Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of the shape and pressure drop of Taylor bubbles in circular tubes

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model based on a combination of lubrication theory and capillary effects (ignoring inertial effects and gravity) is developed to predict the shape and pressure drop of long bubbles flowing in circular tubes in pressure-driven flows. An analytical solution for the thickness of the wetting film left on the tube wall as a function of the Capillary number (the ratio between viscous effects and surface tension) was derived by Klaseboer et al. (Phys Fluids 26:032107, 2014), which considerably extends the original result of Bretherton (J Fluid Mech 10:166–188, 1961) and confirms the empirical law of Aussillous and Quéré (Phys Fluids 12:2367–2371, 2000). It is based on a crucial condition that requires that the bubble must fit inside the tube. An extension of this formulation allows for an analytical expression of the pressure drop across the bubble by applying the tube fit condition for the front and the back of the bubble and a force balance. The complete shape of the bubble can then be obtained numerically by applying boundary conditions at the tube centre. The interesting physics occurring at the back of the bubble is also investigated. A theoretical condition for the minimal length of such a bubble is given. Comparisons with experimental and numerical data for the shape of the bubble, pressure drop and curvature at the front and rear of the bubble for small to intermediate Capillary numbers give excellent agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ABC :

Constants defining a non-dimensional parabola

D :

Universal constant at the front of the bubble

E :

Constant at the back of the bubble

b :

Film thickness in the flat region of the film (m)

\(\hbox {Ca}\) :

Capillary number (\(\mu U / \sigma \))

h :

Film thickness (m)

L :

Length of the bubble (m)

p :

Pressure (Pa)

\(p^*\) :

Non-dimensional pressure

r :

Radial coordinate (m)

R :

Radius of the tube (m)

\(R_{\text {F}}\) :

Radius of curvature of the front of the bubble (m)

\(R_{\text {B}}\) :

Radius of curvature of the back of the bubble (m)

u :

Velocity in the film region (m/s)

U :

Bubble velocity (m/s)

\(U_0\) :

Average liquid velocity (or superficial velocity) (m/s)

x :

Coordinate: distance along the tube wall (m)

y :

Coordinate: perpendicular to the tube wall (m)

W :

Factor relating U to liquid velocity \(U_0\)

\(\mu \) :

Viscosity (Pa s)

\(\rho \) :

Density (kg/m3)

\(\sigma \) :

Surface tension (N/m)

\(\tau \) :

Shear stress at the tube wall (N/m\(^2\))

\(\tau ^*\) :

Non-dimensional shear stress

\(\eta \) :

Non-dimensional film thickness

\(\xi \) :

Non-dimensional x coordinate

\(\Delta p\) :

Total pressure drop across the bubble (Pa)

\(\Delta p_{\text {F}}\) :

Pressure jump at the front of the bubble (Pa)

\(\Delta p_{\text {B}}\) :

Pressure jump at the back of the bubble (Pa)

F :

Refers to front of the bubble

B :

Refers to back of the bubble

References

  • Abadie T, Aubin J, Legendre D, Xuereb C (2012) Hydrodynamics of gas–liquid Taylor flow in rectangular microchannels. Microfluid Nanofluid 12:355–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aland S, Boden S, Hahn A, Klingbeil F, Weismann M, Weller S (2013) Quantitative comparison of Taylor flow simulations based on sharp- and diffuse-interface models. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 73:344–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeli P, Gavriilidis A (2008) Hydrodynamics of Taylor flow in small channels: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 222:737–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aussillous P, Quéré D (2000) Quick deposition of a fluid on the wall of a tube. Phys Fluids 12:2367–2371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boden S, dos Santos Rolo T, Baumbach T, Hampel U (2014) Synchrotron radiation microtomography of Taylor bubbles in capillary two-phase flow. Exp Fluids 55:1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton FP (1961) The motion of long bubbles in tubes. J Fluid Mech 10:166–188

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chan DYC, Klaseboer E, Manica R (2011) Film drainage and coalescence between deformable drops and bubbles. Soft Matter 7:2235–2264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Ryck A (2002) The effect of weak inertia on the emptying of a tube. Phys Fluids 14:2102–2108

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrother F, Stubbs AE (1935) Studies in electro-endosmosis. Part VI. The bubble-tube method of measurement. J Chem Soc 1:527–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng JQ (2010) Steady axisymmetric motion of a small bubble in a tube with flowing liquid. Proc R Soc A 466:549–562

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Giavedoni MD, Saita FA (1997) The axisymmetric and plane cases of a gas phase steadily displacing a Newtonian liquid—a simultaneous solution of the governing equations. Phys Fluids 9:2420–2428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giavedoni MD, Saita FA (1999) The rear meniscus of a long bubble steadily displacing a Newtonian liquid in a capillary tube. Phys Fluids 11:786–794

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Günther A, Jensen KF (2006) Multiphase microfluidics: from flow characteristics to chemical and material synthesis. Lab Chip 6:1487–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günther A, Khan SA, Thalmann M, Trachsel F, Jensen KF (2004) Transport and reaction in microscale segmented gas–liquid flow. Lab Chip 4:278–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta R, Fletcher DF, Haynes BS (2010) Taylor flow in microchannels: a review of experimental and computational work. J Comput Multiphase Flows 2:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern D, Gaver DP (1994) Boundary element analysis of the time-dependent motion of a semi-infinite bubble in a channel. J Comput Phys 115:366–375

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern D, Jensen OE, Grotberg JB (1998) Theoretical study of surfactant and liquid delivery into the lung. J Appl Physiol 85:333–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern D, Fujioka H, Takayama S, Grotberg JB (2008) Liquid and surfactant delivery into pulmonary airways. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 163:222–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Shikazono N (2009a) Measurement of liquid film thickness in micro square channel. Int J Multiphase Flow 35:896–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Shikazono N (2009b) Measurement of the liquid film thickness in micro tube slug flow. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 30:842–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Shikazono N, Kasagi N (2011) Measurement of liquid film thickness in a micro parallel channel with interferometer and laser focus displacement meter. Int J Multiphase Flow 37:36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazel AL, Heil M (2002) The steady propagation of a semi-infinite bubble into a tube of elliptical or rectangular cross-section. J Fluid Mech 470:91–114

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M (2001) Finite Reynolds number effects in the Bretherton problem. Phys Fluids 13:2517–2521

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Irandoust S, Andersson B (1989) Liquid film in Taylor flow through a capillary. Ind Eng Chem Res 28:1684–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan SA, Thalmann M, Trachsel F, Jensen KF (2009) Microfluidic emulsions with dynamic compound drops. Lab Chip 9:1840–1842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaseboer E, Gupta R, Manica R (2014) An extended Bretherton model for long Taylor bubbles at moderate capillary numbers. Phys Fluids 26:032,107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreutzer MT, Kapteijn F, Moulijn JA, Kleijn CR, Heiszwolf JJ (2005) Inertial and interfacial effects on pressure drop of Taylor flow in capillaries. Am Inst Chem Eng J 51:2428–2440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau L, Levich B (1942) Dragging of a liquid by a moving plate. Acta Physicochimica URSS 17:42–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Langewisch DR, Buongiorno J (2015) Prediction of film thickness, bubble velocity, and pressure drop for capillary slug flow using a CFD-generated database. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 54:250–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung SSY, Gupta R, Fletcher DF, Haynes BS (2012a) Effect of flow characteristics on Taylor flow heat transfer. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:2010–2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung SSY, Gupta R, Fletcher DF, Haynes BS (2012b) Gravitational effect on Taylor flow in horizontal micro channels. Chem Eng Sci 69:553–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez MJ, Udell KS (1990) Axisymmetric creeping motion of drops through circular tubes. J Fluid Mech 210:565–591

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Muradoglu M, Stone HA (2007) Motion of large bubbles in curved channels. J Fluid Mech 570:455–466

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ratulowski J, Chang HC (1989) Transport of gas bubbles in capillaries. Phys Fluids A 1:1642–1655

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Reinelt DA, Saffman PG (1985) The penetration of a finger into a viscous fluid in a channel and tube. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 6:542–561

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Suresh V, Grotberg JB (2005) The effect of gravity on liquid plug propagation in a two-dimensional channel. Phys Fluids 17:031,507

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor GI (1961) Deposition of a viscous fluid on the wall of a tube. J Fluid Mech 10:161–165

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Warnier MJF, de Croon MHJM, Rebrov EV, Schouten JC (2010) Pressure drop of gas–liquid Taylor flow in round micro-capillaries for low to intermediate Reynolds numbers. Microfluid Nanofluid 8:33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters SL, Grotberg JB (2002) The propagation of a surfactant laden liquid plug in a capillary tube. Phys Fluids 14:471–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wörner M (2012) Numerical modeling of multiphase flows in microfluidics and micro process engineering: a review of methods and applications. Microfluid Nanofluid 12:841–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Y, Fujioka H, Grotberg JB (2007) Effects of gravity, inertia and surfactant on steady plug propagation in a two-dimensional channel. Phys Fluids 19:082,107

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A.C. was a final year student of R.M. supported by a scholarship provided by A*Star (Overseas Attachment Scheme) during the development of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rogerio Manica.

Additional information

Our definition of symbols is slightly different from Bretherton (1961) and Klaseboer et al. (2014). In our work R is the radius of the tube (Bretherton used r, which is the radial coordinate here), whereas Bretherton used P, Q, R for the parabolas where we use A, B and C instead. The symbol p is reserved for pressures. These conventions comply with more commonly used definitions for these symbols.

Appendix: Numerical implementation of the governing equations

Appendix: Numerical implementation of the governing equations

Numerically we solve Eq. 13 in non-dimensional form. Using the scalings of Eq. 12, the boundary conditions of Eq. 40 are written as

$$\begin{aligned} \left. \begin{array}{lll} \eta (0) &{}= R/b \\ \eta (\xi _{m}) &{}= R/b \\ \frac{d^2\eta (0)}{\hbox {d}\xi ^2}&{}= A_{\text {B}} \end{array}\right\} \end{aligned}$$
(47)

where \(A_{\text {B}}\) is given by Eq. 39.

The domain size [\(0,\xi _{m}\)] is divided in n equally spaced points from \(i = 1\) to n. Eq. 13 has a third-order derivative and is discretised as for \(i=3\) to \(n-2\).

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\eta _{i+2}-2\eta _{i+1}+2\eta _{i-1}+\eta _{i-2}}{2\hbox {d}\xi ^3}= \frac{\eta _i-1}{\eta _{*i}^3} \end{aligned}$$
(48)

where we linearise the systems by taking \(\eta _*\) from the previous iteration. This equation is solved for \(i=3\) to \(n-2\). For \(i=1\) and \(i=n\) we take \(\eta _i=R/b\). Special consideration is needed for the points \(i=2\) and \(i=n-1\). For \(i=n-1\) we take backward difference scheme. Discretisation of the boundary condition allows the calculation of \(i=2\) as follows

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\eta _{2}-2\eta _{1}+\eta _{0}}{\hbox {d}\xi ^2}=A_{\text {B}} \end{aligned}$$
(49)

which provide the missing \(\eta _{0}\) point. For the initial condition, we take \(\eta =R/b\) at the boundaries and \(\eta =1\) for the internal points. We build the matrix and solve the system implicitly using MATLAB. After each iteration we update \(\eta _*\) until convergence is achieved.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cherukumudi, A., Klaseboer, E., Khan, S.A. et al. Prediction of the shape and pressure drop of Taylor bubbles in circular tubes. Microfluid Nanofluid 19, 1221–1233 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-015-1641-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-015-1641-x

Keywords

Navigation