Abstract
Provider-assisted methods of partner notification increase testing and counseling among sexual partners of patients diagnosed with HIV, however they are resource-intensive. The sexual partners of individuals enrolled in a clinical trial comparing different methods of HIV partner notification were analyzed to identify who was unlikely to seek testing on their own. Unconditional logistic regression was used to identify partnership characteristics, which were assigned a score based on their coefficient in the final model, and a risk score was calculated for each participant. The risk score included male partner sex, relationship duration 6–24 months, and index education > primary. A risk score of ≥2 had a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 78% in identifying partners unlikely to seek testing on their own. A risk score to target partner notification can reduce the resources required to locate all partners in the community while increasing the testing yield compared to patient-referral.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bunnell R, Opio A, Musinguzi J, et al. HIV transmission risk behavior among HIV-infected adults in Uganda: results of a nationally representative survey. Aids. 2008;22(5):617–24.
National Statistical Office. Malawi demographic and health survey 2004. Calverton: National Statistical Office (Malawi)/ORC Macro; 2005.
Malamba SS, Mermin JH, Bunnell R, et al. Couples at risk: HIV-1 concordance and discordance among sexual partners receiving voluntary counseling and testing in Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;39(5):576–80.
Guthrie BL, de Bruyn G, Farquhar C. HIV-1-discordant couples in sub-Saharan Africa: explanations and implications for high rates of discordancy. Curr HIV Res. 2007;5(4):416–29.
Mathews C, Coetzee N, Zwarenstein M, et al. A systematic review of strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS. Int J STD AIDS. 2002;13(5):285–300.
European Partner Notification Study Group. Recently diagnosed sexually HIV-infected patients: seroconversion interval, partner notification period and a high yield of HIV diagnoses among partners. QJM. 2001;94(7):379–90.
Harry TC, Sillis M. Outcome of partner notification of HIV infection in a provincial clinic in East Anglia, UK. Int J STD AIDS. 2008;19(1):53–4.
Marcus JL, Bernstein KT, Klausner JD. Updated outcomes of partner notification for human immunodeficiency virus, San Francisco, 2004–2008. Aids. 2009;23(8):1024–6.
Mir N, Scoular A, Lee K, et al. Partner notification in HIV-1 infection: a population based evaluation of process and outcomes in Scotland. Sex Transm Infect. 2001;77(3):187–9.
Brown LB, Miller WC, Kamanga G, et al. HIV partner notification is effective and feasible in sub-Saharan Africa: opportunities for HIV treatment and prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;56(5):437–42.
Williams RL. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):645–6.
McClamroch KJ, Kaufman JS, Behets FM. A formal decision analysis identifies an optimal treatment strategy in a resource-poor setting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(8):776–87.
Steyerberg EW, Bleeker SE, Moll HA, Grobbee DE, Moons KG. Internal and external validation of predictive models: a simulation study of bias and precision in small samples. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(5):441–7.
Tih PM, Forgwei G, Welty T, Welty S, Harrington C, editors. Integrated HIV contact tracing and partner notification in Cameroon: a feasible HIV infection risk reduction intervention for resource-poor settings. Cape Town: 5th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment; 2009.
Boileau C, Bruneau J, Al-Nachawati H, Lamothe F, Vincelette J. A prognostic model for HIV seroconversion among injection drug users as a tool for stratification in clinical trials. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;39(4):489–95.
Chen Z, Branson B, Ballenger A, Peterman TA. Risk assessment to improve targeting of HIV counseling and testing services for STD clinic patients. Sex Transm Dis. 1998;25(10):539–43.
Menza TW, Hughes JP, Celum CL, Golden MR. Prediction of HIV acquisition among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis. 2009;36(9):547–55.
Acknowledgment
This research was supported by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), an NIH funded program #P30 AI50410, NIH grant 1F30MH085431, NIH grant 5R01AI83059 and NIH grant T32 GM008719.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, L.B., Miller, W.C., Kamanga, G. et al. Predicting Partner HIV Testing and Counseling Following a Partner Notification Intervention. AIDS Behav 16, 1148–1155 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-0094-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-0094-9