Abstract
The use of land for intensive arable production in Europe is associated with a range of externalities that typically impose costs on third parties. The introduction of trees in arable systems can potentially be used to reduce these costs. This paper assesses the profitability and environmental externalities of a silvoarable agroforestry system, and compares this with the profitability and environmental externalities from an arable system and a forestry system. A silvoarable experimental plot of poplar trees planted in 1992 in Bedfordshire, Eastern England, was used as a case study. The Yield-SAFE model was used to simulate the growth and yields of the silvoarable, arable, and forestry land uses along with the associated environmental externalities, including carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emissions, nitrogen and phosphorus surplus, and soil erosion losses by water. The Farm-SAFE model was then used to quantify the monetary value of these effects. The study assesses both the financial profitability from a farmer perspective and the economic benefit from a societal perspective. The arable option was the most financially profitable system followed by the silvoarable system and forestry. However, when the environmental externalities were included, silvoarable agroforestry provided the greatest benefit. This suggests that the appropriate integration of trees in arable land can provide greater well-being benefits to society overall, than arable farming without trees, or forestry systems on their own.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agro Business Consultants (2015) The agricultural budgeting & costing book, 82nd edn. Agro Business Consultants, Melton Mowbray
Anthony S, Duethman D, Gooday R, Harris D, Newell-Price P, Chadwick D, Misselbrook T (2009) Quantitative assessment of scenarios for managing trade-off between the economic performance of agriculture and the environment and between different environmental media. Final report, Defra project WQ0106 (module 6)
Burgess PJ, Morris J (2009) Agricultural technology and land use futures. Land Use Policy 26S:S222–S229
Burgess PJ, Incoll LD, Corry DT, Beaton A, Hart BJ (2005) Poplar (Populus spp.) growth and crop yields in a silvoarable experiment at three lowland sites in England. Agrofor Syst 63(2):157–169
Burgess PJ, Crous-Duran J, den Herder M, Dupraz C, Fagerholm N, Freese D, Garnett K, Graves AR, Hermansen JE, Liagre F, Mirck J, Moreno G, Mosquera-Losada MR, Palma JHN, Pantera A, Plieninger T, Upson M (2015) AGFORWARD project periodic report: January to December 2014. Cranfield University, Cranfield. AGFORWARD. https://www.agforward.eu/index.php/en/news-reader/id-27-february-2015.html
Camargo GGT, Ryan MR, Richard TL (2013) Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions from crop production using the farm energy analysis tool. Bioscience 63:263–273
DECC (2009) Carbon valuation in UK policy appraisal: a revised approach. DECC, London, pp 1–128
DECC (2012) Updated short-term traded carbon values used for UK public policy appraisal. DECC, London, pp 1–8
Dupraz C, Vincent G, Lecomte I, Bussière F, Sinoquet H (2004) Above-ground modules in Hi-SAFE (Tree phenology, tree C allocation, tree light interception, microclimate). Deliverable D.4.1 in Silvoarable Agroforestry For Europe (SAFE). European Research Contract QLK5-CT-2001-00560)
Dupraz C, Burgess P, Gavaland A, Graves A, Herzog F, Incoll LD, Jackson N, Keesman K, Lawson G, Lecomte I, Liagre F, Mantzanas K, Mayus M, Moreno G, Palma J, Papanastasis V, Paris P, Pilbeam DJ, Reisner Y, van Noordwijk M, Vincent G, van der Werf W (2005) SAFE final report-synthesis of the silvoarable agroforestry for Europe project. INRA-UMR system editions. European Union, Brussels
EMEP (2003) Cooperative programme for monitoring and evaluation of the long-range transmission of air pollutants in Europe. www.emep.int. Accessed Jan 2017
EU (2013) Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (OJ L 347 of 20.12.2013, p 1)
Farber SC, Costanza R, Wilson MA (2002) Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 41:375–392
Feldwisch N, Frede H, Hecker F (1998) Verfahren zum Abschätzen der Erosions und Auswaschungsgefahr. In: Frede H, Dabbert S (eds) Handbuch zum Gewässerschutz in der Landwirtschaft. Ecomed, Landsberg, pp 22–57
García de Jalón S, Iglesias A, Cunningham R, Pérez Díaz JI (2014) Building resilience to water scarcity in Southern Spain: a case study of rice farming in Doñana protected wetlands. Reg Environ Change 14(3):1229–1242
Gifford R (2000a) Carbon content of woody roots: revised analysis and a comparison with woody shoot components. National Carbon Accounting System technical report no. 7 (revision 1). Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra
Gifford R (2000b) Carbon contents of above-ground tissues of forest and woodland trees. National Carbon Accounting System technical report no. 22. Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra
Graves AR, Burgess PJ, Palma JHN, Herzog F, Moreno G, Bertomeu M, Dupraz C, Liagre F, Keesman K, van der Werf W, Koeffeman de Nooy A, van den Briel JP (2007) Development and application of bio-economic modelling to compare silvoarable, arable and forestry systems in three European countries. Ecol Eng 29:434–449
Graves AR, Burgess PJ, Liagre F, Terreaux J-P, Borrel T, Dupraz C, Palma J, Herzog F (2011) Farm-SAFE: the process of developing a plot- and farmscale model of arable, forestry, and silvoarable economics. Agrofor Syst 81:93–108
Graves AR, Morris J, Deeks L, Rickson J, Kibblewhite M, Harris J, Fairwell T, Truckle I (2015) The cost of soil degradation in England and Wales. Ecol Econ 119:399–413
HM Treasury (2003) The Green Book: appraisal and evaluation in central government. TSO, London. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/220541/green_book_complete.pdf
Hoffman M, Johnson H (2003) Test of a modelling system for estimating nitrogen leaching—a pilot study in a small agricultural catchment. Environ Model Assess 8(1):15–23
IPCC (1996) Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: reference manual. IPCC, Geneva
JACOBS (2008) Environmental accounts for agriculture. Defra project SFS0601 final report. JACOBS UK Ltd, Manchester
Johnston RJ, Rolfe J, Rosenberger RS, Brouwer R (2015) Introduction to benefit transfer methods. In: Johnston RJ, Rolfe J, Randall S, Rosenberger RS, Brouwer R (eds) Benefit transfer of environmental and resource values. A guide for researchers and practitioners. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–582
Liagre F (1997) ARBUSTRA Manuel de l’utilisateur. User manual for ARBUSTRA. Centre Régional de la Propriété Forestiere (CRPF) and l’Institut National de la recherché Agronomique (INRA), Montpellier, pp 1–71
Nair PKR (2011) Methodological challenges in estimating carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems: opportunities and challenges. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3–16
Nemeth T (1996) Nitrogen balances in long term field experiments. Fertil Res 43(1–3):13–19
Nix J (2014) John Nix farm management pocketbook, 44th edn. Agro Business Consultants, Melton Mowbray
Noy-Meir I, Harpaz Y (1977) Agro-ecosystems in Israel. In: Harper J, Gruys P (eds) Agro-ecosystems, vol 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 143–167
OFWAT (2005) Water framework directive—economic analysis of water industry costs. Final report. Water Services Regulation Authority, Oxford
Ovington JD, Madgwick HAI (1958) The sodium, potassium and phosphorus contents of tree species grown in close stands. New Phytol. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1958.tb05316.x
OXERA (2006) What is the cost of reducing ammonia, nitrates and BOD in sewage treatment works effluent? Ofwat, Oxford. http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/rpt_com_oxera080107.pdf
Palma JHN (2015) CliPick: project database of pan-European climate data for default model use. Milestone report 26 (6.1) for EU FP7 research project: AGFORWARD 613520. http://www.agforward.eu/index.php/en/clipick-project-database-of-pan-european-simulated-climate-data-for-default-model-use.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2015
Palma JHN, Graves AR, Burgess PJ, Keesman KJ, van Keulen H, Mayus M, Reisner Y, Herzog F (2007) Methodological approach for the assessment of environmental effects of agroforestry at the landscape scale. Ecol Eng 29(4):450–462
Panagos P, Meusburger K, Ballabio C, Borrelli P, Alewell C (2014) Soil erodibility in Europe: a high-resolution dataset based on LUCAS. Sci Total Environ 479–480:189–200
Panagos P, Ballabio C, Borrelli P, Meusburger K, Klik A, Rousseva S, Tadic MP, Michaelides S, Hrabalíková M, Olsen P, Aalto J, Lakatos M, Rymszewicz A, Dumitrescu A, Beguería S, Alewell C (2015a) Rainfall erosivity in Europe. Sci Total Environ 511:801–814
Panagos P, Borrelli P, Meusburger K (2015b) A new European slope length and steepness factor (LS-factor) for modeling soil erosion by water. Geosciences 5:117–126
Panagos P, Borrelli P, Meusburger K, van der Zanden EH, Poesen J, Alewell C (2015c) Modelling the effect of support practices (P-factor) on the reduction of soil erosion by water at European Scale. Environ Sci Policy 51:23–34
Panagos P, Borrelli P, Poesen J, Ballabio C, Lugato E, Meusburger K, Montanarella L, Alewell C (2015d) The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe. Environ Sci Policy 54:438–447
Sandaña P, Pinochet D (2014) Grain yield and phosphorus use efficiency of wheat and pea in a high yielding environment. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 14(4):973–986
Sing L, Ray D, Watts K (2015) Ecosystem services and forest management. Research note. UK Forestry Commission. http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/FCRN020.pdf/$FILE/FCRN020.pdf
Thomas TH (1991) A spreadsheet approach to the economic modelling of agroforestry systems. For Ecol Manag 45:207–235
Tipping E, Benham S, Boyle JF, Crow P, Davies J, Fischer U, Guyatt H, Helliwell R, Jackson-Blake L, Lawlor AJ, Monteith DT, Roweg EC, Toberman H (2014) Atmospheric deposition of phosphorus to land and freshwater. Environ Sci Process Impacts 16:1608–1617
Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8(8):857–874
Udawatta RP, Krstansky JJ, Henderson GS, Harold E (2002) Agroforestry practices, runoff, and nutrient loss: a paired watershed comparison. J Environ Qual 31(4):1214–1225
UK Forestry Commission (2015) UK Woodland Carbon Code. www.forestry.gov.uk/carboncode
Upson M, Burgess PJ (2013) Soil organic carbon and root distribution in a temperate arable agroforestry system. Plant Soil 373:43–58
Van der Werf W, Keesman K, Burgess P, Graves A, Pilbeam D, Incoll LD, Metselaar K, Mayus M, Stappers R, van Keulen H, Palma J, Dupraz C (2007) Yield-SAFE: a parameter-sparse, process-based dynamic model for predicting resource capture, growth, and production in agroforestry systems. Ecol Eng 29(4):419–433
van Keulen H, Wilf J (1986) Crop production as determined by nutrient availability. Modelling of agricultural production: weather, soils and crops. simulation monographs. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 153–181
van Keulen H, Aarts H, Habekotte B, van der Meer H, Spiertz J (2000) Soil–plant–animal relations in nutrient cycling: the case of dairy farming system ‘De Marke’. Eur J Agron 13(2/3):245–261
van Noordwijk M, Lusiana B (1999) WaNuLCAS, a model of water, nutrient and light capture in agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 43(1–3):217–242
Vlek P, Fillery I, Burford J (1981) Accession, transformation, and loss of nitrogen in soils of the arid region. Plant Soil 58:133–175
Wild A (1993) Soils and the environment: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Williams AG, Audsley E, Sandars DL (2010) Environmental burdens of producing bread wheat, oilseed rape and potatoes in England and Wales using simulation and system modelling. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(8):855–868
Young A, Menz K, Muraya P, Smith C (1998) SCUAF version 4: a model to estimate soil changes under agriculture, agroforestry and forestry. ACIAR technical report series no 41. ACIAR, Canberra, pp 1–49
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support of the European Commission through the AGFORWARD FP7 research project (Contract No. 613520). The silvoarable experiment received funding from the UK Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1992–1997) and the UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1999–2003). The analysis of tree measurements in 2011 were made with the support of the Forestry Commission and the Scottish Forestry Trust.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
García de Jalón, S., Graves, A., Palma, J.H.N. et al. Modelling and valuing the environmental impacts of arable, forestry and agroforestry systems: a case study. Agroforest Syst 92, 1059–1073 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0128-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0128-z