Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Articulating the Meanings of Collective Experiences of Ethical Consumption

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context of the growing popularity of the ethical consumer movement and the appearance of different types of ethical collective communities, the current article explores the meanings drawn from the participation in Responsible Consumption Cooperatives. In existing research, the overriding focus has been on examining individual ethical consumer behaviour at the expense of advancing our understanding of how ethical consumers behave collectively. Hence, this article examines the meanings derived from participating in ethical consumer groups. A qualitative multi-method approach is adopted to increase the validity of findings. This includes focus groups, in-depth interviews, observation and document analysis. Results show that ethical consumption in a group project offers a greater sense of effectiveness and control when compared to individual actions. Furthermore, these groups facilitate the creation of a social circle and encourage new learning as a result of the social interaction that takes place in the ethical community of the cooperative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined community. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2003). What will consumers pay for social products features? Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., & Devinney, T. M. (2007). Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 361–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. (1999). Goal setting and goal striving in consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 63, 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2002). Intentional social action in virtual communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(2), 2–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, C., Cloke, P., Clarke, N., & Malpass, A. (2005). Consuming ethics: Articulating the subjects and spaces of ethical consumption. Antipode, 37(1), 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekin, C., Carrigan, M., & Szmigin, I. (2007). Beyond recycling: ‘Commons-friendly’ waste reduction at new consumption communities. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(5), 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender, T. (1978). Community and social change in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birchall, J., & Simmons, R. A. (2004). What motivates members to participate in cooperatives and mutual businesses? A theoretical model and some findings. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75(3), 465–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann, A. (2000). The moral complexion of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(March), 418–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broderick, A., MacLaran, P., & Ma, P. Y. (2003). Brand meaning negotiation and the role of the online community: A mini case study. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 2(1), 75–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, L., Shaw, D., & Shiu, E. (2008). The impact of ethical concerns on family consumer decision-making. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32, 553–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer—do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, M., Szmigin, I., & Wright, J. (2004). Shopping for a better world? An interpretive study of the potential for ethical consumption within the older market. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(6), 401–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumer don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Wiltshire: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzidakis, A., Hibbert, S., & Smith, A. P. (2007). Why people don’t take their concerns about fair trade to the supermarket: The role of neutralisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherrier, H. (2005). Using existential-phenomenological interviewing to explore meanings of consumption. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, & D. Shaw (Eds.), The ethical consumer (pp. 125–135). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cherrier, H. (2006). Consumer identity and moral obligations in non-plastic bag consumption: A dialectical perspective. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(5), 515–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherrier, H. (2007). Ethical consumption practices: Co-production of self-expression and social recognition. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(5), 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherrier, H. (2009). Disposal and simple living: Exploring the circulation of goods and the development of sacred consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 8(6), 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. F., Kotchen, M. J., & Moore, M. R. (2003). Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: Participation in a green electricity program. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clavin, B., & Lewis, A. (2005). Focus groups on consumers’ ethical beliefs. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, & D. Shaw (Eds.), The ethical consumer (pp. 173–187). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cone, C., & Kakaliouras, A. (1995). Community supported agriculture: Building moral community or an alternative consumer choice. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment, 15(51/52), 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connoly, J., & Prothero, A. (2003). Sustainable consumption: Consumption, consumers and the commodity discourse. Consumption Markets & Culture, 6(4), 275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, I. (2004). Follow the thing: Papaya. Antipode, 36(4), 642–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B. (1997). Community and consumption: Towards a definition of the “linking value” of product or services. European Journal of Marketing, 31(3/4), 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B., & Cova, V. (2001). Tribal aspects of postmodern consumption research: The case of French in-line roller skaters. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 1(1), 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B., Kozinets, R. V., & Shankar, A. (2007a). Consumer tribes. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B., & Pace, S. (2006). Brand community of convenience products: New forms of customer empowerment—the case “my Nutella The Community”. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9/10), 1087–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B., Pace, S., & Park, D. J. (2007b). Global brand communities across borders: The Warhammer case. International Marketing Review, 24(3), 313–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowe, R., & Williams, S. (2000). Who are the ethical consumers? London: The Cooperative Bank.

  • Crane, A. (1999). Are you ethical? Please tick yes? Or no? On researching ethics in business organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(3), 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Astous, A., & Legendre, A. (2009). Understanding consumers’ ethical justifications: A scale for appraising consumers’ reasons for not behaving ethically. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.

  • De Pelsmacker, P., & Janssens, W. (2007). A model for fair trade buying behaviour: The role of perceived quantity and quality of information and of product-specific attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 361–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Klein Pearo, L. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network and small group based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56(6), 465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, C. J. (2009). The role of personal values in fair trade consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 549–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. J. (2000). The future of social-desirability bias research in marketing. Psychology & Marketing, 17(2), 73–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grønjøj, A. (2006). Communication about consumption: A family process perspective on ‘green’ consumer practices. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5(6), 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkier, B. (1999). Consequences of the politicization of consumption: The example of environmentally friendly consumption practices. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 1(1), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. L., & Rist, R. C. (1999). Integrating multiple qualitative research methods (or avoiding the precariousness of a one-legged stool). Psychology & Marketing, 16(4), 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The meaning of style. London: Routlege.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1993). The semiotics of consumption: Interpreting symbolic consumer behaviour in popular culture and works of art. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbeck, C. R., Peters, C., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Gift giving: A community paradigm. Psychology & Marketing, 23(7), 573–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, J. R., & McCarl Nielsen, J. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior. Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environment and Behavior, 23(2), 195–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jannowitz, M. (1952). The community press in an urban setting. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarosz, L. (2008). The city in the country: Growing alternative food networks in metropolitan areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(3), 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. (2001). Utopian enterprise: Articulating the meanings of star trek’s culture of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(June), 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V., & Handelman, J. (1998). Ensouling consumption: A netnographic exploration of the meaning of boycotting behaviour. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1), 475–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal, J. F. (2007). El ‘boom’ de las cooperativas de consumo. El Mundo, supplemento Natura 10. Accessed May 2011, from http://www.elmundo.es/suplementos/natura/2007/10/1168642826.html.

  • Leigh, T. W., Peters, C., & Shelton, J. (2006). The consumer quest for authenticity: The multiplicity of meanings within the MG subculture of consumption. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 481–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for sales. Harvard Business Review, 37(4), 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro, M. L., McCluskey, J. J., & Mittelhammer, R. C. (2002). Will consumers pay a premium for eco-labeled apples? Journal of Consumer Affairs, 36(2), 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, W., & Davenport, E. (2007). To boldly go…exploring ethical spaces to re-politicise ethical consumption and fair trade. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(5), 336–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, S. (2006). Just java: Roasting fair trade coffee. In R. Wilk (Ed.), Fast food/slow food: The cultural economy of the global food system (pp. 241–255). London: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maffesoli, M. (1996). The time of tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S. R. (2011). Conceptualizing the international for-profit social entrepreneur. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. F. (2002). Building brand community. Journal of Marketing, 66(January), 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(December), 310–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behaviour. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moisander, J. (2007). Motivational complexity of green consumerism. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(2007), 404–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muniz, A. M., & O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(March), 412–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2007). Studying the ethical consumer: A review of research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(5), 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaoikonomou, E., Ryan, G., & Valverde, M. (2011). Mapping ethical consumer behaviour. Integrating the empirical research and identifying future directions. Ethics and Behavior, 21(3), 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkins, W., & Craig, G. (2006). Slow living. New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokka, J., & Moisander, J. (2009). Environmental dialogue in online communities: Negotiating ecological citizenship among global travelers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2009), 199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, J. W., & McAlexander, J. H. (1995). Subcultures of consumption: An ethnography of the new bikers. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(June), 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1970). Moral decision making and behaviour. In J. Macauley & L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Altruism and helping behaviour (pp. 127–141). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, J., Imerman, E., & Peters, G. (2002). Community supported agriculture (CSA): Building community among farmers and non-farmers. Journal of Extension, 40(3), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Newholm, T. (2002). Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., Newholm, T., & Dickinson, R. (2006). Consumption as voting: An exploration of consumer empowerment. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9/10), 1049–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Shiu, E. (2002a). Ethics in consumer choice: A multivariate modelling approach. European Journal of Marketing, 37, 1485–1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Shiu, E. (2002b). The role of ethical obligation and self-identity in ethical consumer choice. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 26, 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., Shiu, E., & Clarke, I. (2000). The contribution of ethical obligation and self-identity to the theory of planned behaviour: An exploration of ethical consumers. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(8), 879–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., Shiu, E., Hassan, L., Wilson, E., Bekin, C., & Hogg, G. (2007). Intending to be ethical: An examination of consumer choice in sweatshop avoidance. Advances in Consumer Research, 34, 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2004). Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirsi, A. K., Ward, J. C., & Reingen, P. H. (1996). Microcultural analysis of variation in sharing of causal reasoning about behaviour. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(March), 345–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, P., & Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behaviour: Assessing the role of identification with green consumerism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(4), 388–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D., Hooghe, M., & Micheletti, M. (2005). Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a form of political participation. International Political Science Review, 26(3), 245–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szmigin, I., Carrigan, M., & Mc Eachern, M. (2009). The conscious consumer: Taking a flexible approach to ethical behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2009), 224–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J., & Coskuner-Balli, G. (2007). Countervailing market responses to corporate co-optation and the ideological recruitment of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(August), 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J., Locander, W. B., & Pollio, H. R. (1989). Putting consumer experience back into consumer research: The philosophy and method of existential-phenomenology. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(September), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J., Pollio, H. R., & Locander, W. (1994). The spoken and the unspoken: A hermeneutic approach to understanding the cultural viewpoints that underlie consumers’ expressed meanings. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(December), 432–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J., & Troester, M. (2002). Consumer value systems in the age of postmodern fragmentation: The case of natural health microculture. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(March), 550–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S. A. (1997). Understanding green consumer behaviour. London: Routlege.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2004). Towards understanding members’ general participation in and active contribution to an online travel community. Tourism Management, 25(6), 709–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavestoski, S. (2002). The social-psychological bases of anticonsumption attitudes. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business Management, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Avinguda Universitat 1, 43204, Reus, Spain

    Eleni Papaoikonomou, Mireia Valverde & Gerard Ryan

Authors
  1. Eleni Papaoikonomou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mireia Valverde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gerard Ryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleni Papaoikonomou.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 2.

Table 2 General topic guide for interviews and focus group sessions
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Papaoikonomou, E., Valverde, M. & Ryan, G. Articulating the Meanings of Collective Experiences of Ethical Consumption. J Bus Ethics 110, 15–32 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1144-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1144-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation