Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Scoring Firms’ Codes of Ethics: An Explorative Study of Quality Drivers

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research in the field of management has increasingly focused on strategies and tools related to corporate sustainability. Of the tools examined, codes of ethics have been found to play a primary role. Many studies have investigated the content of such codes, as well as their capacity to condition the behaviour of people within organizations. However, few studies have considered the intrinsic quality of codes of ethics. This study aims to investigate the impact that specific factors—firm size, degree of internationalization and industry effect—can have on the quality of codes of ethics. Based on a sample of 248 listed Italian companies, the results of the empirical analysis show that the quality standard is particularly high in larger companies and in those firms operating in industries in which relationships established with critical stakeholders—and disclosure to those stakeholders—play a crucial role. These results have interesting implications for both researchers and practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accounting Standard Board. (1999). Statement of principles for financial reporting. London.

  • Adhikari, A., & Tondkar, R. H. (1992). Environmental factors influencing accounting disclosure requirements of global stock exchanges. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 4(2), 75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, K., & Nicholls, D. (1994). The impact of non-financial company characteristics on mandatory disclosure compliance in developing countries: The case of Bangladesh. The International Journal of Accounting, 29(1), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T., Cochran, D. S., & Taylor, G. S. (1993). The internal disclosure policies of private-sector employers: An internal look at their relationship to employee whistle blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(2), 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M. E. (1976). Financial reporting practices: Disclosure and comprehensiveness in an international setting. Journal of Accounting Research, 14(1), 10–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, G. C. S. (1989). Codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 305–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondy, K., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). The adoption of voluntary codes of conduct in MNCs: A three-country comparative study. Business and Society Review, 109, 449–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botosan, C. A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of capital. The Accounting Review, 72(3), 323–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). Simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica (The Econometric Society), 47(5), 1287–1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton, J., & Gray, R. (2001). Environmental performance (?), profit, size and industry in UK companies: A brief exploration. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 21(2), 4–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzby, S. L. (1974). The nature of adequate disclosure. The Journal of Accountancy, 152(4), 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, M., Wood, G., Payan, J. M., Singh, J., & Svensson, G. (2012). Code of ethics quality: An international comparison of corporate staff support and regulation in Australia, Canada and the United States. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carasco, E. F., & Singh, J. B. (2003). The content and focus of the codes of ethics of the world’s largest transnational corporations. Business and Society Review, 108, 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerf, A. R. (1961). Corporate reporting and investment decisions. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, E., Chapple, W., Moon, J., & Sullivan, M. (2003). ‘CSR in Asia: A seven country study of CSR website reporting’, research paper series International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility (Vol. 9). UK: Nottingham University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavent, M., Ding, Y., Fu, L., Stolowy, H., & Wang, H. (2006). Disclosure and determinants studies: An extension using the divisive clustering method (DIV). European Accounting Review, 15(2), 181–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleek, M. A., & Leonard, S. L. (1998). Can corporate codes of ethics influence behavior? Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 619–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, T. E. (1989). Voluntary corporate disclosure by Swedish companies. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 1(2), 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowton, C. J., & Thompson, P. (2000). Do codes make a difference? The case of bank lending and the environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 24, 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D. R., & Moore, C. A. (1983). Managerial values and corporate codes of ethics. California Management Review, 25(4), 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, P. J. (1992). Making codes of ethics ‘‘Real’’. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 285–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C., & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure practices in Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Depoers, F. (2000). A cost-benefit study of voluntary disclosure: Some empirical evidence from French listed companies. The European Accounting Review, 9(2), 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donker, H., Poff, D., & Zahir, S. (2008). Corporate values, codes of ethics, and firm performance: A look at the Canadian context. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 527–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, T., Marginson, P., Edwards, P., Ferner, A., & Tregaskis, O. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in multinational companies: Management initiatives or negotiated agreements? (pp. 1–27). Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, P. M. (2011). Corporate codes of conduct: The effects of code content and quality on ethical performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 535–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, B. J., & Cobbin, D. M. (1996). A content analysis of codes of ethics in Australian enterprises. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 11(1), 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, B. J., Cobbin, D. M., & Farrell, H. M. (2002). Can codes of ethics really produce consistent behaviours? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(6), 468–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, E. A., Misangyi, V. F., & Tosi, H. L., Jr. (2010). The effect of CEO pay deviations on CEO withdrawal, firm size, and firm profits. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 629–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaumnitz, B. R., & Lere, J. C. (2002). Contents of codes of ethics of professional business organizations on the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaumnitz, B. R., & Lere, J. C. (2004). A classification scheme for codes of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 329–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, D., Holtzman, M. P., & Mest, D. (2008). International operations and voluntary disclosures by U.S.-based multinational corporations. Advances in International Accounting, 24, 243–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geringer, J. M., Beamish, P. W., & Da Costa, R. C. (1989). Diversification strategy and internationalization: Implications for MNE performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10(2), 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. (1987). Multinationality and performance among British manufacturing companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 18(3), 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995a). Methodological themes: Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 78–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995b). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gugler, P., & Shi, J. Y. J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility for developing country multinational corporations: Lost war in pertaining global competitiveness? Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (1990). Corporate social disclosure practice: A comparative international analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 3, 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackston, D., & Milne, M. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, K., & Miles, S. (2004). Assessing quality assessment of corporate social reporting: UK perspectives. Accounting Forum, 28(1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, S. J. (1991). What corporate America is teaching about ethics. Academy of Management Executive, 5(1), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helin, S., & Sandström, J. (2007). An inquiry into the study of corporate codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hite, R. E., Bellizzi, J. A., & Fraser, C. (1988). Content analysis of ethical policy statements regarding marketing activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 771–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. London: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff, E. A. (1992). The relation between perceived accounting quality and economic characteristics of the firm. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 11(2), 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. J. (1986). A longitudinal study of the readability of the Chairman’s narratives in the corporate reports of a UK company. Accounting and Business Research, 18(64), 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2004). Business codes of multinational firms: What do they say? Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2008). The living code: Embedding ethics into the corporate DNA. Sheffield: Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2011). Toward effective codes: Testing the relationship with unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 233–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M., & Schwartz, M. S. (2008). The effectiveness of business codes: A critical examination of existing studies and the development of an integrated research model. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M., & Wempe, J. (1998). Twelve gordian knots when developing an organizational code of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 853–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. P. (1995). Whistleblowing and the First Level Manager: Determinants of feeling obliged to blow the whistle. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 10, 571–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. P., & Krueger, C. A. (1992). Whistleblowing and the professional. Management Accounting, 74(2), 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2008). Business codes of the global 200: Their prevalence, content and embedding. Amsterdam: KPMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laksmana, I. (2008). Corporate Board Governance and voluntary disclosure of executive compensation practices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 1147–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, M., & Lundholm, R. (1993). Cross-sectional determinants of analyst ratings of corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2), 246–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, M., & Singh, J. B. (1992). The content and focus of Canadian corporate codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 799–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lere, C. L., & Gaumnitz, B. R. (2003). The impact of codes of ethics on decision making: Some insights from information economics. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(4), 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levis, J. (2006). Adoption of corporate social responsibility codes by multinational companies. Journal of Asian Economics, 17, 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logsdon, J. M., & Wood, D. J. (2005). Global business citizenship and voluntary codes of ethical conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugli, E., Kocollari, U., & Nigrisoli, C. (2009). The codes of ethics of S&P/MIB Italian companies: An investigations of their contents and the main factors that influence their adoption. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marnburg, E. (2000). The behavioural effects of corporate ethical codes: Empirical findings and discussion. Business Ethics, 9(3), 200–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCraw, H., Moffeit, K. S., & O’Malley, J. R. (2009). An analysis of the ethical codes of corporations and business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G. (1999). Business ethics: Practical proposals for organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 19, 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G. (2009). An anthology of codes of ethics. European Business Review, 21(4), 344–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKendall, M., DeMarr, B., & Jones-Rikkers, C. (2002). Ethical compliance programs and corporate illegality: Testing the assumptions of the corporate sentencing guidelines. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLain, D. L., & Keenan, J. P. (1999). Risk, information, and the decision about response to wrongdoing in an organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(3), 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1984). The relationship among beliefs, organizational position, and whistleblowing status: A discriminant analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 687–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Schwenk, C. R. (1991). Who blows the whistle and why? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mijatovic, I. S., & Stokic, D. (2010). The influence of internal and external codes on CSR practice: The case of companies operating in Serbia. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 533–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M. J., & Adler, R. W. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(2), 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molander, E. A. (1987). A paradigm for design, promulgation and enforcement of ethical codes. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 619–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1990). Applied linear statistical models. Burr Ridge, IL: Richard D. Irwin Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygaard, S., & Russo, A. (2008). Trust, coordination and knowledge flows in R&D projects: The case of fuel cell technologies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(1), 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, B., & Madden, G. (2006). Ethical codes of conduct in Irish companies: A survey of code content and enforcement procedures. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, B., & Elango, B. (2005). Do multinational operations influence firm value? Evidence from the Triad regions. International Journal of Business and Economics, 4(1), 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, D. M. (1991). Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10, 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, D., Raiborn, C., & Askvik, J. (1997). A global code of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1727–1735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F., & Russo, A. (2008). illycaffè: Value creation through responsible supplier relationships. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 5(Special Issue), 83–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogutz, S., Russo, A., & Migliavacca, P. (Eds.). (2009). Innovation, markets and sustainable energy: The challenge of hydrogen and fuel cells. Cheltenham Glos: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin, D., Giallourakis, M., David, F. R., & Moritz, T. E. (1989). A different look at codes of ethics. Business Horizons, 32(1), 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M., Helmers, C., & Koch, C. (2010). Firm growth and firm size. Applied Economics Letters, 17, 1547–1550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, G., & Dhaliwal, D. (1980). Company size and financial disclosure requirements with evidence from the segmental reporting issue. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 7(4), 555–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmich, B. B., & Houston, J. E. (1998). Corporate codes of ethics in large UK Companies: An empirical investigation of use, content and attitudes. European Journal of Marketing, 23(6), 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S. (2001). The nature of the relationship between corporate codes of ethics and behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S. (2002). A code of ethics for corporate codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S. (2004). Effective corporate codes of ethics: Perceptions of code users. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S. (2005). Universal moral values for corporate codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. B. (2006). Ethics programs in Canada’s largest corporations. Business and Society Review, 111, 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. B. (2011). Determinants of the effectiveness of corporate codes of ethics: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 385–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhvi, S. S., & Desai, H. B. (1971). An empirical analysis of the quality of corporate disclosure. The Accounting Review, 46(1), 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. K., & Smith, N. P. (1971). Readability: A measure of the performance of the communication function of financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 46(3), 552–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. J. (2001). Ethical codes of conduct and organizational context: A study of the relationship between codes of conduct, employee behavior and organizational values. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J. (1999). Does size matter? The state of art in small business ethics. Business Ethics, 8(3), 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J., Jeurissen, R., & Rutherfoord, R. (2000). Small business and the environment in the UK and the Netherlands: Toward stakeholder cooperation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(4), 945–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J., & Lozano, J. F. (2000). Communicating about ethics with small firms: Experiences from the U.K. and Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stead, W. E., Worrell, D. L., & Stead, J. G. (1990). An integrative model for understanding and managing ethical behavior in business organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B. (1994). An analysis of corporate ethical code studies: “Where do we go from here?”. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B. (2008). Corporate ethical codes: Effective instruments for influencing behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 601–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohl, C., Stohl, M., & Popova, L. (2009). A new generation of corporate codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 607–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohs, J. H., & Brannick, T. (1999). Code and conduct: Predictors of Irish Managers’ ethical reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 22, 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, D. (1994). Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, G., Wood, G., & Callaghan, M. (2006). Codes of ethics in corporate sweden. Corporate Governance, 6(5), 547–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, G., Wood, G., Singh, J., & Callaghan, M. (2009). Implementation, communication and benefits of corporate codes of ethics: An international and longitudinal approach for Australia, Canada and Sweden. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18, 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, S., & Li, J. (1996). Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T., Jr Schermerhorn, J. R., & Dienhart, J. W. (2004). Strategic leadership of ethical behavior in business. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, F. (2000). Small firm environmental ethics: How deep do they go? Business Ethics: A European Review, 9(1), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unerman, J. (2000). Methodological issues: Reflections on qualification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 13(5), 667–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., & Hidalgo, E. R. (2006). The impact of corporate ethical values and enforcement of ethical codes on the perceived importance of ethics in business: A comparison of U.S. and Spanish Managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. S. O., & Naser, K. (1995). Firm-specific determinants of comprehensiveness of mandatory disclosure in the corporate annual reports of firms listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 14(4), 311–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R. (1993). Corporate codes of ethics: Purpose, process and content issues. Business & Society, 32(1), 44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R. (1995). Does ethics code design matter? Effects of ethics code rationales and sanctions on recipients’ justice perceptions and content recall. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 367–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. (1999a). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Manager commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 539–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. (1999b). Corporate ethics practices in the mid-1990s: An empirical study of fortune 1000. Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (Vol. 49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. (2000). A cross cultural comparison of the contents of codes of ethics: USA, Canada and Australia. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. (2002). A partnership model of corporate ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(1), 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Muel Kaptein, Editor of the Journal of Business Ethics, and the anonymous reviewers for their comments and support. We also thank Valentina Cortellazzi for her support in collecting data. Participants at the European Business Ethics Network (EBEN) 2012 Research Conference, New Castle, 7–9 June, and at 12th European Academy of Management Annual Conference, Rotterdam, 6–8 June, 2012 are also gratefully acknowledged for their comments. The authors contributed equally to this work and are listed in alphabetical order.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angeloantonio Russo.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 Scoring model: categories and items

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garegnani, G.M., Merlotti, E.P. & Russo, A. Scoring Firms’ Codes of Ethics: An Explorative Study of Quality Drivers. J Bus Ethics 126, 541–557 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1968-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1968-8

Keywords

Navigation