Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Rational Reconstruction of Argumentation Referring to Consequences and Purposes in the Application of Legal Rules: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the author develops an instrument for the rational reconstruction of argumentation in which a judicial decision is justified by referring to the consequences in relation to the purpose of the rule. The instrument is developed by integrating insights from legal theory and legal philosophy about the function and use of arguments from consequences in relation to the purpose of a rule into a pragma-dialectical framework. Then, by applying the instrument to the analysis of examples from legal practice, it is demonstrated that the instrument can offer a heuristic and critical tool for the analysis and evaluation of legal argumentation that can ‘bridge’ the gap between more abstract discussions of forms of legal argumentation on the one hand, and legal arguments as they occur in actual legal practice on the other hand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. Alexy (1989) A Theory of Legal Argumentation. The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bell (1983) Policy Arguments in Judicial Decisions Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Burg, E.: 2000, The Model of Principles, Dissertation University of Amsterdam.

  • Dworkin (1986) Law’s Empire Fontana London

    Google Scholar 

  • F. H. Eemeren Particlevan R. Grootendorst (1992) Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • F. H. Eemeren Particlevan R. Grootendorst (2004) A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • W. N. Eskridge SuffixJr. (1994) Dynamic Statutory Interpretation Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • E. T. Feteris (1999) Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation Kluwer Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • E. T. Feteris (2002a) ArticleTitleA Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context Argumentation 16 IssueID3 349–367 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1019999606665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feteris, E. T.: 2002b, ‘The Role of Arguments from Consequences in Practical Argumentation in a Legal Context’, in H. Hansen, C. W. Tindale, J. A. Blair, R. H. Johnson and R. C. Pinto (eds.), Argumentation and its Applications, Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (CD-rom).

  • Feteris, E. T.: 2003, ‘The Rational Reconstruction of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context: The Analysis and Evaluation of Teleological Argumentation’, in F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair and C. W. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Sicsat, Amsterdam.

  • Feteris, E. T.: 2004, ‘Arguments from Unacceptable Consequences and a Reasonable Application of Law’, in J. A. Blair, D. Farr, H. V. Hansen, R. H. Johnson and C. W. Tindale (eds.), Informal Logic@25, OSSA, Windsor, ON (CD-rom).

  • Fuller, L.: 1948, ‘The Case of the Speluncean Explorers’ law’, Harvard Law Review, 62.

  • L. Fuller (1958) ArticleTitlePositivism and the Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart Harvard Law Review 71 630–672

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Golding (1984) Legal Reasoning Knopf New York

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Gottlieb (1968) The Logic of Choice: An Investigation of the Concepts of Rule and Rationality Allen and Unwin London

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lyons (1993) Moral Aspects of Legal Theory. Essays on Law, Justice, and Political Responsibility Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • D. N. MacCormick (1978) Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • N. MacCormick R. S. Summers (1991) Interpreting Statutes. A Comparative Study Dartmouth Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Nozick (1993) The Nature of Rationality Princeton University Press Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Peczenik (1989) On Law and Reason Kluwer Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Pontier E. Burg (2004) EU Principles on Jurisdiction and Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters According to the Case Law of the European Court of Justice Asser Press The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • R. S Summers (1978) ArticleTitleTwo Types of Substantive Reasons: The Core of a Theory of Common-Law justification Cornell Law Review 63 707–788

    Google Scholar 

  • Wróblewski, J.: 1992, The Judicial Application of Law, (Edited by Zenon Bankowski and Neil MacCormick), Kluwer, Dordrecht etc.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Eveline T. Feteris

Authors
  1. Eveline T. Feteris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eveline T. Feteris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feteris, E.T. The Rational Reconstruction of Argumentation Referring to Consequences and Purposes in the Application of Legal Rules: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Argumentation 19, 459–470 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-0512-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-0512-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation