Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Green product innovation has been recognized as one of the key factors to achieve growth, environmental sustainability, and a better quality of life. Understanding green product innovation as a result of interaction between innovation and sustainability has become a strategic priority for theory and practice. This article investigates green product innovation by means of a multiple case study analysis of 12 small to medium size manufacturing companies based in Italy and Canada. First, we propose a conceptual framework that presents three key environmental dimensions of green product innovation such as energy minimization, materials reduction, and pollution prevention as identified in the life cycle phases of products. Based on insights gained from in-depth interviews, we discuss firms’ motivations to develop green products, environmental policies and targets for products, different dimensions of green product innovation, and challenges faced during developing and marketing of green products. Results from the study are then synthesized and integrated in a toolbox that sheds light on various aspects of green product innovation and provides solutions to challenges and risks that are faced by firms. Finally, implications for managers, academia and public policy makers are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aragon-Correa, J. A. and S. Sharma: 2003, ‘A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy’, Academy of Management Review 28(1), 71-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. and K. Roth: 2000, ‘Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness’, Academy of Management Journal 43(4), 717-748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, H., F. Boons and A. Bragd: 2002, ‘Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives’, Journal of Cleaner Production 10(5), 409-425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berchicci, L. and W. Bodewes: 2005, ‘Bridging Environmental Issues with New Product Development’, Business Strategy and the Environment 14(5), 272–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, I. E., P. H. Cunningham and M. E. Drumwright: 2007, ‘Mainstreaming Corporate Social Responsibility: Developing Markets for Virtue’, California Management Review 49(4), 132-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.: 2001, ‘Design for environment: a quality-based model for green product development’, Management Science 47(2), 250-263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. S., S. B. Lai and C. T. Wen: 2006, ‘The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan’, Journal of Business Ethics 67(4), 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Y. and C. Tsai: 2007, ‘The Effect of Green Design Activities on New Product Strategies and Performance: An Empirical Study among High-tech Companies’, International Journal of Management 24(2), 276-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick, T. and K. Hockerts: 2002, ‘Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability’, Business Strategy and the Environment 11(2), 130-141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M.: 1989, ‘Building Theories from Case Study Research’, Academy of Management Review 14(4), 532-550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraj-Andre’s, E., E. Martinez-Salinas and J. Matute-Vallejo: 2008, ‘A Multidimensional Approach to the Influence of Environmental Marketing and Orientation on the Firm’s Organizational Performance’, Journal of Business Ethics (published on-line October 2008).

  • Gauthier, C.: 2005, ‘Measuring Corporate Social and Environmental Performance: The Extended Life-Cycle Assessment’, Journal of Business Ethics 59(1/2): 199-206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Benito, J. and O. González-Benito: 2006, ‘A Review of Determinant Factors of Environmental Proactivity’, Business Strategy and the Environment 15(2), 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenbiz: 2009, ‘Green Product Trends: More Launches, More Sales’, on line available at: http://www.greenbiz.com/news/2009/04/24/green-product-trends. Last accessed on 30 June 2009.

  • Hall, J. and H. Vredenburg: 2003, ‘The Challenges of Innovating for Sustainable Development’, MIT Sloan Management Review Fall, 61–68.

  • Hellström, T.: 2007, ‘Dimensions of Environmentally Sustainable Innovation: the Structure of Eco-Innovation Concepts’. Sustainable Development 15(3), 148–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S.: 1999, ‘Discontinuous innovation and the growth paradox’, Strategy & Leadership 27(2), 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassaye, W. W. and D. Verma: 1992, ‘Balancing traditional packaging functions with the new ‘green’ packaging concerns’, SAM Advanced Management Journal 57(4), 15-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey & Company: 2008, ‘How Companies Think About Climate Change: A McKinsey Global Survey’, The McKinsey Quarterly February.

  • Miles, M. and M. Huberman: 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis, (Sage, London, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. P. and L. S. Munilla: 1993, ‘The eco-orientation: an emerging business philosophy’, Marketing Theory and Practices 1(2), 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. P. and J. G. Covin: 2000, ‘Environmental Marketing: A Source of Reputational, Competitive, and Financial Advantage’, Journal of Business Ethics 23(3), 299-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottman, J. A., E. R. Stafford and C. L. Hartman: 2006, ‘Green Marketing Myopia’, Environment 48(5), 22-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottman, J. A. (1997) Green Marketing: Opportunity for Innovation. NTC/Contemporary Books, Lincolnwood, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q.: 1990, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ed., (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peattie, K.: 1992, Green Marketing, (Pitman Publishing, London, UK), pp. 64–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peattie, K.: 1995, Environmental marketing management: meeting the green challenge, (Pitman publishing, London, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. and F. L. Reinhardt: 2007, ‘A Strategic Approach to Climate’, Harvard Business Review 85(10), 22-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. and C. van der Linde: 1995, ‘Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate’, Harvard Business Review September–October, 120–133.

  • Pujari, D., K. Peattie and G. Wright: 2004, ‘Organizational Antecedents of Environmental Responsiveness in Industrial New Product Development’, Industrial Marketing Management 33(5), 381-391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujari, D., G. Wright and K. Peattie: 2003, ‘Green and competitive. Influences on environmental new product development performance’, Journal of Business Research 56(8), 657-671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujari, D.: 2006, ‘Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance’, Technovation 26(1), 76-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeld, K-M., K. Rennings and A. Ziegler: 2007, ‘Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: an empirical analysis’, Ecological Economics 61(1), 91-100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, R., D. Wield, J. P. Gardiner and S. Potter: 1996, Innovative Product Development, (The Open University, Milton Keynes).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale, C.: 2000, The Quality of Qualitative Research, (Sage, London, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. and H. Vredenburg: 1998, ‘Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities’, Strategic Management Journal 19(8), 729-753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P.: 1995, ‘Environmental Technologies and Competitive Advantage’, Strategic Management Journal 16 (summer): 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S.: 2008, ‘Momentum Builds for Sustainable Packaging’, Packaging World Magazine February, 60.

  • Van de Ven, A. H., D. E., Polley, R. Garud and S. Venkataraman: 1999, The innovation journey, (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K.: 1981, ‘The Case Study Crisis: Some Answers’, Administrative Science Quarterly 26(1), 58-65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K.: 1989, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Revised Edition (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).

  • Yin, R. K.: 2003, Applications of case study research, Second Edition, (Sage, London, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • York, J. (2009) Pragmatic Sustainability: Translating Environmental Ethics into Competitive Advantage. Journal of Business Ethics 85(1), 97–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Ashish Pujari gratefully acknowledges the support of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Grant (Grant No. 410-2005-1952) for conducting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Devashish Pujari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dangelico, R.M., Pujari, D. Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability. J Bus Ethics 95, 471–486 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0

Key words

Navigation