Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mutual predation between and cannibalism within several freshwater gammarids: Dikerogammarus villosus versus one native and three invasives

  • Published:
Aquatic Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dikerogammarus villosus, a Ponto-Caspian species, is known to be a particularly successful invader, and is currently the prevailing invasive gammarid in Southern German large waters. Field observations suggest that D. villosus has replaced the native G. pulex and the invasive D. haemobaphes, also a Ponto-Caspian species, in some reaches of the German Danube. Dikerogammarus villosus is also believed to be the reason why Echinogammarus berilloni, a Mediterranean species, and Dikerogammarus bispinosus, a further Ponto-Caspian gammaridean species, could not build significant populations in Southern German rivers. Because intraguild predation (IGP) is regarded as a major force leading to species displacements, we hypothesized that superiority in predation by D. villosus is responsible for the disappearance or limited occurrence of several native and invasive gammarideans in many reaches of Southern German waters. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a series of laboratory IGP experiments with 1:1 combinations in which D. villosus was allowed to prey on other gammarids and vice versa. We also studied the extent of cannibalism within species. Dikerogammarus villosus was a stronger predator than G. pulex and E. berilloni. However, D. villosus was not stronger in predation than its relatives D. haemobaphes and D. bispinosus, although results with the combinations of D. villosus and D. bispinosus were less conclusive, especially in the female–female combination. Cannibalism rate was high in D. haemobaphes compared with other species. We conclude that superiority in IGP experiments could explain the disappearance of G. pulex and the missing or limited occurrence of E. berilloni since the arrival of D. villosus in Southern German rivers. However, the results of IGP experiments do not explain why D. haemobaphes was displaced by D. villosus in many places and why D. bispinosus could not build significant populations in Southern German waters. Possibly specific combinations between mutual predation and cannibalism or factors other than predation could have affected displacement and occurrence patterns of Dikerogammarus species in Southern German waters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bij de Vaate A, Klink AG (1995) Dikerogammarus villosus a new immigrant in the Dutch part of the Lower Rhine. Lauterbornia 33:109–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Bij de Vaate A, Jazdzewski K, Ketelaars HAM, Gollash S, van der Velde G (2002) Geographical patterns in range extension of Ponto-Caspian macroinvertebrate species in Europe. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1159–1174. doi:10.1139/f02-098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollache L (2004) Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda): another invasive species in Lake Geneva. Rev Suisse Zool 111:309–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollache L, Devin S, Wattier R, Chovet M, Beisel J-N, Moreteau J-C et al (2004) Rapid range extension of Ponto-Caspian amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus in France: potential consequences. Arch Hydrobiol 160:57–66. doi:10.1127/0003-9136/2004/0160-0057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruijs MCM, Kelleher B, Van der Velde G, Bij de Vaate A (2001) Oxygen consumption, temperature and salinity tolerance of the invasive amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus: indicators of further dispersal via ballast transport. Arch Hydrobiol 152:633–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Carausu S, Dibreanu E, Manolache C (1955) Amphipoda forme salmastre si de apa dulce. In: Fauna Republicii Populare Romine, Crustacea, vol IV, Fac 4. Edutura Academii Republicii Populare Romine, Bucuresti, 407 pp

  • Casellato S, La Piana G, Latella L, Ruffo S (2006) Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894) (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Gammaridae) for the first time in Italy. Ital J Zool (Modena) 73:97–104. doi:10.1080/11250000500502293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devin S, Beisel JN, Bachmann V, Moreteau J-C (2001) Dikerogammarus villosus (Amphipoda: Gammaridae): another invasive species newly established in the Moselle river and French hydrosystems. Ann Limnol 37:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devin S, Piscart C, Beisel J-N, Moreteau J-C (2004) Life history traits of the invader Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in the Moselle River, France. Int Rev Hydrobiol 89:21–34. doi:10.1002/iroh.200310667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick JTA (1992) The nature and implication of differential predation between Gammarus pulex and G. duebeni celticus (Crustacea: Amphipoda). J Zool (Lond) 227:171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick JTA (1996) Post-invasion amphipod communities of Lough Neagh, Northern Ireland: influences of habitat selection and mutual predation. J Anim Ecol 65:756–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick JTA, Platvoet D (1996) Intraguild predation and species exclusion in amphipods: the interaction of behaviour, physiology and environment. Freshw Biol 36:375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick JTA, Platvoet D (2000) Invading predatory crustacean Dikerogammarus villosus eliminates both native and exotic species. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:977–983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dick JTA, Platvoet D (2001) Predicting future aquatic invaders; the case of Dikerogammarus villosus. Aquat Nuisance Species 4:25–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick JTA, Montgomery I, Elwood RW (1993) Replacement of the indigenous amphipod Gammarus duebeni celticus by introduced G. pulex: differential cannibalism and mutual predation. J Anim Ecol 62:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggers TO, Martens A (2001) A key to the freshwater Amphipoda (Crustacea) of Germany. Lauterbornia 42:1–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski M, Bacela B, Konopacka A (2007) How to be an invasive gammarid (Amphipoda: Gammaroidea)—comparison of life history traits. Hydrobiologia 590:75–84. doi:10.1007/s10750-007-0759-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jazdzewski K, Konopacka A, Grabowski M (2004) Recent drastic changes in the gammarid fauna (Crustacea, Amphipoda) of the Vistula River deltaic system in Poland caused by alien invaders. Divers Distrib 10:81–87. doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00062.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzelbach R (1995) Neozoans in European waters—exemplifying the worldwide process of invasion and species mixing. Experientia 51:526–538. doi:10.1007/BF02143203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzler W, Maier G (2003) Asymmetry in mutual predation: possible reason for the replacement of native gammarids by invasives. Arch Hydrobiol 157:473–481. doi:10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-0473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kley A, Maier G (2003) Life history characteristics of the invasive freshwater gammarids Dikerogammarus villosus and Echinogammarus ischnus in the river Main and the Main-Donau canal. Arch Hydrobiol 156:457–469. doi:10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0156-0457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kley A, Maier G (2005) An example of niche partitioning between Dikerogammarus villosus and other invasive and native gammarids: a field study. J Limnol 64:85–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Kley A, Maier G (2006) Reproductive characteristics of invasive gammarids in the Rhine-Main–Danube catchment, South Germany. Limnologica 36:79–90. doi:10.1016/j.limno.2006.01.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Lods-Crozet B, Reymond O (2006) Bathymetric expansion of an invasive gammarid (Dikerogammarus villosus, Crustacea, Amphipoda) in Lake Leman. J Limnol 65:141–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Maazouzi C, Masson G, Soledad Izquiero M, Pihan J-C (2007) Fatty acid composition of the amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus: feeding strategies and trophic links. Comp Biochem Physiol A 147:868–875. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.02.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil C, Dick JTA, Hatcher MJ, Terry RS, Smith JE, Dunn AM (2003) Parasites mediate mutual predation between native and invasive species. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1309–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil C, Dick JTA, Johnson MP, Hatcher MJ, Dunn AM (2004) A species invasion mediated through habitat structure, intraguild predation, and parasitism. Limnol Oceanogr 49:1848–1856

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer G, Maier G, Maas A, Waloszek D (2008) Mouthparts of the Ponto-Caspian invader Dikerogammarus villosus (Amphipoda: Pontogammaridae). J Crust Biol 28:1–15. doi:10.1651/07-2867R.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller JC, Schramm S, Seitz A (2002) Genetic and morphological differentiation of Dikerogammarus invaders and their invasion history in Central Europe. Freshw Biol 47:2039–2048. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00944.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mürle U, Becker A, Rey P (2004) Dikerogammarus villosus (Amphipoda), new in Lake Constance. Lauterbornia 49:77–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Musko IB (1990) Qualitative and quantitative relationships of Amphipoda (Crustacea) living on macrophytes in Lake Balaton (Hungary). Hydrobiologia 191:269–274. doi:10.1007/BF00026062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musko IB, Balogh C, Toth AP, Varga E, Lakatos G (2007) Differential response of invasive malacostracan species to lake level fluctuations. Hydrobiologia 590:65–74. doi:10.1007/s10750-007-0758-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyström P (2002) Ecology. In: Holdich DM (ed) Biology of freshwater crayfish. Blackwell Scientific Press, Oxford, pp 192–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkster S, Stock JH (1967) Range extension in 1966 of the alien amphipod G. tigrinus in the Netherlands. Beaufortia 14:81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Platvoet D, Dick JTA, Konijnendijk N, van der Velde G (2006) Feeding of micro-algae in the invasive Ponto-Caspian amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894). Aquat Ecol 40:237–245. doi:10.1007/s10452-005-9028-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pöckl M (2007) Strategies of a successful new invader in European fresh waters: fecundity and reproductive potential of the Ponto-Caspian amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus in the Austrian Danube, compared with the indigenous Gammarus fossarum and G. roeseli. Freshw Biol 52:50–63. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01671.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA (1981) The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:225–251. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.001301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponyi E (1956) Ökologische, ernährungsbiologische und systematische Untersuchungen an verschiedenen Gammarus-Arten. Arch Hydrobiol 52:367–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponyi E (1961) Über Ernährung einiger Amphipoden (Crustacea) in Ungarn. Ann Instituto Biologici (Tihany) Hungariae 28:117–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleuter M, Schleuter A, Potel S, Banning M (1994) Dikerogammarus haemobaphes (EICHWALD 1841) (Gammaridae) aus der Donau erreicht über den Main-Donau-Kanal den Rhein. Lauterbornia 19:155–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöll F, Becker C, Tittizer T (1995) Das Makrozoobenthos des schiffbaren Rheins von Basel bis Emmerich 1986–1995. Lauterbornia 21:115–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittizer T, Leuchs H, Banning M (1994) Das Makrozoobenthos der Donau im Abschnitt Kehlheim–Jochenstein (Donau-km 2414–2202). Limnologie aktuell, 2, G. Fischer Stuttgart 173–188

  • Tittizer T, Schöll F, Banning M, Haybach A, Schleuter M (2000) Aquatische Neozoen im Makrozoobenthos der Binnenwasserstraßen Deutschlands. Lauterbornia 39:1–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Riel M, van der Velde G, Rajagopal S, Marguillier S, Dehairs F, Bij de Vaate A (2006) Trophic relationships in the Rhine food web during invasion and after establishment of the Ponto-Caspian invader Dikerogammarus villosus. Hydrobiologia 565:39–58. doi:10.1007/s10750-005-1904-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinzierl A, Potel S, Banning M (1996) Obesogammarus obesus (SARS 1894) in der oberen Donau (Amphipoda, Gammaridae). Lauterbornia 26:87–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitledge GW, Rabeni CF (1997) Energy sources and ecological role of crayfishes in an Ozark stream: insights from stable isotopes and gut analysis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:2555–2563. doi:10.1139/cjfas-54-11-2555

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is part of the project “Aquatische Neozoen im Bodensee und seinen Zuflüssen” supported by the European Union within the scope of the Interreg III A-Programme “Alpenrhein-Bodensee-Hochrhein”. We are grateful for this support. We also thank F. Pätzold who showed us habitats of Echinogammarus berilloni.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Experimental Ecology of Animals (Bio. III), University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89069, Ulm, Germany

    Werner Kinzler, Axel Kley & Gerhard Maier

  2. Biosystematic Documentation, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstrasse 20, 89081, Ulm, Germany

    Gerd Mayer & Dieter Waloszek

  3. Bureau of Aquatic Ecology, Brucknerstr. 23, 89250, Senden, Germany

    Gerhard Maier

Authors
  1. Werner Kinzler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Axel Kley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gerd Mayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dieter Waloszek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gerhard Maier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerhard Maier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kinzler, W., Kley, A., Mayer, G. et al. Mutual predation between and cannibalism within several freshwater gammarids: Dikerogammarus villosus versus one native and three invasives. Aquat Ecol 43, 457–464 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-008-9206-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-008-9206-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation