Skip to main content
Log in

The orders of documents, the orders of activity, and the orders of information

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archival Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The invention of literacy was also the invention of written information. Humanly usable information has been (and will likely continue to be for the foreseeable future) tied to human documents. Any order we impose on or find in information is closely tied to human uses that give rise to it or for which it is repurposed, and those orders are expressed in the documentary genres that mediate human communicative action within social activity systems. These social forms of genres and activity systems shape our consciousnesses, cognitive capacities, social identities, and potentials for action. Making sense of a single claim, sentence, or even datum requires an understanding of what kind of text it appears in, engaged in what sort of inquiry using what methods, and where it stands within the evolving intertextual discussion of the field. Sense making requires integrity of the text and visibility of the provenance and socio-historic dynamic from which it arises. Even as the processes of communication have been less tied to immediate social circumstances, they have fostered new kinds of social relations and communicative circumstances that maintain their social character and functionality. As we convert older technologies of information storage based on the physical texts, to digital technologies that can readily draw together heterogeneous pieces from more heterogeneous circumstances, the user ultimately must make sense of the information, and the technologies will need to find ways to support that sense making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen J (2008) The concept of genre in information studies. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol 42(1):339–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin M (1981) The dialogic imagination (Emerson C, Holquist M, Trans.). University of Texas Press, Austin

  • Bakhtin M (1984) Problems of Doestoevsky’s poetics. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry C, Schamber L (1998) Users’ criteria for relevance evaluation: a cross-situational comparison. Inf Process Manage 34(2/3):219–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawarshi A, Reiff M (2010) Genre: an introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. WAC Clearinghouse, Fort Collins

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman C (1988) Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman C (1991) How natural philosophers can cooperate. In: Bazerman C, Paradis J (eds) Textual dynamics of the professions. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 13–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman C (1994) Systems of genre and the enactment of social intentions. In: Freedman A, Medway P (eds) Genre and the new rhetoric, Taylor & Francis, London, pp 79–101

  • Bazerman C (1999a) The languages of Edison’s light. MIT press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman C (1999b) Letters and the social grounding of differentiated genres. In: Barton D, Hall N (eds) Letter writing as a social practice. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 15–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman C (2009) How does science come to speak in the courts? Citations, intertexts, expert witnesses, consequential facts and reasoning. Law Contemp Probl 72(1):91–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman C (2011) Genre as social action. In: Gee J, Handford M (eds) The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Routledge, London, pp 226–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman C, Rogers P (2008a) Writing and secular knowledge apart from modern European institutions. In: Bazerman C (ed) Handbook of research on writing, Routledge, London, pp 143–156

  • Bazerman C, Rogers P (2008b) Writing and secular knowledge within modern European institutions. In: Bazerman C (ed) Handbook of research on writing, Routledge, London, pp 157–176

  • Beresi UC, Kim Y, Song D, Ruthven I (2010a) Why did you pick that? Int J Digit Libr 11(2):59–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beresi UC, Kim Y, Song D, Ruthven I, Baille M (2010b) Relevance in technicolor. Res Adv Technol Digit Libr Lect Notes Comput Sci 6273:196–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresi UC, Kim Y, Baille M, Ruthven I, Song D (2010c) Colouring the dimensions of relevance. Adv Inf Retr Lect Notes Comput Sci 5993:569–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borlund P (2003) The concept of relevance in IR. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 54(10):913–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edison T (1985, 1987) Papers: a selective microfilm edition, parts I & II. University Publications of America, Frederick, Maryland

  • Eisenstein EL (1979) The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody J (1986) The logic of writing and the organization of society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Havelock E (1963) Preface to Plato. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead GH (1934) Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller C (1984) Genre as social action. Q J Speech 70:151–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver G, Kim Y, Ross S (2008) Documentary genre and digital recordkeeping: red herring or a way forward? Arch Sci 8:295–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmandt-Bessera D (1992) Before writing. The University of Texas Press, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmandt-Besserat D (2007) When writing met art: from symbol to story. The University of Texas Press, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz A (1967) The problem of social reality. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky L (1987) Thinking and speech (Minick N ed. and Trans.). Plenum, New York

  • Yakel E, Torres D (2003) AI: archival intelligence and user expertise. Am Arch 66(1):51–78

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Bazerman.

Additional information

A version of this article was published in Danish as: Systemer for dokumenter, systemer for aktivitet og systemer for information. In Nielsen, H. Høyrup, H, and Christensen, H. (Eds.). Nye Vidensmedier: Kultur, Læring, Kommunikation. pp. 63–78, 2011.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bazerman, C. The orders of documents, the orders of activity, and the orders of information. Arch Sci 12, 377–388 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9178-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9178-1

Keywords

Navigation