Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Three Roads to P2P Systems and Their Impact on Business Practices and Ethics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines some of the most relevant issues concerning P2P systems so as to take sides in today’s strongly polarized debate. The idea is to integrate a context-based perspective with an ontological representation of informational norms; thanks to a procedural outlook which is presented in terms of burden of proof. More particularly, we examine three “roads.” First, the topological approach to complex social networks allows us to comprehend the laws according to which information is distributed through P2P systems and how a “short route” has joined, and sometimes replaced, the traditional “long route” between creator, business, and the public. The second road is the context-based perspective elaborated by Helen Nissenbaum, and developed by Francis Grodzinsky and Herman Tavani: The goal is to determine the norms that govern such an informational flow as norms of appropriateness and distribution. The final road is the informational viewpoint on ethics proposed by Luciano Floridi with the idea that standard ethical theories cannot easily be adapted to deal with the new informational issues emerging with digital technology. While empirical evidence on the impact of P2P systems is still quite controversial, it is crucial to determine on whom the burden of proof falls in a given context, on censors or advocates, by singling out both the default norms and exceptions in the use and development of P2P software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adar, E. and B. A. Huberman: 2000, ‘Free Riding on Gnutella’, First Monday, 5(10), http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/792/701, Retrieved 20 April 2009.

  • Andersen, B. and M. Frenz: 2008, ‘The Impact of Music Downloads and P2P File-Sharing on the Purchase of Music: A Study for Industry Canada’, Working Paper, University of London.

  • Anderson, Ch.: 2006, The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More (Hyperion, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauwens, M.: 2005, ‘P2P and Human Evolution: Placing Peer to Peer Theory in an Integral Framework’, http://integralvisioning.org/article.php?story=p2ptheory1. Retrieved 20 April 2009.

  • Benkler, Y.: 2004, ‘Sharing Nicely: On Shareable Goods and the Emergence of Sharing as a Modality of Economic Production’, Yale Law Journal 114, 273-358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjee, S., R.D. Gopal, K. Lertwachara, J.R. Marsden and R. Telang: 2007, ‘The Effects of Digital Sharing Technologies on Music Markets: A Survival Analysis of Albums on Ranking Charts’, Management Science 53(9), 1359-1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calton, J.M.: 2006, ‘Social Contracting as a Pluralist Process of Moral Sense Making: A Dialogic Twist on the ISCT’, Journal of Business Ethics 68, 329-346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and T. Dunfee: 1999, Ties that Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durante, M.: 2008, ‘What Model of Trust for Networked Cooperation? Online Social Trust in the Production of Common Goods (Knowledge Sharing)’, in T. W. Bynum, M. Calzarossa, I. De Lotto and S. Rogerson (eds.), Living, Working and Learning Beyond Technology, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference Ethicomp 2008 (Tipografia Commerciale, Mantova), pp. 211–223.

  • Floridi, L.: 1999, ‘Information Ethics: On the Philosophical Foundation of Computer Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 1, 37–56.

  • Floridi, L.: 2003, ‘On the Intrinsic Value of Information Objects and the Infosphere’, Ethics and Information Technology 4, 287-304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L.: 2006, ‘Information Technology and the Tragedy of the Good Will’, Ethics and Information Technology 8(4), 253-262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L.: 2007a, ‘Global Information Ethics: The Importance of Being Environmentally Earnest’, International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction 3(3), 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L.: 2007b, ‘A Look into the Future Impact of ICT on Our Lives’, The Information Society 23(1), 59-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L.: 2008, ‘Information Ethics, Its Nature and Scope’, in J. van den Hoven and J. Weckert (eds.), Moral Philosophy and Information Technology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 40–65, www.philosophyofinformation.net, pp. 1–31 (online version).

  • Galloway, A.: 2004, Protocol: How Control exists after Decentralization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, J.: 2003, ‘From Having Copies to Experiencing Works: The Development of an Access Right in US Copyright Law’, Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA 50, 113–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal R.D., Bhattacharjee S. (2006) ‘Do Artists Benefit from Online Music Sharing?’. Journal of Business 79(3):1503-1533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.: 1973, ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology 78, 1360-1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco, G.M. and L. Floridi: 2004, ‘The Tragedy of the Digital Commons’, Ethics and Information Technology 6(2), 73-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodzinsky, F. S. and H. T. Tavani: 2008, ‘Online File Sharing: Resolving the Tensions Between Privacy and Property Interest’, in T. W. Bynum, M. Calzarossa, I. De Lotto and S. Rogerson (eds.), Living, Working and Learning Beyond Technology, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference Ethicomp 2008 (Tipografia Commerciale, Mantova), pp. 373–383.

  • Grodzinsky, F.S. and H.T. Tavani: 2005, ‘P2P Networks and the Verizon v. RIAA case: Implications for personal privacy and intellectual property’, Ethics and Information Technology 7(4), 243-250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G.: 1968, ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science 162, 1243-1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide, T.: 2001, ‘Copyright in the EU and the U.S.: What “Access Right”?’, European Intellectual Property Review 23(8), 469-477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iamnitchi, A., M. Ripeanu and I. Foster: 2004, Small-world File-sharing Communities. The 23rd Conference of the IEEE Communications Society (InfoCom 2004), Hong Kong.

  • Johnson-Cramer, M. and R. Phillips: 2006, ‘Ties that Unwind: Dynamism in Integrative Social Contracts Theory’. Journal of Business Ethics 68, 283-302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, A.: 2008, The Cult of the Amateur: How Blogs, MySpace, YouTube, and the Rest of Today’s User-Generated Media Are Destroying Our Economy, Our Culture, and Our Values (Doubleday Business, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E.: 2005, ‘The Ethics of Innovation: P2P Software Developers and Designing Substantial Non-infringing Uses under the Sony Doctrine’, Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 147-162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S.: 1967, ‘The Small World Problem’, Psychology Today 2, 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, A.: 2007, The Regulation of Cyberspace: Control in the Online Environment (Routledge Cavendish, Abingdon, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum, H.: 2004, ‘Privacy as Contextual Integrity’, Washington Law Review 79(1), 119-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum, H., A. Barth, A. Datta and J. C. Mitchell: 2006, Privacy and Contextual Integrity: Framework and Application. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, May. http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum.

  • Nissenbaum, H. and Y. Benkler: 2006, ‘Commons-based Peer Production and Virtue’, Journal of Political Philosophy 14(4), 394-419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberholzer-Gee, F. and K. Strumpf: 2009, ‘File-Sharing and Copyright’, Working Paper 09-132, Harvard Business School.

  • Pagallo, U.: 2006, Teoria giuridica della complessità (Giappichelli, Torino).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagallo, U.: 2007a, ‘‘Small world’ Paradigm and Empirical Research in Legal Ontologies: a Topological Approach’, in G. Ajani, G. Peruginelli, G. Sartor and D. Tiscornia (eds.), The Multilanguage Complexity of European Law: Methodologies in Comparison (European Press Academic Publishing, Florence), pp. 195–210.

  • Pagallo, U.: 2007b, ‘‘Small world’ Paradigm in Social Sciences: Problems and Perspectives’, in T. Ward Bynum, S. Rogerson and K. Murata (eds.), Glocalisation: Bridging the Global Nature of Information and Communication Technology and the Local Nature of Human Beings, I-II, Vol. II (Global e-SCM Research Center, Meiji University, Tokyo), pp. 456–465.

  • Pagallo, U.: 2008a, Let them be Peers: The Future of P2P Systems and Their Impact on Contemporary Legal Networks. Proceedings of the Conference on Law and Technology, 28–29 October 2008, European University Institute, Florence, http://www.one-lex.eu/futureof.

  • Pagallo, U.: 2008b, Ethics Among Peers: From Napster to Peppermint, and Beyond. 5th itAis Conference on “Challenges and Changes: People, Organizations, Institutions and IT”, Paris, 13–14 December 2008, to be published in A. D’Atri and D. Saccà (eds.): 2010, Information Systems: People, Organizations, Institutions, and Technologies (Springer, Heidelberg), pp. 297–304.

  • Pagallo, U.: 2008c, ‘Something Beyond Technology: Some Remarks On Ignorance And Its Role In Evolution’, in T. W. Bynum, M. Calzarossa, I. De Lotto and S. Rogerson (eds.), Living, Working and Learning Beyond Technology, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference Ethicomp 2008 (Tipografia Commerciale, Mantova), pp. 623–631.

  • Pagallo, U. and G. Ruffo: 2007, P2P Systems in Legal Networks: Another ‘Small World’ Case. Artificial Intelligence and Law. Proceedings of ICAIL 2007 Conference, 4–8 June 2007, Stanford, The Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, pp. 287–288.

  • Ricolfi, M.: 2007, ‘Individual and Collective Management of Copyright in a Digital Environment’, in P. Torremans (ed.), Copyright law. A handbook of contemporary research (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 283-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rob, R. and J. Waldfogel: 2006, ‘Piracy on the High C’s: Music Downloading, Sales Displacement, and Social Welfare in a Sample of College Students’, Journal of Law & Economics 49(1), 29-62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffo, G. and R. Schifanella: 2007, ‘FairPeers: Efficient Profit Sharing in Fair Peer-to-Peer Market Places’, Journal of Network and Systems Management 15(3), 355-382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shang, R.-A., Y.-Ch. Chen and P.-Ch. Chen: 2008, ‘Ethical Decisions about Sharing Music Files in the P2P Environment’, Journal of Business Ethics 80, 349-365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, X., H. Yu, J. Buford and M. Akon (eds.): 2009, Handbook of P2P Networking (Heidelberg, Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. and R. Telang: 2008, `Competing with Free: The Impact of Movie Broadcasting on DVD Sales and Internet Piracy', MIS Quarterly 33(2), 321–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D.: 1997, The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavani, H.T.: 2007, ‘Philosophical Theories of Privacy: Implications for an Adequate Online Privacy Policy’, Metaphilosophy 38(1), 1-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A.: 1980, The Third Wave, (Bantam, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaccaro, A. and P. Madsen: 2009a, ‘ICT and NGO: Difficulties in Attempting to Be Extremely Transparent’, Ethics and Information Technology 11(3), 221–231.

  • Vaccaro, A. and P. Madsen: 2009b, ‘Corporate Dynamic Transparency: The New ICT-Driven Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 11(2), 113–122.

  • Walzer, M.: 1983, Spheres of Justice. A Defence of Pluralism and Equality (Basic Books, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiaohe, L.: 2006, ‘On P2P File-Sharing: A Major Problem – A Chinese Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 63, 63-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zentner, A.: 2006, ‘Measuring the Effect of Music Downloads on Music Purchases’, Journal of Law & Economics 49(1), 63-90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Law School, University of Turin, Via. S.Ottavio n. 54, 10124, Turin, Italy

    Ugo Pagallo & Massimo Durante

Authors
  1. Ugo Pagallo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Massimo Durante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ugo Pagallo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pagallo, U., Durante, M. Three Roads to P2P Systems and Their Impact on Business Practices and Ethics. J Bus Ethics 90 (Suppl 4), 551–564 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0606-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0606-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation