Abstract
This study examines how meritocracy as a collective social imaginary promoting social justice and fairness reproduces class and caste inequalities and fosters ethical violence. We interrogate discourse of merit in the narratives of the professional–managerial class-in-making at an Indian business school. Empirically, we draw on interviews, full-text responses to a qualitative questionnaire, and a student’s poem. We describe how business school students articulate merit as a neoliberal ethic, emphasizing prudential, enterprising attitudes, and responsibility. However, this positive, aspirational façade of merit masks practices of ethical violence, wherein individuals invoke an ethical principle as grounds for moral condemnation and linguistic injuries. These practices of ethical violence desubjectify disadvantaged students and result in silence as a form of inequality. We contribute to organizational research on inequalities by foregrounding ethical violence and desubjectification. We detail the possibilities of discursive agency in contesting and interrupting ethical violence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Our data collection had largely concluded by 2019 when IIMs implemented the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) reservation (10%). Thus, this study does not include EWS students. EWS inclusion complicates the binary of upper caste as general (merit) and oppressed castes as reserved (non-merit) and warrants further research.
IIM entrance exams introduced Third Gender as a category in 2019. Prior to this, candidates identified as male or female.
In some regions in India, some OBC groups compete with upper castes for economic and political dominance. Nevertheless, in the context of higher education, the general category’s claim on merit is entrenched. Dominant discourses relegate a student claiming a reservation to the shadow of ‘non-merit’ (Deshpande, 2013).
Beedis are South Asian cigarettes made of tobacco wrapped in tendu leaves.
State universities give domicile preferences; central institutions like IIMs, IITs and NITs do not.
Lakh is a unit in the Indian numbering system, equalling 100,000.
References
Allen, A. (2011). Michael Young’s the rise of the meritocracy: A philosophical critique. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(4), 367–382
Allen, A. (2012). Life without the “X” Factor: Meritocracy past and present. Power and Education, 4(1), 4–19
Amis, J. M., Mair, J., & Munir, K. A. (2020). The organizational reproduction of inequality. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 195–230
Arnold, D., & Blackburn, S. (Eds.). (2004). Telling lives in India: Biography, autobiography, and life history. Indiana University Press.
Bapuji, H., & Chrispal, S. (2018). Understanding economic inequality through the lens of caste. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3998-8
Bapuji, H., Ertug, G., & Shaw, J. D. (2020). Organizations and societal economic inequality: A review and way forward. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 60–91
Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and the Holocaust. Polity Press.
Bell, E., & King, D. (2010). The elephant in the room: Critical management studies conferences as a site of body pedagogics. Management Learning, 41(4), 429–442
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage.
Bristow, A., Robinson, S., & Ratle, O. (2017). Being an early-career CMS academic in the context of insecurity and ‘excellence’: The dialectics of resistance and compliance. Organization Studies, 38(9), 1185–1207
Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. Routledge.
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.
Butler, J. (2006). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso.
Butler, J. P. (2009). Giving an account of oneself. Fordham University Press.
Butler, J. (2020). The force of nonviolence: The ethical in the political. Verso.
Brown, W. (2005). Edgework: Critical essays on knowledge and politics. Princeton University Press.
Castilla, E. J. (2008). Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers. American Journal of Sociology, 113(6), 1479–1526
Castilla, E. J. (2017). Meritocracy. In F. M. Moghaddam (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of political behavior. (pp. 479–482). Sage.
Castilla, E. J., & Benard, S. (2010). The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 543–676
Castilla, E. J., & Ranganathan, A. (2020). The production of merit: How managers understand and apply merit in the workplace. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1335
Chakravarty, S., & Somanathan, E. (2008). Discrimination in an elite labour market? Job placements at IIM-Ahmedabad. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(44), 45–50
Chrispal, S., Bapuji, H., and Zietsma, C. (2020). Caste and organization studies: Our silence makes us complicit. Organization Studies, 0170840620964038.
Clarke, C. A., & Knights, D. (2015). Careering through academia: Securing identities or engaging ethical subjectivities? Human Relations, 68(12), 1865–1888
Combs, G. M., & Nadkarni, S. (2005). The tale of two cultures: Attitudes towards affirmative action in the United States and India. Journal of World Business, 40(2), 158–171
Contu, A. (2018). ‘… The point is to change it’—Yes, but in what direction and how? Intellectual activism as a way of ‘walking the talk’ of critical work in business schools. Organization, 25(2), 282–293
Crabtree, J. (2019). The billionaire raj: A journey through India’s new gilded age. Tim Duggan Books.
Dar, S., Liu, H., Martinez Dy, A., & Brewis, D. N. (2020). The business school is racist: Act up! Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420928521
Deshpande, A. (2013). Affirmative action in India. Oxford University Press.
Deshpande, S. (2003). Contemporary India: A sociological view. Penguin.
Dirks, N. B. (2001). Castes of mind: Colonialism and the making of modern India. Princeton University Press.
Dobos, N. (2017). Networking, corruption, and subversion. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(3), 467–478
Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Sage.
Fernandes, L., & Heller, P. (2006). Hegemonic Aspirations: New middle class politics and India’s democracy in comparative perspective. Critical Asian Studies, 38(4), 495–522
Fotaki, M., & Prasad, A. (2015). Questioning neoliberal capitalism and economic inequality in business schools. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 14(4), 556–575
Foucault, M. (1980). The History of Sexuality. (Vol. 1)Trans. Robert Hurley.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. University of Massachusetts Press.
Foucault, M. (1991). Politics and the Study of Discourse. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in governmentality.University of Chicago Press.
Giroux, H. A. (2013). America’s education deficit and the war on youth. NYU.
Gooptu, N. (2013). Enterprise culture in neoliberal India: Studies in youth, class, work and media. Routledge Contemporary South Asia Series.
Gray, B., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. (2013). Encountering social class differences at work: How “class work” perpetuates inequality. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 670–699
Guru, G. (2009). Rejection of rejection: Foregrounding self-respect. In G. Guru (Ed.), Humiliation: Claims and context. (pp. 209–225). Oxford University Press.
Han, B.-C. (2017). Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and new technologies of power. Verso Books.
Hanna, E., & Gough, B. (2020). The impact of infertility on men’s work and finances: Findings from a qualitative questionnaire study. Gender, Work & Organization, 27(4), 581–591
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
Huber, C., & Munro, I. (2014). “Moral distance” in organizations: An inquiry into ethical violence in the works of Kafka. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(2), 259–269
IIT Kanpur. (2018). JEE (Advanced) 2018—Joint Implementation Committee Report.
IIMCAT (2020). IIM Common Admission Test Website Brief on IIMs and CAT. https://iimcat.ac.in/per/g01/pub/756/ASM/WebPortal/1/index.html?756@@1@@1#! Accessed on 1st November 2020.
Illich, I. (2002). Deschooling Society. Harper Row.
Jodhka, S. S., & Newman, K. (2007). In the name of globalisation: Meritocracy, productivity and the hidden language of caste. Economic and Political Weekly, 4125–4132.
Jørgensen, M. W., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. Sage.
Joshi, S., & Malghan, D. (2017). Faculty diversity at the Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs): A preliminary snapshot. IIM Bangalore Research Paper, 554, 1–5
Kärreman, D., & Alvesson, M. (2010). Understanding ethical closure in organizational settings–the case of media organizations. In S. L. Muhr, B. M. Sorensen, & S. Vallentin (Eds.), Ethics and organizational practice: Questioning the moral foundations of management. (pp. 57–80). Edward Elgar.
Khan, S. R. (2011). Privilege: The making of an adolescent elite at St. Paul’s School. Princeton University Press.
Kumar, N. (2016). The middle-class child: Ruminations on failure. In A. Baviskar & R. Ray (Eds.), Elite and everyman: The cultural politics of the Indian middle classes.Routledge.
Littler, J. (2018). Against meritocracy: Culture, power and myths of mobility. Routledge.
May, T. (2016). Britain, the great meritocracy: Prime Minister’s speech. Retrieved October 6, 2019, from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/britain-the-great-meritocracy-prime-ministers-speech
McCoy, S. K., & Major, B. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 341–351
McNamee, S., & Miller, R. (2004). The meritocracy myth. Rowman & Littlefield.
MHRD. (2008). Report of IIM Review Committee. New Delhi: Government of India.Retrieved October 6 2019, from https://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/documentreports/bhargava_IIMreview_0.pdf.
Mistree, D. F. A. (2015). Understanding meritocracy: A study of higher education institutions in India. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Princeton University.
Mosse, D. (2018). Caste and development: Contemporary perspectives on a structure of discrimination and advantage. World Development, 110, 422–436
Mukherjee, R. (1999). Caste in itself, caste and class, or caste in class. Economic and Political Weekly, 1759–1761.
Munshi, K. (2016). Caste networks in the modern Indian economy. In S. M. Dev & P. Babu (Eds.), Development in India. (pp. 13–37). Springer.
Munshi, K., & Rosenzweig, M. (2009). Why is mobility in India so low? Social insurance, nequality, and growth (No. w14850). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Report, N. D. L. M. (2017). Digital literacy training to non-IT literate citizens. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology.
Nair, J. (2017). The provocations of the public university. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(37), 35–39
NSO. (2020). Household Social Consumption on Education in India: NSS 75th round. Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation. Government of India.
O’Malley, P. (1992). Risk, power and crime prevention. Economy and Society, 21(3), 252–275
Pandey, G. (2016). Dreaming in English: Challenges of nationhood and democracy. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(16), 56–62
Patel, A. (2017, December). Who Are the People Attracted to Narendra Modi And His Style? His Followers Show A Clear Pattern. Retrieved October 6, 2019, from https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/who-are-the-people-attracted-to-narendra-modi-and-his-style-his-followers-show-a/306179.
Pathania, G. J., & Tierney, W. G. (2018). An ethnography of caste and class at an Indian university: Creating capital. Tertiary Education and Management, 24(3), 221–231
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press.
Prasad, A., O’Brien, L. T., & Sockbeson, C. E. S. (2020). Caste at work: Study of factors influencing attitudes toward affirmative action in India. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 39(6), 597–616
Rani, C. S. (1998). Dalit women's writing in Telugu. Economic and Political Weekly 33(17), WS21–WS24.
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N., O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 83–104
Sandel, M. (2020). The tyranny of merit: What’s become of the common good. Farrar.
Scully, M. A. (2002). Confronting errors in the meritocracy. Organization, 9(3), 396–401
Scully, M., Rothenberg, S., Beaton, E. E., & Tang, Z. (2018). Mobilizing the wealthy: Doing “privilege work” and challenging the roots of inequality. Business & Society, 57(6), 1075–1113
Sennett, R. (2006). The new culture of capitalism. Yale University Press.
Shah, C. (2019). ‘The torture continued’: Mumbai doctor’s chilling suicide note released. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/mumbai-doctor-s-chilling-suicide-note-released/story-F6FeUlRGIOCIr6G56GZgCO.html.
Shamir, R. (2008). The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and Society, 37(1), 1–19
Śliwa, M., & Johansson, M. (2014a). The discourse of meritocracy contested/reproduced: Foreign women academics in UK business schools. Organization, 21(6), 821–843
Śliwa, M., & Johansson, M. (2014b). How non-native English-speaking staff are evaluated in linguistically diverse organizations: A sociolinguistic perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(9), 1133–1151
Springer, S. (2016). The discourse of neoliberalism: An anatomy of a powerful idea. Rowman & Littlefield.
Subramanian, A. (2019). The caste of merit: Engineering education in India. Harvard University Press.
Teltumbde, A. (2018). Republic of caste: Thinking equality in the time of neoliberal Hindutva. Navayana.
The Wire. (2019). My birth is my fatal accident: Rohith Vemula's searing letter is an indictment of social prejudices. https://thewire.in/caste/rohith-vemula-letter-a-powerful-indictment-of-social-prejudices.
Uhlmann, E. L., & Cohen, G. L. (2005). Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychological Science, 16(6), 474–480
Vaid, D. (2012). The caste-class association in India. Asian Survey, 52(2), 395–422
Vaid, D. (2014). Caste in contemporary India: Flexibility and persistence. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 391–410
Vaid, D. (2016). Patterns of social mobility and the role of education in India. Contemporary South Asia, 24(3), 285–312
van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2011). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19(4), 507–524
Varman, R. (2014). Marketing thought in India: Challenges of hegemony and inclusivity. Vikalpa, 39(2), 1–6
Varman, R., Saha, B., & Skålén, P. (2011). Market subjectivity and neoliberal governmentality in higher education. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(11–12), 1163–1185
Varman, R., Skålén, P., Belk, R. W., & Chaudhuri, H. R. (2020). Normative violence in domestic service: A study of exploitation, status, and grievability. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04444-1
Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2003). Introduction: Theory, interdisciplinarity and critical discourse analysis. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis (pp 1–32).Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis.Sage.
World Inequality Report. (2018). World Inequality Lab. Retrieved on October 6, 2019, from http://wir2018.wid.world/files/download/wir2018-summary-english.pdf.
Yang, T., & Aldrich, H. E. (2014). Who’s the boss? Explaining gender inequality in entrepreneurial teams. American Sociological Review, 79(2), 303–327
Yengde, S. (2019). Caste matters. Penguin India.
You Yenn, T. (2019). This is what inequality looks like. Ethos Books.
Young, M. D. (1958). The rise of the meritocracy 1870–2033. (2nd ed.). Penguin Books.
Zyglidopoulos, S. C., & Fleming, P. J. (2008). Ethical distance in corrupt firms: How do innocent bystanders become guilty perpetrators? Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 265–274
Zwick-Maitreyi, M., Soundararajan, T., Dar, N., Bheel, R. F., & Balakrishnan, P. (2018). Caste in the United States: A survey of caste among South Asian Americans. Equality Labs.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Editor Sara Louise Muhr and the anonymous reviewers for the highly insightful and constructive comments. We are grateful to Rohit Varman for his generosity and the incisive, detailed comments at various stages. We are thankful to Dheeraj Singh for the multiple conversations and to Divya S. for sharing her poetry.
Funding
We have not received any funding for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
We have complied with Journal of Business Ethics’ ethical standards. This work has not been published before and is not under consideration for publication anywhere else. The paper has not been previously rejected or withdrawn after review by the Journal of Business Ethics and its submission has been approved by all co-authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study. All participants except Divya S. and Dheeraj Singh have been anonymized and there is no identifying information. We use Dheeraj’s and Divya’s names with permission. Additional informed consent was obtained from the participant, Divya S., whose poem is one of the data sources in this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Questionnaire
Sl. No. | Question |
---|---|
1 | When you consider someone as meritorious (either yourself, your batchmates, or seniors), what aspects/ qualities/ characteristics are you referring to? |
2 | When you consider someone as not meritorious (either yourself, your batchmates, or seniors), what aspects/ qualities/ characteristics are you referring to? |
3 | What do you consider as essential to making this institution a more meritocratic place? (Assuming merit is a desirable quality. If you disagree, please explain) |
4 | Any other views you wish to share |
Appendix 2: A Scheduled Caste Girl, By Divya. S.
I conquered the world
With broken English
With a half working left brain, but
With an empowered right brain.
I pushed away lakhs of aspirers
Who were better than me!
With a single paper,
A caste certificate.
I barred the gates of [ABC]
For a student with 99 percentile,
But doomed to be born in upper-caste.
What do I do?
Is it my privilege to be born in a Scheduled Caste family?
Is it his/her fault to be born in an upper-caste family?
Is it the government's mandate to place the reservation system?
What is it?
But apparently, I failed at [ABC]
With lesser self-esteem
With lesser exposure.
Miles between their
Family background and mine.
Square miles between their
Pockets and mine.
I looked upon their wardrobe, I awed.
I looked upon their make-up, I awed.
I looked upon their accessories, I awed.
But when I went back home,
My naïve mother told everyone,
“My daughter is studying in [ABC].”
My pain withered away
My self-esteem blossomed again.
I'm the conqueror,
At least in my own world.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vijay, D., Nair, V.G. In the Name of Merit: Ethical Violence and Inequality at a Business School. J Bus Ethics 179, 315–337 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04824-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04824-1