Skip to main content
Log in

Causality Between Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence from Canadian Firms

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assesses the causal relationship between corporate social performance (CSP) and financial performance (FP). We perform our empirical analyses on a sample of 179 publicly held Canadian firms and use the measures of CSP provided by Canadian Social Investment Database for the years 2004 and 2005. Using the “Granger causality” approach, we find no significant relationship between a composite measure of a firm’s CSP and FP, except for market returns. However, using individual measures of CSP, we find a robust significant negative impact of the environmental dimension of CSP and three measures of FP, namely return on assets, return on equity, and market returns. This latter finding is consistent, at least in the short run, with the trade-off hypothesis and, in part, with the negative synergy hypothesis which states that socially responsible firms experience lower profits and reduced shareholder wealth, which in turn limits the socially responsible investments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Allouche, J. and P. Laroche: 2005a, ‘Responsabilité sociale et performance financière des entreprises: une synthèse de la littérature’, Actes du colloque organisé par CREFIGE et CERIT (Nancy), 17–19 Mars

  • Allouche, J., & Laroche, P. (2005b). A meta-analytical investigation of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines, 57, 18–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambec, S. and P. Lanoie: 2007, ‘When and Why Does It Pay to be Green?’, Working Paper, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL), Université Pierre Mendès-France

  • Brooks, L.J. (1997). Business ethics in Canada: Distinctiveness and directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(6), 591–604. doi:10.1023/A:1005758211031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F., & French, K.R. (1992). The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465. doi:10.2307/2329112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F., & French, K.R. (1993). Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3–56. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisman, R., G. Heal and V. Nair: 2005, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing Well by Doing Good?’, Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania

  • Freeman, R.E. 1984, Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach, (Pitman, Boston)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine 13, 32–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C.W.J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 428–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, S.B., & Waddock, S.A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034–1046. doi:10.2307/256611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D.N. 1995, ‘Basic Econometrics’, 3rd edition (McGraw Hill, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J., & Freeman, R. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 479–487. doi:10.2307/256971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J. and G. D. Keim: 2001, ‘Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line?’, Strategic Management Journal 22, 125–139. doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, L., & Roberts, R.W. (2004). Corporate social performance: Empirical evidence on Canadian firms. Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 9, 73–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, L. and R. W. Roberts: 2007, ‘Corporate Social Performance, Financial Performance and Institutional Ownership in Canadian Firms’, Accounting Forum. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2007.05.001

  • McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872. doi:10.2307/256342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MJRA Inc.: 2003, http://www.mjrajsi.com/about.asp?section=1&level_2=0&level_3=0

  • Nelling, E. and E. Webb: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Virtuous Circle Revisited’, Working Paper, Drexel University and Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, L.E., & O’Bannon, D.P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship: a typology and analysis. Business & Society, 36, 419–429. doi:10.1177/000765039703600406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R.W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An Application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(92)90015-K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557. doi:10.2307/258135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, S. (1975). Are socially responsible firms good investment risks? Management Review, 64, 18–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A. and S. M. Graves: 1997, ‘The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link’, Strategic Management Journal 18(4), 303–319. doi:10. 1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G

  • Weidenbaum, M., & Sheldon, V. (1987). Takeovers and stockholders: winners and losers. California Management Review, 29(4), 57–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1967, The Economics of Discretionary Behaviour: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm, (Markham, Chicago)

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, (Free Press, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M.-L. (2006). Corporate social performance, corporate financial performance, and firm size: A meta-analysis. Journal of American Academy of Business, 8(1), 163–171

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claude Francoeur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Makni, R., Francoeur, C. & Bellavance, F. Causality Between Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence from Canadian Firms. J Bus Ethics 89, 409–422 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0007-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0007-7

Keywords

Navigation