Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sustainable biodiversity conservation in the Niger Delta: a practical approach to conservation site selection

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rich biodiversity repository of the Niger Delta region of Nigeria is under severe threat from diverse sources such as deforestation, inadequate farming practices, invasive alien species, urbanization and oil and gas exploration and development activities. This biodiversity “hot spot” is the second most sensitive environment in Africa. The over 70 Protected Areas (PAs) here have lost substantial portions of their area which translates to loss of biodiversity. The need to select representative sites within each of the ecological zones of the region for effective and sustainable biodiversity conservation is, therefore, essential. Vital site criteria that have ecological, socio-economic and cultural dimensions were selected and assessed through a combination of relevant scientific information, indigenous traditional knowledge and participatory rural appraisal (PRA) to yield Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs).They are significantly different from the site selection criteria and principles used in the UK and to a large extent adopt the critical factors that underscore biodiversity conservation in a largely primary production based economy such as in much of the developing world. The three sites selected for biodiversity conservation through this process yielded not only community buy-in but also participatory action and ownership, which are critical for the sustainability of the biodiversity conservation efforts. Shell Nigeria and World Wide Fund (WWF) representatives are already concluding plans to commence effective conservation projects in the selected sites. This approach is hereby advocated for consideration and adoption for the preservation of the remaining stock of the unique biodiversity in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker DR, Harris CC, McLaughlin WJ, Nielsen EA (2003) A participatory approach to social impact assessment: the interactive community forum. Environ Impact Assess Rev 23:367–382. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00098-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrini-Feyerabend G (2004) Governance of protected areas, participation and equity. In: Secretariat of the convention on biological diversity, biodiversity issues for consideration in the planning, establishment and management of protected areas sites and networks. CBD technical series no. 15, Montreal, Canada

  • Borrini-Feyerabend G, Kothari A, Oviedo G (2004a) Indigenous and local communities and protected areas: towards equity and enhanced conservation. IUCN and Cardiff University best practice protected area guidelines no. 11, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrini-Feyerabend G, Pimbert M, Farvar MT, Kothari A, Renard Y (2004b) Sharing Power: learning by doing in co-management of natural resources throughout the world, IIED and IUCN/CEESP/CMWG, Cenesta, Tehran. ISBN 1 84369 444 1

  • Borrini-Feyerabend G, Pimbert M, Farvar MT, Kothari A, Renard Y (2007) Sharing power: a global guide to collaborative management of natural resources. Earthscan, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosius JP, Tsing AL, Zerner C (eds) (2005) Communities and conservation: histories and politics of community-based natural resources management. Altamira Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VE, Naylor RL, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL et al (2000) Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234–242. doi:10.1038/35012241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costello C, Polasky S (2001) Dynamic site selection. JEL Classif R52:Q20. University of California, Santa Barbara, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwall WRT, Vie JC (2005) Identifying important sites for conservation of freshwater biodiversity: extending the species based approach. Fish Manag Ecol 12:287–293. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2400.2005.00449.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA (2006) Local sites: guidance on their identification, selection and management, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, (www.defra.gov.uk) London, p 36

  • Eken G et al (2004) Key biodiversity areas as site conservation targets. Bioscience 54(12):1110–1118. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[1110:KBAASC]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgood JH, Heigham JB, Moore AM, Nason AM, Sharland RE, Skiner NJ (1994) The birds of Nigeria: an annotated checklist, British Ornithologists’ union check-list no. 4, Second edn. The Natural History Museum, UK p 306

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezealor A (ed) (2002) Critical sites for biodiversity conservation in Nigeria. Nigeria Conservation Foundation, Lagos, Nigeria

    Google Scholar 

  • FMENV (2004) Site prioritization to select conservation site in selected states of the Niger Delta, Federal Ministry of Environment (FMENV). Abuja, Nigeria, Technical Report

  • Finnamore A, Alonso A, Santisteban J, Cordova S, Valencia G, Cruz ADL et al (2002) A Framework for assessment and monitoring of arthropods in a lowland tropical rainforest. Environ Monit Assess 76(1):43–53. doi:10.1023/A:1015268804354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happold CA (1987) The mammals of Nigeria. Clarendon Press, Oxford p 401

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari A (1997) Conserving India’s agro-biodiversity: prospects and policy implications. Gatekeeper series no. 65. International Institute of Environment and Development, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari A, Anuradha RV (1999) Biodiversity and Intellectual Property Rights: can the two co-exist? J Int Wildl Policy 2(2):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meine C (1999) Humans and other catastrophes: perspectives on extinction. American Museum of Natural History, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • NDDC (2004) Biodiversity and natural resources sector study. Niger Delta regional master plan. Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC)

  • NDES (1997) Niger Delta environmental survey: biodiversity. Phase I Report, vol IV

  • Ndukwu BO (2002) Review of sites of biodiversity importance in the Niger Delta. Report (submitted to) Shell Petroleum and Development Company of Nigeria Limited SPDC, Nigeria

  • Obot EA (2003) Niger Delta bioscape: delineating core biodiversity conservation range for named species. Technical Report, Nigerian Conservation Foundation, Lagos

  • Phil-Eze PO (2001) Biodiversity and environmental problems in Nigeria. In: Ofomata GEK, Phil-Eze PO (eds) Geographical perspectives on environmental problems and management in Nigeria. Jamoe Enterprises, Enugu, Nigeria, pp 33–52

  • Phil-Eze PO, Umeuduji JE (2004) Human impact on biodiversity. In: Bell-Gam WI, Arokoyo SB, Umeuduji JE (eds) Perspectives on the human environment. Amethyst & Colleagues Publishers, Port Harcourt, Nigeria, pp 54–70

    Google Scholar 

  • PiP (2006) How we work: site selection, Parks in Peril. The nature conservancy, Latin America and the Caribbean

  • Powell CB (1997) Discoveries and priorities for mammals in the freshwater forests of the Niger Delta. Oryx 31:83–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey DA (1996) Traditional resource rights: international instruments for protection and compensation for indigenous peoples and local communities. IUCN—The World Conservation Union, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • ProNatura (2001) Mexico: private land mechanisms for biodiversity conservation in Mexico. Global Environmental Facility (GEF)

  • Sterling E, Sitnik M (1997): Measuring, monitoring and evaluation for biodiversity conservation at the ecoregional and site levels. Applications of NASA technology for biodiversity conservation, April 1–2, USA

  • UN (2005) The millennium development goals report 2005, United Nations department of Public Information, New York, DPI/2390, p 48

  • WCMC (2005) World Conservation and Monitoring Centre (WCMC) Protected area database. (www.unep-wcmc.org)

  • Were JLR (2001) Cross-Niger transition forests, (AT0106). Report to the World Wildlife Fund (WWF)

  • Whitmore TC (1997) Tropical forest disturbance, disappearance and species loss. In: Laurence WF, Bierregaard RO (eds) Tropical forest remnants: ecology management and conservation of fragmented communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1994) Natural resources management in Burkina Faso. Agriculture and technology notes, no. 6, The World Bank, Washington

  • World Bank (1995) Defining an environmental development strategy for the Niger Delta. Industry and energy operation division, vol I & II, West Central Africa department

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. E. A. Obot, Dr A. U. Ezealor, Dr B. O. Ndukwu and Mr M. P. O. Dore for their contributions in developing the criteria and site selection methodology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. O. Phil-Eze.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phil-Eze, P.O., Okoro, I.C. Sustainable biodiversity conservation in the Niger Delta: a practical approach to conservation site selection. Biodivers Conserv 18, 1247–1257 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9451-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9451-z

Keywords

Navigation