Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sticks and Stones may Break Your Bones, but Words can Break Your Spirit: Bullying in the Workplace

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Workplace bullying has a well-established body of research internationally, but the United States has lagged behind the rest of the world in the identification and investigation of this phenomenon. This paper presents a managerial perspective on bullying in organizations. The lack of attention to the concept of workplace dignity in American organizational structures has supported and even encouraged both casual and more severe forms of harassment that our workplace laws do not currently cover. The demoralization victims suffer can create toxic working environments and impair organizational productivity. Some methods of protecting your organization from this blight of bullying are proposed. Bullying has always been part of the human condition; history is rife with references to abuse of power and unnecessary or excessive force. The classic bully story is of Joseph and his brothers, a tale of envy and hostility. The refinement of bullying to include various forms of legally defined social harassment is a relatively late phenomenon, however, dating to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In the United States, bullying is not illegal, whereas it is illegal in many other countries. Bullying is not about benign teasing, nor does it include the off-color jokes, racial slurs, or unwelcome advances that are the hallmarks of legally defined harassment. Workplace bullying is the pattern of destructive and generally deliberate demeaning of co-workers or subordinates that reminds us of the activities of the schoolyard bully. Unlike the schoolyard bully, however, the workplace bully is an adult, usually (but not always) aware of the impact of his or her behavior on others. Bullying in the workplace, often tacitly accepted by the organizational leadership, can create an environment of psychological threat that diminishes corporate productivity and inhibits individual and group commitment. The two examples that follow will help to clarify the difference between harassment and bullying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. Adams (1992) Bullying at Work: How to Confront and Overcome ItVirago Press London

    Google Scholar 

  • Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 1967

  • Americans with Disabilities Act, 1990

  • Testimony of Anita F. Hill, Professor of Law, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK (10/11/1991)

  • D. Beale (2001) Monitoring Bullying in the Workplace N. Tehrani (Eds) Building a Culture of Respect: Managing Bullying at Work Taylor & Francis London 77–94

    Google Scholar 

  • L.M. Bernardi Fall. (2001) ArticleTitleManagement by Bullying: The Legal Consequences Canadian Manager. 26 IssueID3 13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, 1998

  • Civil Rights Act, 1964

  • L. Costigan (1998) Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: A Guide for Employees Managers and Employers The Columbia Press Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Coyne E. Seigne P. Randall (2000) ArticleTitlePredicting Workplace Victim Status from Personality’ European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 9 IssueID3 335–349

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Crawford (1999) ArticleTitleConundrums and confusion in organizations: The Etymology of the Word “Bully,” International Journal of Manpower. 20 IssueID1/2 86–94

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Crawford (2001) Organizational Responses to Bullying N. Tehrani (Eds) Building a Culture of Respect: Managing Bullying at Work Taylor & Francis London 21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Dignity at Work Bill, 1999 (U.K.)

  • S. Einarsen (1999) ArticleTitleThe Nature and Causes of Bullying at Work International Journal of Manpower. 20 IssueID1/2 16–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S. & S. B. Matthiesen: (1999). Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress among Victims of Bullying at Work’, Abstracts for the Ninth European Congress on Work and Organizational Psychology Helsinki Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 178

  • S. Einarsen H. Hoel D. Zapf C.L. Cooper (2003) The Concept of Bullying at Work: The European Tradition S. Einarsen H. Hoel D. Zapf C.L. Cooper (Eds) Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International Perspectives in Research and Practice Taylor & Francis London 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 1998

  • P.M. Glendinning Fall. (2001) ArticleTitleWorkplace bullying: Curing the Cancer of the American Workplace Public Personnel Management, 30 IssueID3 269–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris v. Forklift Systems, 1993

  • G. Hofstede (1997) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind McGraw-Hill New York

    Google Scholar 

  • A.B. Hubert (2003) To Prevent and Overcome Undesirable Interaction: A Systematic Approach Model S. Einarsen H. Hoel D. Zapf C.L Cooper (Eds) Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International perspectives in research and practice Taylor & Francis London 299–311

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Keashly K. Jagatic (2003) By Any Other Name American Perspectives on Workplace Bullying S. Einarsen H. Hoel D. Zapf C.L. Cooper (Eds) Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace International Perspectives in Research and Practice Taylor & Francis London 131–161

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lee (2000) ArticleTitleAn Analysis of Workplace Bullying in the UK Personnel Review. 29 IssueID5 593–612

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Leighton (2001) Dignity at Work: The Legal framework N. Tehrani (Eds) Building a Culture of Respect: Managing Bullying at Work Taylor & Francis London 97–114

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Leymann (1986) Bullying – Psychological Violence in Working Life Student literature Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Namie (1999) The Workplace Bullying & Trauma Institute Survey Results. Presented at Work, Stress and Health ’99: Private Organization of Work in a Global Economy. Fourth Interdisciplinary Conference on Occupational Health and Safety APA/NIOSH Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Namie R. Namie (2000) The Bully at Work Sourcebooks Inc. Naperville, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, P. S.: February 21, 2000, Bullies at work. It’s nasty business that only boosts the sale of Tums. San Diego Union Tribune (Knight Ridder).

  • Pfaffenbach, W. L. (2000 November 27, Verdict for workplace bullying is upheld. Bias claim fails, but plaintiff gets $730K. Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly. 29 M.L.W. 731.

  • Pregnancy Discrimination Act, 1978

  • J.B. Pryor L.F. Fitzgerald (2003) Sexual Harassment Research in the United States S. Einarsen H. Hoel D. Zapf C.L. Cooper (Eds) Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International Perspectives in Research and Practice Taylor & Francis London 79–100

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Rains (2001) Don’t Suffer in Silence: Building an Effective Response to Bullying at Work N. Tehrani (Eds) Building a Culture of Respect: Managing Bullying at Work Taylor & Francis London 155–163

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Rayner H. Hoel (1997) ArticleTitleA summary review of literature relating to workplace bullying Journal of Community& Applied Social Psychology. 7 IssueID3 181–191

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Rayner H. Hoel C.L. Cooper (2002) Workplace Bullying: What We Know Who is to Blame and What Can We Do? Taylor & Francis London

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Richard H. Daley (2003) Bullying Policy S. Einarsen H. Hoel D. Zapf C. L. Cooper (Eds) Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International Perspectives in Research and Practice Taylor & Francis London 247–258

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Sheehan M. Barker (1999) ArticleTitleApplying Strategies for Dealing with Workplace Bullying International Journal of Manpower, 20 IssueID1/2 50–57

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Tehrani (2003) Counselling and Rehabilitating Employees Involved in Bullying S. Einarsen H. Hoel D. Zapf C. L. Cooper (Eds) Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International Perspectives in Research and Practice Taylor & Francis London 270–284

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Vartia L. Korppoo S. Fallenius M.-L. Mattila (2003) Workplace Bullying: The role of Occupational Health Services S. Einarsen H. Hoel D. Zapf C. L. Cooper (Eds) Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International Perspectives in Research and Practice Taylor & Francis London 285–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Victimization at Work Ordinance (1993, Sweden)

  • Workplace Health and Safety, Department of Industrial Relations. (2002), Workplace Bullying Taskforce Report.Queensland, Australia. www.andreaadamstrust.org

  • D. Yamada (2003) Workplace bullying and the law: Towards a transnational consensus? S. Einarsen H. Hoel D. Zapf C. L. Cooper (Eds) Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International Perspectives in Research and Practice Taylor & Francis London 399–411

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Zapf (1999) ArticleTitleOrganisational, Work Group Related and Personal Causes of Mobbing/Bullying at Work International Journal of Manpower. 20 IssueID1/2 70–86

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vega, G., Comer, D.R. Sticks and Stones may Break Your Bones, but Words can Break Your Spirit: Bullying in the Workplace. J Bus Ethics 58, 101–109 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-1422-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-1422-7

Keywords

Navigation