Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selective anti-scatter grid removal during coronary angiography and PCI: a simple and safe technique for radiation reduction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to quantify the radiation dose reduction during coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through removal of the anti-scatter grid (ASG), and to assess its impact on image quality in adult patients with a low body mass index (BMI). Methods A phantom with different thicknesses of acrylic was used with a Westmead Test Object to simulate patient sizes and assess image quality. 129 low BMI patients underwent coronary angiography or PCI with or without the ASG in situ. Radiation dose was compared between both patient groups. Results With the same imaging system and a comparable patient population, ASG removal was associated with a 47% reduction in total dose-area product (DAP) (p < 0.001). Peak skin dose was reduced by 54% (p < 0.001). Operator scatter was reduced to a similar degree and was significantly reduced through removal of the ASG. Using an image quality phantom it was demonstrated that image quality remained satisfactory. Conclusions Removal of the ASG is a simple and effective method to significantly reduce radiation dose in coronary angiography and PCI. This was achieved while maintaining adequate diagnostic image quality. Selective removal of the ASG is likely to improve the radiation safety of cardiac angiography and interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ICRP. The recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 37:1-332

  2. Eastman TR (2013) ALARA and digital imaging systems. Radiol Technol 84:297–298

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Agarwal S, Parashar A, Ellis SG, Heupler FA Jr, Lau E, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR (2014) Measures to reduce radiation in a modern cardiac catheterization laboratory. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 7:447–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chambers CE, Fetterly KA, Holzer R, Lin PJ, Blankenship JC, Balter S, Laskey WK (2011) Radiation safety program for the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77:546–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilligan P, Lynch J, Eder H, Maguire S, Fox E, Doyle B, Casserly I, McCann H, Foley D (2015) Assessment of clinical occupational dose reduction effect of a new interventional cardiology shield for radial access combined with a scatter-reducing drape. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 86:935–940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Christopoulos G, Papayannis AC, Alomar M, Kotsia A, Michael TT, Rangan BV, Roesle M, Shorrock D, Makke L, Layne R, Grabarkewitz R, Haagen D, Maragkoudakis S, Mohammad A, Saroude K, Cipher DJ, Chambers CE, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES (2014) Effect of a real-time radiation monitoring device on operator radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization: the radiation reduction during cardiac catheterization using real-time monitoring study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 7:744–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alazzoni A, Gordon CL, Syed J, Natarajan MK, Rokoss M, Schwalm JD, Mehta SR, Sheth T, Valettas N, Velianou J, Pandie S, Al Khdair D, Tsang M, Meeks B, Colbran K, Waller E, Fu Lee S, Marsden T, Jolly SS (2015) Randomized Controlled Trial of Radiation Protection With a Patient Lead Shield and a Novel, Nonlead Surgical Cap for Operators Performing Coronary Angiography or Intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 8:e 002384

  8. Smith IR, Stafford WJ, Hayes JR, Adsett MC, Dauber KM, Rivers JT (2016) Radiation risk reduction in cardiac electrophysiology through use of a gridless imaging technique. Europace 18:121–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ricciardello M, McLean D (1995) Assessment of fluoroscopic systems with a simple test object. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 18:104–113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson SM, Prasan AM, Virdi A, Lassere M, Ison G, Ramsay DR, Weaver JC (2016) Real-time colour pictorial radiation monitoring during coronary angiography: effect on patient peak skin and total dose during coronary angiography. Eurointervention 12:e939–e947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stecker MS, Balter S, Towbin RB, Miller DL, Vañó E, Bartal G, Angle JF, Chao CP, Cohen AM, Dixon RG, Gross K, Hartnell GG, Schueler B, Statler JD, de Baère T, Cardella JF (2009) Guidelines for patient radiation dose management. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:S263–S273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Compliance requirements for ionizing radiation apparatus used in diagnostic imaging. Australian Environment protection authority; Radiation Guideline 6 available at http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au

  13. Ciraj-Bjelac O, Rehani M, Minamoto A, Sim KH, Liew HB, Vano E (2012) Radiation-induced eye lens changes and risk for cataract in interventional cardiology. Cardiology 123:168–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Suzuki S, Furui S, Kohtake H, Yokoyama N, Kozuma K, Yamamoto Y, Isshiki T (2006) Radiation exposure to patient’s skin during percutaneous coronary intervention for various lesions, including chronic total occlusion. Circ J 70:44–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roguin A, Goldstein J, Bar O, Goldstein JA (2013) Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol 111:1368–1372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ubeda C, Vano E, Gonzalez L, Miranda P (2013) Influence of the antiscatter grid on dose and image quality in pediatric intervention al cardiology X-ray systems. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 82:51–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Partridge J, McGahan G, Causton S, Bowers M, Mason M, Dalby M, Mitchell A (2006) Radiation dose reduction without compromise of image quality in cardiac angiography and intervention with the use of a flat panel detector without an antiscatter grid. Heart 92:507–510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. IEC. International Electrotechnical Commission IEC 60601-2-43 ed 2.0 (2010) Medical electrical equipment - Part 2–43: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for interventional procedures. Geneva, Switzerland

  19. Fetterly K, Schuler B (2007) Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced anti-scatter grids for large patient imaging with digital X-ray systems. Phys Med Biol 52:4863–4880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, St George Hospital, Kogarah, 2217, Sydney, Australia

    James R. Roy, Philip Sun, Glenn Ison, Ananth M. Prasan, Tom Ford, Andrew Hopkins, David R. Ramsay & James C. Weaver

  2. Department of Medicine, University of New South Wales, 2031, Sydney, Australia

    Andrew Hopkins & James C. Weaver

Authors
  1. James R. Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philip Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Glenn Ison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ananth M. Prasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tom Ford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andrew Hopkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. David R. Ramsay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. James C. Weaver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James C. Weaver.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

GI has accepted travel support from Toshiba Medical Systems to attend conferences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roy, J.R., Sun, P., Ison, G. et al. Selective anti-scatter grid removal during coronary angiography and PCI: a simple and safe technique for radiation reduction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33, 771–778 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1067-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1067-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation