Skip to main content
Log in

Conditioning and Sampling Issues of EMG Signals in Motion Recognition of Multifunctional Myoelectric Prostheses

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historically, the investigations of electromyography (EMG) pattern recognition-based classification of intentional movements for control of multifunctional prostheses have adopted the filter cut-off frequency and sampling rate that are commonly used in EMG research fields. In practical implementation of a multifunctional prosthesis control, it is desired to have a higher high-pass cut-off frequency to reduce more motion artifacts and to use a lower sampling rate to save the data processing time and memory of the prosthesis controller. However, it remains unclear whether a high high-pass cut-off frequency and a low-sampling rate still preserve sufficient neural control information for accurate classification of movements. In this study, we investigated the effects of high-pass cut-off frequency and sampling rate on accuracy in identifying 11 classes of arm and hand movements in both able-bodied subjects and arm amputees. Compared to a 5-Hz high-pass cut-off frequency, excluding the EMG components below 60 Hz decreased the average accuracy of 0.1% in classifying the 11 movements across able-bodied subjects and increased the average accuracy of 0.1 and 0.4% among the transradial (TR) and shoulder disarticulation (SD) amputees, respectively. Using a 500 Hz instead of a 1-kHz sampling rate, the average classification accuracy only dropped about 2.0% in arm amputees. The combination of sampling rate and high-pass cut-off frequency of 500 and 60 Hz only resulted in about 2.3% decrease in average accuracy for TR amputees and 0.4% decrease for SD amputees in comparison to the generally used values of 1 kHz and 5 Hz. These results suggest that the combination of sampling rate of 500 Hz and high-pass cut-off frequency of 60 Hz should be an optimal selection in EMG recordings for recognition of different arm movements without sacrificing too much of classification accuracy which can also remove most of motion artifacts and power-line interferences for improving the performance of myoelectric prosthesis control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ajiboye, A. B., and R. B. Weir. A heuristic fuzzy logic approach to EMG pattern recognition for multifunctional prosthesis control. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 13(3):280–291, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan, A. D., and K. B. Englehart. Continuous myoelectric control for powered prostheses using hidden Markov models. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52:121–124, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chu, J. U., I. Moon, and M. S. Mun. A real-time EMG pattern recognition system based on linear-nonlinear feature projection for a multifunction myoelectric hand. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53:2232–2239, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clancy, E. A., S. Bouchard, and D. Rancourt. Estimation and application of EMG amplitude during dynamic contractions. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 20(6):47–54, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Clancy, E. A., E. L. Morin, and R. Merletti. Sampling, noise-reduction and amplitude estimation issues in surface electromyography. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 12:1–16, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Englehart, K., and B. Hudgins. A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50(7):848–854, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Englehart, K., B. Hudgins, and A. D. Chan. Continuous multifunction myoelectric control using pattern recognition. Tech. Disabil. 15(2):95–103, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farina, D., R. Merletti, and R. M. Enoka. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. J. Appl. Physiol. 96:1486–1495, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gallant, P. J., E. L. Morin, and L. E. Peppard. Feature-based classification of myoelectric signals using artificial neural networks. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 36:4485–4489, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hargrove, L., K. Englehart, and B. Hudgins. A comparison of surface and intramuscular myoelectric signal classification. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54:847–853, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, Y. G., K. B. Englehart, B. Hudgins, and A. D. Chan. A Gaussian mixture model based classification scheme for myoelectric control of powered upper limb prostheses. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52(11):1801–1811, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, H., P. Zhou, G. Li, and T. A. Kuiken. An analysis of EMG electrode configuration for targeted muscle reinnervation based neural machine interface. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 16(1):37–45, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, H., P. Zhou, G. Li, and T. A. Kuiken. Spatial filtering improves EMG classification accuracy following targeted muscle reinnervation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 37:1849–1857, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hudgins, B. S., P. A. Parker, and R. N. Scott. A new strategy for multi-functional myoelectric control. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 40(1):82–94, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ives, J. C., and J. K. Wigglesworth. Sampling rate effects on surface EMG timing and amplitude measures. Clin. Biomech. 18:543–552, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuiken, T. A. Consideration of nerve-muscle grafts to improve the control of artificial arms. J. Technol. Disabil. 15(2):105–111, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kuiken, T. A. Targeted reinnervation for improved prosthetic function. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 17(1):1–13, 2006.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuiken, T. A., G. A. Dumanian, R. D. Lipschutz, L. A. Miller, and K. A. Stubblefield. The use of targeted muscle reinnervation for improved myoelectric prosthesis control in a bilateral shoulder disarticulation amputee. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 28(3):245–253, 2004.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuiken, T. A., G. Li, B. A. Lock, R. D. Lipschutz, L. A. Miller, K. A. Stubblefield, and K. B. Englehart. Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. JAMA 301:619–628, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, G., A. E. Schultz, and T. A. Kuiken. Quantifying pattern recognition based myoelectric control of multifunctional transradial prostheses. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 18:185–192, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lock, B. A., K. Englehart, and B. Hudgins. Real-time myoelectric control in a virtual environment to relate usability vs. accuracy. In: MyoElectric Controls Symposium, New Brunswick, Fredericton, pp. 122–127, 2005.

  22. Parker, P. A., and R. N. Scott. Myoelectric control of prostheses. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 13(4):283–310, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Reaz, M. B. I., M. S. Hussain, and F. Mohd-Yasin. Techniques of EMG signal analysis: detection, processing, classification and applications. Biol. Proced. Online 8:11–35, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sears, H. H. Trends in upper-extremity prosthetic development. In: Atlas of Limb Prosthetics, edited by J. H. Bowker, and J. W. Michael. St. Louis: Mosby, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stegeman, D. F. and H. J. Hermens. Standards for surface electromyography: the European project “Surface EMG for non-invasive assessment of muscles (SENIAM),” http://www.med.uni-jena.de/motorik/pdf/stegeman.pdf, 2007.

  26. Winter, D. A. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou, P., M. M. Lowery, K. B. Englehart, H. Huang, G. Li, L. Hargrove, J. P. A. Dewald, and T. A. Kuiken. Decoding a new neural machine interface for control of artificial limbs. J. Neurophysiol. 98(5):2974–2982, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Todd Kuiken at Neural Engineering Center for Artificial Limbs, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, USA, for supplying the raw EMG data from SD amputees for this study. This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant #60971076, Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Fund (ITF) #GHP/031/08, the Shenzhen Governmental Basic Research Grand #JC200903160393A, and grants from Guangdong Key Laboratory of Robotics and Intelligent System, Guangdong Province #2009A060800016 and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Neuropsychiatric Modulation. We also thank the industrial sponsors Standard Telecommunication Ltd., Jetfly Technology Ltd., Golden Meditech Company Ltd., Bird International Ltd., Bright Steps Corporation and PCCW for their supports to the ITF project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guanglin Li.

Additional information

Associate Editor Thurmon E. Lockhart oversaw the review of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, G., Li, Y., Yu, L. et al. Conditioning and Sampling Issues of EMG Signals in Motion Recognition of Multifunctional Myoelectric Prostheses. Ann Biomed Eng 39, 1779–1787 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0265-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0265-x

Keywords

Navigation