Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Apology, Restitution, and Forgiveness After Psychological Contract Breach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using forgiveness theory, we investigated the effects of organizational apology and restitution on eliciting forgiveness of a transgressing organization after transactional psychological contract breach. Forgiveness theory proposes that victims are more likely to forgive offenders when victims’ positive offender-oriented emotions replace negative ones. Three pre-post laboratory experiments, using vignettes about a broken promise of financial aid, found that while apology-alone and restitution-alone each increased likelihood of forgiving, restitution-alone was the more effective of the two responses. When combined with an apology, restitution boosted the effect of apology-alone. However, restitution was unnecessary if positive emotions replaced negative ones; third-party blame accomplished this negative-to-positive emotion replacement. Consistent with forgiveness theory, offender-oriented negative-to-positive emotion replacement partially mediated all effects, and negative emotion reductions were strongly correlated with positive emotion gains. We discuss implications for the repair of damaged norms and relationships within an organizational community. These include reparative effects of apology and restitution, dual-process conceptions of violation and repair, repair after psychological contract breach, and emotion replacement models of forgiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 653–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aycan, Z., & Kabasakal, H. (2006). Social contract and perceived justice of workplace practices to cope with financial crisis. Group & Organization Management, 31(4), 469–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basford, T. E., Offermann, L. R., & Behrend, T. S. (2014). Please accept my sincerest apologies: Examining follower reactions to leader apology. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1), 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, W. L. (1997). Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 23(2), 177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, W. L. (2014). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: Image repair theory and research. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, J. M. (2015). Shifting identification: A theory of apologies and pseudo-apologies. Public Relations Review, 41(1), 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., Barclay, L. J., Tripp, T. M., & Aquino, K. (2016). A systems perspective on forgiveness in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 245–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisel, R. S., & Messersmith, A. S. (2012). Organizational and supervisory apology effectiveness: Apology giving in work settings. Business Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 425–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, L. J., & Wertheim, E. H. (2015). Development of the factors related to forgiveness inventory (FRFI): Assessing social-cognitive facilitators and inhibitors of interpersonal forgiveness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31(2), 100–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonyarit, I., Chuawanlee, W., Macaskill, A., & Supparerkchaisakul, N. (2013). A psychometric analysis of the workplace forgiveness scale. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 319–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordia, P., Kiazad, K., Restubog, S. L. D., DiFonzo, N., Stenson, N., & Tang, R. L. (2014). Rumor as Revenge in the Workplace. Group & Organization Management, 39(4), 363–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottom, W. P., Gibson, K., Daniels, S. E., & Murnighan, J. K. (2002). When talk is not cheap: Substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation. Organization Science, 13(5), 497–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. P. (2011). Art and artifice in public apologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 299–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradfield, M., & Aquino, K. (1999). The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on forgiveness and revenge in the workplace. Journal of Management, 25(5), 607–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, D. S., & Exline, J. J. (2012). Forgiveness at four levels: Intrapersonal, relational, organizational, and collective-group. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (pp. 244–259). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, G. F., Bennett, A. A., Humphrey, R. H., Batchelor, J. H., & Cairo, A. H. (2016). Unraveling the complexities of empathy research: A multi-level model of empathy in organizations. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. E. J. Härtel & W. J. Zerbe (Eds.) Emotions and organizational governance. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, A., Barling, J., & Dupré, K. E. (2014). Leader apologies and employee and leader well-being. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, R. D., Tsang, J.-A., Ahmad, N. Y., Worthington, E. L., Witvliet, C. v., & Wade, N. (2012). Do actions speak louder than words? Differential effects of apology and restitution on behavioral and self-report measures of forgiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(4), 294–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chih, Y., Kiazad, K., Zhou, L., Capezio, A., Li, M., & Restubog, D., S (2016). Investigating employee turnover in the construction industry: A psychological contract perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(6), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett, J. L., & Childs, E. (2011). Minding the gap: Meaning, affect, and the potential shortcomings of vignettes. Social Science Research, 40(2), 513–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, C. (2011). Organizational rhetoric: Strategies of resistance and domination. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2002). A daily diary study of affective responses to psychological contract breach and exceeded promises. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2005). Understanding psychological contracts at work: A critical evaluation of theory and research. Oxford: Oxford University Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle-Shapiro, J., A.-M., & Kessler, I. (2003). The employment relationship in the UK public sector: A psychological contract perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 213–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cugueró-escofet, N., Fortin, M., & Canela, M. (2014). Righting the wrong for third parties: How monetary compensation, procedure changes and apologies can restore justice for observers of injustice. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby, B. W., & Schlenker, B. R. (1982). Children’s reactions to apologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(4), 742.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., Pillutla, M. M., & Folmer, C. R. (2010). How important is an apology to you?: Forecasting errors in evaluating the value of apologies. Psychological Science, 22(1), 45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., & Schouten, B. C. (2008). When apologies for injustice matter: The role of respect. European Psychologist, 13(4), 239–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ruiter, M., Schalk, R., & Blomme, R. J. (2016). Manager responses to employee dissent about psychological contract breach: A dyadic process approach. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(2), 188–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiBlasio, F. A. (1998). The use of a decision-based forgiveness intervention within intergenerational family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 20(1), 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiFonzo, N. (2010). Ferreting facts or fashioning fallacies? Factors in rumor accuracy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(11), 1124–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T., Lewicki, R. J., & Zaheer, A. (2009). Repairing relationships within and between organizations: Building a conceptual foundation. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th edn., pp. 269–322). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, R. D., & Fitzgibbons, R. P. (2015a). Deepening the understanding of forgiveness. In R. D. Enright & R. P. Fitzgibbons (Eds.), Forgiveness therapy: An empirical guide for resolving anger and restoring hope (pp. 31–38). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, R. D., & Fitzgibbons, R. P. (2015b). Measures of interpersonal forgiveness. In R. D. Enright & R. P. Fitzgibbons (Eds.), Forgiveness therapy: An empirical guide for resolving anger and restoring hope (pp. 251–269). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, R. D., & Rique, J. (2004). The Enright Forgiveness Inventory: Sampler set: Manual, test booklet, scoring key. Menlo Park: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exline, J. J., Deshea, L., & Holeman, V. T. (2007). Is apology worth the risk? Predictors, outcomes, and ways to avoid regret. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(4), 479–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, R., Gelfand, M. J., & Nag, M. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 894–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, R. J. (2006). Trauma and forgiveness: A spiritual inquiry. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 9(2), 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanigan, B. (1998). Forgivers and the unforgivable. In R. D. Enright & J. North (Eds.), Exploring forgiveness (pp. 95–105). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, C., & Cheng, C. (2014). Unfulfilled expectations and promises, and behavioral outcomes. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 22(1), 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuno, M., & Ohbuchi, K. c. (1998). How effective are different accounts of harm-doing in softening victims’ reactions? A scenario investigation of the effects of severity, relationship, and culture. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 167–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, G. J., & Davis, J. R. (2005). Psychological determinants of forgiveness: An evolutionary perspective. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 29, 111–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J., Butterfield, K., & Neale, N. (2016). Moral repair in the workplace: A qualitative investigation and inductive model. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(1), 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S. L., Abid-Dupont, M.-A., Manville, C., & Hasel, M. C. (2017). Repairing broken trust between leaders and followers: How violation characteristics temper apologies. Journal of Business Ethics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3509-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, P. A., Rusbult, C. E., Finkel, E. J., & Kamashiro, M. (2010). In the wake of betrayal: Amends, forgiveness, and the resolution of betrayal. Personal Relationships, 17(2), 253–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. M., Opland, R. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2010). Psychological contracts and counterproductive work behaviors: Employee responses to transactional and relational breach. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 555–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickul, J. (2001). When organizations break their promises: Employee reactions to unfair processes and treatment. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(4), 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P. H., Dirks, K. T., & Cooper, C. D. (2009). The repair of trust: A dynamic bilateral perspective and multilevel conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 401–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff, J., Wagner, U., & Strack, M. (2012). Apologies: Words of magic? The role of verbal components, anger reduction, and offence severity. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 18(2), 109–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzynski, M. J. (1998). The virtue of forgiveness as a human resource management strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(1), 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazare, A. (2005). On apology. Cary: Oxford University Press, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Polin, B. (2012). The art of the apology: The structure and effectiveness of apologies in trust repair. In R. M. Kramer & T. L. Pittinsky (Eds.), Restoring trust in organizations and leaders: Enduring challenges and emerging answers (pp. 95–128). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. T., Parra, G. R., & Cohen, R. (2015). Apologies in close relationships: A review of theory and research. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 7(1), 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships II: Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1586–1603.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montes, S. D., & Irving, P. G. (2008). Disentangling the effects of promised and delivered inducements: Relational and transactional contract elements and the mediating role of trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1367–1381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donohue, W., & Nelson, L. (2009). the role of ethical values in an expanded psychological contract. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 251–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M., & Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palanski, M. E. (2012). Forgiveness and reconciliation in the workplace: A multi-level perspective and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reb, J., Goldman, B. M., Kray, L. J., & Cropanzano, R. (2006). Different wrongs, different remedies? Reactions to organizational remedies after procedural and interactional injustice. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 31–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, H., & Gray, B. (2009). Repairing relationship conflict: How violation types and culture influence the effectiveness of restoration rituals. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 105–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • restitution. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved May 26, 2017, from Dictionary.com website http://www.dictionary.com/browse/restitution.

  • Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., & Tang, R. L. (2007). Behavioural outcomes of psychological contract breach in a non-Western culture: The moderating role of equity sensitivity. British Journal of Management, 18(4), 376–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 574–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3), 245–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (2007). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (3rd edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal, 2(2), 121–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (2011). The individual–organization relationship: The psychological contract. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 191–220). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., & Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (1994). Linking strategy and human resource practices: How employee and customer contracts are created. Human Resource Management, 33(3), 463–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, R. C., & Jerome, A. M. (2004). On organizational apologia: A reconceptualization. Communication Theory, 14(3), 191–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scher, S. J., & Darley, J. M. (1997). How effective are the things people say to apologize? Effects of the realization of the apology speech act. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(1), 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schminke, M., Caldwell, J., Ambrose, M. L., & McMahon, S. R. (2014). Better than ever? Employee reactions to ethical failures in organizations, and the ethical recovery paradox. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 206–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R., & Gee, J. (2004). When social accounts backfire: The exacerbating effects of a polite message or an apology on reactions to an unfair outcome. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 322–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, L. (2000). Apology subverted: The commodification of apology. The Yale Law Journal, 109(5), 1135–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takaku, S. (2001). The effects of apology and perspective taking on interpersonal forgiveness: A dissonance-attribution model of interpersonal forgiveness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4), 494–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavuchis, N. (1991). Mea culpa: A sociology of apology and reconciliation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, E. C., Dineen, B. R., & Lewicki, R. J. (2004). The road to reconciliation: Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. Journal of Management, 30(2), 165–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomprou, M., Rousseau, D. M., & Hansen, S. D. (2015). The psychological contracts of violation victims: A post-violation model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(4), 561–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Reid, E. M., & Elving, C. (2006). Apologies and transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(2), 195–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walfisch, T., Van Dijk, D., & Kark, R. (2013). Do you really expect me to apologize? The impact of status and gender on the effectiveness of an apology in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(7), 1446–1458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. U. (2006). Moral repair: Reconstructing moral relations after wrongdoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, F., & Si, S. (2013). Psychological contract breach, negative reciprocity, and abusive supervision: The mediated effect of organizational identification. Management and Organization Review, 9(3), 541–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, J. (2009). Why it is unethical to apologize: an examination of apology and regret. Kyoto University Research Information Repository. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2433/126649.

  • Wohl, M. J. A., Hornsey, M. J., & Philpot, C. R. (2011). A critical review of official public apologies: Aims, pitfalls, and a staircase model of effectiveness. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5(1), 70–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, E. L. (2005). More questions about forgiveness: Research agenda for 2005–2015 (pp. 557–573). In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, E. L. (2006). Forgiveness and reconciliation: Theory and application. Abington: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, E. L., & Scherer, M. (2004). Forgiveness is an emotion-focused coping strategy that can reduce health risks and promote health resilience: theory, review, and hypotheses. Psychology & Health, 19(3), 385–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, E. L., & Wade, N. G. (1999). The psychology of unforgiveness and forgiveness and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18(4), 385–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zechmeister, J. S., Garcia, S., Romero, C., & Vas, S. N. (2004). Don’t apologize unless you mean it: A laboratory investigation of forgiveness and retaliation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(4), 532–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zechmeister, J. S., & Romero, C. (2002). Victim and offender accounts of interpersonal conflict: Autobiographical narratives of forgiveness and unforgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 675–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 647–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, X., Van Dijke, M., Leunissen, J. M., Giurge, L., & De Cremer, D. (2015). When saying sorry may not help: transgressor power moderates the effect of an apology on forgiveness in the workplace. Human Relations, 69(6), 1387–1418.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Anthony Alongi

    Present address: Change Sciences, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Rochester Institute of Technology, 18 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA

    Nicholas DiFonzo, Anthony Alongi & Paul Wiele

Authors
  1. Nicholas DiFonzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anthony Alongi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul Wiele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas DiFonzo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants accorded with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board of the Rochester Institute of Technology and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DiFonzo, N., Alongi, A. & Wiele, P. Apology, Restitution, and Forgiveness After Psychological Contract Breach. J Bus Ethics 161, 53–69 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3984-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3984-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation