Skip to main content
Log in

A new multi-criteria scenario-based solution approach for stochastic forward/reverse supply chain network design

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analyzing current trends in supply chain management, lead to find unavoidable steps toward closing the loop of supply chain. In order to expect best performance of Closed-Loop Supply Chain (CLSC) network, an integrated approach in considering design and planning decision levels is necessary. Further, real markets usually contain uncertain parameters such as demands and prices of products. Therefore, the next important step is considering uncertain parameters.

In order to cope with designing and planning a closed-loop supply chain, this paper proposes a multi-period, multi-product closed-loop supply chain network with stochastic demand and price in a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) structure. A multi criteria scenario based solution approach is then developed to find optimal solution through some logical scenarios and three comparing criteria. Mean, Standard Deviation (SD), and Coefficient of Variation (CV), which are the mentioned criteria for finding the optimal solution. Sensitivity analyses are also undertaken to validate efficiency of the solution approach. The computational study reveals the acceptability of proposed solution approach for the stochastic model. Finally, a real case study in an Indian manufacturer is evaluated to ensure applicability of the model and the solution methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2007). Supply chain management: strategy, planning and operation. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. H., & Zhang, G. (2012). An integrated model for closed-loop supply chain configuration and supplier selection: multi-objective approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(8), 6782–6791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. H., & Zhang, G. (2013). A three-stage model for closed-loop supply chain configuration under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 51(5), 1405–1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chouinard, M., D’Amours, S., & Aït-Kadi, D. (2008). A stochastic programming approach for designing supply loops. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(2), 657–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, R. S. (1991). Scenario optimization. Annals of Operations Research, 30(1), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sayed, M., Afia, N., & El-Kharbotly, A. (2010). A stochastic model for forward-reverse logistics network design under risk. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 58(3), 423–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M., Persona, A., Sgarbossa, F., & Zanin, G. (2011). Multi-stage supply network design in case of reverse flows: a closed-loop approach. International Journal of Operational Research, 12(2), 157–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francas, D., & Minner, S. (2009). Manufacturing network configuration in supply chains with product recovery. Omega, 37(4), 757–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guide, V. D. R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2009). OR forum—the evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Operations Research, 57(1), 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaut, M., & Wallace, S. W. (2007). Evaluation of scenario-generation methods for stochastic programming. Pacific Journal of Optimization, 3(2), 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krarup, J., & Pruzan, P. M. (1983). The simple plant location problem: survey and synthesis. European Journal of Operational Research, 12(1), 36–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamming, R., & Hampson, J. (1996). The environment as a supply chain management issue. British Journal of Management, 7(s1), S45–S62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Listeş, O. (2007). A generic stochastic model for supply-and-return network design. Computers & Operations Research, 34(2), 417–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogryczak, W. (2000). Multiple criteria linear programming model for portfolio selection. Annals of Operations Research, 97(1–4), 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özceylan, E., & Paksoy, T. (2013). Fuzzy multi objective linear programming approach for optimizing a closed-loop supply chain network. International Journal of Production Research, 51(8), 2443–2461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özkır, V., & Başlıgil, H. (2013). Multi-objective optimization of closed-loop supply chains in uncertain environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 41, 114–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pishvaee, M. S., & Torabi, S. A. (2010). A possibilistic programming approach for closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 161(20), 2668–2683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pishvaee, M. S., Rabbani, M., & Torabi, S. A. (2011). A robust optimization approach to closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(2), 637–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pokharel, S., & Mutha, A. (2009). Perspectives in reverse logistics: a review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53(4), 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramezani, M., Bashiri, M., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2013). A new multi-objective stochastic model for a forward/reverse logistic network design with responsiveness and quality level. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(1–2), 328–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasikumar, P., & Kannan, G. (2009). Issues in reverse supply chain, part III: classification and simple analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 2(1), 2–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrijver, A. (2003). Combinatorial optimization: polyhedra and efficiency. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soleimani, H., Seyyed-Esfahani, M., & Shirazi, M. A. (2013). Designing and planning a multi-echelon multi-period multi-product closed-loop supply chain utilizing genetic algorithm. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-4953-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramoniam, R., Huisingh, D., & Chinnam, R. B. (2009). Remanufacturing for the automotive aftermarket-strategic factors: literature review and future research needs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(13), 1163–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonanont, A., Yimsiri, S., Jitpitaklert, W., & Rogers, K. J. (2008). Performance evaluation in reverse logistics with data envelopment analysis. In Proceedings of the 2008 industrial engineering research conference (pp. 764–769).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, G., & Min, H. (2011). Designing a closed-loop supply chain with stochastic product returns: a genetic algorithm approach. International Journal of Information Systems for Logistics and Management, 9(4), 397–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X., & Xiuquan, X. U. (2013). An integrated optimization model of a closed-loop supply chain under uncertainty. In LISS 2012 (pp. 1389–1395). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirmehdi Seyyed-Esfahani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soleimani, H., Seyyed-Esfahani, M. & Shirazi, M.A. A new multi-criteria scenario-based solution approach for stochastic forward/reverse supply chain network design. Ann Oper Res 242, 399–421 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-013-1435-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-013-1435-z

Keywords

Navigation