Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of non-structural elements in RC buildings during the L’Aquila, 2009 earthquake

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Italy infills and partitions (non-structural elements) are typically made up of hollow brick masonry, disposed in one or two parallel vertical walls. Many studies have analysed their role on the seismic behaviour of moment resisting framed RC buildings and many seismic codes, all over the world, have provided specific additional measures for them. During the Abruzzo seismic sequence, non-structural damage in RC buildings, both private and public, was extensive, varying from small cracks to collapse, along with minor or no damage to structural elements. This damage involved a number of buildings, both old and recently completed, determining heavy socio-economic consequences, including human casualties, loss of building functionality (particularly important in case of strategic constructions), and unusable buildings. In this paper a review of the most frequent damage patterns is performed, aimed at identifying the main causes of damage and linking them to commonly adopted construction rules. For this purpose, local and global structural configurations frequently exhibiting non-structural damage are described, aside from out-of-plane and in-plane failures. Furthermore, a review of code provisions on non structural elements has been performed in the paper making reference to the most prominent current seismic codes and, finally, some design and construction rules are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braga F, Dolce M, Liberatore D (1982) Southern Italy November 23, 1980 earthquake: a statistical study on damaged buildings and an ensuing review of the M.S.K.-76 scale. CNR-PFG no 503, 1982, Roma

  • CEN (1998) Eurocode 6: design of masonry structures—Part 1-1: general rules for buildings—rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry, prEN 1996-1, March 1998, Brussels

  • CEN (2003) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, prEN 1998-1, December 2003, Brussels

  • CEN (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings, prEN 1998-3, June 2004, Brussels

  • Decanini LD, De Sortis A, Goretti A, Liberatore L, Mollaioli F, Bazzurro P (2004) Performance of reinforced concrete the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake, earthquake spectra, special issue on the Molise 2002 earthquake, vol 20, no 2, May 2004

  • Dolce M, Manfredi G (2009) Research needs in earthquake engineering highlighted by the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. In: Proceedings of the conference the state of earthquake engineering research in Italy: the ReLUIS-DPC 2005–2008 Project, Naples, April 2009

  • DPC-ReLUIS (2009) Linee guida per la riparazione e il rafforzamento di elementi strutturali, tamponature e partizioni, available at http://www.reluis.it (in Italian)

  • ESC Working Group Macroseismic Scales (1998) European Macroseismic Scale 1998. In: Grunthal G (ed) Luxembourg 1998

  • FEMA (1998a) FEMA 306: evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings—basic procedures manual, prepared by The Applied Technology Council

  • FEMA (1998b) FEMA 307: evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings—technical resources, prepared by The Applied Technology Council

  • FEMA (1998c) FEMA 308: repair of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings, prepared by The Applied Technology Council

  • FEMA (2000) FEMA 356: prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, prepared by American Society of Civil Engineers, November 2000

  • FEMA (2006) FEMA 547—techniques for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, October 2006

  • Masi A (2003) Seismic vulnerability assessment of gravity load designed R/C frames. Bull Earthq Eng 1(3): 371–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masi A, Vona M, Mucciarelli M (2010) Selection of natural and synthetic accelerograms for seismic vulnerability studies on RC frames. J Struct Eng (in press). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.209

  • NTC (2008) D.M. 14.1.2008—Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, Ministero delle Infrastrutture, available at http://www.cslp.it (in Italian)

  • NZSEE (2006) Assessment and improvement of the structural performance of buildings in earthquakes, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Recommendations of a NZSEE Study Group on Earthquake Risk Buildings, June 2006

  • Verderame GM, Iervolino I, Ricci P (2009) Report on the damages on buildings following the seismic event of the 6th of April 2009, v.1.20, available at http://www.reluis.it

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Manfredi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braga, F., Manfredi, V., Masi, A. et al. Performance of non-structural elements in RC buildings during the L’Aquila, 2009 earthquake. Bull Earthquake Eng 9, 307–324 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9205-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9205-7

Keywords

Navigation