Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A resource-based perspective on leader-member exchange: An updated meta-analysis

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leader-member exchange (LMX) pertains to the exchange relationship between supervisors and subordinates. While prior results validated LMX’s critical role in the workplace, less is known about “what has been input and exchanged” to cultivate this dyadic relationship. In this study, a resource framework based on conservation of resources theory (COR) was developed as an alternative theoretical perspective in investigating relationships between LMX and its correlates. Three groups of resources which has incorporated newly studied and existing correlates of LMX and existing constructs that could not be easily fitted into other theoretical frameworks were argued as antecedents to LMX. COR theory highlights the important role of LMX in transforming instrumental resources into favorable outcomes. The model also incorporates two types of LMX consequences: employee competitiveness and organizational enhancements. The findings contribute to the LMX literature by identifying the types of resources that are valuable in cultivating a high-quality LMX relationship, which in turn relates to the competitiveness of employees and their contribution that can enhance organizational effectiveness. Overall, the study findings indicate that LMX is significantly related to various antecedents and outcomes. Implications for theory development and directions for future research are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Studies marked with an asterisk are included in the meta-analysis.

  • *Abu Bakar, H., Mustaffa, C. S., & Mohamad, B. 2009. LMX quality, supervisory communication and team-oriented commitment: A multilevel analysis approach. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14: 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Agarwal, U. A., Datta, S., Blake-Beard, S., & Bhargava, S. 2012. Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work engagement. Career Development International, 17(3): 208–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Ahmed, I., Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail, W., Mohamad Amin, S., & Musarrat Nawaz, M. 2013. A social exchange perspective of the individual guanxi network: evidence from Malaysian-Chinese employees. Chinese Management Studies, 7(1): 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Aleksić, D., Mihelič, K. K., Černe, M., & Škerlavaj, M. 2017. Interactive effects of perceived time pressure, satisfaction with work-family balance (SWFB), and leader-member exchange (LMX) on creativity. Personnel Review, 46(3): 662–679.

  • *Allen, T. D., & Eby, L. T. 2003. Relationship effectiveness for mentors: Factors associated with learning and quality. Journal of Management, 29(4): 469–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. 2003. Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2): 295–305.

  • Anand, S., Hu, J., Liden, R. C., & Vidyarthi, P. R. 2011. Leader-member exchange: Recent research findings and prospects for the future. The Sage Handbook of Leadership: 311–325.

  • *Anand, S., Vidyarthi, P. R., Liden, R. C., & Rousseau, D. M. 2010. Good citizens in poor-quality relationships: Idiosyncratic deals as a substitute for relationship quality. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5): 970–988.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Anderson, S. E., & Williams, L. J. 1996. Interpersonal, job, and individual factors related to helping processes at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3): 282–296.

  • *Andrews, M. C., & Kacmar, K. M. 2001. Discrimination among organizational politics, justice, and support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22: 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Audenaert, M., Decramer, A., George, B., Verschuere, B., & Van Waeyenberg, T. 2016. When employee performance management affects individual innovation in public organizations: the role of consistency and LMX. International Journal of Human Resource Management: 1–20.

  • Banks, G. C., Batchelor, J. H., Seers, A., O’Boyle, E. H., Pollack, J. M., & Gower, K. 2014. What does team–member exchange bring to the party? A meta-analytic review of team and leader social exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(2): 273–295.

  • *Basu, R., & Green, S. G. 1995. Subordinate performance, leader-subordinate compatibility, and exchange quality in leader-member dyads: A field study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25: 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Basu, R., & Green, S. G. 1997. Leader-member exchange and transformational leadership: An empirical examination of innovative behaviors in leader-member dyads. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27: 477–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, T., & Porath, C. L. 2003. Transcendent behavior. In K. Cameron, J. Dutton, & R. Quinn (Eds.). Positive organizational scholarship: 403–425. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. 1996. Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1538–1567.

  • Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. 2010. SHRM and job design: Narrowing the divide. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2-3): 379–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M., & Eisenstat, R. A. 2000. The silent killers of strategy implementation and learning. Sloan Management Review, 41(4): 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Bernas, K. H., & Major, D. A. 2000. Contributors to stress resistance: Testing a model of women’s work-family conflict. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24: 170–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Bhal, K. T. 2006. LMX-citizenship behavior relationship: Justice as a mediator. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(2): 106–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Bhal, K. T., Ansari, M. A., & Aafaqi, R. 2007. The role of gender match, LMX tenure, and support in leader-member exchange. International Journal of Business and Society, 8: 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Bhal, K. T., & Gulati, N. 2006. Predicting turnover intentions: Incorporating the role of organization and work-group level variables. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 7: 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. 1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria for fairness. In B. Sheppard (Ed.). Research on negotiation in organizations, vol. 1: 43–55. Greenwich: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. 1988. Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3): 676–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Boies, K., & Howell, J. M. 2006. Leader–member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 17: 246–257.

  • *Borchgrevink, C. P., & Boster, F. J. 1997. Leader-member exchange development: A hospitality antecedent investigation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 16: 241–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Botero, I. C., & Van Dyne, L. 2009. Employee voice behavior interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the United States and Colombia. Management Communication Quarterly, 23: 84–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Brandes, P., Dharwadkar, R., & Wheatley, K. 2004. Social exchanges within organizations and work outcomes: The importance of local and global relationships. Group & Organization Management, 29: 276–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Brown, D. J., Ferris, D. L., Heller, D., & Keeping, L. M. 2007. Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102: 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. 2005. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2): 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. P. 1996. A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2): 235–255.

  • *Burris, E. R., Detert, J. R., & Chiaburu, D. S. 2008. Quitting before leaving: The mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 912–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butts, M. M., Casper, W. J., & Yang, T. S. 2013. How important are work–family support policies? A meta-analytic investigation of their effects on employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. 1971. The attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Carmeli, A., Atwater, L., & Levi, A. 2011. How leadership enhances employees’ knowledge sharing: the intervening roles of relational and organizational identification. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3): 257–274.

  • Carter, M. Z., Mossholder, K. W., Feild, H. S., & Armenakis, A. A. 2014. Transformational leadership, interactional justice, and organizational citizenship behavior the effects of racial and gender dissimilarity between supervisors and subordinates. Group & Organization Management, 39(6): 691–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Chambel, M. J., Castanheira, F., Oliveira-Cruz, F., & Lopes, S. 2015. Work context support and Portuguese soldiers’ well-being: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. Military Psychology, 27(5): 297–310.

  • *Chen, C. V., Wang, S., Chang, W., & Hu, C. 2008a. The effect of leader-member exchange, trust, supervisor support on organizational citizenship behavior in nurses. Journal of Nursing Research, 16: 321–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Chen, C. Y., Mao, H. Y., Hsieh, A. T., Liu, L. L., & Yen, C. H. 2013. The relationship among interactive justice, leader-member exchange, and workplace friendship. Social Science Journal, 50(1): 89–95.

  • *Chen, G., Kirkman, B. L., Kanfer, R., Allen, D., & Rosen, B. 2007. A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 331–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Chen, N. Y., & Tjosvold, D. 2007. Guanxi and leader member relationships between American managers and Chinese employees: Open-minded dialogue as mediator. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24: 171–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Chen, N. Y., & Tjosvold, D. 2008. Goal interdependence and leader-member relationship for cross-cultural leadership in foreign ventures in China. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29: 144–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Chen, Z., Lam, W., & Zhong, J. A. 2012. Effects of perceptions on LMX and work performance: Effects of supervisors’ perception of subordinates’ emotional intelligence and subordinates’ perception of trust in the supervisor on LMX and, consequently, performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(3): 597–616.

  • *Chen, Z. X., Tsui, A. S., & Zhong, L. 2008b. Reactions to psychological contract breach: A dual perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29: 527–548.

  • *Cheng, T., Huang, G. H., Lee, C., & Ren, X. 2012. Longitudinal effects of job insecurity on employee outcomes: The moderating role of emotional intelligence and the leader-member exchange. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(3): 709–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Chullen, C. L., Dunford, B. B., Angermeier, I., Boss, R. W., & Boss, A. D. 2010. Minimizing deviant behavior in healthcare organizations: The effects of supportive leadership and job design. Journal of Healthcare Management, 55(6): 381–398.

  • *Cogliser, C. C., & Schriesheim, C. A. 2000. Exploring work unit context and leader-member exchange: A multi-level perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5): 487–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Meitar, R., Carmeli, A., & Waldman, D. A. 2009. Linking meaningfulness in the workplace to employee creativity: The intervening role of organizational identification and positive psychological experiences. Creativity Research Journal, 21(4): 361–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Collins, B. J., Burrus, C. J., & Meyer, R. D. 2014. Gender differences in the impact of leadership styles on subordinate embeddedness and job satisfaction. Leadership Quarterly, 25(4): 660–671.

  • *Collins, M. D. 2010. The effect of psychological contract fulfillment on manager turnover intentions and its role as a mediator in a casual, limited-service restaurant environment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(4): 736–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, M. 1974. Psychological energy transformations: Developing positive polarization. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 6(1): 39–56.

  • Cropanzano, R., Dasborough, M. T., & Weiss, H. M. 2017. Affective events and the development of leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 42(2): 233–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. A., & Chen, P. Y. 2002. Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group & Organization Management, 27: 324–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Culbertson, S. S., Huffman, H., & Alden-Anderson, R. 2010. Leader-member exchange and work-family interactions: The mediating role of self-reported challenge- and hindrance-related stress. Journal of Psychology, 144: 15–36.

  • Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. 1975. A vertical dyadic linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13: 46–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • *De Villiers, J. R., & Stander, M. W. 2011. Psychological empowerment, work engagement and turnover intention: The role of leader relations and role clarity in a financial institution. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 21(3): 405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • *DeConinck, J. B. 2010. The effect of organizational justice, perceived organizational support, and perceived supervisor support on marketing employees’ level of trust. Journal of Business Research, 63(12): 1349–1355.

  • *DeConinck, J. B. 2011. The effects of leader-member exchange and organizational identification on performance and turnover among salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 31(1): 21–34.

  • *Dobbins, G. H., Cardy, R. L., & Platz-Vieno, S. J. 1990. A contingency approach to appraisal satisfaction: An initial investigation of the joint effects of organizational variables and appraisal characteristics. Journal of Management, 16: 619–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Douglas, C., & Zivnuska, S. 2008. Developing trust in leaders: An antecedent of firm performance. Advanced Management Journal, 73: 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBrin, A. J. (2010). Impression management in the workplace: Research, theory and practice. Routledge.

  • *Dulac, T., Choyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., Henderson, D. J., & Wayne, S. J. 2008. Not all responses to breach are the same: The interconnection of social exchange and psychological contract processes in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 1079–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. 2012. A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6): 1715–1759.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Dulebohn, J. H., & Ferris, G. R. 1999. The role of influence tactics in perceptions of performance evaluations’ fairness. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 288–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. 2001. Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. 2002. Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3): 565–573.

  • *Elicker, J. D., Levy, P. E., & Hall, R. J. 2006. The role of leader-member exchange in the performance appraisal process. Journal of Management, 32: 531–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Engle, E. M., & Lord, R. G. 1997. Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 988–1010.

  • *Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. 2005. From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 659–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. 2013. Transformational-transactional leadership and upward influence: The role of relative leader-member exchanges (RLMX) and perceived organizational support (POS). Leadership Quarterly, 24(2): 299–315.

  • Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. 2010. Differentiated leader-member exchanges: The buffering role of justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6): 1104–1120.

  • *Erdogan, B., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. 2004. Work value congruence and intrinsic career success: The compensatory roles of leader-member exchange and perceived organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 57: 305–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Erdogan, B., & Liden, R. C. 2006. Collectivism as a moderator of responses to organizational justice: Implications for leader-member exchange and ingratiation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan, B., Liden, R. C., & Kraimer, M. L. 2006. Justice and leader-member exchange: The moderating role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 395–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Ertürk, A. 2014. Influences of HR practices, social exchange, and trust on turnover intentions of public IT professionals. Public Personnel Management, 43(1): 140–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Ertürk, A., & Vurgun, L. 2015. Retention of IT professionals: Examining the influence of empowerment, social exchange, and trust. Journal of Business Research, 68(1): 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, S. M., Van Dyne, L., & Kamdar, D. 2015. The contextualized self: How team–member exchange leads to coworker identification and helping OCB. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2): 583–595.

  • *Farrell, M. A., & Oczkowski, E. 2012. Organisational identification and leader member exchange influences on customer orientation and organisational citizenship behaviours. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 20(4): 365–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Farr-Wharton, R., Brunetto, Y., & Shacklock, K. 2011. Professionals’ supervisor-subordinate relationships, autonomy and commitment in Australia: a leader-member exchange theory perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(17): 3496–3512.

  • *Fein, E. C., Tziner, A., Lusky, L., & Palachy, O. 2013. Relationships between ethical climate, justice perceptions, and LMX. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(2): 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., & Heller, D. 2009. Organizational supports and organizational deviance: The mediating role of organization-based self-esteem. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108: 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. 1992. Perceptions of organizational politics. Journal of Management, 18: 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. 1980. Resource theory. In Social Exchange: 77–94. US: Springer.

  • *Furst, S. A., & Cable, D. M. 2008. Employee resistance to organizational change: Managerial influence tactics and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 453–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Furunes, T., Mykletun, R. J., Einarsen, S., & Glasø, L. 2015. Do low-quality leader-member relationships matter for subordinates? Evidence from three samples on the validity of the Norwegian LMX scale. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 5(2): 71–87.

  • *Gajendran, R. S., & Joshi, A. 2012. Innovation in globally distributed teams: The role of LMX, communication frequency, and member influence on team decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6): 1252–1261.

  • *Garg, S., & Dhar, R. 2017. Employee service innovative behavior: The roles of leader-member exchange (LMX), work engagement, and job autonomy. International Journal of Manpower, 38(2): 242–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattiker, U. E., & Larwood, L. 1988. Predictors for managers’ career mobility, success, and satisfaction. Human Relations, 41: 569–591.

  • Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. 1997. Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 827–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Golden, T. D. 2006. The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 319–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, C., & Rosen, B. 2001. The leader-member exchange as a link between managerial trust and employee empowerment. Group & Organization Management, 26: 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Goodwin, V. L., Bowler, W. M., & Whittington, J. L. 2009. A social network perspective on LMX relationships: Accounting for the instrumental value of leader and follower networks. Journal of Management, 35: 954–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Gordon, H. J., Demerouti, E., Le Blanc, P. M., & Bipp, T. 2015. Job crafting and performance of Dutch and American health care professionals. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14: 192–202.

  • Gouldner, A. W. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2): 161–178.

  • Graen, G., & Cashman, J. F. 1975. A role making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In J. G. Hunt, & L. L. Larson (Eds.). Leadership frontiers. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. B., Liden, R. C., & Hoel, W. 1982. Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 868–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. 1987. Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 9: 175–208. Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. 1995. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6: 219–247.

  • *Graen, G. B., Wakabayashi, M., Graen, M. R., & Graen, M. G. 1990. International generalizability of American hypotheses about Japanese management progress: A strong inference investigation. Leadership Quarterly, 1: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. 2006. Losing sleep over organizational injustice: Attenuating insomniac reactions to underpayment inequity with supervisory training in interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1): 58–69.

  • Greer, L. L., Caruso, H. M., & Jehn, K. A. 2011. The bigger they are, the harder they fall: Linking team power, team conflict, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(1): 116–128.

  • *Greguras, G. J., & Ford, J. M. 2006. An examination of the multidimensionality of supervisor and subordinate perceptions of leader-member exchange. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79: 433–465.

  • Griffin, M. A., Patterson, M. G., & West, M. A. 2001. Job satisfaction and teamwork: The role of supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(5): 537–550.

  • *Gupta, V., & Krishnan, V. R. 2004. Impact of socialization on transformational leadership: Role of leader member exchange. South Asian Journal of Management, 11: 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldman, G. R. 1976. Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2): 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbesleben, J. R., Harvey, J., & Bolino, M. C. 2009. Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1452–1465.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Hansen, S. D., Alge, B. J., Brown, M. E., Jackson, C. L., & Dunford, B. B. 2013. Ethical leadership: Assessing the value of a multifoci social exchange perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(3): 435–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Harris, K. J., Harris, R. B., & Eplion, D. M. 2007. Personality, leader-member exchanges, and work outcomes. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 8: 92–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Harris, K. J., Harris, R. B., & Harvey, P. 2008. An examination of the impact of supervisor on the relationship between job strains and turnover intention for computer workers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38: 2108–2131.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Harris, K. J., & Kacmar, K. M. 2005. Easing the strain: The buffer role of supervisors in the perceptions of politics-strain relationship. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78: 337–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., & Carlson, D. S. 2006. An examination of temporal variables and relationship quality on promotability ratings. Group & Organization Management, 31: 677–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. J., Wheeler, A. R., & Kacmar, K. M. 2009. Leader-member exchange and empowerment: Direct and interactive effects on job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and performance. Leadership Quarterly, 20: 371–382.

  • Harris, T. B., Li, N., & Kirkman, B. L. 2014. Leader-member exchange (LMX) in context: How LMX differentiation and LMX relational separation attenuate LMX’s influence on OCB and turnover intention. Leadership Quarterly, 25(2): 314–328.

  • *Heck, A. K., Bedeian, A. G., & Day, D. V. 2005. Mountains out of molehills? Tests of the mediating effects of self-esteem in predicting workplace complaining. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35: 2262–2289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekman, D. R., Bigley, G. A., Steensma, H. K., & Hereford, J. F. 2009. Combined effects of organizational and professional identification on the reciprocity dynamic for professional employees. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3): 506–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D. J., Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E. 2008. Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and psychological contract fulfillment: A multilevel examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 1208–1219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, H. M., Dasborough, M. T., & Ashkanasy, N. M. 2008. A multi-level analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work. Leadership Quarterly, 19(2): 195–211.

  • *Hesselgreaves, H., & Scholarios, D. 2014. Leader–member exchange and strain: A study of job demands and role status. Human Resource Management Journal, 24(4): 459–478.

  • Higgins, M. C., & Kram, K. E. 2001. Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(2): 264–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Hill, R. T., Morganson, V. J., Matthews, R. A., & Atkinson, T. P. 2016. LMX, breach perceptions, work-family conflict, and well-being: A mediational model. Journal of Psychology, 150(1): 132–149.

  • Hobfoll, S. E. 1989. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44: 513–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. 2001. The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50: 337–421.

  • Hobfoll, S. E. 2011. Conservation of resources theory: Its implication for stress, health, and resilience. The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping: 127–147.

  • *Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. 2014. Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3): 390–403.

  • *Hofmann, D. A., & Morgeson, F. P. 1999. Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: The role of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 286–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Hopper, D. T., & Martin, R. 2008. Beyond personal Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) quality: The effects of perceived LMX variability on employee reactions. Leadership Quarterly, 19: 20–30.

  • *Hsiung, H. H. 2012. Authentic leadership and employee voice behavior: A multi-level psychological process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3): 349–361.

  • *Hsu, B. F., Chen, W. Y., Wang, M. L., & Lin, Y. Y. 2010. Explaining supervisory support to work-family conflict: The perspectives of guanxi, LMX, and emotional intelligence. Journal of Technology Management in China, 5(1): 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Hu, J., & Liden, R. C. 2013. Relative leader–member exchange within team contexts: How and when social comparison impacts individual effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 66(1): 127–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Huang, X., Chan, S. C., Lam, W., & Nan, X. 2010. The joint effect of leader–member exchange and emotional intelligence on burnout and work performance in call centers in China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(7): 1124–1144.

  • *Hui, C., Lee, C., & Rousseau, D. M. 2004. Psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior in China: Investigating generalizability and instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2): 311–321.

  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage publications.

  • Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. 2007. Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 269–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Jackson, E. M., & Johnson, R. E. 2012. When opposites do (and do not) attract: Interplay of leader and follower self-identities and its consequences for leader-member exchange. Leadership Quarterly, 23(3): 488–501.

  • *Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. 2004. Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 368–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Jawahar, I. M., & Carr, D. 2007. Conscientiousness and contextual performance: The compensatory effects of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22: 330–349.

  • *Johnson, R. E., Selenta, C., & Lord, R. G. 2006. When organizational justice and the self-concept meet: Consequences for the organization and its members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99: 175–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. 2001. Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied Psychology, 86(1): 80–92.

  • Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. 2002. Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 797–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kacmar, K. M., Carlson, D. S., & Bratton, V. K. 2004. Situational and dispositional factors as antecedents of ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65: 309–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kacmar, K. M., Carlson, D. S., & Brymer, R. A. 1999. Antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment: A comparison of two scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(6): 976–994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacmar, K. M., Witt, L. A., Zivnuska, S., & Gully, S. M. 2003. The interactive effect of leader-member exchange and communication frequency on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 764–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A. 1990. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4): 692–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kamdar, D., & Van Dyne, L. V. 2007. The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1286–1298.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kang, D. S., Stewart, J., Kim, H., & Lim, J. C. 2012. Unravelling the impact of psychological empowerment on customer service behaviours as a consequence of ‘Leader-Member Exchange’. Service Industries Journal, 32(11): 1791–1809.

  • *Karanika-Murray, M., Bartholomew, K. J., Williams, G. A., & Cox, T. 2015. Leader-Member Exchange across two hierarchical levels of leadership: Concurrent influences on work characteristics and employee psychological health. Work & Stress, 29(1): 57–74.

  • *Karriker, J. H., & Williams, M. L. 2009. Organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior: A mediated multifoci model. Journal of Management, 35: 112–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kath, L. M., Marks, K. M., & Ranney, J. 2010. Safety climate dimensions, leader-member exchange, and organizational support as predictors of upward safety communication in a sample of rail industry workers. Safety Science, 48(5): 643–650.

  • Katrinli, A., Atabay, G., Gunay, G., & Guneri, B. 2008. Leader-member exchange, organizational identification and the mediating role of job involvement for nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 64: 354–362.

  • Khurram, S. 2009. Perceived organizational support, antecedents and consequences proposing and testing a model in a public sector university of Pakistan. South Asian Journal of Management, 16(1): 7–26.

  • Kim, T. Y., Liu, Z., & Diefendorff, J. M. 2015. Leader-member exchange and job performance: The effects of taking charge and organizational tenure. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(2): 216–231.

  • *Kim, W., Ok, C., & Lee, M. J. 2009. Antecedents of service employees’ organizational citizenship behaviors in full-service restaurants. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 50: 180–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kraimer, M. L., Seibert, S. E., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Bravo, J. 2011. Antecedents and outcomes of organizational support for development: The critical role of career opportunities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3): 485–500.

  • *Kraimer, M. L., & Wayne, S. J. 2004. An examination of perceived organizational support as a multidimensional construct in the context of an expatriated assignment. Journal of Management, 30: 209–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kraimer, M. L., Wayne, S. J., & Jaworski, R. A. 2001. Sources of support and expatriate performance: The mediating role of expatriate adjustment. Personnel Psychology, 54: 71–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kudisch, J. D., Fortunato, V. J., & Smith, A. F. R. 2006. Contextual and individual difference factors predicting individuals’ desire to provide upward feedback. Group & Organization Management, 31: 503–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kumar, M., & Singh, S. 2012. Roles of perceived exchange quality and organisational identification in predicting turnover intention. IIMB Management Review, 24(1): 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kumar, M., Singh, S., Rai, H., & Bhattacharya, A. 2012. Measuring humane orientation of organizations through social exchange and organizational identification facilitation and control of burnout and intent to quit. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 15(4): 520–547.

  • *Kunze, M., & Phillips, J. 2011. The influence of employee affect on leader-member exchange and perceptions of psychological contract violation. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 4(2): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, W. J., & Choi, S. B. 2015. Effect of rating discrepancy on turnover intention and leader-member exchange. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(3): 801–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kwan, H. K., Liu, J., & Yim, F. H. K. 2011. Effects of mentoring functions on receivers’ organizational citizenship behavior in a Chinese context: A two-study investigation. Journal of Business Research, 64(4): 363–370.

  • *Lamertz, K. 2002. The social construction of fairness: Social influence and sense making in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Landry, G., & Vandenberghe, C. 2009. Role of commitment to the supervisor, leader-member exchange, and supervisor-based self-esteem in employee-supervisor conflicts. Journal of Social Psychology, 149: 5–27.

  • *Lapierre, L. M., Hackett, R. D., & Taggar, S. 2006. A test of the links between family interference with work, job enrichment and leader-member exchange. Applied Psychology: An international Review, 55: 489–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle, J. J., Rupp, D. E., & Brockner, J. 2007. Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: The target similarity model. Journal of Management, 33(6): 841–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Law, K. S., & Wong, C. S. 1999. Multidimensional constructs in structural equation analysis: An illustration using the job perception and job satisfaction constructs. Journal of Management, 25: 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Lawrence, E. R., & Kacmar, K. M. 2012. Leader-member exchange and stress: The mediating role of job involvement and role conflict. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 14(1): 39–52.

  • Leana, C. R. 1986. Predictors and consequences of delegation. Academy of Management Journal, 29(4): 754–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Lee, J. 2008. Effects of leadership and leader-member exchange on innovativeness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23: 670–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Chae, Y. J., & Shin, I. 2016. Motivational antecedents of leader-member exchange differentiation: Evidence from South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(1): 87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Lee, K., Scandura, T., Kim, Y., Joshi, K., & Lee, J. 2012. Examining leader-member exchange as a moderator of the relationship between emotional intelligence and creativity of software developers. Engineering Management Research, 1(1): 15–28.

  • *Lee, K., Scandura, T. A., & Sharif, M. M. 2014. Cultures have consequences: A configural approach to leadership across two cultures. Leadership Quarterly, 25(4): 692–710.

  • Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Sablynski, C. J., Burton, J. P., & Holtom, B. C. 2004. The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5): 711–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Leow, K. L. 2011. The organizational commitment: The study of mentoring and leader-member Exchange (LMX) among auditors in Malaysia—moderating effects of gender. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 6(1): 123–146.

  • Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. 2002. Examining the human resource architecture: The relationships among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations. Journal of Management, 28(4): 517–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, N., Liang, J., & Crant, J. M. 2010. The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A relational perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2): 395–404.

  • *Li, X., Sanders, K., & Frenkel, S. 2012. How leader-member exchange, work engagement and HRM consistency explain Chinese luxury hotel employees’ job performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(4): 1059–1066.

  • *Liao, E. Y., & Hui, C. 2016. Supervisor monitoring and subordinate innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(2): 168–192.

  • *Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. 2010. Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5): 1090–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, P. Y. 2011. Linking work–family conflict to job attitudes: the mediating role of social exchange relationships. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(14): 2965–2980. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, S. S., Liao, S. S., Hu, D. C., Hu, D. C., Chung, Y. C., Chung, Y. C., & Chen, L. W. 2017. LMX and employee satisfaction: mediating effect of psychological capital. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(3), 433–449.

  • Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. 2006. Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(6): 723–746.

  • *Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. 1998. Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24: 43–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. 2000. An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 407–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. 1993. A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 662–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Lindsey Hall, K. K., Baker, T. L., Andrews, M. C., Hunt, T. G., & Rapp, A. A. 2016. The importance of product/service quality for frontline marketing employee outcomes: The moderating effect of leader-member exchange (LMX). Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 24(1): 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Liu, Y., Loi, R., & Lam, L. W. 2011. Linking organizational identification and employee performance in teams: The moderating role of team-member exchange. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(15): 3187–3201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., Cai, Z., Li, J., Shi, S., & Fang, Y. 2013. Leadership style and employee turnover intentions: A social identity perspective. Career Development International, 18(3): 305–324.

  • Locke, E. A., McClear, K., & Knight, D. 1996. Self-esteem and work. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodahl, T. M., & Kejnar, M. 1965. The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(1): 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Ma, E., & Qu, H. 2011. Social exchanges as motivators of hotel employees’ organizational citizenship behavior: The proposition and application of a new three-dimensional framework. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(3): 680–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L., & Qu, Q. 2010. Differentiation in leader–member exchange: A hierarchical linear modeling approach. Leadership Quarterly, 21(5): 733–744.

  • Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. 1992. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2): 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maertz, C. P., Griffeth, R. W., Campbell, N. S., & Allen, D. G. 2007. The effects of perceived organizational support and perceived supervisor support on employee turnover. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(8): 1059–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Magni, M., & Pennarola, F. 2008. Intra-organizational relationships and technology acceptance. International Journal of Information Management, 28: 517–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Mahsud, R., Yukl, G., & Prussia, G. 2010. Leader empathy, ethical leadership, and relations-oriented behaviors as antecedents of leader-member exchange quality. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(6): 561–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Major, D. A., Fletcher, T. D., Davis, D. D., & Germano, L. M. 2008. The influence of work-family culture and workplace relationships on work interference with family: A multilevel model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29: 881–897.

  • *Major, D. A., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T., & Gardner, P. D. 1995. A longitudinal investigation of newcomer expectations, early socialization outcomes, and the moderating effects of role development factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80: 418–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Marstand, A. F., Martin, R., & Epitropaki, O. 2017. Complementary person-supervisor fit: An investigation of supplies-values (SV) fit, leader-member exchange (LMX) and work outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 28(3): 418–437.

  • Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. 2016. Leader-member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1): 67–121.

  • Maslyn, J. M., & Uhl-Bien, M. 2001. Leader-member exchange and its dimensions: Effects of self-effort and other’s effort on relationship quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 697–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. 2000. Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 38–748.

  • Matthews, R. A., & Toumbeva, T. H. 2015. Lagged effects of family-supportive organization perceptions and supervision in relation to generalized work-related resources. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(3): 301–313.

  • Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. 2012. Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1): 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., Caruso, D. R., & Sitarenios, G. 2001. Emotional intelligence as a standard intelligence. Emotion, 1: 232–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • *McCarthy, J. M., Trougakos, J. P., & Cheng, B. H. 2016. Are anxious workers less productive workers? It depends on the quality of social exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101: 279–291.

  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. 2002. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1): 20–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. 2001. Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6): 1102–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Morrow, P. C., Suuki, Y., Crum, M. R., Ruben, R., & Pautsch, G. 2005. The role of leader-member exchange in high turnover work environments. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20: 681–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Mroz, J. E., & Allen, J. A. 2015. It’s all in how you use it: Managers’ use of meetings to reduce employee intentions to quit. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 67(4): 348–361.

  • *Murphy, S. M., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Erdogan, B. 2003. Understanding social loafing: The role of justice perceptions and exchange relationships. Human Relations, 56: 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. 2011. Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1): 71–94.

  • *Nathan, B. R., Mohrman, A. M., & Milliman, J. 1991. Interpersonal relations as a context for the effects of appraisal interviews on performance and satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 34(2): 352–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Nelson, D., Basu, R., & Purdie, R. 1998. An examination of exchange quality and work stressors in leader-follower dyads. International Journal of Stress Management, 5: 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W., Sorensen, K. L., & Yim, F. H. 2009. Does the Job Satisfaction—Job Performance Relationship Vary Across Cultures? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(5): 761–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. 2005. Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58: 367–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • *O’Donnell, M., Yukl, G., & Taber, T. 2012. Leader behavior and LMX: a constructive replication. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(2): 143–154.

  • *Omilion-Hodges, L. M., & Baker, C. R. 2013. Contextualizing LMX within the workgroup: The effects of LMX and justice on relationship quality and resource sharing among peers. Leadership Quarterly, 24(6): 935–951.

  • *Ordun, G., & Beyhan Acar, A. 2014. Impact of emotional intelligence on the establishment and development of high quality leader-member exchange (LMX). Advances in Management & Applied Economics, 4(2): 111–129.

  • *Owens, B. P., Baker, W. E., Sumpter, D. M., & Cameron, K. S. 2016. Relational energy at work: Implications for job engagement and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1): 35–49.

  • *Ozer, M. 2008. Personal and task-related moderators of leader-member exchange among software developers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 1174–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Ozer, M. 2011. A moderated mediation model of the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviors and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6): 1328–1336.

  • *Paglis, L. L., & Green, S. G. 2002. Both sides now: Supervisor and subordinate perspectives on relationships quality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32: 250–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Pan, J. Z., & Wen-xia, Z. 2011. Under dual perspective of work exchange and social exchange: The study of impact of LMX on affective commitment. Nankai Business Review International, 2(4): 402–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Pan, W., Sun, L. Y., & Chow, I. H. S. 2012. Leader-member exchange and employee creativity: Test of a multilevel moderated mediation model. Human Performance, 25(5): 432–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Parke, M. R., Seo, M. G., & Sherf, E. N. 2015. Regulating and facilitating: The role of emotional intelligence in maintaining and using positive affect for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3): 917–934.

  • Parker, S. K., & Sprigg, C. A. 1999. Minimizing strain and maximizing learning: The role of job demands, job control, and proactive personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(6): 925–939.

  • *Patterson, P., Yu, T., & Kimpakorn, N. 2014. Killing two birds with one stone: Cross-selling during service delivery. Journal of Business Research, 67(9): 1944–1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, S. C., & Huffman, A. H. 2005. A longitudinal examination of the influence of mentoring on organizational commitment and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1): 158–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. 2006. Leader-member exchange (LMX), paternalism, and delegation in the Turkish business culture: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37: 264–279.

  • *Phillips, A. S., & Bedeian, A. G. 1994. Leader-follwer exchange quality: The role of personal and interpersonal attributes. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 990–1001. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. L., & Gardner, D. G. 2004. Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: A review of the organization-based self-esteem literature. Journal of Management, 30(5): 591–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Portoghese, I., Galletta, M., & Battistelli, A. 2011. The effects of work-family conflict and community embeddedness on employee satisfaction: The role of leader-member exchange. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(4): 39–48.

  • *Raghuram, S., Gajendran, R. S., Liu, X., & Somaya, D. 2017. Boundaryless LMX: Examining LMX’s impact on external career outcomes and alumni goodwill. Personnel Psychology, 70(2): 399–428.

  • *Reid, M. F., Riemenschneider, C. K., Allen, M. W., & Armstrong, D. J. 2008. Information technology employees in state government: A study of affective organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction. American Review of Public Administration, 38: 41–61.

  • *Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., & Bordia, S. 2011. Investigating the role of psychological contract breach on career success: Convergent evidence from two longitudinal studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2): 428–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., Tang, R. L., & Krebs, S. A. 2010. Investigating the moderating effects of leader-member exchange in the psychological contract breach–Employee performance relationship: A test of two competing perspectives. British Journal of Management, 21(2): 422–437.

  • Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. 2010. Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3): 617–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Rieck, T., Callahan, J. L., & Watkins Jr., C. E. 2015. Clinical supervision: An exploration of possible mechanisms of action. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 9(2): 187–194.

  • Robinson, S. L. 1996. Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4): 574–599.

  • *Roch, S. G., & Shanock, L. R. 2006. Organizational justice in an exchange framework: Clarifying organizational justice distinctions. Journal of Management, 32: 299–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockstuhl, T., Dulebohn, J. H., Ang, S., & Shore, L. M. 2012. Leader-member exchange (LMX) and culture: A meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6): 1097–1130.

  • Rosenberg, M. 1965. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Runhaar, P., Konermann, J., & Sanders, K. 2013. Teachers’ organizational citizenship behaviour: Considering the roles of their work engagement, autonomy and leader–member exchange. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30: 99–108.

  • Saari, L. M., & Judge, T. A. 2004. Employee attitudes and job satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 43(4): 395–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Sagas, M., & Cunningham, G. B. 2004. Treatment discrimination in college coaching: Its prevalence and impact on the career success of assistant basketball coaches. International Sports Journal, 8: 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. 1978. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly: 224–253.

  • Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. 1990. Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9: 185–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Sanders, K., Moorkamp, M., Torka, N., Groeneveld, S., & Groeneveld, C. 2010. How to support innovative behaviour? The role of LMX and satisfaction with HR practices. Technology and Investment, 1: 59–68.

  • *Scandura, T. A., & Schriesheim, C. A. 1994. Leader-member exchange and supervisor career mentoring as complementary constructs in leadership research. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1588–1602.

  • *Schaubroeck, J., & Lam, S. S. K. 2002. How similarity to peers and supervisor influences organizational advancement in different cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1120–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Schermuly, C. C., Meyer, B., & Dämmer, L. 2013. Leader-member exchange and innovative behavior. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12: 132–142.

  • *Schriesheim, C. A. 1995. Multivariate and moderated within- and between-entity analysis (WABA) using hierarchical linear multiple regression. Leadership Quarterly, 6: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., & Cogliser, C. C. 1999. Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. Leadership Quarterly, 10(1): 63–113.

  • Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., & Yammarino, F. J. 2000. Investigating contingencies: An examination of the impact of span of supervision and upward controllingness on leader-member exchange using traditional and multivariate within- and between-entities analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 659–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Schriesheim, C. A., & Cogliser, C. C. 2009. Construct validation in leadership research: Explication and illustration. Leadership Quarterly, 20: 725–736.

  • *Schriesheim, C. A., Neider, L. L., & Scandura, T. A. 1998. Delegation and leader-member exchange: Main effects, moderators, and measurement issues. Academy of Management Journal, 41(3): 298–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Schriesheim, C. A., Neider, L. L., & Tepper, B. J. 1992. Development and preliminary validation of a new scale (LMX-6) to measure leader-member exchange in organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52: 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriesheim, C. A., Wu, J. B., & Cooper, C. D. 2011. A two-study investigation of item wording effects on leader–follower convergence in descriptions of the leader-member exchange (LMX) relationship. Leadership Quarterly, 22(5): 881–892.

  • *Schyns, B. 2006. Are group consensus in leader-member exchange (LMX) and shared work values related to organizational outcomes? Small Group Research, 37: 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Schyns, B., & Croon, M. A. 2006. A model of task demands, social structure, and leader-member exchange and their relationship to job satisfaction. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17: 602–615.

  • Schyns, B., Torka, N., & Gossling, T. 2007. Turnover intention and preparedness for change Exploring leader-member exchange and occupational self-efficacy as antecedents of two employability predictors. Career Development International, 12: 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Schyns, B., & von Collani, G. 2002. A new occupational self-efficacy scale and its relation to personality constructs and organizational variables. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11: 219–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schyns, B., & Wolfram, H. J. 2008. The relationship between leader-member exchange and outcomes as rated by leaders and followers. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29: 631–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. 1994. Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 580–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. 1998. Following the leader in R&D: The joint effect of subordinate problem-solving style and leader-member relations on innovative behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, G. J., & Holmvall, C. M. 2010. The joint influence of supervisor and subordinate emotional intelligence on leader-member exchange. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4): 593–605.

  • *Sekiguchi, T., Burton, J. P., & Sablynski, C. J. 2008. The role of job embeddedness on employee performance: The interactive effects with leader-member exchange and organization-based self-esteem. Personnel Psychology, 61: 761–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Self, D. R., Holt, D. T., & Schaninger Jr., W. S. 2005. Work-group and organizational support: A test of distinct dimensions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78: 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. 1996. Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanock, L. R., & Eisenberger, R. 2006. When supervisors feel supported: relationships with subordinates' perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3): 689–695.

  • Shaw, J. D., & Ertug, G. 2017. The suitability of simulations and meta-analyses for submissions to academy of management journal. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6): 2045–2049.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Shen, Y. 2007. Antecedents and consequences of organizational identification: A social exchange perspective. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39: 918–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Sherony, K. M., & Green, S. G. 2002. Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 542–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Shmidt, J. L., Zapalski, C., & Toole, J. 2005. The relationship between intragroup dichotomization and bipolar groupthink. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 10: 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Sin, H. P., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. 2009. Understanding why they don’t see eye to eye: An examination of leader-member exchange (LMX) agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1048–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P., & Gelfand, M. J. 1995. Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29(3): 240–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Sluss, D. M., Klimchak, M., & Holmes, J. J. 2008. Perceived organizational support as a mediator between relational exchange and organizational identification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73: 457–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparr, J. L., & Sonnentag, S. 2008. Fairness perceptions of supervisor feedback, LMX, and employee well-being at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17: 198–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Sparrowe, R. T., Soetjipto, B. W., & Kraimer, M. L. 2006. Do leaders’ influence tactics relate to members’ helping behavior? It depends on the quality of the relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1194–1208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, P. D. 1986. Financial innovation, efficiency, and disequilibrium: Problems of monetary management in the United Kingdom, 1971-1981. Oxford University Press.

  • *Srikanth, P. B., & Gurunathan, L. 2013. Interactional justice and job mobility preparedness: Mediating role of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX). IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(3): 7–32.

  • Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. 1979. Social cognitive theory and self efficacy: Implications for Motivation Theory and Practice.

  • *Stepina, L. P., Perrewe, P. L., Hassell, B. L., Harris, J. R., & Mayfield, C. R. 1991. A comparative test of the independent effects of interpersonal, task, and reward domains on personal and organizational outcomes. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6: 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Suazo, M. M. 2011. The impact of affect and social exchange on outcomes of psychological contract breach. Journal of Managerial Issues, 32(2): 190–205.

  • *Sui, Y., Wang, H., Kirkman, B. L., & Li, N. 2016. Understanding the curvilinear relationships between LMX differentiation and team coordination and performance. Personnel Psychology, 69(3): 559–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Tangirala, S., Green, S. G., & Ramanujam, R. 2007. In the shadow of the boss’s boss: Effects of supervisors’ upward exchange relationships on employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Tejeda, M. J. 2006. Nondiscrimination policies and sexual identity disclosure: Do they make a difference in employee outcomes? Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 18: 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Tekleab, A. G., & Chiaburu, D. S. 2011. Social exchange: Empirical examination of form and focus. Journal of Business Research, 64(5): 460–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Tekleab, A. G., Takeuchi, R., & Taylor, M. S. 2005. Extending the chain of relationships among organizational justice, social exchange, and employee reactions: The role of contract violations. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 146–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Thomas, C. H., & Lankau, M. J. 2009. Preventing burnout: The effects of LMX and mentoring on socialization, role stress, and burnout. Human Resource Management, 48: 417–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Thompson, G., & Vecchio, R. P. 2009. Situational leadership theory: A test of three versions. Leadership Quarterly, 20: 837–848.

  • *Tierney, P. 1999. Work relations as a precursor to a psychological climate for change: The role of work group supervisors and peers. Journal of Organizational Change, 12: 120–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Tordera, N., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Peiro, J. M. 2008. The moderator effect of psychological climate on the relationship between leader-member exchange (LMX) quality and role overload. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17: 55–72.

  • Triandis, H. C. 1995. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder: Westview Press.

  • *Tse, H. H. M., Dasborough, M. T., & Ashkanasy, N. M. 2008. A multi-level analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work. Leadership Quarterly, 19: 195–211.

  • *Tse, H. H. M., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Dasborough, M. T. 2012. Relative leader-member exchange, negative affectivity and social identification: A moderated-mediation examination. Leadership Quarterly, 23(3): 354–366.

  • *Tumasjan, A., Strobel, M., & Welpe, I. 2011. Ethical leadership evaluations after moral transgression: Social distance makes the difference. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4): 609–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Tummers, L. G., & Bronkhorst, B. A. 2014. The impact of leader-member exchange (LMX) on work-family interference and work-family facilitation. Personnel Review, 43(4): 573–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnley, W. H., Bolino, M. C., Lester, S. W., & Bloodgood, J. M. 2003. The impact of psychological contract fulfillment on the performance of in-role and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 29(2): 187–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Uhl-Bien, M., & Maslyn, J. M. 2003. Reciprocity in manager-subordinate relationships: Components, configurations, and outcomes. Journal of Management, 29: 511–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. 2003. Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6): 1359–1392.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Van Dyne, L., Kamdar, D., & Joireman, J. 2008. In-role perceptions buffer the negative impact of low LMX on helping and enhance the positive impact of high LMX on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 1195–1207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. 1998. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1): 108–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Vandenberghe, C., Bentein, K., & Stinglhamber, F. 2004. Affective commitment to the organization, supervisor, and work group: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64: 47–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Vecchio, R. P. 2005. Explorations in employee envy: Feeling envious and feeling envied. Cognition and Emotion, 19: 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Vecchio, R. P., Griffeth, R. W., & Hom, P. W. 1986. The predictive utility of the vertical dyad linkage approach. Journal of Social Psychology, 126: 617–625.

  • *Venkataramani, V., Richter, A. W., & Clarke, R. 2014. Creative benefits from well-connected leaders: Leader social network ties as facilitators of employee radical creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5): 966–975.

  • *Vidyarthi, P. R., Erdogan, B., Anand, S., Liden, R. C., & Chaudhry, A. 2014. One member, two leaders: Extending leader-member exchange theory to a dual leadership context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3): 468–483.

  • *Volmer, J., Spurk, D., & Niessen, C. 2012. Leader-member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement. Leadership Quarterly, 23(3): 456–465.

  • *Wakabayashi, M., & Graen, G. B. 1984. The Japanese career progress study: A 7-year follow-up. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 603–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakabayashi, M., Graen, G. B., Graen, M., & Graen, M. 1988. Japanese management progress: Mobility into middle management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakabayashi, M., Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. 1990. Generalizability of the hidden investment hypothesis among line managers in five leading Japanese corporations. Human Relations, 43: 109–1116. 

    Google Scholar 

  • *Walumbwa, F. O., Cropanzano, R., & Hartnell, C. A. 2009. Organizational justice, voluntary learning behavior, and job performance: A test of the mediating effects of identification and leader-member exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30: 1103–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. 2011. Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader-member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2): 204–213.

  • Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. 2010. When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1): 106–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Wang, H., Law, K. S., & Chen, Z. X. 2008. Leader-member exchange, employee performance, and work outcomes: An empirical study in the Chinese context. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19: 1809–1824.

  • *Wang, M., Burlacu, G., Truxillo, D., James, K., & Yao, X. 2015. Age differences in feedback reactions: The roles of employee feedback orientation on social awareness and utility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4): 1296–1308.

  • *Wang, X., Liao, J., Xia, D., & Chang, T. 2010. The impact of organizational justice on work performance: Mediating effects of organizational commitment and leader-member exchange. International Journal of Manpower, 31(6): 660–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Wat, D., & Shaffer, M. A. 2005. Equity and relationship quality influences on organizational citizenship behaviors. Personnel Review, 34: 406–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Kraimer, M. L., & Graf, I. K. 1999. The role of human capital motivation and supervisor sponsorship in predicting career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20: 577–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E. 2002. The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 590–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. 1997. Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 82–111.

  • Whitener, E. M. 1990. Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 315–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Wikaningrum, T. 2007. Coworker exchange, Leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 9(2): 187–215.

  • Williams, E. A., Scandura, T. A., & Gavin, M. 2009. Understanding team-level career mentoring by leaders and its effects on individual team-source learning: The effects of intra-group processes. Human Relations, 62: 1635–1666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. 2001. Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 27(6): 701–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. A., & Hobfoll, S. E. 2004. Commitment, psychological well-being and job performance: An examination of conservation of resources (COR) theory and job burnout. Journal of Business and Management, 9: 389–406.

  • *Yagil, D. 2006. Perceptions of justice within leader-employee dyads. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 9(3): 291–304.

  • *Yukl, G., & Fu, P. P. 1999. Determinants of delegation and consultation by managers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20: 219–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Yukl, G., O’Donnell, M., & Taber, T. 2009. Influence of leader behaviors on the leader-member exchange relationship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(4): 289–299.

  • *Zacher, H., Pearce, L. K., Rooney, D., & McKenna, B. 2014. Leaders’ personal wisdom and leader–member exchange quality: The role of individualized consideration. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(2): 171–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., & Dodgson, M. 2007. The development of emerging technologies. High Tech Entrepreneurship. In Asia: Innovation, Industry and Institutional Dynamics in Mobile Payments, 45-92.

  • Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. 2010. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1): 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Zhang, Y., Huai, M. Y., & Xie, Y. H. 2014. Paternalistic leadership and employee voice in China: A dual process model. Leadership Quarterly, 26(1): 25–36.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. UGC/FDS14/B10/16).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Hang Seng Management College, Shatin, Siu Lek Yuen,, Hong Kong

    Eko Yi Liao

  2. School of Business, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong

    Chun Hui

Authors
  1. Eko Yi Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chun Hui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eko Yi Liao.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 4 Definition or operationalization of LMX correlates
Full size table

Appendix 2

Table 5
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liao, E.Y., Hui, C. A resource-based perspective on leader-member exchange: An updated meta-analysis. Asia Pac J Manag 38, 317–370 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9594-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9594-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation