research Advisory Committee of the California Department of Food and Agriculture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger A. Baldwin.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Jacob.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baldwin, R.A., Meinerz, R. & Witmer, G.W. Cholecalciferol plus diphacinone baits for vole control: a novel approach to a historic problem. J Pest Sci 89, 129–135 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-015-0653-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-015-0653-3

Keywords

Navigation