Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An integrated rough ELECTRE II approach for risk evaluation and effects analysis in automatic manufacturing process

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Smart manufacturing is an essential part of fourth industrial revolution in which robotic machines can control and perceive automatically to provide effectiveness and convenience in production process. However, the existence of potential failures and defects not only influence the manufacturing process but also damages the resources and cause negative impacts on environment. Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) is a key approach to identify and eliminate possible failures and evaluate the risks from design, system and process. This research paper provides a novel FMEA approach for risk evaluation by integrating rough set theory and ELimination and Choice Translating REality (ELECTRE) II method to handle the subjectivity and uncertainty in experts’ judgements without much prior information, membership functions and additional adjustments. Rough numbers are used to study uncertainty in linguistic terms using intervals instead of single fixed values. The proposed approach is formulated by defining different types of concordance and discordance sets using optimization techniques based on statistical dispersion and maximum deviation method. The presented technique shows the strong, weak and neutral pairwise relations among failure modes by systemically comparing them from each risk component. The distance functions and averaging methods are applied to check the similarities and differences among error modes which improves the accuracy of the results. The developed rough FMEA approach is applied to identify the potential failures of robot working in optical cable industry and evaluate the risk components of manufacturing and production process. Rough ELECTRE II approach can be effectively applied to enhance the efficiency of working conditions and prevent the loss of crude materials and energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adeel A, Akram M, Koam AN (2019) Multi-criteria decision-making under mHF ELECTRE-I and HmF ELECTRE-I. Energies 12(9):1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn J, Noh Y, Park SH, Choi BI, Chang D (2017) Fuzzy-based failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) of a hybrid molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) and gas turbine system for marine propulsion. J Power Sources 364:226–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Arshad M (2020) Bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS and bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE-I methods to diagnosis. Comput Appl Math 39(1):1–21

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Luqman A (2020) Granulation of ecological networks under fuzzy soft environment. Soft Comput 24:11867–11892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Waseem N, Liu P (2019) Novel approach in decision making with \(m\)-polar fuzzy ELECTRE-I. Int J Fuzzy Syst 21(4):1117–1129

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Luqman A, Alcantud JCR (2020a) Risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis: hybrid TOPSIS and ELECTRE I solutions with Pythagorean fuzzy information. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05350-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Ilyas F, Garg H (2020b) Multi-criteria group decision making based on ELECTRE I method in Pythagorean fuzzy information. Soft Comput 24(5):3425–3453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arabsheybani A, Paydar MM, Safaei AS (2018) An integrated fuzzy MOORA method and FMEA technique for sustainable supplier selection considering quantity discounts and supplier’s risk. J Clean Prod 190:577–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benayoun R, Roy B, Sussman B (1996) Electre: Une methode pour guider le choix en presence de points de vue multiples. Technical Report, Paris, France, SEMA-METRA International, Direction Scientifique

  • Chen N, Xu Z (2015) Hesitant fuzzy ELECTRE II approach: a new way to handle multi-criteria decision making problems. Inf Sci 292:175–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasuyu C, Gmen E, Narlß M, Kokangül A (2016) Classical and fuzzy FMEA risk analysis in a sterilization unit. Comput Ind Eng 101:286–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong ZF, Hao CX, Ge CZ (2019) Annual report of environmental economic policy in 2018. Environ Econ 7:12–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattahi R, Khalilzadeh M (2018) Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment. Saf Sci 102:290–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kang J, Sun L, Sun H, Wu C (2017) Risk assessment of floating offshore wind turbine based on correlation-FMEA. Ocean Eng 129:382–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Chen L (2019) A novel evidential FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief structure and grey relational projection method. Eng Appl Artif Intell 77:136–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Fang H, Song W (2019) Modified failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty: a rough cloud theory-based approach. Appl Soft Comput 78:195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Li Y (2019) An extended MULTIMOORA method for probabilistic linguistic multi-criteria group decision-making based on prospect theory. Comput Ind Eng 136:528–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Liu W (2020) Multiple-criteria decision making method based on the scaled prioritized operators with unbalanced linguistic information. Artif Intell Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09812-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Ming X (2019) A methodological framework with rough-entropy-ELECTRE TRI to classify failure modes for co-implementation of smart PSS. Adv Eng Inform 42(100968):1–14

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, You X (2020) Linguistic neutrosophic partitioned Maclaurin symmetric mean operators based on clustering algorithm and their application to multi-criteria group decision-making. Artif Intell Rev 53:2131–2170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Deng X, Jiang W (2017) Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy measure and fuzzy integral. Symmetry 9(8):162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Wang Y, Jia F, Fujita H (2020a) A multiple attribute decision making three-way model for intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Int J Approx Reason 119:177–203

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Zhang X, Wang Z (2020b) An extended VIKOR method for multiple attribute decision making with linguistic \(D\) numbers based on fuzzy entropy. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 19(01):143–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H, Jiang S, Song W, Ming X (2018) A rough multi-criteria decision-making approach for sustainable supplier selection under vague environment. Sustainability 10(8):2622. https://doi.org/10.3390/sul10082622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangeli M, Shahraki A, Saljooghi FH (2019) Improvement of risk assessment in the FMEA using nonlinear model, revised fuzzy TOPSIS, and support vector machine. Int J Ind Ergon 69:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156(2):445–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sci 11(5):341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1996) Rough sets, rough relations and rough functions. Fundamenta Informaticae 27(2–3):103–108

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rafie M, Namin FS (2015) Prediction of subsidence risk by FMEA using artificial neural network and fuzzy inference system. Int J Min Sci Technol 25(4):655–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B (1990) The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods, in readings in multiple criteria decision aid. Springer, Berlin, pp 155–183

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1986) Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Manag Sci 32(7):841–855

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sarwar M (2020) Decision-making approaches based on color spectrum and D-TOPSIS method under rough environment. Comput Appl Math. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-01284-7

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sarwar M, Akram M, Zafar F (2018) Decision making approach based on competition graphs and extended TOPSIS method under bipolar fuzzy environment. Math Comput Appl 23:68. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca23040068

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sarwar M, Akram M, Shahzadi S (2020) Bipolar fuzzy soft information applied to hypergraphs. Soft Comput 6:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Farhani S, Ozturk I (2015) Do coal consumption and industrial development increase environmental degradation in China and India? Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(5):3895–3907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1963) Mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shumaiza AM, Al-Kenani AN (2019) Multiple-attribute decision making electre II method under bipolar fuzzy model. Algorithms 12:226. https://doi.org/10.3390/a12110226

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Song W, Ming X, Wu Z, Zhu B (2014) A rough TOPSIS approach for failure mode and effects analysis in uncertain environments. Qual Reliab Eng Int 30(4):473–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng GH, Huang JJ (2011) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. CRC Press

  • Wan N, Li L, Ye C, Wang B (2019) Risk assessment in intelligent manufacturing process: a case study of an optical cable automatic arranging robot. IEEE Access 7:105892–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L-E, Liu H-C, Quan M-Y (2016) Evaluating the risk of failure modes with a hybrid MCDM model under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments. Comput Ind Eng 102:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Gao JM, Wang RX, Chen K, Gao ZY, Zheng W (2017) Failure mode and effects analysis by using the house of reliability-based rough VIKOR approach. IEEE Trans Reliab 67(1):230–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai LY, Khoo LP, Zhong ZW (2008) A rough set enhanced fuzzy approach to quality function deployment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37(5–6):613–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang J (2014) Objective attributes weights determining based on Shannon information entropy in hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Math Probl Eng 2014:Article ID 463930

  • Zhou X, Tang Y (2018) Modeling and fusing the uncertainty of FMEA experts using an entropy-like measure with an application in fault evaluation of aircraft turbine rotor blades. Entropy 20(11):864. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20110864

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, Government College Women University, Sialkot, Pakistan

    Musavarah Sarwar

  2. Department of Mathematics, University of the Punjab, New Campus, Lahore, 4590, Pakistan

    Muhammad Akram

  3. School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, 250014, Shandong, China

    Peide Liu

Authors
  1. Musavarah Sarwar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Akram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peide Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peide Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarwar, M., Akram, M. & Liu, P. An integrated rough ELECTRE II approach for risk evaluation and effects analysis in automatic manufacturing process. Artif Intell Rev 54, 4449–4481 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10003-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10003-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation