Skip to main content
Log in

Vessel Diameter Measurement from Intravital Microscopy

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The blood vessel diameter is often measured in microcirculation studies to quantify the effects of various stimuli. Intravital video microscopy is used to measure the change in vessel diameter by first recording the video and analyzing it using electronic calipers or by using image shearing technique. Manual measurement using electronic calipers or image shearing is time-consuming and prone to measurement error, and automated measurement can serve as an alternative that is faster and more reliable. In this paper, a new feature-based tracking algorithm is presented for automatically measuring diameter of vessels in intravital video microscopy image sequences. Our method tracks the vessel diameter throughout the entire image sequence once the diameter is marked in the first image. The parameters were calibrated using the intravital videos with manual ground truth measurements. The expriment with 10 synthetic videos and 20 intravital microscopy videos, including 10 fluorescence confocal and 10 non-confocal transmission, shows that the measurement can be performed accurately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 9
FIGURE 10
FIGURE 11
FIGURE 12
FIGURE 13
FIGURE 14
FIGURE 15
FIGURE 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. G. Brown. A survey of image registration techniques. ACM Computing Surveys, 24(4):325–376, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. W. Cox and A. Jesmanowicz. Real-Time 3D Image Registration for Functional MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 42:1014–1018, 1999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Davatzikos, J. L. Prince, and R. N. Bryan. Image registration based on boundary mapping. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on, 15(1):112–115, 1996.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Duza and I. H. Sarelius. Increase in endothelial cell Ca2+ in response to mouse cremaster muscle contraction. The Journal of Physiology, 555(2):459–469, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. F. N. E. Gavins and B. E. Chatterjee. Intravital micro-scopy for the study of mouse microcirculation in anti-inflammatory drug research: focus on the mesentery and cremaster preparations. J. Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 49:1–14, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Giachetti. Matching techniques to compute image motion. Image and Vision Computing, 18:247–260, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Intaglietta, M., and K. Messmer. Technological Developments in the Study of the Microcirculation. Clinical and Applied Microcirculation Research. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 139–148, 1995.

  8. J. F. Krucker, G. L. LeCarpentier, J. B. Fowlkes, and P. L. Carson. Rapid elastic image registration for 3-D ultrasound. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on, 21(11):1384–1394, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Maes, A. Collignon, D. Vandermeulen, G. Marchal, and P. Suetens. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutualinformation. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on, 16(2):187–198, 1997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Magers and J. E. Faber. Real-time measurement of microvascular dimensions using digital cross-correlation image processing. Journal of Vascular Research, 29:241–247, 1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. A. Maintz and M. A. Viergever. A survey of medical image registration. Medical Image Analysis, 2(1):1–36, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. C. L. Murrant and I. H. Sarelius. Local and remote arteriolar dilations initiated by skeletal muscle contraction. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol., 279:H2285–H2294, 2000.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. W. Pluim, J. A. Maintz, and M. A. Viergever. Image registration by maximization of combined mutual information and gradient information. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on, 19(8):809–814, 2000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmugge, S., W. Kamoun, J. Villalobos, M. Clemens, and M. Shin. Segmentation of vasculature for intravital microscopy using bridging vessel snake. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 2006, pp. 177–180

  15. M. Sonka, W. Liang, and R. M. Lauer. Automated analysis of brachial ultrasound image sequences: early detection of cardiovascular disease via surrogates of endothelial function. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 21(10):1271–1279, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Tyml, D. Anderson, D. Lidington, and H. Lakak. A new method for assessing arteriolar diameter and hemodynamic resistance using image analysis of vessel lumen. American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 284:1721–1728, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by Grant No. HL18208 and HL76414 from National Institute of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaesung Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, J., Jirapatnakul, A.C., Reeves, A.P. et al. Vessel Diameter Measurement from Intravital Microscopy. Ann Biomed Eng 37, 913–926 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9666-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9666-5

Keywords

Navigation