Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Shaping Sustainable Value Chains: Network Determinants of Supply Chain Governance Models

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the characteristics and advantages of interorganizational governance models based on extensive collaboration are well established in the literature, inquiry has only recently extended to sustainable supply chain management, highlighting the potential benefits of combining the integration of social and environmental issues concerning the supply chain with governance models based on joint decision making and extensive cooperation. Yet, firms still differ in both the pervasiveness of such collaborative approaches along the value chain and the extent to which sustainability issues are addressed to the advantage of all parties involved. In an attempt to predict variety in the governance models related to sustainability along the value chain, we propose a theoretical model that identifies and frames four sustain- able supply chain governance (SSCG) models, resulting from combinations of supply chain network density and centrality of the focal organizations. We show how, as centrality increases, firms are able to exert influence over their network, coordinating integrated approaches along the value chain. Moreover, as high centrality combines with increasing interconnectedness of the actors within a supply chain network, instrumental approaches are progressively replaced by more relational attitudes aimed at joint value creation among partners. Conditions for SSCG models’ success and the main benefits gained by firms in different structural contexts are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett, L. M.: 2007, ‘Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Review 32(3), 794-816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., D. Korschun, and S. Sen: 2009, ‘Strengthening Stakeholder–Company Relationships through Mutually Beneficial Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives’, Journal of Business Ethics 85(Supplement 2), 257-272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacich, P.: 1972, ‘Factoring and Weighting Approaches to Status Scores and Clique Identification’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2, 113-120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovel, D., and J. Martha: 2000, ‘From Supply Chain to Value Net’, The Journal of Business Strategy 21(4), 24-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J.: 1984, ‘Being in the Right Place: A Structural Analysis of Individual Influences in an Organization’, Administrative Science Quarterly 29(4), 518-539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R.: 2000a, ‘Ethical Issues in International Buyer–Supplier Relationships: A Dyadic Examination’, Journal of Operations Management 18(2), 191-208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R.: 2000b, ‘Precursors of Unethical Behaviour in Global Supplier Management’, Journal of Supply Chain Management 36(1), 45-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R.: 2005, ‘Purchasing Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: The Key Mediating Roles of Organizational Learning and Supplier Performance ‘, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 35(3), 177-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., R. J. Auskalnis, and C. L. Ketchum: 1999, ‘Purchasing from Minority Business Enterprises: Key Success Factors’, Journal of Supply Chain Management 35(1), 28-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., and J. R. Carter: 1998, ‘Interorganizational Determinants of Environmental Purchasing: Initial Evidence from the Consumer Product Industries’, Decision Sciences 29(3), 659-684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., and M. M. Jennings: 2002a, ‘Logistics Social Responsibility: An Integrative Framework’, Journal of Business Logistics 23(1), 145-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., and M. M. Jennings: 2002b, ‘Social Responsibility and Supply Chain Relationships’, Transportation Research 38E(1), 37-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., and M. M. Jennings: 2004, ‘The Role of Purchasing in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Structural Equation Analysis’, Journal of Business Logistics 25(1), 145-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. W., G. L. Frank, and R. A. Kemp: 2000, ‘A Multinational Comparison of Key Ethical Issues, Helps and Challenges in the Purchasing and Supply Management Profession: The Key Implications for Business and the Professions’, Journal of Business Ethics 23(1), 83-100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A.: 2004, `The Art of the Possible: Relationship Management in Power Regimes and Supply Chains', Supply Chain Management 9(5), 346–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Daboub, A. J., and J. M. Calton: 2002, ‘Stakeholder Learning Dialogues: How to Preserve Ethical Responsibilities in Networks’, Journal of Business Ethics 41(1/2), 85-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I. A.: 2009, ‘Alliances and Networks: Creating Success in the Uk Fair Trade Market’, Journal of Business Ethics 86(1), 109-126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detomasi, D. A.: 2007, ‘The Multinational Corporation and Global Governance: Modelling Global Public Policy Networks’, Journal of Business Ethics 71(3), 321-334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., and L. E. Preston: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, M. J., and J. T. Schlachter: 2008, ‘A Virtue-Ethics Analysis of Supply Chain Collaboration’, Journal of Business Ethics 82(4), 851-864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J., and H. Singh: 1998, ‘The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage’, Academy of Management Review 23(4), 1-322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmelhainz, M. A., and R. J. Adams: 1999, ‘The Apparel Industry Response to ‘Sweatshop’ Concerns: A Review and Analysis of Codes of Conduct’, Journal of Supply Chain Management 35(3), 51-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C.: 1979, ‘Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification’, Social Networks 1, 215-239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, (Pitman, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel, S. J., and D. Scott: 2005, ‘Compliance, Collaboration, and Codes of Labour Practice: The Adidas Connection’, California Management Review 45(1), 29-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frooman, J.: 1999, ‘Stakeholder Influence Strategies’, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 191-205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., J. Humphrey, and T. Sturgeon: 2005, ‘The Governance of Global Value Chains’, Review of International Political Economy 12(1), 78-104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, J. H.: 2005, ‘Stakeholder Influence Strategies: An Empirical Exploration’, Journal of Business Ethics 61(1), 79-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W., and T. M. Jones 1992, ‘Stakeholder-Agency Theory’, Journal of Management Studies 29(2), 131-154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D.: 1974, ‘Dependency and Vulnerability: An Exchange Approach to the Control of Organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly 19(1), 45-59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, B.: 2009, ‘Implementing Supplier Codes of Conduct in Global Supply Chains: Process Explanations from Theoretic and Empirical Perspectives’, Journal of Business Ethics 85(1), 77-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., W. S. Hesterly, and S. P. Borgatti: 1997, ‘A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms’, Academy of Management Review 22(4), 911-945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG: 2008. KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2008. KPMG International.

  • Lee, P. D.: 2005, ‘Measuring Supply Chain Integration: A Social Network Approach’, Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal 6(2), 58-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M., and A. Linton: 2003, ‘Fair Trade: A Cup at a Time?’, Politics and Society 31(3), 407-432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S. J., and J. Phillips: 2008, ‘Embedding CSR Values: The Global Footwear Industry’s Evolving Governance Structure’, Journal of Business Ethics 81(1), 143-156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logsdon, J. M.: 1991, ‘Interests and Interdependence in the Formation of Social Problem-Solving Collaborations’, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27(1), 23-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., B. Hillebrand, and D. McAlister: 2002, ‘Managing Socially Responsible Buying: How to Integrate Non-Economic Criteria into the Purchasing Process’, European Management Journal 20(6), 641-648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloni, M. J., and M. E. Brown: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in the Supply Chain: An Application in the Food Industry’, Journal of Business Ethics 68(1), 35-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamic, I.: 2005, ‘Managing Global Supply Chain: The Sports Footwear, Apparel and Retail Sectors’, Journal of Business Ethics 52(1-2), 81-100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan: 1977, ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology 83 340-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min, H., and W. P. Galle: 1997, ‘Green Purchasing Strategies: Trends and Implications’, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 33(3), 10-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle, and D. J. Wood: 1997, ‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts’, Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853-886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.: 2004, ‘The Fair Trade Movement: Parameters, Issues and Future Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 53, 73-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, B. A., and B. Menguc: 2006, ‘Stakeholder Multiplicity: Toward an Understanding of the Interactions between Stakeholders’, Journal of Business Ethics 66(4), 377-391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C.: 1991, ‘Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes’, Academy of Management Review 16(1), 405-425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, J. N., S. E. Fawcett, and A. Cooper: 1993, ‘Challenges and Approaches to Purchasing from Minority-Owned Businesses’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 18(2), 71-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Aleman, P., and M. Sandilands: 2008, ‘Building Value at the Top and the Bottom of the Global Supply Chain: Mnc-Ngo Partnerships’, California Management Review 51(1), 24-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F. and A. Russo: 2008, ‘Illycaffè: Value Creation through Responsible Supplier Relationships’, Journal of Business Ethics Education 5(Special Issue), 83–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F., A. Russo and A. Tencati: 2007, ‘Csr Strategies of Smes and Large Firms. Evidence from Italy’, Journal of Business Ethics 74(3), 285–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., and G. R. Salancik. 1978, The External Control of Organizations, (Harper & Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R., and C. B. Caldwell: 2001, ‘Value Chain Responsibility: A Farewell to Arm’s Length’, Business & Society Review 110(4), 345-370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, J. E., L. E. Preston, and S. Sachs: 2002, ‘Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View’, California Management Review 45(1), 6-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W.: 1990, ‘Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization’, in B. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior,(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 295-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., K. W. Koput, and L. Smith-Doerr: 1996, ‘Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology’, Administrative Science Quarterly 41(1), 116-145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razzaque, M. A., and T. P. Hwee: 2002, ‘Ethics and Purchasing Dilemma: A Singaporean View’, Journal of Business Ethics 35(4), 307-326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, A. M., and D. Reed: 2009, ‘Partnerships for Development: Four Models of Business Involvement’, Journal of Business Ethics 90(1), 3-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rein, M., and L. Stott: 2009, ‘Working Together: Critical Perspectives on Six Cross-Sector Partnerships in Southern Africa’, Journal of Business Ethics 90(1), 79-89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivoli, P.: 2003, ‘Labor Standards in the Global Economy: Issues for Investors’, Journal of Business Ethics 43(3), 223-232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S.: 2003, ‘Supply Chain Specificts? Understanding the Patchy Success of Ethical Sourcing Initiatives’, Journal of Business Ethics 44(2/3), 159-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. and P. Engardio: 2006, ‘Secrets, Lies, and Sweatshops’, Business Week (November 27).

  • Rowley, T. J.: 1997, ‘Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences’, Academy of Management Journal 22(4), 887-910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, J., J. Nollet, and M. Beaulieu: 2006, ‘Reverse Logistics Network and Governance Structures’, Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal 7(2), 58-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, A. and F. Perrini: 2010, ‘Investigating Stakeholder Theory and Social Capital: CSR in Large Firms and SMEs’, Journal of Business Ethics 91(2), 207–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, A. and A. Tencati: 2009, ‘Formal Vs. Informal CSR Strategies: Evidence from Italian Micro, Small, Medium-Sized, and Large Firms’, Journal of Business Ethics 85(Suppl. 2), 339–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch, B., G. Bohlen, and A. Diamantopoulos: 1996, ‘The Link between Green Purchasing Decisions and Measures of Environmental Consciousness’, European Journal of Marketing 30(5), 35-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, C., and H. Gunter: 2005, ‘Measuring Supply Chain Performance: Current Research and Future Directions’, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 55(3), 242-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spekman, R., J. Kamauff and N. Myhr: 1998, ‘An Empirical Investigation into Supply Chain Management: A Perspective on Partnerships’, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 28(8), 630-650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strand, R.: 2009, ‘Corporate Responsibility in Scandinavian Supply Chain’, Journal of Business Ethics 85(Supplement 1), 179-185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tencati, A., and L. Zsolnai: 2008, ‘The Collaborative Enterprise’, Journal of Business Ethics 85(3), 367-376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teuscher, P., B. Grüninger, and N. Ferdinand: 2006, ‘Risk Management in Sustainable Supply Chain Management (Sscm):Lessons Learnt from the Case of Gmo-Free Soybeans’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 13, 1-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Tulder, R., J. van Wijk, and A. Kolk: 2009, ‘From Chain Liability to Chain Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 85(Supplement 2), 399-412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verwaal, E., and M. Hesselmans: 2004, ‘Drivers of Supply Network Governance: An Explorative Study of the Dutch Chemical Industry’, European Management Journal 22(4), 442-451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vurro, C., M. T. Dacin and F. Perrini: ‘Institutional Antecedents of Partnering for Social Change: How Institutional Logics Shape Cross-Sector Social Partnerships’, Journal of Business Ethics (Forthcoming)

  • Waddock, S. A., C. B. Bodwell, and S. B. Graves: 2002, ‘Responsibility: The New Business Imperative’, Academy of Management Executive 16(2), 132-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, S. V., R. B. Handfield, and S. A. Melnyk: 1998, ‘The Green Supply Chain: Integrating Suppliers into Environmental Management Processes’, Journal of Supply Chain Management 34(2), 2-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wathne, K. H. and J. B. Heide: 2004, ‘Relationship Governance in a Supply Chain Network’, Journal of Marketing 68(1), 73-89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisband, E.: 2009, ‘The Virtues of Virtue: Social Capital, Network Governance, and Corporate Social Responsibility’, American Behavioral Scientist 52(6), 905-918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, R. A., and D. S. Putler: 2002, ‘How Tight Are the Ties That Bind Stakeholder Groups?’, Organization Science 13(1), 64-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J.: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, Academy of Management Review 16(4), 691-718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J., and R. E. Jones: 1995, ‘Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance’, International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3(3), 229-267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clodia Vurro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vurro, C., Russo, A. & Perrini, F. Shaping Sustainable Value Chains: Network Determinants of Supply Chain Governance Models. J Bus Ethics 90 (Suppl 4), 607–621 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0595-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0595-x

Keywords

Navigation