Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Discursive Construction of Gender in Contemporary Management Literature

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyses how the new type of worker is constructed in respect to gender in current management literature. It contributes to the increasing body of work in organisational theory and business ethics which interrogates management texts by analysing textual representations of gender. A discourse analysis of six texts reveals three inter-connected yet distinct ways in which gender is talked about. First, the awareness discourse attempts to be inclusive of gender yet reiterates stereotypes in its portrayal of women. Second, within the individualisation discourse, formerly discriminatory elements of gender lose their importance but a gender dimension reappears within the idea of ‹Brand You’. Third, in the new ideal discourse, women are constructed as ideal workers of the future. The article argues that there is little space within this web of discourses for an awareness of the continued inequalities experienced by women in relation to men to be voiced and that this rhetorical aporia contributes to a ‹post-feminist’ climate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker J. 1990, Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations Gender & Society 4(2), 139–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Acker J., D. R. V. Houten 1992. Differential Recruitment and Control: The Sex Structuring of Organizations in: A. J. Mills, P. Tancred (eds) Gendering Organizational Analysis. Sage, London, pp 15-30

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahl H.: 2004, The Scientific Reproduction of Gender Inequality: A Discourse Analysis of Research Texts on Women’s Entrepreneurship. Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M.: 1998, Gender Relations and Identity at Work: A Case Study of Masculinities and Femininities in an Advertising Agency Human Relations 51(8), 969–1005

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M.: 2002, Postmodernism and Social Research. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M., Y. D. Billing: 1997, Understanding Gender and Organizations. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur M. B., D. M. Rousseau: 1996. Introduction: The Boundaryless Career as a New Employment Principle in: M. B. Arthur, D. M. Rousseau (eds) The Boundaryless Career – A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayman R.: 1993. Leadership Perception: The Role of Gender and Culture. in: M. M. Chemers, R. Ayman (eds) Leadership Theory and Research: Perspectives and Directions. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 137–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Batt R., S. Christopherson, N. Rightor, D. Van Jaarsveld: 2001, Networking. Work Patterns and Workforce Policies for the New Media Industries. Economic Policy Institute, Washington (DC)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U.: 2000, The Brave New World of Work. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U., E. Beck-Gernsheim: 1996. Individualization and “Precarious Freedoms”: Perspectives and Controversies of a Subject-Orientated Sociology. in: P. Heelas, S. Lash, P. Morris (eds) Detraditionalization: Critical Reflections on Authority and Identity. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 23–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendl R.: 2006. Gender Subtexte der Betriebswirtschaftlichen Organisationsforschung – zur Analyse zum State of the Field in: R. Bendl (eds) Betriebswirtschaftslehre und Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung, Teil 1: Verortung geschlechterkonstituierender (Re-)Produktionsprozesse. Peter Lang, Frankfurt/Main, pp. 165-194

    Google Scholar 

  • Benschop Y., H. Doorewaard: 1998a, Covered by Equality: The Gender Subtext of Organizations. Organization Studies 19(5), 787–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Benschop Y., H. Doorewaard: 1998b, Six of One and Half a Dozen of the Other: The Gender Subtext of Taylorism and Team-Based Work Gender, Work and Organization 5(1), 5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig M., S. Condor, D. Edwards, M. Gane, D. Middleton, A. Radley: 1988, Ideological Dilemmas – A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair H.: 2001, You’re Only as Good as Your Last Job’: the Labour Process and the Market in the British Film Industry Work, Employment and Society 15(1), 149–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Bly R.: 1991, Iron John – A Book about Men. Element Books, Shaftesbury

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski L., E. Chiapello: 2006, The New Spirit of Capitalism. Verso Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenkert G. G.: 1997. Radical Feminism and Business Ethics in: A. L. Larson, R. E. Freeman (eds) Women’s Studies and Business Ethics: Towards a New Conversation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewis J.: 2000. When a Body Meet a Body...’: Experiencing the Female Body at Work. in: L. McKie, N. Watson (eds) Organizing Bodies: Policy, Institutions and Work. MacMillan, London, pp. 166–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewis J., S. Linstead: 2000, Sex, Work and Sex Work – Eroticizing Organization. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown R. B.: 1995, Meetings and Intersections: Organizational Theory Encounters Feminist Theorising Women’s Studies International Forum 18(2), 197–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess Z., P. Tharenou: 2002, Women Board Directors: Characteristics of the few Journal of Business Ethics 37(1), 39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke R. J.: 1997, Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: A Needed Resource Journal of Business Ethics 16(9), 909–915

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler J.: 1990, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler J.: 1993, Bodies That Matter: On The Discursive Limits of “Sex”. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury Schweppes. 2006. Corporate and Social Responsibility Report 2006

  • Cairncross F.: 1997, The Death of Distance : How the Communications Revolution Will Change Our Lives. Orion Business Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairncross F.: 2002, The Company of the Future – How the Communications Revolution is Changing Management. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Calás M. B.: 1992. An/other silent voice? Representing “Hispanic women” in Organizational Texts. in: A. J. Mills, P. Tancred (eds) Gendering Organizational Analysis. Sage, London, pp. 201–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Calás M. B., L. Smircich: 1991a. Re-Writing Gender into Organizational Theorizing: Directions from Feminist Perspectives in: M. Reed, M. Hughes (eds) Rethinking Organization: New Directions in Organization Theory and Analysis. Sage, London, pp. 227–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Calás M. B., L. Smircich: 1991b, Voicing Seduction to Silence Leadership Organization Studies 12(4), 567–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Calás M. B., L. Smircich: 1992. Using the “F” Word – Feminist Theories and the Social Consequences of Organizational Research. in: A. J. Mills, P. Tancred (eds) Gendering Organizational Analysis. Sage, London, pp. 222–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Calás M. B., L. Smircich: 1993, Dangerous Liaisons: The “Feminine-in-Management” Meets “Globalization” Business Horizons 36(2), 71–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Calás M. B., L. Smircich: 1996. From ‹The Woman’s’ Point of View: Feminist Approaches to Organization Studies. in: S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, W. R. Nord (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies. Sage, London, pp. 218–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Calás M. B., L. Smircich: 1997. Predicando la Moral en Calzoncillos? Feminist Inquiries into Business Ethics in: A. L. Larson, R. E. Freeman (eds) Women’s Studies and Business Ethics: Towards a New Conversation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 50–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert L. M., J. V. Ramsey: 1996, Speaking as Female and White: A Non-Dominat/Dominat Group Standpoint Organization 3(4), 468–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron D.: 1995. Verbal Hygiene for Women: Performing Gender Identity. in: U. Pasero, F. Braun (eds) Konstruktion von Geschlecht. Centaurus, Pfaffenweiler, pp. 143–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M.: 1996, The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell, Cambridge (MA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M.: 1997, Power of Identity. Blackwell, Cambridge (MA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M.: 2000. The Institutions of the New Economy, Vol. 2002: A summary of the Address to the Delivering the Virtual Promise? Conference, London, 19th June 2000 (http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/events/castells.htm)

  • Catalyst. 2006. 2006 Census: Women Corporate Officers (http://www.catalystwomen.org/knowledge/cote.shtml)

  • CEPT Consult. 2002. Frauen in Zukunftsberufen – Chance Multimedia – Eine Untersuchung im Auftrag des Senatsamtes für Gleichstellung. Hamburg: Senatsamt für Gleichstellung

  • Cockburn C.: 1983, Brothers – Male Dominance and Technological Change. Pluto, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen L., M. Mallon: 1999, The Transition from Organisational Employment to Portfolio Working: Perceptions of `Boundarylessness Work, Employment & Society 13(2), 329–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson D.: 1992, Managing The Shopfloor: Subjectivity, Masculinity, And Workplace Culture. W. de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson D., J. Hearn: 1994, Naming Men as Men: Implications for Work, Organization and Management Gender, Work and Organization 1(1), 2–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson D., J. Hearn: 2000. Critical Studies on Men, Masculinities and Management. in: M. J. Davidson, R. J. Burke (eds) Women in Management Current Research Issues Vol 2. Sage, London, pp. 263–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson D. L., J. Hearn: 2005. Men and Masculinities in Work, Organizations, and Management. in: M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, R. W. Connell (eds) Handbook of Studies on Men & Masculinities. Sage, London, pp. 289–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell R. W.: 2005. Globalization, Imperialism, and Masculinities in: M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, R. W. Connell (eds) Handbook of Studies on Men & Masculinities. Sage, London, pp. 71–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell R. W., J. Hearn, M. S. Kimmel: 2005. Introduction in: M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, R. W. Connell (eds) Handbook of Studies on Men & Masculinities. Sage, London, pp. 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppock V., D. Haydon, I. Richter: 1995, The Illusions of ‹Post-Feminism’ – New Women, Old Myths Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Crainer S.: 2003, The Ultimate Business Library – The Greatest Books that Made Management Capstone, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir S.: 1949/1993, The Second Sex. Everyman’s Library, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry R.: 1997. Feminism: How Does It Play in the Corporate Theatre. in: A. L. Larson, R. E. Freeman (eds) Women’s Studies and Business Ethics – Toward a New Conversation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 11–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, R.: 2002. ‹Feminist Theory and Business Ethics’, in: R. Frederick, E. (ed) A Companion to Business Ethics (Blackwell, Oxford), pp. 81–87

  • Drucker P. F.: 1969, The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society. Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist, T. 2006. Survey: The Battle For Brainpower: 5 Oct 2006

  • Edley N., M. Wetherell: 1999, Imagined Futures: Young Men’s Talk About Fatherhood and Domestic Life British Journal of Social Psychology 38, 181–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely R. J.: 1994, The Effects of Organizational Demographics and Social Identity on Relationships among Professional Women Administrative Science Quarterly 39(2), 203–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough N.: 1992, Discourse and Social Change. Polity, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough N.: 1995, Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough N.: 2005, Peripheral Vision: Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies: The Case for Critical Realism Organization Studies 26(6), 915–939

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi S.: 1993, Backlash: The Undeclared War Against Women. Vintage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling A.: 2000, Sexing The Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson K. E.: 1994, On Bringing More Theory, More Voices and More Politics to the Study of Organization Organization 1(1), 81–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Fondas N.: 1997, Feminization Unveiled: Management Qualities in Contemporary Writings Academy of Management Review 22(1), 257–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser J., M. Gold: 2001, “Portfolio Workers”: Autonomy and Control amongst Freelance translators Work, Employment and Society 15(4), 679–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhard B., M. Osterloh, R. Schmid: 1992. (Wie) Kommen Frauen in deutschsprachigen Personallehrbüchern vor? in: G. Krell (eds) Personalpolitik Aus Der Sicht Von Frauen – Frauen Aus Der Sicht Der Personalpolitik : Was Kann Die Personalforschung Von Der Frauenforschung Lernen?. Hampp, München, pp. 28–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi S.: 1995, Gender, Symbolism and Organizational Culture. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi S., J. Marshall, A. J. Mills: 2003. Theorizing Gender and Organizing in: R. Westwood, S. Clegg (eds) Debating Organization – Point-Counterpoint in Organization Studies. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 325–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A.: 1991, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill R.: 1993. Justifying Injustice: Broadcasters’ Accounts of Inequality in Radio in: E. Burman, I. Parker (eds) Discourse Analytic Research: Repertoires and Readings of Texts in Action. Routledge, London, pp. 75–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill R.: 2000. Discourse Analysis in: M. Bauer, G. Gaskell (eds) Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A Practical Handbook for Social Research. Sage, London, pp. 172–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R.: 2002, Cool, Creative and Egalitarian? Exploring Gender in Project-Based New Media Work in Europe Information, Communication and Society 5(1), 70–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill R., D. Dodd. 2000. New Media – Working Practices in the Electronic Arts DGV of the European Commission and the London School of Economics, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill R., K. Henwood, C. McLean: 2000. The Tyranny of the ‹Six-Pack’? Understanding Men’s Responses to Representations of the Male Body in Popular Culture in: C. Squire (ed) Culture in Psychology. Routledge, London, pp. 100–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill R., K. Henwood, C. McLean: 2005, Body Projects and the Regulation of Normative Masculinity Body & Society 11(1), 37–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C.: 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover S. H., M. A. Bumpus, G. F. Sharp, G. A. Munchus: 2002, Gender differences in Ethical Decision Making Women in Management Review 17(5), 217–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Green L., P. W. Parkin, J. Hearn: 2001. Power in: E. M. Wilson (ed) Organizational Behaviour and Gender. Sage, London, pp. 188–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosser K., J. Moon: 2005, Gender Mainstreaming and Corporate Social Responsibility: Reporting Workplace Issues Journal of Business Ethics 2005(62), 4, 327–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakim C.: 1996, Key Issues in Women’s Work – Female Heterogeneity and the Polarisation of Women’s Employment Athlone, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy C. B.: 1993, Understanding Organisations. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy C. B.: 1994, The Empty Raincoat – Making Sense of the Future. Hutchinson/Arrow, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy C. B.: 2001, The Elephant and the Flea: Looking Backwards to the Future. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy C., I. Palmer, N. Phillips: 2000, Discourse as a Strategic Resource Human Relations 53(9), 1227–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow E., J. Hearn: 1995, Cultural Constructions: Contrasting Theories of Organisational Culture and Gender Construction Gender, Work & Organization 2(4), 180–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn J., P. W. Parkin: 1983, Gender and Organizations: A Selective Review and a Critique of a Neglected Area Organization Studies 4(3), 219–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn J., P. W. Parkin: 1992. Gender and Organizations: A Selective Review of a Neglected Area in: A. J. Mills, P. Tancred (eds) Gendering Organizational Analysis. Sage, London, pp. 46–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Henninger A.: 2001, Gender-Probleme in der New Economy: Geschlechterverhältnisse in kleinen Software-Firmen Zeitschrift für Frauenforschung und Geschlechterstudien 2001(3), 88–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill D.: 1997, The future of men Phoenix, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson K. H.: 1995, Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. M., F. H. Gautschi: 1988, Will the Ethics of Business Change? A Survey of Future Executives Journal of Business Ethics 7(4), 231–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter R. M.: 1977, Men and Women of the Corporation. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter R. M.: 1989, When Giants Learn to Dance: Mastering the Challenges of Strategy, Management and Careers in the 1990s. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter R. M.: 2001, Evolve! Succeeding in the Digital Culture of Tomorrow. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelan, E. K.: 2007, “‹That Could not Happen Today’– Making Sense of Gender Discrimination in the Knowledge Economy”, 5th Gender, Work and Organization Conference, Keele, UK, 27–29th June 2007

  • Kerfoot D., D. Knights: 1993, Management, Masculinity and Manipulation: From Paternalism to Corporate Strategy in Financial Services in Britain Journal of Management Studies 30(4), 659–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot D., D. Knights: 1996. The Best is Yet to Come?’: The Quest for Embodiment in Managerial Work in: D. L. Collinson, J. Hearn (eds) Men and Managers, Managers as Men – Critical Perspectives on Men, Masculinities and Management. Sage, London, pp. 78–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Lämsä A.-M., T. Sintonen: 2001, A Discursive Approach to Understanding Women Leaders in Working Life Journal of Business Ethics 34(3–4), 255–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard P.: 2004, Westerns, Weddings and Web-Weavers: Reading Gender as Genre in Organizational Theory Gender, Work and Organization 11(1), 74–94

    Google Scholar 

  • MacInnes J.: 1998, The End of Masculinity. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLellan C., J. Dobson: 1997, Women, Ethics, and MBAs Journal of Business Ethics 16(11), 1201–1209

    Google Scholar 

  • Manske A.: 2003. Arbeits– und Lebensarrangements in der Multimediabranche unter Vermarktlichungsdruck – Rationalisierungspotenzial für den Markterfolg in: E. Kuhlmann, S. Betzelt (eds) Geschlechterverhältnisse im Dienstleistungssektor – Dynamiken, Differenzierungen und neue Horizonte. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp. 133–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall H., M. Wetherell: 1989. Talking About Career and Gender Identities: A Discourse Analysis Perspective in: S. Skevington, D. Baker (eds) The Social Identity of Women. Sage, London, pp. 106–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall J.: 2007, The Gendering of Leadership in Corporate Social Responsibility Journal of Organizational Change Management 20(2), 165–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin J., D. Collinson: 2003. Feminist Theory and Critical Theory: Unexplored Synergies. In: M. Alvesson, H. Willmott (eds) Studying Management Critically. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin J., K. Knopoff: 1997. The Gendered Implications of Apparently Gender-Neutral Theory: Re-Reading Max Weber in: A. L. Larson, R. E. Freeman (eds) Women’s Studies and Business Ethics: Towards a New Conversation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 30–49

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe A. C., R. Ingram, M. C. Dato-on: 2006, The Business of Ethics and Gender Journal of Business Ethics 64(2), 101–116

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell L.: 2000, The Trouble With Men? Young People, Gender Transformations and the Crisis of Masculinity International Journal of Urban and Regional Planning 24(1), 201–209

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell L.: 2001, Men, Management and Multiple Masculinities in Organisations Geoforum 32(2), 181–198

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell L.: 2002, Transitions to Work: Masculine Identities, Youth Inequality, and Labour Market Change Gender, Place & Culture 9(1), 39–59

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell L.: 2003, Redundant Masculinities? Employment change and white working class youth. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson D., D. M. Kolb: 2000, Moving out of the ‹Armchair’: Developing a Framework to Bridge the Gap between Feminist Theory and Practice Organization 7(4), 553–571

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary J.: 1997, Developing a New Mindset: The ‹Career Ambitious’ Individual Women in Management Review 12(3), 91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley A.: 1972, Sex, Gender and Society. Gower, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley J. G.: 2000, Gender-Based Barriers to Senior Management Positions: Understanding the Scarcity of Female CEOs Journal of Business Ethics 27(4), 321–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbor J. O.: 2000, Mythicizing and Reification in Entrepreneurial Discourse: Ideology-Critique of Entrepreneurial Studies Journal of Management Studies 37(5), 605–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Oriz D. R.: 1997. Phallocorporatism in: A. L. Larson, R. E. Freeman (eds) Women’s Studies and Business Ethics: Towards a New Conversation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 127–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker I.: 1990, Discourse: Definitions and Contradictions Philosophical Psychology 3(2), 189–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrons D.: 2003, The New Economy and the Work – Life Balance: Conceptual Explorations and a Case Study of New Media Gender, Work and Organization 10(1), 65–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters T.: 2001, The Brand You 50. Alfred A. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters T. R. H. Waterman: 1982, In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies. Harper and Row, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson C. A., J. Philpot: 2007, Women’s Roles on U. S. Fortune 500 Boards: Director Expertise and Committee Memberships Journal of Business Ethics 72(2), 177

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips A., B. Taylor: 1980, Sex and Skill: Towards a Feminist Economics Feminist Review 6, 79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips N., C. Hardy: 1997, Managing Multiple Identities: Discourse, Legitimacy and Resources in the UK Refugee System Organization 4(2), 159–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink D. H.: 2001, Free Agent Nation: How America’s New Independent Workers Are Transforming The Way We Live Warner Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pongratz H. J., G. G. Voß: 2003, From Employee to ‹Entreployee’: Towards A ‹Self-Entrepreneurial’ Work Force? Concepts and Transformation 8(3), 239–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter J.: 1997. Discourse Analysis as a Way of Analysing Naturally Occurring Talk in: D. Silverman (ed) Qualitative Research – Theory, Method and Practice. Sage, London, pp. 144–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter J., M. Wetherell: 1987, Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter J., M. Wetherell, R. Gill, D. Edwards: 1990, Discourse: Noun, Verb or Social Practice? Philosophical Psychology 3(2), 205–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Projansky S.: 2001, Watching Rape New York University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Puwar N.: 2004, Space Invaders: Race, Gender and Bodies Out of Place Berg, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh V., S. Kumra, S. Vinnicombe: 2002, Gender and Impression Management Strategies: Managing the Good Opinions Held by Others for Career Success Journal of Business Ethics 37(1), 77–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. and S. Vinnicombe: 2006. The Female FTSE Report 2006 (http://www.som.cranfield.ac.uk/som/research/centres/cdwbl/downloads/FTSE2006full.pdf)

  • Solomon R. C.: 1997. Competition, Care, and Compassion: Toward a Nonchauvinist View of the Corporation in: A. L. Larson, R. E. Freeman (eds) Women’s Studies and Business Ethics: Towards a New Conversation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 144–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer S. A., J. Potter: 2000, The Management of Heterosexist Talk: Conversational Resources and Prejudiced Claims Discourse & Society 11(4), 543–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen D.: 1998, Talking From 9 to 5: Women and Men at Work, Language, Sex and Power Virago Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S.: 2001. Locating and Conducting Discourse Analytic Research in: M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, S. Yates (eds) Discourse as Data: a Guide for Analysis. Sage, London, pp. 5–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas D.: 1993, Not guilty – Men: The case for the Defence Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas R., A. Davies: 2005, What Have the Feminists Done for Us? Feminist Theory and Organizational Resistance Organization 12(5), 711–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney M.: 1995. Negotiating a Software Career: Informal Work Practices and “The Lads” in a Software Installation in: K. Grint, R. Gill (eds) The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkiss F.: 1998. Analysing Discourse in: C. Seale (ed) Researching. Society and Culture Sage, London, pp. 245–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Treanor, J.: 2007. Women quit before hitting glass ceiling (http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,2028833,00. html)

  • Vinnicombe, S. and N. L. Colwill: 1995, The Essence of Women in Management (Prentice Hall, London)

  • Wajcman J.: 1998, Managing Like a Man. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell M., J. Potter: 1992, Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimatisation of Exploitation. Harvester Wheatsheaf, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell M., H. Stiven, J. Potter: 1987, Unequal Egalitarianism: A Preliminary Study of Discourses Concerning Gender And Employment Opportunities British Journal of Social Psychology 26, 59–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetterer A.: 2003. Rhetorische Modernisierung: Das Verschwinden der Ungleichheit aus dem zeitgenössischen Differenzwissen in: G.-A. Knapp, A. Wetterer (eds) Achsen der Differenz - Gesellschaftstheorie und feministische Kritik 2. Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster, pp. 286–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetterer A.: 2004. Widersprüche zwischen Diskurs und Praxis : Gegenstandsbezug und Erkenntnispotenziale einer sozialkonstruktivistischen Perspektive in: U. Helduser, D. Marx, T. Paulitz, K. Pühl (eds) under construction? Konstruktivistische Perspektiven in feministischer Theorie und Forschungspraxis. Campus, Frankfurt a.M., pp. 58–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton A., S. Bird: 1996. Stand by Your Man – Homosociality, Work Groups, and Men’s Perceptions of Difference in: C. Cheng (ed) Masculinities in Organizations. Sage, London, pp. 97–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E. M.: 2001. Organizational Behaviour and Gender in: E. M. Wilson (ed) Organizational Behaviour Reassessed – The Impact of Gender. Sage, London, pp. 1–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

An earlier version of this article was published in German. The full reference is Kelan, E. K.: 2006. ``Zur (De)Konstruktion von Geschlecht in neuer Managementliteratur'', in R. Bendl, Betriebswirtschaftslehre und Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung, Teil 1: Verortung geschlechterkonstituierender (Re-)Produktionsprozesse (Peter Lang, Frankfurt/Main). I thank the Peter Lang Verlag for allowing me to publish a changed version of the article in English. I am also grateful to Rosalind Gill, Julia Nentwich, Rachel Dunkley-Jones and the two anonymous reviewers for their comments which improved this article immensely.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth K. Kelan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelan, E. The Discursive Construction of Gender in Contemporary Management Literature. J Bus Ethics 81, 427–445 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9505-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9505-2

Keywords

Navigation