Abstract
The response spectrum method (RSM) has been incorporated into many codes for seismic design of aboveground structures since 1950s. However, no RSM is presented in details for the seismic design of underground structures due to the complexity of seismic soil–structure interaction (SSI). In this paper, the RSM is developed for the seismic analysis of the underground structures including SSI. First, the underground design response spectrum is derived using two different procedures from the ground design response spectrum that is commonly available in most seismic design codes. Second, the SSI analysis model consisting of the underground structure and its adjacent soil is established with the roller side boundaries and the bottom boundary subjected to the underground response spectrum. Third, the RSM is applied to the SSI analysis model to estimate the structural response under the underground response spectrum. Finally, the numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the feasibility of the RSM for the SSI analysis model of underground structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABAQUS (2012) ABAQUS/standard user’s manual version 5.8. Karlsson Sorensen Inc, Hibbit
Abuhajar O, El Naggar H, Newson T (2015) Experimental and numerical investigations of the effect of buried box culverts on earthquake excitation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 79:130–148
Afra H, Pecker A (2002) Calculation of free field response spectrum of a non-homogeneous soil deposit from bed rock response spectrum. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(2):157–165
AIJ (2004) Recommendations for loads on buildings. Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo (in Japanese)
Amorosi A, Boldini D (2009) Numerical modeling of the transverse dynamic behavior of circular tunnels in clayey soils. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 59(6):1059–1072
Asthana AK, Datta TK (1990) A simplified response spectrum method for random vibration analysis of flexible base buildings. Eng Struct 12(3):185–194
Ates S, Constantinou MC (2011) Example of application of response spectrum analysis for seismically isolated curved bridges including soil-foundation effects. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31(4):648–661
Berrah M, Kausel E (2010) Response spectrum analysis of structures subjected to spatially varying motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 21(6):461–470
Bhavikatti Q, Cholekar SB (2017) Soil structure interaction effect for a building resting on sloping ground including infiill subjected to seismic analysis. Int J Res Eng Appl Sci 4(7):1547–1551
BSL (2000) The building standard law of Japan. The Ministry of Construction, Tokyo
Butt UA, Ishihara T (2012) Seismic load evaluation of wind turbine support structures considering low structural damping and soil structure interaction. In: European wind energy association annual event, Copenhagen
Chen Y (2014) Effect of pile–soil–structure interaction on the cable-stayed bridge in response to the earthquake. Appl Mech Mater 539:731–735
Chen HT, Tan P, Zhou FL (2017) An improved response spectrum method for non-classically damped systems. Bull Earthq Eng 15(10):4375–4397
Chopra AK (2001) Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Chopra AK (2010) Elastic response spectrum: a historical note. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(1):3–12
Cilingir U, Madabhushi SPG (2011) A model study on the effects of input motion on the seismic behavior of tunnels. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31(3):452–462
CJJ (2012) Urban bridge seismic specification (CJJ 166-2011). Architecture and Building Press, Beijng (in Chinese)
Clough RW, Penzien J (1993) Dynamics of structures, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York
Der Kiureghian A, Neuenhofer A (1992) Response spectrum method for multi-support seismic excitations. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 21(8):713–740
Du XL, Zhao M (2010a) Stability and identification for rational approximation of frequency response function of unbounded soil. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39(2):165–186
Du XL, Zhao M (2010b) A local time-domain transmitting boundary for simulating cylindrical elastic wave propagation in infinite media. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(10):937–946
Eurocode 8 (2003) Design of structures for earthquake resistance. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
Gasparini, DA, Vanmarcke EH (1976) Simulated earthquake motions compatible with prescribed response spectra. Department of Civil Engineering, Research Report R76-4, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
GB (2010) Code for seismic design of buildings (GB 50011-2010). China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
GB (2014) Code for seismic design of urban rail transit structures (GB 50909-2014). China Planning Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Gupta VK, Trifunac MD (1991) Seismic response of multistoried buildings including the effects of soil–structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 10(8):414–422
Hashash YMA, Hook JJ, Schmidt B, Yao IC (2001) Seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16(4):247–293
Hatzigeorgiou GD, Beskos DE (2010) Soil–structure interaction effects on seismic inelastic analysis of 3-D tunnels. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(9):851–861
Hu YX (2006) Earthquake engineering. Seismological Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Huang JQ, Zhao M, Du XL (2017) Non-linear seismic responses of tunnels within normal fault ground under obliquely incident P waves. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 61:26–39
ICC (2003) International building code (IBC). International Code Council, Falls Church
Kaul MK (1978) Stochastic characterization of earthquakes through their response spectrum. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 6(5):497–509
Kishida A, Takewaki I (2010) Response spectrum method for kinematic soil–pile interaction analysis. Adv Struct Eng 13(1):181–198
Kojima K, Fujita K, Takewaki I (2014) Unified analysis of kinematic and inertial earthquake pile responses via the single-input response spectrum method. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 63(1):36–55
Li Y, Zhao M, Xu CS, Du XL, Li Z (2018) Earthquake input for finite element analysis of soil–structure interaction on rigid bedrock. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 79:250–262
Liu GH, Lian JJ, Liang C, Li G, Hu JJ (2016) An improved complex multiple-support response spectrum method for the non-classically damped linear system with coupled damping. Bull Earthq Eng 14(1):161–184
Liu GH, Lian JJ, Liang CL, Zhao M (2017) An effective approach for simulating multi-support earthquake underground motions. Bull Earthq Eng 15(11):4635–4659
Lou M, Wang H, Chen X, Zhai Y (2011) Structure–soil–structure interaction: literature review. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31(12):1724–1731
Luco JE, Contesse L (1973) Dynamic structure–soil–structure interaction. Bull Seismol Soc Am 63(4):1289–1303
Maldonad GO, Singh MP (1991) An improved response spectrum method for calculating seismic design response. Part 2: non-classically damped structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 20(7):637–649
Pitilakis K, Tsinidis G (2014) Performance and seismic design of underground structures. In: Maugeri M, Soccodato C (eds) Earthquake geotechnical engineering design. Geotechnical, geological and earthquake engineering, vol 28. Springer, Basel, pp 279–340
Raheem SEA, Ahmed MM, Alazrek TMA (2014) Soil–structure interaction effects on seismic response of multi-story buildings on raft foundation. J Eng Sci 42(4):05–930
Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB (1972) SHAKE: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. Report No. UCB/EERC-72/12, University of California, Berkeley
Singh V, Mala K (2017) Effect on seismic response of building with underground storey considering soil structure interaction. Int J Res Eng Appl Sci 4(6):96–102
Singh MP, Singh S, Matheu EE (2000) A response spectrum approach for seismic performance evaluation of actively controlled structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 29(7):1029–1051
Suman D, Tengali SK (2017) Soil structure interaction of RC building with different foundations and soil types. Int J Res Eng Appl Sci 4(7):732–736
Sutharshana S, Mcguire W (1988) Non-linear response spectrum method for three-dimensional structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 16(6):885–900
Thakkar SK, Dubey RN, Singh JP (2002) Effect of Inertia of embedded portion of well foundation on seismic response of bridge substructure. In: 12th symposium on earthquake engineering, I.I.T. Roorkee, India
Tongaonkar NP, Jangid RS (2003) Seismic response of isolated bridges with soil–structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 23(4):287–302
Tsinidis G (2017) Response characteristics of rectangular tunnels in soft soil subjected to transversal ground shaking. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 62:1–22
Tsinidis G, Pitilakis K, Anagnostopoulos C (2016a) Circular tunnels in sand: dynamic response and efficiency of seismic analysis methods at extreme lining flexibilities. Bull Earthq Eng 14(10):2903–2929
Tsinidis G, Pitilakis K, Madabhushi G (2016b) On the dynamic response of square tunnels in sand. Eng Struct 125:419–437
Tsinidis G, Rovithis E, Pitilakis K, Chazelas JL (2016c) Seismic response of box-type tunnels in soft soil: experimental and numerical investigation. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 59:199–214
Vidya V, Raghuprasad BK, Amarnath K (2015) Seismic response of high rise structure due to the interaction between soil and structure. Int J Res Eng Appl Sci 5(5):207–218
Wang Z, Der Kiureghian A (2015) Multiple-support response spectrum analysis using load-dependent Ritz vectors. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(15):2283–2297
Wilson EL, Der Kiureghian A, Bayo EP (1981) Short communications: a replacement for the SRSS method in seismic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 9(2):187–192
Wolf JP (1985) Dynamic soil–structure interaction. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Wolf JP (1988) Soil–structure-interaction analysis in time domain. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Wolf JP (1994) Foundation vibrational analysis using simple physical models. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Yu RF, Zhou XY (2007) Simplifications of CQC method and CCQC method. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 6(1):65–76
Yu RF, Zhou XY (2008) Response spectrum analysis for non-classically damped linear system with multiple-support excitations. Bull Earthq Eng 6(2):261–284
Yu HT, Cai C, Guan XF, Yuan Y (2016) Analytical solution for long lined tunnels subjected to travelling loads. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 58:209–215
Yu H, Yuan Y, Bobet A (2017) Seismic analysis of long tunnels: a review of simplified and unified methods. Undergr Space 2:73–87
Zhao M, Du XL, Liu JB, Liu H (2011) Explicit finite element artificial boundary scheme for transient scalar waves in two-dimensional unbounded waveguide. Int J Numer Methods Eng 87(11):1074–1104
Zhao M, Gao ZD, Wang LT, Du XL, Huang JQ, Li Y (2017) Obliquely incident earthquake for soil–structure interaction in layered half space. Earthq Struct 13(6):573–588
Zhao M, Li HF, Du XL, Wang PG (2018a) Time-domain stability of artificial boundary condition coupled with finite element for dynamic and wave problems in unbounded media. Int J Comput Methods Singap 15(3):1850099
Zhao M, Wu LH, Du XL, Zhong ZL, Xu CS, Li L (2018b) Stable high-order absorbing boundary condition based on new continued fraction for scalar wave propagation in unbounded multilayer media. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 334:111–137
Zienkiewicz OC, Bianic N, Shen FQ (1988) Earthquake input definition and the transmitting boundary condition. In: Conference on advances in computational non-linear mechanics, pp 109–138
Acknowledgements
This work described in this paper is supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1504305), National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (2015CB057902) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (U1839201, 51678015 and 51421005). Opinions and positions expressed in this paper are those of the authors only and do not reflect those of the National Key R&D Program, 973 Program and NSFC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, M., Gao, Z., Du, X. et al. Response spectrum method for seismic soil–structure interaction analysis of underground structure. Bull Earthquake Eng 17, 5339–5363 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00673-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00673-6